MJLD
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2007
- Messages
- 11,517
I highly doubt we're the only club interested in making a bid.
Signing this lad would be a poisoned chalice. He'll want away to La Liga within 3 to 4 years.
Looks quality though and cheap as chips.
Werder want a bidding war. Man City are ready to outbid anyone even their own shadow.
Does Ozil want to come to England? The lure of La Liga is 2 clubs. The lure of the Prem is Arsenal, Chelsea and United. Don't underestimate the lure of London.
The problem at Real is they have enough players fighting for a few places. I doubt he could walk into the Barca team.
Realistically Arsenal are not in the bidding which leaves both Chelsea and ourselves.
In the end we won't know his real intentions unless we formalise a bid.
Said himself Champions league and trophies... We can offer that, especially with him on board. The transfer would be too perfect to make sense for United
Unfortunately I think this is true.
That's the title of today's Kicker:
I don't think we will sign Ozil because it would mean one of Berba or Nani making way.
Ozil plays best in a 4-3-3 which would mean No Berba and Nani v Ozil for the left sided attacker.
If we play 4-4-2 I dont see Ozil playing as a left winger as he does not do the defensive side as well. He would be better playing down the middle as he has done at times for WB so it woud be him v Berba for the position of second striker.
Signing Ozil may seem brilliant on the surface but it would mean some tough decisions for SAF. SAF has shown his faith in Berba and Nani has signed a new deal and has SAF backing so I don't think this deal will happen.
If Luka Modric can adopt a role in a central midfield 2 i see no reason why Ozil cant, similiar build/stature, very similiar styled players who both probably prefer the free role just in behind the striker.
Yeah and where do Tottenham get with that formation - nowhere. Playing Ozil in a two man midfield is a recipe for disaster and SAF would never play it.
It's why all the rubbish regards Modric joining United was hot air.
Yeah and where do Tottenham get with that formation - nowhere. Playing Ozil in a two man midfield is a recipe for disaster and SAF would never play it.
It's why all the rubbish regards Modric joining United was hot air.
Yeah and where do Tottenham get with that formation - nowhere. Playing Ozil in a two man midfield is a recipe for disaster and SAF would never play it.
It's why all the rubbish regards Modric joining United was hot air.
I dunno, I think Ozil is more versatile than you're giving him credit for. We usually only play 4-4-2 at home and against lower teams anyway so i wouldn't see Ozil behind Berba/Rooney as that bad (as Scholes did back in the day) against those teams.
The champions league perhaps?
I dunno, I think Ozil is more versatile than you're giving him credit for. We usually only play 4-4-2 at home and against lower teams anyway so i wouldn't see Ozil behind Berba/Rooney as that bad (as Scholes did back in the day) against those teams.
Lol
See what they do in the CL. Seriously if you think Ozil in a midfield 2 will work lets just say I disagree.
Redknapp only knows 4-4-2 and thats it. The best teams in the CL don't play that and I suggest you read the link below by one of is not the best football commentator.
The Question: What next for 4-4-2? | Jonathan Wilson | Sport | guardian.co.uk
Tottenham also outplayed and comfortably beat last seasons champions at white hart lane playing with Modric in a midfield 2.
To say it gets them nowhere after their best season in decades is at best rather silly at worst fecking idiotic..
Im not advocating buying ozil and playing him exclusively in a 2 man midfield, nor am i saying its his best role, it clearly isnt, what im saying is for the majority of matches we play against the lesser sides im pretty confident in saying Ozil is more than capable of playing in a midfield 2, he wont play in a 2 against the better sides because as a side we don’t play that way in said matches.
Anyway its all academic really, he wont be coming here so it’s a mute point.
If Luka Modric can adopt a role in a central midfield 2 i see no reason why Ozil cant, similiar build/stature, very similiar styled players who both probably prefer the free role just in behind the striker.
Experience in the position and experience having to do the dirty work associated with it. And how do we know Ozil wants to become a central midfielder? If he wanted to be one, wouldnt he already be one? If Ozil can play central midfield why cant Berbatov for example? Berbatov defends more than him (or Silva, who we had this weird theory about as well). So?
So we can play 4-4-2 with Ozil in midfield against lesser sides when at home - that't not many matches is it.
We won't be buying Ozil as to fit him into the team means one of Berba or Nani will have to make way. Ozil is not good at tracking back and making him do that could affect his game.
What dirty work does Modric do exactly i must have missed it? Modric like Ozil has exclusivly played in between the lines in that free role off the front be it a club level or for Croatia, but has shown at Spurs when required hes capable of playing from a little deeper in a midfield pair still with licence to get forward and create but just from a starting point 10 yards deeper on the pitch....whats to suggest Ozil cant do the same given hes very similiar in stature and style to Modric?
And is there any need to keep bringing Berbatov up in every discussion? Berbatovs been a striker for over a decade, Ozils not a striker, any comparison is futile.
Probably did, afterall it was just one game he played central midfield and then again in the next one after an hour or so and changes were made. Modric played deeper than Huddlestone. Positionally he's in the right places to plug holes in the midfield and obviously he attempts to close players down and tackle even though he's crap at it. Ozil doesnt put much effort into defending (its okay, he doesnt have to), he doesnt defend positionally because one of his best qualities is picking up advanced positions and making runs to occupy the defence. If he does that from midfield it leaves huge gaps the opposition can break through at will.
Berbatov, when played in the hole, did a good job plugging holes with his position, dropping into a midfield area when we didnt have the ball. And he does decently closing players down and tackling. These are the qualities Ozil would need to suddenly discover if he was going to be a central midfielder.
I don't think we will sign Ozil because it would mean one of Berba or Nani making way.
Ozil plays best in a 4-3-3 which would mean No Berba and Nani v Ozil for the left sided attacker.
If we play 4-4-2 I dont see Ozil playing as a left winger as he does not do the defensive side as well. He would be better playing down the middle as he has done at times for WB so it woud be him v Berba for the position of second striker.
Signing Ozil may seem brilliant on the surface but it would mean some tough decisions for SAF. SAF has shown his faith in Berba and Nani has signed a new deal and has SAF backing so I don't think this deal will happen.
He would be perfekt as the attacking midfielder in a 4-5-1
agreed - but then what happens with Berbatov, Hernandez, Owen, Macheda if we go with a predominantly 451?
I do think we could play 442 with Ozil in the side though - just depends on the game.
I think he could be played centrally in most of our home games in a season - the games we dominate possession in - we don't generally need two central players offering defensive work all that often. There is also a possibility of playing him from the left of the midfield 4 - I know he would drift, but it could work (similar to how Ronaldo played). That type of role, with Evra overlapping and giving the width and pulling players away could work for Ozil, but i'm not entirely sure on it - just a thought. If that is a plan though, Nani gets dropped to the bench for it, but I suppose that is life at United; if you are good enough you will play and if Nani isn't up to the competition for a place on the left then so be it.
Manchester United are leading the chase for Germany World Cup star, Mesut Ozil.
Sir Alex Ferguson is the clear front-runner for the Werder Bremen playmaker, readying a bid of up to £12m to bring his top target to Old Trafford.
Bremen are bracing themselves for a swoop before the transfer window closes at the end of August and expect United to follow up their interest with a firm offer.
United chief executive, David Gill, revealed this week that money is available to sign a world class player.
And having scoured the talent at this summer’s World Cup, Ferguson believes Ozil has the potential to be the long-term successor to Paul Scholes and boost his bid to regain the Premier League title.
The 21-year-old was one of the stand-out performers in South Africa, helping Germany reach the semi-finals and he played a key role in their 4-1 demolition of England.
But he is available at a cut price with Bremen worried they will lose him for nothing when he is out of contract at the end of the season.
Real Madrid are also monitoring Ozil, but Jose Mourinho is ready to wait until January to negotiate in the hope of signing him on a free.
That gives Ferguson the chance to steal a march on the Spanish giants and land a player who will fit into the club’s policy of signing emerging talent.
Meanwhile, Aalesund director, Henrik Hoff, has confirmed that United are interested in Danish goalkeeper, Anders Lindegaard.
MEN Sport revealed this week that Fergie had targeted the keeper as a long-term successor to Edwin van der Sar.
United lead Ozil race - Manchester Evening News
I'd be delighted if we signed him. It won't happen though. You guys need to stop torturing yourselves.