Daysleeper
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2014
- Messages
- 4,790
- Supports
- Barcelona
And I won’t argue against the methodology and calculations by a genius.
Okay, now you’re making me blush
And I won’t argue against the methodology and calculations by a genius.
See the links above in my previous post. They contain more proof than you need)
It is already public info that he was rejected by Real, PSG, Chelsea etc.. and he joined United with last minute intervention. City only decided to join after failing to sign Kane and did not even agree with Juve on a transfer fee unlike United..
Don’t be so thick @kc7 already has all the proof which has been common knowledge for some time.
but go ahead and take the Trump route of “fake news”
I've noticed your posts getting more and more aggressive. It's understandable -- your idol and mister football went on to join a farmers league and bankrupted his boyhood club due to pure greed. I understand your anger, just take deep breaths.
Not aggressive at all, you’re the one getting defensive and deflecting because you have no counter. You get shown proof and have zero comeback because countless times you’ve been proven wrong over and over and over.
And Messi didn’t bankrupt the club, Barto did with awful contracts to Griezmann, dembele and coutinho and Roberto.
I’m sorry your idol took a team that won 9 serie a in a row to a fourth place finish and bounced even willing to join a huge rival until a retired manager had to slap some sense into him. Just relax, it’ll be fine.
So Cristiano was going to betray United until the last minute and Messi found out that he was leaving Barcelona in August and at lightning speed all contracts were closed with PSG?
Not aggressive at all, you’re the one getting defensive and deflecting because you have no counter. You get shown proof and have zero comeback because countless times you’ve been proven wrong over and over and over.
And Messi didn’t bankrupt the club, Barto did with awful contracts to Griezmann, dembele and coutinho and Roberto.
I’m sorry your idol took a team that won 9 serie a in a row to a fourth place finish and bounced even willing to join a huge rival until a retired manager had to slap some sense into him. Just relax, it’ll be fine.
Yeah excuse me for not taking "goal" seriously.
I see you're trying to cope with Messi playing in farmers league while Ronaldo is playing in a serious league. I mean who could this happen.
The fact he run the Barca club into financial ruin is what takes the cake really
When money can be agreed upon in a hurry of course contracts can be done quickly.
Look at how quickly Ronaldo’s contract was done with United. Ronaldo was 100% going to betray United until Fergie stepped in. Pep even said a deal was done and everything. Messi would never ever entertain going to Madrid. Barca fans can be more sore about psg but the reality it’s not as big of a rivalry as people may think. Barto just destroyed the team himself.
Constantly deflecting yet again
Just give up man, I get that you’re one of those tin foil hat people who doesn’t believe anything and that you know it all but you’re way off the mark. Do some research know and again and there is absolutely no shame in admitting you’ve been wrong. It’s just a discussion.
Sorry to hear your idol was had zero issue with going to rival. Fergie saved his entire united legacy.
Too bad no one did that for Messi. Now he has tarnished himself in Ligue 1 taking on the might Lille!
I really don't think he was going to go to City, but I also tell you that deep down I don't care. I did not actively follow him after he left Madrid.When money can be agreed upon in a hurry of course contracts can be done quickly.
Look at how quickly Ronaldo’s contract was done with United. Ronaldo was 100% going to betray United until Fergie stepped in. Pep even said a deal was done and everything. Messi would never ever entertain going to Madrid. Barca fans can be more sore about psg but the reality it’s not as big of a rivalry as people may think. Barto just destroyed the team himself.
Let's not fool ourselves, you may post extensive and detailed lines of arguments but it always boils down to the fact that you're talking about stuff that correlates only loosely with the individual class of the player. The criteria you deem important aren't based on your observations and knowledge of football, your opinion on football is based on your affection towards Cristiano Ronaldo. The outcome is preset and you are open to adjusting your arguments and opinions as long as they lead to a specific result.
And that's a common theme in here. In a way it is reminiscent of the Overton window. One side of the argument is constantly bringing up arguments that make no sense at all. Now it suddenly seems reasonable to discuss stuff that has nothing to do with the players as individuals, just because it still makes more sense than some of the insane things posted in here. Arguments that would never be used in other player comparisons. I mean, I've never seen such discussions in a transfer thread. When people discuss which option out of Sancho, Grealish and Coman is the best. Or Varane, Upamecano and Koundé. When it is really about finding the best player and few have any preferences going into the discussions, nobody talks about the stuff you're constantly bringing up (trophies, etc.). Same thing when other legends are discussed, e. g. Maradona vs. Pelé (which wouldn't even be a discussion based on your criteria).
As I thought, links from goal.com and ESPN mean nothing.
@Daysleeper
"Messi had a meeting at the Qatari consulate in Barcelona." (December 2020)
And the source is good. Quim is a Barça fan, a very honest guy who does not speak nonsense. Possibly the sanest guy on the whole show
Of course Jorge Messi denied it (what else could he do?).
I really don't think he was going to go to City, but I also tell you that deep down I don't care. I did not actively follow him after he left Madrid.
Although I do not think so, I would not bet a kidney for his loyalty to United, for money, for being on the front page, etc, but in the same way the idea that that meeting with Laporta was the one that decided everything, and not months in advance It seems like a fairy tale.
Cristiano played there more than a decade ago, and Messi, from the Masía, has gone to the club that is humiliating you. He had been tinkering with his renewal for a year and as I told you in some other post, the club had to think of all kinds of systems to pay him (like that story of paying him in 5 years) while his colleagues were pressured to cut wages to pay him.
Why did he go to PSG and not City? they rejected him? or could they not pay him?
There may be no rivalry, but culés on social media seem quite rabid with PSG
When money can be agreed upon in a hurry of course contracts can be done quickly.
Look at how quickly Ronaldo’s contract was done with United. Ronaldo was 100% going to betray United until Fergie stepped in. Pep even said a deal was done and everything. Messi would never ever entertain going to Madrid. Barca fans can be more sore about psg but the reality it’s not as big of a rivalry as people may think. Barto just destroyed the team himself.
1. I don’t know much of Muller as I wasn’t born during his time, but Ronaldo did score more goals in knockout rounds and finals than anyone I have been awared of though. And even Muller has amazing goal ratio, there are also contexts you can’t just totally ignored when comparing both players. Context such as the fact that Ronaldo has played around 200 games as midfield winger during his formative years at United vs Muller being striker throughout his career. Whereas Germany in 1970s was a far stronger side than Portugal during 2010s etc which would definitely affect their WC stats. Don’t get me wrong, Muller was a great player too, and is probably among my top 10-15 GOAT. But Ronaldo had done and shown much more throughout his career, it’s not even a question. For example in terms of Ballon D’ors, Ronaldo has won it 5 times and runners up 7 times. Muller has only won it once and manage runners up 2 times. Its 12 vs 3 in terms of how the world view them as best player in the world in their time. It’s huge difference.There’s plenty valid behind my reasoning if you actually look at the history. Muller played less games than Ronaldo. So you have to look at goal ratio. Muller has a better goal to game ratio at club level, at international level and in the World Cup. My point about ‘clutchness’ (which is a ridiculous unquantifiable notion anyway) is simply that Muller has scored the winning goal in a World Cup final, the winning goal in a Euros final and the winning goal in an EC final. Ronaldo has done none of these things (his goals in CL finals were not ‘winning goals’ per se). In fact he hasn’t even scored a goal in the KO rounds of the WC. Therefore Muller is the more prolific goalscorer and the better clutch goalscorer if it’s all about ‘winning goals’
Not all all, because Messi is not just a goalscorer. That’s the whole point. He is a creative player who also gets a lot of goals. He doesn’t stand or fall performance wise on whether he scores. He has been man of the match over 60 times in games where he hasn’t scored. For Ronaldo? 9 times.
All great achievements.
I think it was a PR act to get United to sign him. He used City to sign for us the same way he used us to sign new contract with Madrid.
I asked for proof. Show me proof.
Totenham's interest in Messi was also not reported in the media. Is your conclusion that Totenham would not have bought Messi?
Again, this isn't your Bartha fantasy world -- you have any credible sources that show only Man United was interested in Ronaldo an no one else?
No, it is completely the opposite. City was reluctant to pay the fee and Guardiola had reservations about Ronaldo fitting in as reported in the ESPN article below. Juve fans on their forum were quite bitter of City not willing to pay any transfer fee as things were developing..
-- https://www.espn.com/soccer/soccer-...t-juventus-and-man-cityreturn-to-old-trafford
" .....City began looking at how to make a deal work. There was a reluctance to meet the financial demands of both Juventus and Ronaldo -- he earned €31m net and bonuses per year at Juventus, who also asked for around €28m in a transfer fee to avoid a capital loss on the deal that brought Ronaldo from Real Madrid in 2018 -- and Pep Guardiola also had reservations about how he would fit in on and off the pitch...."
"... On Thursday night, Mendes received a proposal from United. On Friday morning, conversations with Juventus began and United assured the Italian club they were prepared to pay a fee, something City had so far resisted. .."
AND a lot of United guys directly contacted Ronaldo including SAF hearing about potential City move..Even Rio himself talked in detail about his phone call..
" his former United teammates Rio Ferdinand and Patrice Evra, Portugal teammate Bruno Fernandes, and Ferguson all got involved. For their part, Ferdinand and Ferguson told him simply "you cannot sign for City." Phone calls were made and WhatsApp messages sent to Ronaldo -- Evra later posted a portion of his conversation on Twitter -- while Woodward began talking to Mendes."
1. I don’t know much of Muller, but Ronaldo did score more goals in knockout rounds and finals than anyone I’d have awared though. And even Muller has amazing goal ratio, there are also contexts you can’t just totally ignored when comparing both players. Context such as the fact that Ronaldo has played around 200 games as midfield winger during his formative years at United vs Muller being striker throughout his career. Whereas Germany in 1970s was a far stronger side than Portugal during 2010s etc which would definitely affect their WC stats. Don’t get me wrong, Muller was a great player too, and is probably among my top 10-15 GOAT. But Ronaldo had done and shown much more throughout his career, it’s not even a question.
2. I never have any problem admitting Messi is better player when compared their performance on the pitch over the years (especially in recent years). If this is to you the most defining factor in deciding Messi > Ronaldo, I am fine with it too. But let’s not belittle Ronaldo’s greatness in football. He has his own level of impact on influencing games, winning trophies and achieving things where very very few could compare throughout the history of the game, and where a lot of people admire too.
Very well said, that’s more or less my sentiments too. While I don’t think it matters much if Messi spend his retiring years at PSG, as he has already done enough with Barca over the years to cement his place as GOAT, but watching him playing most of the his future games in French league during his final years are quite a waste indeed, as he is still one of the best out there, if not the best. But lets see how he is doing in CL then, I won’t be betting against him winning another CL before his retirement.Honestly, I’d just like to add this why Messi going to PSG is such a bummer for me personally. While I’ll always choose my club over any specific player, him going to the French league means I won’t give a crap about 90% of his matches outside of the CL ones.
Had Messi gone to city (and frankly winning an epl title with a team that dominated epl in recent years anyway doesn’t do much for me, but I know it would for a lot of other people) I’d at least been watching him a lot more since I love playing fantasy premiere league.
I bring this up because obviously people who are massive fans of either Messi or Ronaldo (or both) have tons of great memories over the years and at least with Ronaldo going to United it’ll be easier to watch him in the hopes he continues to create more memories, because while yes, he’s 37, he’s still a fantastic player.
I’ll always have a soft spot for Messi after watching him for so many years but with psg it does feel like a semi retirement for me which is a shame. I’m sure I’ll catch his highlights on Reddit or something. I wish him the best, and I still say if he does get psg their first cl title it would be an incredible achievement.
But maybe that’s on me as well, as the only leagues I take seriously are la liga and epl. I’m not even saying all other leagues are bad (hell, maybe the French league is in fact underrated), but I just don’t have any desire to keep up with them week in and week out outside of the really big matches (Milan derby, Bayern vs Dortmund, Napoli vs Roma etc..)
I asked for proof. Show me proof.
Totenham's interest in Messi was also not reported in the media. Is your conclusion that Totenham would not have bought Messi?
Again, this isn't your Bartha fantasy world -- you have any credible sources that show only Man United was interested in Ronaldo an no one else?
That's not true at all.
At the end of the day it's a team game and there are many great players that didn't achieve as much as they should for whatever reason but in his case (and Messi) it's hard to deny that they were the core reason (or one of the core reasons) behind their clubs / nation success and they should get rated for those achievements as well because they did it more times than 99,9% players in the history of the game.
That isn't dumb metrics but they don't give you the big picture because it's bordeline impossible to consider all the factors behind the impact of 1 single player. Like off pitch leadership / motivation for example
It is a dumb metric, no matter how you put it. This sport is not only played by 11 players per team, the performance level has also much to do with synergies and systems. There is only so much a single individual can do and this goes both ways. Messi and Cristiano wouldn't have these crazy numbers if they didn't play for teams that could buy all the quality in the world. And similarly, they're not to blame for their teams not winning anything big as long as their very own performances were on point. Cristiano didn't win a single CL with Madrid during his individual peak. That alone invalidates your whole argument.
Here's one from Marca with more than 400,000 votes:The fact that Messi is winning a poll vs Cristiano made in a Man Utd forum says everything.
That poll in other forums would be way more favorable towards Messi, that's a fact.
Ronaldo won a poll on who was the GOAT on Twitter with over 500,000 votes. The options even also included Pele and Maradona.The fact that Messi is winning a poll vs Cristiano made in a Man Utd forum says everything.
That poll in other forums would be way more favorable towards Messi, that's a fact.
Definitely a few on here who made numerous fake twitter accounts to keep voting for Ronaldo.Ronaldo won a poll on who was the GOAT on Twitter with over 500,000 votes. The options even also included Pele and Maradona.
Tbf Messi would’ve received a lot of votes from the same people as well.Definitely a few on here who made numerous fake twitter accounts to keep voting for Ronaldo.
Well, exactly. It is not Ronaldo‘s fault that he is Portugese and therefore will never win the World Cup.That's not true at all.
At the end of the day it's a team game and there are many great players that didn't achieve as much as they should for whatever reason but in his case (and Messi) it's hard to deny that they were the core reason (or one of the core reasons) behind their clubs / nation success and they should get rated for those achievements as well because they did it more times than 99,9% players in the history of the game.
That isn't dumb metrics but they don't give you the big picture because it's bordeline impossible to consider all the factors behind the impact of 1 single player. Like off pitch leadership / motivation for example
Levy would be clever enough to know that Messi would never have been interested in joining Spurs. For the greatest players there is only a select clubs they want to join unless they want to go the MLS.
Wrong again. Messi was sought after by Chelsea as well, and Pep had been constantly asking about him as recently as April but Messi told him he was staying with Barca.
and Ronaldo just went to serie A to a team that won 9 serie A and gave them their worst finish in over a decade. Zero room to talk farmers league when psg didn’t even win the title last season and this was before Messi.
I never said City rejected Ronaldo, just that they were wavering on him because they were indecisive. Giving a 37 year old the biggest contract in epl history is beyond insane, but you can never put a price on nostalgia. Messi is still at a ballon d’or level at least. And his international trophy is a more meaningful one than anything Ronaldo has won in 3 years now.
You need to do some research instead of spouting nonsense. You even said I said City rejected Ronaldo which I never did. Work on your reading comprehension my friend. It will go a long way in this debate I can assure you.
That's my point. Many clubs were not "into" Ronaldo either because they know there's no chance they will get him.
Yes Ballon D'or player Messi is playing in ligue 1 taking on mighty clermont foot this week while goal poacher fox in the box old man Ronaldo somehow ended at the biggest club in the world.
I don't know why you're so annoyed, Messi consumed all of Barca for his personal wealth account and left the burning ship and now he's enjoying some Qatari dough. Be happy! Maybe they will make the copa America a yearly competition so he can win it even more!
The burden of proof lies with you, to prove that they were interested and willing to meet his/juventus terms.
Asking others to provide proofs for a negative is a logical fallacy, called “Appeal to Ignorance”.
Example : Can you provide proof to show me that unicorns do not exist? If you cannot do so, then they exist.
Also, there is a difference between interest and actually going out and making the time, money and effort to get him.
Example : I am interested in getting rid of all rats in my country, but am I interested enough to spend all my time, money and effort doing so?