Messi v Ronaldo | Contains double your daily salt allowance

Messi or Ronaldo

  • Messi

  • Ronaldo


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
How in the world is Juve's defense better than Barcelona's? Bonucci would be Barcelona's fourth centreback... Chiellini is great but he can barely run anymore. Nevermind actually believing the midfield is on the same level rather than two or three levels below. Juve are starting Bentancur ffs.

Juve have a very good team, top 5 in the world. But winning the Champions League with Juventus would be a MUCH bigger achievement than winning it with this Barcelona team and anyone who argues otherwise is either biased or an idiot.

Bonucci would be Barcelona's fourth centreback

You honestly think Thomas Vermaelen and Clement Lenglet are better defenders than Leonardo Bonucci? The only defender at Barca better than him is Umtiti. He's better than Pique (as is Chiellini).

Nevermind actually believing the midfield is on the same level rather than two or three levels below. Juve are starting Bentancur ffs.

Bentancur is a good player. Pjanic, Bentancur, Khedira, Matuidi and Emre Can is a good midfield group. The Barcelona midfield may well be better technically but they'll get run over as they always do by a decent team. That Juve midfield is seriously strong in that regard.

But winning the Champions League with Juventus would be a MUCH bigger achievement than winning it with this Barcelona team and anyone who argues otherwise is either biased or an idiot.

I never said anything about how big an achievement it would be if Barca win it or how it compares to Barca winning it. In fact, I never even mentioned Barcelona at all. I said it'll take on Maradona 86 levels of mystique and clearly you're already sowing the seeds with your underrating of just how good a squad they have.
 
If that's the case why would EURO's count for Ronaldo?

Copa America and Euros are very different.

First because winning the Copa America with Argentina and the Euros with Portugal are very different things, one is much easier than the other. Second because the competitions have a different level of prestige, Brazil regularly sent their B team to Copa America and the invitations to countries outside of South America don't really help. Third, because Copa America is much more frequent. There was one in 2015, another in 2016, now there will be one in 2019 then another in 2020. Would have been much easier to win the Euros if they happened as often as the Copa America.

With that said, it would be great for Messi to at least get one trophy for Argentina and it would be important for them given how long the trophy drought has lasted for. Not saying it would be irrelevant, just that it wouldn't really have a big impact on his legacy.
Also funny to mention who Portugal managers were, unlike it wasn't the same for the Argie sides that were in utter shambles.

If you think Sampaoli is bad, then I have some names for you :lol:
 
You honestly think Thomas Vermaelen and Clement Lenglet are better defenders than Leonardo Bonucci? The only defender at Barca better than him is Umtiti. He's better than Pique (as is Chiellini).

What? Lenglet, Pique and Umtiti are all better. Have you seen Bonucci attempt to defend? He was so awful for Milan last season that he became a meme, he hasn't been much better this time around at Juve.

Only reason he plays is because Juve don't have technically good midfielders aside from Pjanic so they need him to play out from the back. Benatia is the better player.

Bentancur is a good player. Pjanic, Bentancur, Khedira, Matuidi and Emre Can is a good midfield group. The Barcelona midfield may well be better technically but they'll get run over as they always do by a decent team. That Juve midfield is seriously strong in that regard.

None of Bentancur, Emre Can or Khedira would even make Barcelona's squad ffs, nevermind the starting eleven. Khedira is not even half the player he was at Madrid, Juve will let him go at the end of the season. Bentancur has potential, but let's get real here. Barcelona have 5 different midfielders that would start for Juve. Busquets, Rakitic, Vidal, Arthur and Coutinho... Denis Suarez would have a good shot at starting over Bentancur too.

Juve's midfield is clearly their weakest point, pretty much every top team has a better midfield.

I never said anything about how big an achievement it would be if Barca win it or how it compares to Barca winning it. In fact, I never even mentioned Barcelona at all. I said it'll take on Maradona 86 levels of mystique and clearly you're already sowing the seeds with your underrating of just how good a squad they have.

I mean it obviously won't take Maradona 86 levels of mystique ffs. I called them a top 5 squad in the world, is that underrating them? That might be a bit generous if anything.

Barcelona, PSG, Bayern, City and Liverpool could all be considered better. Maybe even Madrid or Atletico too. It's not really a big enough difference.
 
What platform? Just having good players with zero chemistry isn't a good platform.

Portugal didn't have chemistry either. If Messi had an ounce of leadership he'd have gelled those players together. Not to mention he was selecting players for games in the world cup.

I don't want to debate about international stuff. It's something I just hold a different opinion on. If anyone is going to waste time telling me how poor Argentinas squad is/was in an attempt to make Messi shine as some international hero they're wasting their time convincing me.
 
Reading the thread looks like Messi has won feck all whilst Cristiano swept everything in sight.

Messi won 9 titles, 4 CL(he still played 6 games in 05-06, despite in inferior role), 6 CdR.

Cristiano won 5 titles, 5 CL, 5 domestic cups (including League Cup as well).

Looking at those trophy cabinets I'll easily take Messi's considering he has double the league titles..

Messi has won a lot of titles and CL throughout his career, but please don't count those titles (04-05, 05-06) and CL (05-06) are "won by him" where he only feature a few games, play a bit role, and mainly as subs, for sake of arguments. I mean, those are mainly won by Ronaldinho & Co., please don't take credits away from those greats.
 
There's a discussion about the legitimacy of Atletico Madrid's league form in the last 5 years, rainman-level breakdowns of performances in international games that happened 10+ years ago, arguments about who is a better defender; Bonucci or Pique.

I love this thread.
 
Imagine still debating this day after day as like the main thing in your life.
 
When Messi had Iniesta and Xavi in their prime then he really had the required world class talent around him to free him up. Once the latter two waned then Barca were never the same even with Suarez and Neymar.
Real spent a lot of money assembling Modric, Bale, Benzema, Isco, James Rodriguez and Cristiano so they managed to overtake Barca by spending.
But that Messi under Pep with an Iniesta and Xavi in their prime (all costing Barca nothing) is best player I've seen. Messi has been average for a good 5 seasons now by his standards.
 
I agree somewhat. I think if Ronaldo wins 1 Champions League with Juventus in the next 4 years while being their best player, he'll have done more than enough to not get that kind of comments.

Would be big for Messi to do it at least one more time too but I really think the 2018 World Cup was his last big shot at really pulling off something that would change the way his legacy will go down. Don't think 1 Copa America will do anything for him.

I think Messi's legacy has been cemented now. It doesn't matter what he does in 2022, he has missed too many opportunities.

As for Ronaldo, I think it's clear from watching them that Messi is the more talented. He can do things nobody else can. Ronaldo might just be the better footballer though, being able to perform in every situation you're thrown into counts for a lot.
 
Why are everyone jerking so hard on UCL wins ? Just watch both of them and see which one brings more enjoyment to your eyes
 
"In his career (club + country) Messi has only 31 fewer goals than Ronaldo while being 2.5 years younger and playing 152 fewer games

Also, since whoscored.com started keeping track of stats in 2009, here are some stats for club + country:

  • Ronaldo has played 716 more minutes (38012 vs 37296).
  • Ronaldo has taken 723 more shots (2898 vs 2175, 33% more) to reach the same goal tally as Messi since 2009: 442 goals.
  • Messi has 35 more assists (159 vs 124, 28% more).
  • Messi's passing percentage is 3.3% better (83.9% vs 80.6%).
  • Messi has made 235 more key passes (985 vs 750, 31% more).
  • Messi has 99 more man of the match awards (236 vs 137, 72% more).
  • Messi's average rating is 0.51 better (8.60 vs 8.09).
  • Messi has made 1215 more successful dribbles (1976 vs 761, 160% more).
  • Messi's successful dribble percentage is 8.8% better: (60.4% vs 51.6%).
Lionel Andrés Messi Cuccittini is on another planet."

Taken from reddit, analysis done by reddit user: u/futb0l
 
No. Take Messi and Ronaldo out of those teams and it's obvious to see during Ronaldo's time there who had the best team around them.

The fact that things turned out the way they turned out makes Barcelona fans sick to their stomach.



If Michael Jordan had won feck all playing exactly the same way, he wouldn't be considered half the player he is. All it took was missing a few extra shots and instead of being the greatest basketball player ever with 6 championships, he'd be a great player with 3. Winning matters, it's the whole point of it.

Ronaldo didn't win what he's won by being Nicky Butt. It's not about player's A trophy cabinet bieng better than player B's so therefore player A is better than player B, that's obviously stupid. You take into account the circumstances of it all.

Messi having only played in 3 Champions League finals in all of his career with the team he's had around him throughout and having won nothing for a country that has 2 World Cups and 14 Copa Americas to their name is rightfully held against him. You can't just pretend it doesn't and you can't just pretend he's having 10/10 performances every time while his team lets him down because it obviously hasn't been the case.

Messi did not win anything for his country no, what’s Ronaldo won? 1 trophy, big deal. Messi got player of the tournament in the World Cup, being top scorer on the way. It’s a stupid argument. Is Nani a better player than Messi for winning a European Championship for his country, no. Your argument about winning is important, yes, and of course Messi has more trophies than most clubs have in their history. He has the same amount of European Cups as Man UTD have in literally their whole history, a club some like to call the biggest in the world.

14 Copa America’s? Really, the completion runs every 2 years, he’s not 65 years old...

I am not sure Barcelona fans are sick of Real and their success. I would suggest in a league sense, they would have enjoyed the past few years, and bar a one season winning wonder of Jose, they have been dominating the league over Madrid for the past 10 years, and in that time, they have beaten them many times, with a 5 nil result springing to mind, and at 3-2 defeat to Messi’s last minute goal last year. They also win the Champions League themselves 3 times in a 7 year period as well, so it’s not all bad.

Maybe, it’s Messi, the team player that made the difference. Madrid spent billions buying the greatest players in the world, only to lose to a team (certainly in Pep’s era and a bit beyond), who could field 8 home grown players at any one time.

I guess we will agree to disagree, you’re a UTD supporter, so you will always think Ronaldo is the better of the 2, so there’s no point wasting my time.

What I don’t understand about some fans on here, is that Ronaldo left UTD, having tried to leave the year before. He knew he was going the year he went, and in the final where Messi played as a part of a team, Ronaldo, was playing on his own, shooting from stupid angles, whilst lifting his skirt up for Madrid’s lustful eyes. It felt, when I watched the game, that he was trying to beat Barcelona to gain favour with Madrid, rather than trying to win the trophy for UTD. He then leaves and wins trophy after trophy, and literally every time his contract negotiations began, or he wanted more money, he used UTD as some kind of sick pawn to ratchet up his wages, whilst having absolutely no intention of going there.

Once he was at a certain level (like Beckham) with UTD he cleared off as soon as he could, to a bigger club, yet on here people love him for it.
 
I am not going to compare anyone but I need to say something here based on my personal opinion related with the fact I think I do have a good understanding of the trajectory by CR7 with Portugal during the years. (not comparing the 2)

First based on my opinion the best team were he played was the 2004 one. And I don't think that was exactly the best one I watched. The best period was between 1994/2004, even if the results didn't followed the style of play and overall quality of those generations.

He never was part of youth NT's with winning culture like the ones who were leaded by Carlos Queiroz who won 2 under 20 WC's in 1989/1991.

Not did his generations had players with similar quality to him. Ok he played with the likes of Ricardo Carvalho, Moutinho, Nani, Pepe, Quaresma after that period but anyone who follows Portugal will tell you the best NT we had was the one at Euro 2000 (for those who didn't watched the 66 team), the 2004 team was mainly a Mourinho Porto team with Scolari as a motivational leader.

Only going to add he was 19 at Euro 2004 and to remember a few who said he didn't do much. Scolari on his first match left players like Ricardo Carvalho, Ronaldo, Deco, Nuno Valente on the bench because he was stuck with the old guard.

First match with Greece if I remember well we were losing already and I think he only played 45 minuted and the goal scored was by the inexperienced player from a setpiece. Second game vs Russia we needed to win and Scolari changed half the team but he was still on the bench. What happened? We were winning already, but he and Rui Costa entered during the second half. Guess who made the assist for Rui Costa to score? Exactly. Him.

Last game. Spain. We needed to win. Against our neighbours we probably didn't beat since the late 70's or something similar. He started the game replacing Simão Sabrosa. He had a great impact on that game and was one of the best on the pitch.

Against England his duel against Ashley Cole was great and its a fact he struggled against him. Semifinal against the Netherlands. He scored again from a setpiece. On the final vs Greece where we incompetently bottled again the only good chances we created were all done by him.

This to say you can dismiss everything you want from him but his impact on 2004 was great for us. Football isn't only stats. Its also the impact players have on the pitch even when they don't score or assist.

I have to be honest here. For me the only great game in 2006 was vs France on the semifinal. Again the stats will tell you he didn't scored or assisted. But watch this.



Now if this done by a 21 year player against the team and players it was is nothing relevant I would go and try to start talking about quantum physics for Dummies. I guess Henry and the other players saw the same thing as me.

He clearly was blatantly targeted by Boulahrouz against the Dutch. What goes around comes around and they tasted our nastiness reacting to that. It wasn't pretty but shit happens. On the group stages he clearly wasn't our best player. At all. He only played 2 games and on both of them he was nowhere near the best player on the pitch.

This just to say I agree his overall best tournament for us was in 2012 but he didn't played with the best generations imo. On 2016 I still keep my opinion Nani and Pepe were as important as him, knowing of course it wasn't a great team.

2018 he was better than Messi. Period. Trying to say he barely qualified on the group stages with Iran or Morocco while Argentina was slaughtered vs Croatia, toothless vs Iceland and at best competent vs Nigeria is what? And if we try to say Messi played with worse players than him for Argentina we better close this Forum and go watch something else.

Again, I am not saying he is the best, because I already left my opinions on this subject. But there is a lot of overrating or excuses for both players at International Level without knowing the contexts where they play.

Let alone trying to imply they played on the same circumstances. At best Portugal 2018 was on a similar state individually to Argentina. At best. And he was better in Russia. Of course Messi for Barcelona this season has no one to be compared. He is by far the best club player this season. No discussion here. At all.

Last time I will jump on this thread because its pointless. There is a lot of revisionism going around on both sides and sometimes someone has to spoil the party. ;)
 
Messi did not win anything for his country no, what’s Ronaldo won? 1 trophy, big deal. Messi got player of the tournament in the World Cup, being top scorer on the way.

First of all, outside blind Messi supporters , everyone who understands a little bit of football knows that golden ball was a total farce. Messi himself knew he didn't deserve it. Top scorer by scoring a grand total of zero goals from 2nd round onwards. Harry kane is the top scorer of this world cup, do you put him on a pedestal for it and think that he should have won the golden ball?

The rest of your post explains it though. The hyperboles, the unreal hate for Ronaldo leaving UTD, that real Madrid s one season wonder was Jose's achievement. The exaggerations are so extreme that it almost provides comic relief. You are the stereotypical Messi brigade member who thinks Ronaldo is a glorified Thomas Mueller, that whenever Ronaldo achieves something, it's always the team, but Messi is a one-man show, playing with championship level players around him all through his life.

Carry on with your ridiculous agenda.
 
Close the poll, it is satisfyingly a clear 50/50 between the two.

Also, I second what Moonred said. What's especially baffling is how a fervent few of those who hold one over the other constantly feel the need to invade a thread dedicated to the (supposedly) lesser of the two to set the record straight. Answers to questions nobody asked.
 
"In his career (club + country) Messi has only 31 fewer goals than Ronaldo while being 2.5 years younger and playing 152 fewer games

Also, since whoscored.com started keeping track of stats in 2009, here are some stats for club + country:

  • Ronaldo has played 716 more minutes (38012 vs 37296).
  • Ronaldo has taken 723 more shots (2898 vs 2175, 33% more) to reach the same goal tally as Messi since 2009: 442 goals.
  • Messi has 35 more assists (159 vs 124, 28% more).
  • Messi's passing percentage is 3.3% better (83.9% vs 80.6%).
  • Messi has made 235 more key passes (985 vs 750, 31% more).
  • Messi has 99 more man of the match awards (236 vs 137, 72% more).
  • Messi's average rating is 0.51 better (8.60 vs 8.09).
  • Messi has made 1215 more successful dribbles (1976 vs 761, 160% more).
  • Messi's successful dribble percentage is 8.8% better: (60.4% vs 51.6%).
Lionel Andrés Messi Cuccittini is on another planet."

Taken from reddit, analysis done by reddit user: u/futb0l
Some of those stats are just the difference between a playmaker/attacking midfielder and a striker. Also i'm surprised the difference in passing and successful deibbles is inferior to what i would think considering the roles of the players and the styles of the clubs.
 
Copa America and Euros are very different.

First because winning the Copa America with Argentina and the Euros with Portugal are very different things, one is much easier than the other. Second because the competitions have a different level of prestige, Brazil regularly sent their B team to Copa America and the invitations to countries outside of South America don't really help. Third, because Copa America is much more frequent. There was one in 2015, another in 2016, now there will be one in 2019 then another in 2020. Would have been much easier to win the Euros if they happened as often as the Copa America.

With that said, it would be great for Messi to at least get one trophy for Argentina and it would be important for them given how long the trophy drought has lasted for. Not saying it would be irrelevant, just that it wouldn't really have a big impact on his legacy.


If you think Sampaoli is bad, then I have some names for you :lol:

Hungary, Iceland, Austria, Croatia, Poland, Wales and finally France where he barely plays.

It wouldn't be as hard as Ronaldo with Portugal? If Messi beats a good Brazil on a Copa America final he surpasses Portugal's trajectory in 2016 with just that final.
 
Messi has won a lot of titles and CL throughout his career, but please don't count those titles (04-05, 05-06) and CL (05-06) are "won by him" where he only feature a few games, play a bit role, and mainly as subs, for sake of arguments. I mean, those are mainly won by Ronaldinho & Co., please don't take credits away from those greats.
Yeah, naturally I didn't compare their contribution but rather trophy cabinets. Obviously he didn't play that much of a role in some of them.
 
@SCP that's a fair assessment and I do agree with most of the points. In regards to that game against France I've just watched the highlights again and he was threatening, probing and creating space, but the end product just wasn't there and you can see it yourself. Sure he was young, but if you are giving that performance such a high credit, then it's fair to say Messi had pretty good games against Switzerland and Belguim in the KO stages, was threatening in the SF in the first half against the Dutch and was Argentina's best player in the final by all accounts.

I don't think any WC Ronaldo had was comparable to Messi's 2014. Reading through the thread I get the impression that Cristiano is hailed for his EURO exploits, whilst Messi's Copa showings are swept under the carpet due to not being as good as the EURO's as a tournament. It's not like he can feature there so if you are using same yard sticks I don't see why we should move goal posts like that?

Messi's influence on the game is bigger than Ronaldo's. That's pretty easy to see watching them game by game. Cristiano can preserve energy, have the team work for him, whilst you see Messi constantly dropping deep for Argentina, starting moves and usually being at the very end of them. He usually makes double the passes Ronaldo does in any game and is much more involved in the game, yet he gets beaten with the stick that he doesn't score in the KO stages in the 2014?




In a WC showing I certainly haven't see Cristiano better his 2014 form, even if it is inferior to some of the classics and some of the best performances historically.
 
@SCP that's a fair assessment and I do agree with most of the points.
Thanks. :lol:

My intention wasn't to restart the endless discussion here. I promised it was the last time, and with this I wasn't trying to dismiss Messi.

I just like to rebate stated opinions (not yours) who usually these days are supported by stats or trophies. I was trying to insert everything based on my memory. Rewatching those highlights I wasn't wrong.

As a matter of fact that for me was the"game" where I confirmed he had a different type of personality to be different than others for Portugal. Not saying it was the best ever. Other day if I can we will have better discussions about them, keeping in mind I will not give my opinions trying to degrade one to make the other look better.

Its clear for me Messi is a genial player born from a club with a clear football identity. The other is a player who had several transformations during the years, talented yes but not with the same level of geniality. We shall discuss past performances or achievements to other threads, but like I said I will avoid comparisons.

Its just different realitys who can't be compared, let alone today in 2019. ;)
 
Thanks. :lol:

My intention wasn't to restart the endless discussion here. I promised it was the last time, and with this I wasn't trying to dismiss Messi.

I just like to rebate stated opinions (not yours) who usually these days are supported by stats or trophies. I was trying to insert everything based on my memory. Rewatching those highlights I wasn't wrong.

As a matter of fact that for me was the"game" where I confirmed he had a different type of personality to be different than others for Portugal. Not saying it was the best ever. Other day if I can we will have better discussions about them, keeping in mind I will not give my opinions trying to degrade one to make the other look better.

Its clear for me Messi is a genial player born from a club with a clear football identity. The other is a player who had several transformations during the years, talented yes but not with the same level of geniality. We shall discuss past performances or achievements to other threads, but like I said I will avoid comparisons.

Its just different realitys who can't be compared, let alone today in 2019. ;)

Sorry to be that guy and I know English isn't your first language but genial means to be well-mannered and friendly, which I don't think you meant.
 
Sorry to be that guy and I know English isn't your first language but genial means to be well-mannered and friendly, which I don't think you meant.
Ok. Change genial with great. Second time on a row I return to this topic. Again. :wenger:
 
In his career (club + country) Messi has only 31 fewer goals than Ronaldo while being 2.5 years younger and playing 152 fewer games

Also, since whoscored.com started keeping track of stats in 2009, here are some stats for club + country:

  • Ronaldo has played 716 more minutes (38012 vs 37296).
  • Ronaldo has taken 723 more shots (2898 vs 2175, 33% more) to reach the same goal tally as Messi since 2009: 442 goals.
  • Messi has 35 more assists (159 vs 124, 28% more).
  • Messi's passing percentage is 3.3% better (83.9% vs 80.6%).
  • Messi has made 235 more key passes (985 vs 750, 31% more).
  • Messi has 99 more man of the match awards (236 vs 137, 72% more).
  • Messi's average rating is 0.51 better(8.60 vs 8.09).
  • Messi has made 1215 more successful dribbles (1976 vs 761, 160% more).
  • Messi's successful dribble percentage is 8.8% better: (60.4% vs 51.6%).
 
In his career (club + country) Messi has only 31 fewer goals than Ronaldo while being 2.5 years younger and playing 152 fewer games

Also, since whoscored.com started keeping track of stats in 2009, here are some stats for club + country:

  • Ronaldo has played 716 more minutes (38012 vs 37296).
  • Ronaldo has taken 723 more shots (2898 vs 2175, 33% more) to reach the same goal tally as Messi since 2009: 442 goals.
  • Messi has 35 more assists (159 vs 124, 28% more).
  • Messi's passing percentage is 3.3% better (83.9% vs 80.6%).
  • Messi has made 235 more key passes (985 vs 750, 31% more).
  • Messi has 99 more man of the match awards (236 vs 137, 72% more).
  • Messi's average rating is 0.51 better(8.60 vs 8.09).
  • Messi has made 1215 more successful dribbles (1976 vs 761, 160% more).
  • Messi's successful dribble percentage is 8.8% better: (60.4% vs 51.6%).
Messi is not only better than Ronaldo (as proven statistically), he's the best player to have ever lived.
 
If Messi had an ounce of leadership he'd have gelled those players together. Not to mention he was selecting players for games in the world cup.
Sounds like tabloid tier stuff. That kind of "fake news memes" a 90 year old grandma shares on facebook.

Some of the 'facts' invented to make Ronaldo look better than Messi are hilarious.
 
Why are everyone jerking so hard on UCL wins ? Just watch both of them and see which one brings more enjoyment to your eyes
We are talking about the greatest footballer, not the most entertaining footballer.
 
In his career (club + country) Messi has only 31 fewer goals than Ronaldo while being 2.5 years younger and playing 152 fewer games

Also, since whoscored.com started keeping track of stats in 2009, here are some stats for club + country:

  • Ronaldo has played 716 more minutes (38012 vs 37296).
  • Ronaldo has taken 723 more shots (2898 vs 2175, 33% more) to reach the same goal tally as Messi since 2009: 442 goals.
  • Messi has 35 more assists (159 vs 124, 28% more).
  • Messi's passing percentage is 3.3% better (83.9% vs 80.6%).
  • Messi has made 235 more key passes (985 vs 750, 31% more).
  • Messi has 99 more man of the match awards (236 vs 137, 72% more).
  • Messi's average rating is 0.51 better(8.60 vs 8.09).
  • Messi has made 1215 more successful dribbles (1976 vs 761, 160% more).
  • Messi's successful dribble percentage is 8.8% better: (60.4% vs 51.6%).
Conveniently ignoring the fact that Messi started off in a much more dominating side, playing further up the pitch.
 
There are always excuses for Messi. When he flops it's the team. I remember the stick Ronaldo got when Madrid were constantly being knocked out in the SF.

Messi was anonymous in the 3 biggest matches of his career. 2 Copa finals and a WC final. Not only that, in the group stage Argentina battered Chile without Messi!

Being a better technical footballer doesn't make you a better football player.

Put Ronaldo in any team he delivers. He doesn't hinder his teammates like Messi does and he doesn't need to be at the centre of everything.

If Juve win the CLi it would trump anything Messi has done in his career. Ronaldo would have delivered the CL to 3 different teams that were suffering droughts.

For people claiming that Ronaldo is just a a goalscorer, Cruyff even said he was better than George Best!

What he has shown is the willingness to adapt and not hog the ball 24/7 like Messi.
 
There are always excuses for Messi. When he flops it's the team. I remember the stick Ronaldo got when Madrid were constantly being knocked out in the SF.

Messi was anonymous in the 3 biggest matches of his career. 2 Copa finals and a WC final. Not only that, in the group stage Argentina battered Chile without Messi!

Being a better technical footballer doesn't make you a better football player.

Put Ronaldo in any team he delivers. He doesn't hinder his teammates like Messi does and he doesn't need to be at the centre of everything.
Too obvious. You need to be more subtle.
 
Too obvious. You need to be more subtle.

Not really. There is a reason BArca is easier to stop when they play top teams. Pack the centre and they are toothless because everything goes through Messi. Juventus, Roma, Ateltico Madrid twice. Being able to defer is a sign of a top player. To use the Jordan example, Phil Jackson had to tell Jordan to not do as much and they started winning more. Messi doing everything works in La Liga because of the talent advantage Barca have over every other team but against the elites in the Cl, it works against them and it shows for Argentina as well. Stop him and you stop the team, not because the team itself is poor but because it's all geared towards him.
 
Conveniently ignoring the fact that Messi started off in a much more dominating side, playing further up the pitch.
Don't you think this obsession you have for a certain player is becoming rather toxic?
 
Don't you think this obsession you have for a certain player is becoming rather toxic?
I think people who make this statement are just pissed that the guy he/she is responding to doesn't agree with his opinion...it makes you sound petulant; if you're not ready to get involved with the discussion, then don't reply.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.