11101
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2014
- Messages
- 21,826
I know you're supposed to respect the players of the past, and all that. But if you go back and watch videos of the 1958 World Cup that Pele played in (or even the 1966 World Cup that England won) the standard is dreadful. I know the ball is different, but realistically if either Messi or Ronaldo went back and played at that time then they would be the best in the world by a country mile. I mean, the standard is sh*te. The 1970 Brazil team was the first team, in my opinion, to play anything approaching modern football, and consequently they won every game in that tournament.
I'm sure Pele would adapt to some extent if he played in the modern game, but if you look at his technical ability and what he actually did on the pitch at that time, to say that he's a better player than Messi or Ronaldo is laughable, in my opinion. And I personally think Ronaldo is a bit overrated at present, despite being a brilliant goalscorer, but I shudder to think how many he would have scored in the 1950s.
Sorry but that's as stupid a post as you'll ever see.
You can't compare eras. Pele would be an absolute monster if he was playing now, just like Messi or Ronaldo would still be great if they were born in 1950. The footballing ability they all have is consistent across eras, but everything else is different. Pele with modern training and equipment would be unstoppable, just as Ronaldo with thick leather boots and a ploughed pitch to play on would look half the player he does now.