Messi v Ronaldo | Contains double your daily salt allowance

Messi or Ronaldo

  • Messi

  • Ronaldo


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's time for this debate to end, Ronaldo always has been the better of the two. He gets questioned because of his ego and the fact he used to play for us. The way Ronaldo carries the Portugal team is remarkable.
 
FFS, it was a draw in a group where both teams will comfortably get 7 points.

It was one of the biggest games in Portugal history. Portugal-Spain in a World Cup...

Morocco and Iran are pretty good teams too and Portugal has problems breaking down teams. If we lose by 3 or 4 yesterday I guarantee you we'd have been knocked out of the group stages just like we were in 2014 after losing 4-0 to Germany. Portugal isn't Argentina.
 
3 in 2014, 1 in 2006. I thought that he didn't score in 2010.
Scored 4 in 2014 (1 vs Bosnia, 1 vs Iran, 2 vs nigeria)
Yep, agree with this. 12/13 season was almost a draw, to be fair, and I think that Ballon D'Or should have gone to Ribery (same as I think that in 2010 it should have gone to Sneijder, with Xavi and Iniesta behind him).

I would give this season to Ronaldo, significantly better in UCL defeats significantly better in the league.

05-06 should go to Ronaldo too, but Messi was very young back then and despite his promise, his season was cut short from Chelsea, and then he didn't play in the latter stages of UCL and the league.

Edit: I don't think that Messi really had a world cup in 2014. Better than Ronaldo by a country mile, but Argies scored just 2 knockout goals in the tournament, 1 of which was an assist by Messi. I don't remember him getting even close to scoring, and the final was quite boring, the only clear thing I remember are the goal and Higuain messing that chance. It looked to me more a political decision of FIFA trying to create the new generation Pele, rather than a just award. The likes of Muller and Robben were significantly better than him in the tournament, and to be fair, neither of those were legendary performances from a World Cup (not even near Zidane 2006, with from what I've heard is not in the level of Garrincga 62, Pele 70, Cruyff 74 or Maradona 86).
Didnt include before 06/07 as they were both just inconsistent youngsters before then and 06-07 was when Ronaldo turned into one of the best in the world and Messi was on the verge of becoming that. But yeah, agreed though. Still valid as an example though as Argentina wouldnt have been close to the final of Messi wasnt there while its shitty for Ronaldo he was injured, but I dont think you would hear him use that as an excuse and he wouldve been gutted anyway. Like you said, in 2014 there was nobody who really had a memorable world cup throughout. Even robben who was class didnt really much in the knockout rounds. We'll see how this one goes, and if anything, itll go further then anything in potentially making a decision between them. Ronaldo with the advantage, but it's been 1 game. Without anything significant like a clear player of the tournament or winning it, I dont think much will change in their legacies though. They're both just locked in for me as top 2.
 
Just enjoy them both, it's neither here nor there whose better. They will both go down in the history books.
 
Messi moves like a retired player at times. He is almost free of defensive duties. Ronaldo's movement requires much more energy. He always runs further than Messi and has more sprints too. Mentally it might be more difficult to play both as a playmaker and a forward but Messi conserves energy by running less than all players bar the keepers.

I think something was lost in translation because I don't see the link between your point and mine at all. I agree with what you're saying though.
 
To be fair to Messi, this Argentina XI is actually slightly inferior to Portugal.
Portugal fullbacks > Argentina fullbacks
Rui Patricio > Caballero/Romero
Rojo + Otamendi > Fonte and Pepe
Carvalho - Moutinho - Bruno Fernandes > Biglia, Meza, Mascherano
Argies attack > Portugals attack

Argentina has better forwards and CB's but GK,fullbacks and midfield are in Portugal's favour.

On paper Argentina win against Portugal more often than now. They literally have 4-5 world class forwards.

Give me Quaresma and Ronaldo over any of the Argies though :drool:
 
It's time for this debate to end, Ronaldo always has been the better of the two. He gets questioned because of his ego and the fact he used to play for us. The way Ronaldo carries the Portugal team is remarkable.
Lol imagine actually thinking Ronaldo is a better footballer than Messi. Like, imagine actually genuinely thinking that lol
 
Does Evra have a disproportionately huge head or is something wrong with the video? :lol:

Something with the video is clearly off.

As to the topic at hand, I've always been Team Messi and still am, but I must say Ronaldo has been VERY impressive these last few years with how he seemingly always is there to deliver in the big games. Something just doesn't work out between Messi and the NT. The Argentina team has always been a bit of a disappointment, though. Maradona was the only one who could lift that team up. Messi needs a WC gold to eclipse him, atleast in Argentina.

edit: Let's not forget Mario Kempes who was a great player as well.
 
The fact that he's been a world class winger and a world class forward should be a plus for him, not a negative.
Messi has broken the all-time calendar year goalscoring record as a forward, he was by far the best player in the world as a winger, and he now tops La Liga in literally every statistical category playing as a number 10. He is, and has been, far more flexible than Ronaldo, and quite obviously has a far superior skillset. If you're comparing the two as footballers over their career as whole, there really is no comparison. That's why, as I said, Messi has been Spanish player of the year nine times, and Ronaldo has won it once. Because Messi is far better. It should be a massive compliment to Ronaldo that he's even compared to Messi because Muller was never compared to Cruyff.

It's also kind of hilarious that people on here are now claiming that Ronaldo is better than Messi because of one free-kick when Messi already broke the La Liga free-kick record this year, has a much better record as a free-kick taker than Ronaldo, and this is the first time Ronaldo has hit the target from a free-kick in absolutely ages. He's basically a liability taking free-kicks most of the time, he was due to score one.
 
It's time for this debate to end, Ronaldo always has been the better of the two. He gets questioned because of his ego and the fact he used to play for us. The way Ronaldo carries the Portugal team is remarkable.
The last 24 hours should put this argument to bed.

Messi was perhaps the best in the world during Pep’s Barca, but since then Ronaldo won four CL’s with Madrid and the Euros with Portugal.

Messi is a phenomenal player, but melts like butter under pressure. Ronaldo is a phenomenal player and an ice blooded leader.

Ronaldo owned Spain, one of the best teams in the world all by himself, while Messi failed against Iceland with the help of world class players like Aguero and Di Maria.

Where was Ronaldo in the last 3 World Cups? Did you miss Argentina making the final in 2014? Messi winning the golden ball?

No of course not, Ronaldo played better in the opening game of the group stages so it's all forgotten about. :rolleyes:

Such short memories. We've had 10 years of watching these guys now but apparently, you're only as good as your most recent game.
 
Where was Ronaldo in the last 3 World Cups? Did you miss Argentina making the final in 2014? Messi winning the golden ball?

No of course not, Ronaldo played better in the opening game of the group stages so it's all forgotten about. :rolleyes:

Such short memories. We've had 10 years of watching these guys now but apparently, you're only as good as your most recent game.
The same Messi who cried off the Argentina team for a while eh?
 
Where was Ronaldo in the last 3 World Cups? Did you miss Argentina making the final in 2014? Messi winning the golden ball?

No of course not, Ronaldo played better in the opening game of the group stages so it's all forgotten about. :rolleyes:

Such short memories. We've had 10 years of watching these guys now but apparently, you're only as good as your most recent game.

Messi really wasn't that good in the last World Cup.

Even he looked embarrassed when he was given the Golden Ball.
 
Totally agree with Evra's take on their respective mentalities: Ronaldo relishes the pressure, Messi doesn't.

It's absurd to suggest he crumbles under the pressure but I think he finds it more of a chore. Ronaldo loves that it all rests on him. They obviously exist in very different environments where Messi is not only responsible for the clinical moments but for every phase of play, so the pressure is much more constant. Ronaldo has been the key player for over a decade but he's never been the player people look to every time they get the ball. Both he and his team-mates know to limit his involvement to where he can be most devastating. Messi hasn't had that kind of role for a long time and I reckon that takes a much bigger toll.

I don't think Ronaldo has ever been a better player than Messi at their respective peaks, but I think he might well end up being the greater player. Still a long way to go but I didn't think that was possible years ago. What he's done since then is insane.

Yep, this is a good summary. Messi might have had a higher peak but Ronaldo's legacy moments are going to be fresher in our minds. Plus I think Ronaldo's relentless narcissism lends itself better for perceptions of greatness. Take yesterday, the whole routine before his freekick - built himself up and then delivered. Or the Euro 2016 Final: he had no role to play but still got people talking about him with his antics on the touchline.
 
It was one of the biggest games in Portugal history. Portugal-Spain in a World Cup...

Morocco and Iran are pretty good teams too and Portugal has problems breaking down teams. If we lose by 3 or 4 yesterday I guarantee you we'd have been knocked out of the group stages just like we were in 2014 after losing 4-0 to Germany. Portugal isn't Argentina.

what a weird statement. Ronaldo probably has more hat-tricks than both morocco and iran's players have goals. Portugal are considerably better than morocco and iran and at the very worst they should have been expecting no less than 6 points from this group. the fact spain and portugal met first in a group theyll both easily get out of takes some gloss off this game. He didn't own spain, in order to do that you need to win. thats just a fact. I think given the fact that they had two days with their new manager and didn't get beat in the first game v the second best team in the group would go down as quite a decent result for the spanish players.
 
In a few minutes @IFC 1905 will post that Argentina didn't defeat Island cause Island had better players, Sigurdsson had more help than Messi, and if Finnobagson played for Argentina instead of Aguero, then maybe Argentina would have won.

The delusion is unprecedented.


This is Agueros first goal in 3 world cups

Please, don't be more ridiculous.
 
Totally agree with Evra's take on their respective mentalities: Ronaldo relishes the pressure, Messi doesn't.

It's absurd to suggest he crumbles under the pressure but I think he finds it more of a chore. Ronaldo loves that it all rests on him. They obviously exist in very different environments where Messi is not only responsible for the clinical moments but for every phase of play, so the pressure is much more constant. Ronaldo has been the key player for over a decade but he's never been the player people look to every time they get the ball. Both he and his team-mates know to limit his involvement to where he can be most devastating. Messi hasn't had that kind of role for a long time and I reckon that takes a much bigger toll.

I don't think Ronaldo has ever been a better player than Messi at their respective peaks, but I think he might well end up being the greater player. Still a long way to go but I didn't think that was possible years ago. What he's done since then is insane.
So why doesn't someone else take penalty kicks for Argentina? Messi is consistently not great at them. I think that says something.
 
Messi really wasn't that good in the last World Cup.

Even he looked embarrassed when he was given the Golden Ball.

in 4 of the 7 games he was quite clearly the best player on the park. only james rodriguez came close to him in 2014 but the award has to go to the one who made the final.
 
in 4 of the 7 games he was quite clearly the best player on the park. only james rodriguez came close to him in 2014 but the award has to go to the one who made the final.

He literally only won because all of the Germans were at the same level in their team so they couldn't choose one of them to win.

Messi was better than his Argentine team mates by a long way but that was just further highlighted today because he didn't show up and they were shite.

Having said that, I remember Mascherano being a warrior, especially in the semis. He was better than Messi.
 
Lol imagine actually thinking Ronaldo is a better footballer than Messi. Like, imagine actually genuinely thinking that lol

Ronaldo’s performances have been evidence above that Ronaldo has been turning the tide in this debate, but nothing has been more evidence of this than posts like those above, which is probably the 10th+ version of the same type of post I’ve been seeing across forums these past few months.

The exchange is usually some variation of this:


“How can you think Ronaldo is better? LOL”

“Ya know, I used to think Messi was better too, but when you actually look at the following list of achievements (aka evidence), both team and individual, both club and national team,performances in big games, in the CL, etc. etc. Ronaldo is the winner in my opinion.”

....

“How can you think Ronaldo is better? LOL”
 
What Cruyff, Pelé, Platini, Maradona, Eusébio, Beckenbauer etc. did on the international stage which cemented their legacy was impose themselves on their national team in a way Messi or Ronaldo have never come close to.

Nobody in Portugal says Eusebio had a bigger impact for Portugal than Ronaldo these days, not even 90 year old Benfica fans. Eusebio had a better tournament, that World Cup in 1966 was unbelievable and I watched all the games myself but Ronaldo's longevity for the national team surpasses that easily.

Eusebio had better teammates around him too, just like all of those names you mentioned. I think outside of Portugal, people don't really have any notion of what Ronaldo's been for Portugal and it's a shame.

It's difficult to know how to fit Ronaldo into that discussion because he's the only player who has never really been the focal point of the attack, so it's much harder to define what his influence should be and what it is. But for Messi it's clear as day. They need him to be the leader and to bring it all together and he doesn't have the personality to relish that role, and that in itself is a major cause of their lack of success IMO.

Ronaldo not being the focal point of the attack and still doing what he does is actually a plus for the teams he plays for though, he doesn't really need to see a lot of the ball at his feet to make a difference.

Football has changed, having a focal point of the attack is mostly a negative thing nowadays and it becomes a lot easier to stop teams. Argentina need Messi to have less influence than what he does and this season it's been the same for Barcelona even if the results were very good. It will work often because Messi is that good but defering so much to one player is bad for the team.
 
Messi has broken the all-time calendar year goalscoring record as a forward, he was by far the best player in the world as a winger, and he now tops La Liga in literally every statistical category playing as a number 10. He is, and has been, far more flexible than Ronaldo, and quite obviously has a far superior skillset. If you're comparing the two as footballers over their career as whole, there really is no comparison. That's why, as I said, Messi has been Spanish player of the year nine times, and Ronaldo has won it once. Because Messi is far better. It should be a massive compliment to Ronaldo that he's even compared to Messi because Muller was never compared to Cruyff.

It's also kind of hilarious that people on here are now claiming that Ronaldo is better than Messi because of one free-kick when Messi already broke the La Liga free-kick record this year, has a much better record as a free-kick taker than Ronaldo, and this is the first time Ronaldo has hit the target from a free-kick in absolutely ages. He's basically a liability taking free-kicks most of the time, he was due to score one.
You realize that he is the active player with most free kicks scored?
 
Missed penalty and a gazillion chances against Chelsea in 2012

0:51, 4:11, 9:40. Totally his fault we went out, what a stinker of a game, did barely anything.



Nevermind he already carried that team to Semis with 8 goals in the 4 previous games.

unable to score in 2010 against Inter (right) despite playing with one player more

Yeah, another uninspirational game by Messi, he only asked Julio Cesar to wonderfully stop a screamer (4:13), or served Bojan with a perfect cross for him to screw up (9:52). Maybe if he stopped dribbling 1vs3 to complete 8 dribbles in a UCL Semifinal and scored more, his team would win!. Completing 8 dribbles in a Semifinal game when guys like Neymar or Hazard attempt 7 per game is a total sign of underperforming, as you have said.



anonymous against Bayern in 2013

April, 2nd, Messi plays 45' vs PSG, scores one, leaves injured
April, 10th, Messi subs in for 28' vs PSG (injured) creates the chance of the goal that put us through
April 23rd, plays 90' in Barcelona's 4-0 loss vs Bayern, despite not playing for almost 3 weeks in La Liga,
May, 1st, misses 2nd leg vs Bayern (still injured but benched)

'Messi had to play injured because Barcelona proved to be dire without him vs PSG, but was anonymous in a big game'

Revan's resume of Barcelona's UCL downfalls "You know, Leo was the best player in his team, asked Cech and Julio Cesar to make legendary saves to stop him, even assisted in goals or created clear cut chances, but Barcelona were eliminated because HE underperformed, not the other 10 players".
"Oh, and that season where he put a subpar team in UCL Semis playing injured vs PSG? He was so anonymous that he even got benched!".
 
Messi is definitely very poor on penalties btw, should be Aguero taking it for Argentina.
 
So why doesn't someone else take penalty kicks for Argentina? Messi is consistently not great at them. I think that says something.

That's a good question but I'm not sure the answer is quite so self-explanatory. Either Messi wants to do everything, and what I'm saying is utterly rubbish, or Messi's team-mates what him to do everything. They're the two reasons he would take all of the penalties. Also I don't think they actually have any other good penalty takers, weirdly. Can't remember that being a strength of any of their strikers anyway?

It's really clear that his team-mates rely on him. He is the go-to player for everything. Ultimately what I was suggesting was that I think Messi is uncomfortable with that reality, whereas I think Ronaldo craves it.
 
The last 24 hours should put this argument to bed.

Messi was perhaps the best in the world during Pep’s Barca, but since then Ronaldo won four CL’s with Madrid and the Euros with Portugal.

Messi is a phenomenal player, but melts like butter under pressure. Ronaldo is a phenomenal player and an ice blooded leader.

Ronaldo owned Spain, one of the best teams in the world all by himself, while Messi failed against Iceland with the help of world class players like Aguero and Di Maria.

Yeah class, lets definite their careers in a 24 hour period. Great arguement.

"Owned Spain". They drew. Calm the feck down. It was a phenomenal performance by Ronaldo, one that'll go down as one of the greatest individual performances in World Cup history. But seriously, he didn't guide Portugal to victory.
 
What Cruyff, Pelé, Platini, Maradona, Eusébio, Beckenbauer etc. did on the international stage which cemented their legacy was impose themselves on their national team in a way Messi or Ronaldo have never come close to. It wasn't their success that was so impressive, it was the fact that they were quite clearly the key to making those teams tick, they created that cohesion, they were able to rise above the limitations of national football and create something beautiful. It's difficult to know how to fit Ronaldo into that discussion because he's the only player who has never really been the focal point of the attack, so it's much harder to define what his influence should be and what it is. But for Messi it's clear as day. They need him to be the leader and to bring it all together and he doesn't have the personality to relish that role, and that in itself is a major cause of their lack of success IMO.
All of these players benefit from a mythology that is now attached to them, and the fact that they didn't have to play in modern football, where even someone like Iceland are a more than competent team, and the game is just a lot tighter and it's much harder for individual players to stand out. Also, for example, although Cruyff was a great player, the Netherlands never won a major title while he was in the team. Ronaldo has won a major trophy at international level, although his performances in that tournament were no better than decent, while Messi was instrumental in the three major finals that Argentina have reached.

You're not going to get one player dragging a team through a tournament nowadays. Ronaldo has had one standout game because he's a great player, but he quite possibly won't have another one in this tournament. When Portugal won the Euros, they did it because their defence was outstanding. And this is the primary reason why I would give Argentina absolutely no chance of winning this World Cup; their defence is dreadful. It won't matter what Messi does, not that it's realistic to expect one player to make the difference in a major international tournament comprising all of the best teams and players in the world.

Messi was man of the match in the first four matches of the last World Cup, and he still got criticised. It's because we set unrealistic expectations for these players, as we watch all of their games. Ronaldo too now, because he's set the bar so high, if he has a quiet game later in the tournament all of the pundits will start saying "why has Ronaldo gone missing?". Which is just an unfair level of expectation of an outstanding forward. Whereas in the past, the top foreign players were more mysterious and magisterial as we'd rarely, if ever, seen them before.
 
Ronaldo isn't even in the GOAT argument. He's a highly effective forward, but ultimately a limited player.

Before there was all of the ridiculous hype of the modern era, there was a player called Gerd Muller. He was a more prolific goalscorer than Ronaldo for both club and country, with a better goals per game record. Muller scored 653 goals in 707 appearances, plus 68 for Germany in 62 appearances. He also won the European Cup several times, and the European Championships and the World Cup. And he was decisive in the World Cup, scoring 10 goals in 1970, and the winning goal in the 1974 World Cup final, holding the all-time World Cup scoring record for 32 years. Bear in mind that Ronaldo hadn't scored in the World Cup before yesterday.

Yet I have never on one occasion ever heard anyone suggest that Gerd Muller is the greatest footballer of all-time because it was understood that he was nowhere near as good technically as Cruyff, who played in the same era. People actually understood that there is more to the game than putting the ball in the back of the net back then. And bear in mind that there was a much bigger gulf in goalscoring between Muller and Cruyff than there is between Messi and Ronaldo. In fact, Messi has outscored Ronaldo, particularly when operating as a forward, and still has a better goals per game ratio. Even though he plays as a number 10, and Ronaldo is a pure poacher. Messi basically plays Ozil's position, and also scores 45 goals per season.

And everyone knows that Messi is a better passer, dribbler, and free-kick taker than Ronaldo, has better control, creates more chances, gets more assists, contributes far more to the game, and scores more difficult goals, far more regularly. Even obsessive Ronaldo supporters on this thread have never challenged this because it is blatantly obvious.

That's why Messi has completely dominated Spanish football over the last decade, winning the player of the year numerous times, I think it will be nine once he wins it for the 2017-18 season, which is inevitable, whereas Ronaldo has won it once. That's why in The Guardian's review of the season, the following was said:

Ronaldo is a great player, but he will not go down as even close to being the greatest of all-time, and technically he is miles behind Messi, and always will be. That's why Messi is always bracketed with Maradona and Pele, whereas Ronaldo is compared to Messi.

This dude just called Ronaldo a "limited player" :lol:
 
in 4 of the 7 games he was quite clearly the best player on the park. only james rodriguez came close to him in 2014 but the award has to go to the one who made the final.
Muller and Robben were better too (especially the later).

Diego Forlan won the award in 2010, despite not reaching the final.
 
Muller and Robben were better too (especially the later).

Diego Forlan won the award in 2010, despite not reaching the final.

he reached the semi's though, rodriguez only the quarters. if colombia made the semi's would have been a travesty not to give james the award.
 
Still a better World Cup than any Ronaldo has had so far.

Nah, you see, Messi was awful the past WC, he scored 4 goals that gave Argentina 8 of his 9 points, but it was just group phase. Yesterday Ronaldo proved he's better at international level because he scored 3, doesn't matter it was also group phase, or that they amount to 1 point, he did it yesterday, not 4 years ago, and Portugal still haven't lost this WC final, so he's totally better than Leo.
 
Nobody in Portugal says Eusebio had a bigger impact for Portugal than Ronaldo these days, not even 90 year old Benfica fans. Eusebio had a better tournament, that World Cup in 1966 was unbelievable and I watched all the games myself but Ronaldo's longevity for the national team surpasses that easily.

Eusebio had better teammates around him too, just like all of those names you mentioned. I think outside of Portugal, people don't really have any notion of what Ronaldo's been for Portugal and it's a shame.

Ronaldo not being the focal point of the attack and still doing what he does is actually a plus for the teams he plays for though, he doesn't really need to see a lot of the ball at his feet to make a difference.

Football has changed, having a focal point of the attack is mostly a negative thing nowadays and it becomes a lot easier to stop teams. Argentina need Messi to have less influence than what he does and this season it's been the same for Barcelona even if the results were very good. It will work often because Messi is that good but defering so much to one player is bad for the team.

Tbh I copied and pasted a few sentences from a point I made a few years ago because I was lazy but thought it was still relevant. Ronaldo's achievement in the Euros does put him in a different position now to then. Personally I'd say it allows him to be excluded from the discussion, rather than celebrated within it, but we can agree to disagree there. Comparing his influence to Eusébio's, when talking about their contribution at the highest level of international football, seems utterly absurd to me. But I definitely don't have any interest in having that kind of discussion with someone who identifies so strongly with one of those players.
 
So Ronaldo scores a couple of goals and suddenly he is better than Messi even though "everyone knows that Messi is a better passer, dribbler, and free-kick taker than Ronaldo, has better control, creates more chances, gets more assists, contributes far more to the game, and scores more difficult goals, far more regularly"

Why should Ronaldo be considered better than Messi?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.