Messi v Ronaldo | Contains double your daily salt allowance

Messi or Ronaldo

  • Messi

  • Ronaldo


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
You seem to be the one who fails to grasp that the awards are based on calendar year. Ronaldo’s great first half 2017 was enough for his landslide victory despite his poor last 3/4 months.

2018 Ronaldo has been as good if not better than Messi, the fact the La Liga is gone before 2018 started has nothing to do with anything.
Read again @TheRedScot post as he was referring to 17/18 season to which you have replied, no one was even talking about calendar year you pillock learn how to read before being this cocky.
 
Read again @TheRedScot post as he was referring to 17/18 season to which you have replied, no one was even talking about calendar year you pillock learn how to read before being this cocky.
I’ve already pointed out that I think Ronaldo has already made up for the poor first few months in this calendar year.

So what exactly is your point here?

No he didn’t they are out of CDR, la liga is gone. You can’t be best player by just turning up for few months a season, consistency matters.

You were the one who said you can't be best player by just turning up for a few months, which is exactly what Ronaldo did in 2017.
 
Was has Ronaldo done 2018 to be better?
Messi is always the best player for Barca. When was the last game Ronaldo was the best player for Real? I mean when you see the game for 90 odd minutes and you think Ronaldo was the best. Its always Modric or Marcello, sometines Ramos or Isco. Take Ronaldo out of Real and they play exactly the same, take Messi out of Barca and you have a different team.
 
I’ve already pointed out that I think Ronaldo has already made up for the poor first few months in this calendar year.

So what exactly is your point here?
I’m afraid you’re the only one on the whole planet apart from his family who sees it that way.
 
I’m afraid you’re the only one on the whole planet apart from his family who sees it that way.
Ronaldo has scored more goals over the season than Messi.

Care to reply to my 2nd point in the above message?
 
You were the one who said you can't be best player by just turning up for a few months, which is exactly what Ronaldo did in 2017.
Well yes and if you read my last post on previous page I explicitly said that Ronaldo was pretty consistent last year and for this reason they won La Liga, he just went another gear in final months.
 
Well yes and if you read my last post on previous page I explicitly said that Ronaldo was pretty consistent last year and for this reason they won La Liga, he just went another gear in final months.
My point is that he was NOT consistent in 2017 (great first half, poor 2nd half), yet won the Ballon D'or in a landslide.

Hence, the football world values that great first half more than consistency throughout the YEAR.

The fact he was quite consistent during 2nd half 2016 helped them win La Liga but had little impact on Ballon D'or 2017.
 
So you think it's his goalscoring which puts him above Messi?

If so I think that's stupid. There's a fat guy in Scotland who broke Henrik Larsson's goal record. He isn't even close to being as good as him. Scored more goals but...

No, I don't think it's goalscoring that puts Ronaldo above Messi.

I think Ronaldo's above Messi because I think he's been better in the Champions League and better for his country.
 
Yes, but while doing that you should take into account the importance of said performances. 7 WC games are bigger than 100 league games so they should be judged accordingly. It relates to individual skill because you're judging their performances, not sure I understand what you mean by that.



Well, first of all I think there's a lot more to football than how talented you are on the ball.

And secondly to answer your question, no. I'll give the example I gave earlier. In 2017, Messi scored more goals, Messi was consistently the better dribbler and the better passer... but Ronaldo was the better player simply because the biggest competition is shorter and he was better there.

But were not talking about is who the best player in important games, we're talking about who is the best player full stop. The performances in important games are important and does show individual skill yes, but obviously not all of it (and who has been the better player in important games is again very much up for discussion). The bigger the sample you take, the better the result you will get and you are deliberately ignoring the majority of both players performances. I just don't see how that is a good way of coming to any sort of fair conclusion about who is the better player.

Look, let's say that I would play 100 games against Roger Federer, 80 in WTP tournaments and 20 in Grand slam tournaments. I would win 60 out of the 80 WTP matches but only 6/20 GS matches. Even though overall I've won twice as many games would you still think that he is better than me because he won more important matches? This of course becomes even more flawed when you make a comparison like this in a team sport where you need to rely on 15+ other players to perform as well.
 
Define top class. Personally I think it's an insult to either player to be talked about as anything less than best 5 EVER.

You tell me, you were the one who brought up this talk about top class when you decided that the "Messi cult" couldn't acknowledge that Ronaldo was a top class player, despite no one saying anything remotely close to that.
 
You tell me, you were the one who brought up this talk about top class when you decided that the "Messi cult" couldn't acknowledge that Ronaldo was a top class player, despite no one saying anything remotely close to that.
Obviously I was talking about the select group of best players ever.
 
But were not talking about is who the best player in important games, we're talking about who is the best player full stop. The performances in important games are important and does show individual skill yes, but obviously not all of it (and who has been the better player in important games is again very much up for discussion). The bigger the sample you take, the better the result you will get and you are deliberately ignoring the majority of both players performances. I just don't see how that is a good way of coming to any sort of fair conclusion about who is the better player.

I'm not ignoring them, I am giving them less importance compared to other more important performances.

Look, let's say that I would play 100 games against Roger Federer, 80 in WTP tournaments and 20 in Grand slam tournaments. I would win 60 out of the 80 WTP matches but only 6/20 GS matches. Even though overall I've won twice as many games would you still think that he is better than me because he won more important matches?

Absolutely
 
Look, let's say that I would play 100 games against Roger Federer, 80 in WTP tournaments and 20 in Grand slam tournaments. I would win 60 out of the 80 WTP matches but only 6/20 GS matches. Even though overall I've won twice as many games would you still think that he is better than me because he won more important matches? This of course becomes even more flawed when you make a comparison like this in a team sport where you need to rely on 15+ other players to perform as well.
Most people have Federer as the greatest tennis player ever because of his grand slam record.

Pete Sampras actually finished year end number 1 more often.
 
Obviously I was talking about the select group of best players ever.

I don't think Ronaldo is excluded from that group even if someone says that he thinks that a few players are better than him.

Most people have Federer as the greatest tennis player ever because of his grand slam record.

Pete Sampras actually finished year end number 1 more often.

I know, I hold him as not only the best tennis player ever but also one of the best athletes ever, but it's not all because of his GS record.
 
I'm not ignoring them, I am giving them less importance compared to other more important performances.



Absolutely

Alright then, I guess all that's left is to say let's agree to completely disagree.. :D Good talk and I hope you have a great weekend!
 
FRwtLCr.jpg


Says it all really
 
Says it all really

That says a lot more about you Barcelona fans and the level of stupidity and patheticness your hatred gives you than it does about Ronaldo.

How many of the 20 games were before 2007? How many were friendlies where he played 45 minutes? Why exlude Argentina, Belgium and the Netherlands? Why is Sweden in the column above?
 
@Daysleeper When you mention him start calling him Ronaldo and not ronaldo, he is bigger than that.
 
I don't think Ronaldo is excluded from that group even if someone says that he thinks that a few players are better than him.

I know, I hold him as not only the best tennis player ever but also one of the best athletes ever, but it's not all because of his GS record.
Rivaldo! Seriously? Do you think of him as one of the best?

It's not ALL because of his GS record, but that is a BIG factor.

It's not all because of Cristiano's CL record, but it's a big factor, also if you want to talk about consistency, he has scored 50+ for whatever many years.
 
ronaldo in NT my friend ;)

30yibS9.jpg
My friend, he doesn't play for Argentina and put Messi playing for Santos he probably would use his magnificent creativity to cross balls from Catalunya to Portugal, you know you Barcelona fanatics give a bad name for Messi doing that crap propaganda do you? We don't hate Messi, we write his name as it should be, its Messi not messi.
 
So Ronnie has scored against the likes of Sweden, Holland, Belgium, and Czech Republic. Sounds fair to me.
 
Anyone doing one for Messi?

Show us his great record against the likes of Venezuela, Paraguay, Ecuador and co?

o9AsCpX.jpg



Multiple goals against Brazil, Uruguay, Chile, Columbia, Mexico, Croatia, Spain as well goals against Portugal, France, and Germany
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_international_goals_scored_by_Lionel_Messi

Some interesting facts: actually Messi scored goals against good NT, while we have to keep in mind the South American qualifiers don't have crap teams like Andorra or whatever.

3 goals against Brazil in a friendly, but not in qualifiers, would like to know how many times he played against Brazil in the SAQF.

The other factor neglected is Messi can play with players like Higuain, Aguero or others, while Cristiano had to play with awfull players like Postiga, Éder, André Silva, even Pauleta or Nuno Gomes compared to the players who played alongside Messi are a joke.

@Daysleeper :nono: he scored 3 goals against Brazil in a friendly, don't twist facts. Ok, actually 4 because he scored 1 more in another friendly, I guess he shits himself when he has to play them when it really matters.
 
Better to score 1 against Andorra in a game that matters, than 3 against Brazil in a friendly.
 
ronaldo in NT my friend ;)

Those numbers are in line with any other top goalscorer from Europe, none of them com close to scoring as much as Ronaldo. Argentina, Netherlands, Croatia, Poland, Czech Republic, Belgium, Sweden, etc.

A lot of the goals against what you'd call crap teams are huge goals in big games. He scores an hattrick to win us a game 3-2 in Armenia or in Northern Ireland and you treat it like it doesn't matter. If he doesn't score against Andorra we wouldn't have won that game and gone to the playoffs for example. If he doesn't score against Bosnia we don't go to the Euros in 2012. He plays for Portugal, not Argentina and his goals at least come in official matches.

Can't believe it's 2018 and we're discussing the teams Cristiano Ronaldo has scored goals against. Hopefully it keeps going for a long time
 
:lol: 4 goals in 2 friendlies vs Brazil, where are the goals in the Qualifiers? Does he have to play with players like Postiga, Éder or André Silva? Or managed by a dinossaur like Santos? Why they never answer this is really mind boggling.
 
o9AsCpX.jpg



Multiple goals against Brazil, Uruguay, Chile, Columbia, Mexico, Croatia, Spain as well goals against Portugal, France, and Germany
So basically lots of goals against teams he plays very often. How novel.
 
Rivaldo! Seriously? Do you think of him as one of the best?

It's not ALL because of his GS record, but that is a BIG factor.

It's not all because of Cristiano's CL record, but it's a big factor, also if you want to talk about consistency, he has scored 50+ for whatever many years.

No I don't, and even if someone else does it still doesn't prove what you initially whined about.
 
Come on, arguing over who has been better for their country is daft. Both haven’t done amazing. That is why I put Pele and Maradona above them both.

Messi has got to 4 finals and won 0. Ronaldo has got to 1 final and won the tournament, albeit going off injured in the final.

However, Messi has done more to get his team to the finals.

Ronaldo scored 3 goals at the Euro. 2 in the 3-3 group game. And 1 in the semi vs wales to make it 2-0.

Absurd how anyone can say Ronaldo has done better for their countries.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.