Messi v Ronaldo | Contains double your daily salt allowance

Messi or Ronaldo

  • Messi

  • Ronaldo


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought it was your only post in the thread. I'm honored that you come back.
On your choice of Messi, it is understandable. I also think that Messi is a better football player,without using statistics (although I decided to vote for Cris).
You choose several mediapuntas / enganches / jugones.
Actually you could put on that list any top number 10 in the last 30 years and you´d say that plays better football than Cristiano.
In fact that's what a playmaker does, play and make play to the others.
Domain of space, ball and combinations.
I also like those examples, I'm not a purist but I like the concepts of tikitaka, Menotti or Cruyff, but that has nothing to do with underestimating the goal. Although Cristiano does more than just penalties and easy goals. If we search deeply perhaps we will find some assist,or the abstract concept of football intelligence on the pitch.
I don't know very well the point of that anecdote of penalties against Chelsea?. Maybe you do not like him and are being slightly subjective?.

Of course I remember Rivaldo, at Barça and his season in Coruña where I used to go to the stadium.Did you see him live? (and by the way, Cristiano?)
Firstly you complain about the statistics and then you bring an article full of them :rolleyes:
I also remember endless debates in radio about his position on the left where many times disappeared,his lack of leadership.
I liked his dribbling,his stride and the amazing free kicks but in my opinion was so slow.Leadership and intelligence ... were not his greatest virtues,
and personally I think that affected his departure from Barcelona. Tostao said it, "he scores goals but can not think because he does not know.".

Comparing him with Cristiano is incredibly excessive .


I always like reasoned debate, and understand where you are coming from to an extent (it's a game where goals are the ultimate arbiter, after all).

But before one can score a goal, many other things have to be in place, but I made no comment about penalties and Chelsea so you may be confusing me with another poster.

Yes, I saw Rivaldo live in both Manchester and Barcelona (a few times), and also very much remember the dreadful way Van Gaal used both him and another of my favourites Riquelme, but that's another story. Think of how relatively bad that Barca side was and how Rivaldo essentially carried it for 2 seasons (they had a party when they finished 4th!). I don't see CR ever playing as selflessly as Rivaldo did for Barca at that time.

Well, there was a slight ironic lead-up to my posting the article with Rivaldo's stats, but I understand that humour doesn't translate well on the page sometimes - the utter ridiculousness of thinking that statistics can lead to truly objective assessments about human beings' endeavours (see various Labour Party 'target-driven' policies in the UK over the late 90s and 2000s) is the point I'm driving at and this is the very thing that many CR fans seem to cling to rather too vehemently.

I completely understand not being an aesthete in competitive sports, but how a team wins games is more complex than scoring goals. There's a reason that Kroos and Modric complained about the way the team seemed to be set-up for Ronaldo to score goals but it was effective. It's here where I feel many Ronaldo fans begin to lose the concept of a player in a team game and that's why Ronaldo will be considered more like Gerd Muller than Johan Cruyff in years to come. That still doesn't stop him being an amazing player, and that's what you should enjoy - it's nothing but a entertaining meaningless diversion, after all...
 
Last edited:
This isn't a valid comparison.

Serie A in the 1990s was far more competitive top to bottom than La Liga in the 2010s, the quality of defenders in Serie A was far superior to the quality of defenders in La Liga, the tactical and referee paradigms are completely different and RM in the 2010s is a far more dominant team in league than Inter in the late 1990s.

In Ronaldo's first three seasons at Inter, Inter had a total of 62, 59 and 58 Goals For (with no team even breaking 70 GF during this era).
Throughout the 2010s Real Madrid averages more than 100 goals as a team every season (102, 121, 103, 104, 118, 110, 106).

Completely different eras in different leagues so impossible to rationally compare raw numbers like you are.
The same fat Ronaldo who was outscored consistently by the likes of Bierhoff in his career? :lol:
 
Ronaldo fans are really funny, He's not even the better player at Real Madrid, Ramos and Modric are far more important for the team than Cristiano.

They clearly aren't.

That's blasphemy to suggest so.
 
If people are smiling and realise all this is bunkum it's not worth any real emotion, then we are getting somewhere. Please, laugh away and be merry!
The thing is, that most Ronaldo fans realize that Messi is a great great player. Personally I think he's the 2nd best ever.

On the other hand, the Messi brigade consistently feel the need to come up with ludicrous views like fat Ronaldo (even Rivaldo :lol: ) was better.
 
The thing is, that most Ronaldo fans realize that Messi is a great great player. Personally I think he's the 2nd best ever.

On the other hand, the Messi brigade consistently feel the need to come up with ludicrous views like fat Ronaldo (even Rivaldo :lol: ) was better.

That’s the first and probably only person who will say that about rivaldo :lol:
 
This thread needs to be closed after this :lol:

Jesus, I wonder how people like you have managed to survive the past couple of years. Say what you want about Messi and Ronaldo but the biggest difference between them is that for Ronaldo there are people like you... while for Messi there aren't.

Thanks for your concern about one's survival. Actually, life has treated me very well. One hopes it's doing the same to you, too, and your psychological happiness is not dependent on the relative subjective assessment of a random sportsperson. That would be cognitive dissonance of a worrying order, but on the plus side I completely agree that this thread should be closed and everyone finds something slightly more productive to do!
 
The thing is, that most Ronaldo fans realize that Messi is a great great player. Personally I think he's the 2nd best ever.

On the other hand, the Messi brigade consistently feel the need to come up with ludicrous views like fat Ronaldo (even Rivaldo :lol: ) was better.

So, just to clarify, you think C Ronaldo is the greatest player who ever lived?
 
I’d like to know the demographics of the more rabid Cristiano Ronaldo defenders.

I wonder if they may also be fans of American sports as their attitudes do seem to betray statistic-driven assessments.

Football is more nuanced than other team sports and sometimes a player can control a game without necessarily playing the final ball or putting the ball in the net. As Pink Moon rightly said (and if anyone hasn’t listened to Nick Drake, they bloody should), if you can’t see these things through a simple eye test, it’s not worth discussing.

Zidane, original Ronaldo, Ronaldinho and Rivaldo, were all better footballers than Cristiano Ronaldo (they’re just 4 examples I imagine will irk but you could name a myriad of players throughout history), but these rather obsessed fans just quote trophies won and goal scoring stats without a full idea of how a team sport actually works.

This leads to my final point (you’ll all be relieved to hear): I’ve been watching football for over 35 years and I’ve never seen a more selfish individual as Cristiano. His behaviour during the penalty shootout against Chelsea in the CL final was hilariously childish and, unfortunately, this mindset continues today (‘I’m the best, aren’t I?’ Et al...)

That’s the main difference I see between Messi and Ronaldo - Messi plays for the team first and Ronaldo expects the team to play first for him.

He’s still an amazing physical specimen and must be applauded for how he’s committed to his fitness throughout his career, but he’s nowhere near the quality of footballer that his uber-fans of statistics think.

So, to all CR7 fans: relax, take joy in your favourite now seemingly deciding to start playing properly after January and scoring lots of goals at the business end of the season for the next few years (helps with individual awards), and just remember, football is meaningless; use the time you spend looking for statistics more enjoyably, whatever that may be. Please.

To any CR fans that have steam coming out of their ears at this blasphemy, don’t bother responding as this will be my only contribution to this massive waste of everyone’s time. (In case any CR disciples are wondering as I’ve not posted one statistic, I think Messi’s by far the superior player and, in other shocking news, I do believe the Pope shows Catholic sympathies and bears defecate in forest-like areas.)

There’s a lot of fun to be had in life...but not here!

Such a long post wasted due to the garbage in bold. Unfortunate you don't see just how amazing of a player Ronaldo is if you think all of them are better footballers.
 
I always like reasoned debate, and understand where you are coming from to an extent (it's a game where goals are the ultimate arbiter, after all).

But before one can score a goal, many other things have to be in place, but I made no comment about penalties and Chelsea so you may be confusing me with another poster.

Yes, I saw Rivaldo live in both Manchester and Barcelona (a few times), and also very much remember the dreadful way Van Gaal used both him and another of my favourites Riquelme, but that's another story. Think of how relatively bad that Barca side was and how Rivaldo essentially carried it for 2 seasons (they had a party when they finished 4th!). I don't see CR ever playing as selflessly as Rivaldo did for Barca at that time.

Well, there was a slight ironic lead-up to my posting the article with Rivaldo's stats, but I understand that humour doesn't translate well on the page sometimes - the utter ridiculousness of thinking that statistics can lead to truly objective assessments about human beings' endeavours (see various Labour Party 'target-driven' policies in the UK over the late 90s and 2000s) is the point I'm driving at and this is the very thing that many CR fans seem to cling to rather too vehemently.

I completely understand not being an aesthete in competitive sports, but how a team wins games is more complex than scoring goals. There's a reason that Kroos and Modric complained about the way the team seemed to be set-up for Ronaldo to score goals but it was effective. It's here were I feel many Ronaldo fans begin to lose the concept of a player in a team game and that's why Ronaldo will be considered more like Gerd Muller than Johan Cruyff in years to come. That still doesn't stop him being an amazing player, and that's what you should enjoy - it's nothing but a entertaining meaningless diversion, after all...
This comment seems more reasonable than the others, where you did not seem to be a fan of reasoned debate, unless it was pure sarcasm.
I do not like statistics either, but there are certain statistics that can be translated into the greatness of a player.
We can talk about being able to come back when you are dead, face the key moments in a continuous way, leadership, influence and remembrance among the fans.

Now you say that he is an amazing player that we should enjoy but your first post didn´t sound like that, rather you underestimated him a lot.

I do not completely agree about Rivaldo's lack of self-interest, since it was also one of the continuous criticisms throughout his career.
There is much more than the goal, but that is not the role of Cristiano and until recently Messi did not participate as actively.
To be remembered as Cruyff he must first be remembered for what he does in a world cup. In 2010 he lowered his head, in la copa América he got angry and left, and in 2014, although he played well, he did not leave scenes to remember in 20 years.

If Messi wins with Barça, it´s Messi who wins, if he loses with the National team is Argentina who loses.

Being an esthete or not, there are many components at the time of the final assessment.
 
These are the kind of posts that make me laugh. Whilst I agree that Messi is better, why do so many Messi fans have to try so hard to downplay Ronaldo? On what planet are Modric and Ramos 'far' more important than Ronaldo? Why so much hyperbole just to prove a point? It just makes your opinion less credible imo.
glad that you laughed, I rather take Modric or Ramos for my team than CR, I guess is as funny as claiming that Cristiano is a better player than Messi.
 
This comment seems more reasonable than the others, where you did not seem to be a fan of reasoned debate, unless it was pure sarcasm.
I do not like statistics either, but there are certain statistics that can be translated into the greatness of a player.
We can talk about being able to come back when you are dead, face the key moments in a continuous way, leadership, influence and remembrance among the fans.

Now you say that he is an amazing player that we should enjoy but your first post didn´t sound like that, rather you underestimated him a lot.

I do not completely agree about Rivaldo's lack of self-interest, since it was also one of the continuous criticisms throughout his career.
There is much more than the goal, but that is not the role of Cristiano and until recently Messi did not participate as actively.
To be remembered as Cruyff he must first be remembered for what he does in a world cup. In 2010 he lowered his head, in la copa América he got angry and left, and in 2014, although he played well, he did not leave scenes to remember in 20 years.

If Messi wins with Barça, it´s Messi who wins, if he loses with the National team is Argentina who loses.

Being an esthete or not, there are many components at the time of the final assessment.

I don't deny CR is an amazingly effective player, and in the last 10 years he would be the 'second pick' of many football followers, but having watched him closely for all his career he is, in my eyes, a level below the Maradona, Pele, Cruyff, Messi 'level' many of his fans seem to think he is.

Well, part of my career (to date) involved highly sarcastic writing so you're right that there's some of that in my posts, but sometimes sarcasm is the only style that pique certain brains to think clearly but we're entering psychological realms I don't have time for now.

You make an interesting point about Messi and how he is viewed. I think Messi himself acknowledges that his Barca teams help him substantially and if he played for Spain he would probably have at least one World Cup. But I think he's very much blamed when Argentina lose http://www.calciomercato.com/en/news/argentina-sampaoli-world-cup-the-pressure-is-on-messi-20649

Personally, I don't think he's better than Maradona but I believe it was the great music writer Ian MacDonald (if anyone is a Beatles fan and hasn't somehow read this, do it - now! https://www.theguardian.com/books/2...cdonald-a-song-by-song-history-of-the-beatles) that said the young always believe that the time they're living through is the best of everything. I think that applies greatly in this whole Messi/CR farrago and also the modern obsession with statistics is a big part of the problem here (Moneyball anyone?!).

Going back a little, I agree the objective assessment must include character, and I think both players are as driven as you could ask for given the fame and wealth they have. If Messi does win the WC, would that change your thoughts on him as a player?
 
Last edited:
I don't know very well the point of that anecdote of penalties against Chelsea?. Maybe you do not like him and are being slightly subjective?.

Apologies, I did mention his laying down away from the rest of the United team during the penalty shootout as an example of his selfish behaviour. That's another important arbiter for me; namely, the best players have always been team players as well as brilliant individuals. CR is too selfish too often...
 
There's something very important that everyone is overlooking, the key ingredient missing from this discussion:

Ronaldo is taller and better-looking. I asked my girlfriend and she said he's definitely better than Messi. She also said Real Madrid are the best team because they won the Champions Cup.

Please close the thread.
 
There's something very important that everyone is overlooking, the key ingredient missing from this discussion:

Ronaldo is taller and better-looking. I asked my girlfriend and she said he's definitely better than Messi. She also said Real Madrid are the best team because they won the Champions Cup.

Please close the thread.

Does your girlfriend want to be a surrogate mother?
 
Apologies, I did mention his laying down away from the rest of the United team during the penalty shootout as an example of his selfish behaviour. That's another important arbiter for me; namely, the best players have always been team players as well as brilliant individuals. CR is too selfish too often...
I don't deny CR is an amazingly effective player, and in the last 10 years he would be the 'second pick' of many football followers, but having watched him closely for all his career he is, in my eyes, a level below the Maradona, Pele, Cruyff, Messi 'level' many of his fans seem to think he is.

Well, part of my career (to date) involved highly sarcastic writing so you're right that there's some of that in my posts, but sometimes sarcasm is the only style that pique certain brains to think clearly but we're entering psychological realms I don't have time for now.

You make an interesting point about Messi and how he is viewed. I think Messi himself acknowledges that his Barca teams help him substantially and if he played for Spain he would probably have at least one World Cup. But I think he's very much blamed when Argentina lose http://www.calciomercato.com/en/news/argentina-sampaoli-world-cup-the-pressure-is-on-messi-20649

Personally, I don't think he's better than Maradona but I believe it was the great music writer Ian MacDonald (if anyone is a Beatles fan and hasn't somehow read this, do it - now! https://www.theguardian.com/books/2...cdonald-a-song-by-song-history-of-the-beatles) that said the young always believe that the time they're living through is the best of everything. I think that applies greatly in this whole Messi/CR farrago and also the modern obsession with statistics is a big part of the problem here (Moneyball anyone?!).

Going back a little, I agree the objective assessment must include character, and I think both players are as driven as you could ask for given the fame and wealth they have. If Messi does win the WC, would that change your thoughts on him as a player?


Don´t worry. I also believe that Maradona is better, because I love the legend that surrounds him and because that left leg is unmatched.

For the same reason I adored Romario. He did not give a shit about the team, he was a "viva la vida", but cool even celebrating the goals.Quality, character and different from the rest.
That is one of the values that I see in Cristiano. That attraction, competitive spirit, fierce criticism for any aspect of his life but at the same time example of professionalism and competitiveness. I think it's a very particular character.
Do you think 13, 14 years old kids will forget Cristiano in 10 years because he only scored goals? Messi is great, but as I said in my first post he lacks spark, character, or put himself to the test in another scenario. Anyway I am a Madrid fan and I can not avoid raising one a little and looking for some defect in the other.

I imagine that defending Cristiano at all costs is tremendously complicated but Messi fans can also be very suffocating with that sense of absolute truth. Especially at the written level, because in real life most of people talks about Cristiano, at least in my environment.
 
Don´t worry. I also believe that Maradona is better, because I love the legend that surrounds him and because that left leg is unmatched.

For the same reason I adored Romario. He did not give a shit about the team, he was a "viva la vida", but cool even celebrating the goals.Quality, character and different from the rest.
That is one of the values that I see in Cristiano. That attraction, competitive spirit, fierce criticism for any aspect of his life but at the same time example of professionalism and competitiveness. I think it's a very particular character.
Do you think 13, 14 years old kids will forget Cristiano in 10 years because he only scored goals? Messi is great, but as I said in my first post he lacks spark, character, or put himself to the test in another scenario. Anyway I am a Madrid fan and I can not avoid raising one a little and looking for some defect in the other.

I imagine that defending Cristiano at all costs is tremendously complicated but Messi fans can also be very suffocating with that sense of absolute truth. Especially at the written level, because in real life most of people talks about Cristiano, at least in my environment.

I think kids move on very quickly to the next hero, but for Real Madrid and United fans of course Cristiano will be remembered as one of the greats - but will he remembered in the same universal way that Maradona, Pele or Cruyff will by all fans?

I loved Romario as well for the character (also Stoichkov at the time), but I do think Cristiano is a little too 'sanitised' (like Messi) to be compared to people like Maradona or Romario, but you cannot fault his commitment, agreed. His physical state is a lesson to us all - I've not seem many 33 year olds that conditioned!

Among my peers, it's the opposite: all acknowledge CR's effectiveness but all would have Messi first; just goes to show, as Sly Stone said, different strokes for different folks...
 
Last edited:
I don't deny CR is an amazingly effective player, and in the last 10 years he would be the 'second pick' of many football followers, but having watched him closely for all his career he is, in my eyes, a level below the Maradona, Pele, Cruyff, Messi 'level' many of his fans seem to think he is.
I've seen them all. Ronaldo belongs in the pantheon of greats you have named Cruyff doesn't. I think Pele, Messi, Maradona and Ronaldo are the best four players I have seen in my lifetime. Cruyff is top 10 all time, but Ronaldo is the best European player I've been lucky enough to see. Cruyff was great but IMLTHO he doesn't belong in such exalted company.
 
Thing with people comparing current players with past great, they tend to only remember (from their long term blurry memory) the best performance of the past great, and comparing it to the many “average” performances of the current player (from their short term sharp memory) The thing is, I’ve also seen Brazil Ronaldo, Rivaldo and even Zidane has many average/bad/forgettable performances too.

Another example is, when talking about Ronaldo, many people here could only remember him in his recent 2 years (more as a goalscorer) and forget how amazing he was in the majority of his United career, and over half of his Real Madrid time (skillful winger/wing forward with lots of flair, absolutely dominating in counter attack play, amazing long shots etc)
 
Yup, now I know, I am speaking with a football Einstein, really impressed with your superior knowledge, next you are going to bring me a quote from Confucius or what?

I accept with total humbleness a guy from Argentina, Brazil, Italy, Spain, Germany, France, maybe even England saying yup you are shit, now a dutch fan I just have to say with total respect, first beat us then come and talk with me.
sup!

Nah just kidding, meaningless friendly, couldn't resist though. Good luck at the WC, we'l watch it from the couch :(
 
I think kids move on very quickly to the next hero, but for Real Madrid and United fans of course Cristiano will be remembered as one of the greats - but will he remembered in the same universal way that Maradona, Pele or Cruyff will by all fans?

I loved Romario as well for the character (also Stoichkov at the time), but I do think Cristiano is a little too 'sanitised' (like Messi) to be compared to people like Maradona or Romario, but you cannot fault his commitment, agreed. His physical state is a lesson to us all - I've not seem many 33 year olds that conditioned!

Among my peers, it's the opposite: all acknowledge CR's effectiveness but all would have Messi first; just goes to show, as Sly Stone said, different strokes for different folks...

Ronaldo is one of his kind, his recent years may not have capture the essence of truly beautiful game as comparable to other past great or Messi does. But in terms of pure drive, determination, competitiveness, effectiveness and hunger for goals, I don’t think I’ve seen anything similar to that in the past. And for that very reason (apart from his supreme stats, unmatched individual records, overall success and achievements) Ronaldo will always have a special place in football history imho.
 
Ronaldo is one of his kind, his recent years may not have capture the essence of truly beautiful game as comparable to other past great or Messi does. But in terms of pure drive, determination, competitiveness, effectiveness and hunger for goals, I don’t think I’ve seen anything similar to that in the past. And for that very reason (apart from his supreme stats, unmatched individual records, overall success and achievements) Ronaldo will always have a special place in football history imho.

Not to start an argument, but his individual records can be matched or similar by Messi. Just like Messi has other individual records, that can be matched or are similar by Ron.
 
Not to start an argument, but his individual records can be matched or similar by Messi. Just like Messi has other individual records, that can be matched or are similar by Ron.

I think Ronaldo holds more individual records than Messi (but Ronaldo has the advantage as he hold records in 2 different league. But he does also hold more records in Europe)

But yes, when both of them are so far ahead of others, you can regard them similar.

You can check list of individual records comparison on the link below:

www.messivsronaldo.net/records/
 
I've seen them all. Ronaldo belongs in the pantheon of greats you have named Cruyff doesn't. I think Pele, Messi, Maradona and Ronaldo are the best four players I have seen in my lifetime. Cruyff is top 10 all time, but Ronaldo is the best European player I've been lucky enough to see. Cruyff was great but IMLTHO he doesn't belong in such exalted company.

And Platini?
 
Thing with people comparing current players with past great, they tend to only remember (from their long term blurry memory) the best performance of the past great, and comparing it to the many “average” performances of the current player (from their short term sharp memory) The thing is, I’ve also seen Brazil Ronaldo, Rivaldo and even Zidane has many average/bad/forgettable performances too.

Another example is, when talking about Ronaldo, many people here could only remember him in his recent 2 years (more as a goalscorer) and forget how amazing he was in the majority of his United career, and over half of his Real Madrid time (skillful winger/wing forward with lots of flair, absolutely dominating in counter attack play, amazing long shots etc)

He hasn't been like that for at least 5 years.
 
I think Ronaldo holds more individual records than Messi (but Ronaldo has the advantage as he hold records in 2 different league. But he does also hold more records in Europe)

But yes, when both of them are so far ahead of others, you can regard them similar.

You can check list of individual records comparison on the link below:

www.messivsronaldo.net/records/

The records that they both hold are ridiculous and I can’t see their records being broken for a long long time.
 
He hasn't been like that for at least 5 years.

That’s fair enough. But he has spent like 6 seasons in MU (3 of which are world class), and 9 seasons in Real. To break it down, even if he hasn’t been like that in 3 to 5 years, there are at least another 7 to 9 years which he is, and that contributed to majority of his career.

Thing is, while Ronaldo (and Messi) has over 10 years at the very very top, many other past greats (Brazil Ronaldo, Rivaldo and Zidane etc) only has about less than half of that. Then we have people here comparing “short peak years” of past great in their mind, with Ronaldo recent “average” years (performance-wise) from his “bottom half” career.

If Ronaldo and Messi are from the past, and Brazil Ronaldo, Rivaldo and Zidane are from present time at 31-33 years of age (with lots of average performances week in week out, rather less impressive stats, records, consistency) I am pretty sure there isn’t any comparison worthy to mention.
 
Last edited:
The poll (and the rivalry) summed up in a picture.

24pguap.jpg
 
I don't like his style of play at Real much, but Cristiano has to be clearly above all other strikers like Müller, Ronaldo, Van Basten, Eusebio etc. based on his longevity / effectiveness alone.
 
That’s fair enough. But he has spent like 6 seasons in MU (3 of which are world class), and 9 seasons in Real. To break it down, even if he hasn’t been like that in 3 to 5 years, there are at least another 7 to 9 years which he is, and that contributed to majority of his career.

Thing is, while Ronaldo (and Messi) has over 10 years at the very very top, many other past greats (Brazil Ronaldo, Rivaldo and Zidane etc) only has about less than half of that. Then we have people here comparing “short peak years” of past great in their mind, with Ronaldo recent “average” years (performance-wise) from his “bottom half” career.

If Ronaldo and Messi are from the past, and Brazil Ronaldo, Rivaldo and Zidane are from present time at 31-33 years of age (with lots of average performances week in week out, rather less impressive stats, records, consistency) I am pretty sure there isn’t any comparison worthy to mention.

If consistency and longevity are all that matter in these debates then why is Platini not mentioned above Maradona more often?
 
I don't like his style of play at Real much, but Cristiano has to be clearly above all other strikers like Müller, Ronaldo, Van Basten, Eusebio etc. based on his longevity / effectiveness alone.

Muller was at Bayern for 15 years making 453 appearances and scoring 398 goals.

Eusebio was at Benfica from 1961- 1975 making 301 appearances and scoring 317 goals.

Them two had longevity and effectiveness. Yes Ronaldo should be higher than them 2 in the list of all time greats, but not ahead by much just on them two reasons you stated.
 
If consistency and longevity are all that matter in these debates then why is Platini not mentioned above Maradona more often?

Longevity and consistency is one thing, being best 1-2 player in world for a decade, breaking record after record, winning trophies after trophies, and at the same time having biggest impact ever in major competition is another.
 
If consistency and longevity are all that matter in these debates then why is Platini not mentioned above Maradona more often?

If Platini had done what he did in Euro 84 in the 1986 World Cup and won it for France ahead of Argentina who'd be remembered as the better player? If Maradona's handball gets called and they lose on penalties what happens to his legacy? If Pele was portuguese and Eusebio was brazilian who'd be remembered as the better player?

What these great players leave behind is a legacy, how consistently well they performed or what their attributes are is just a small part of that. Nobody here watched 200 matches of Eusebio yet they know where to rank him if they make a list of their 10 top players of all time because they know what his achievements are

Consistency matters, but not that much. And longevity matters because it has a big impact on what legacy a player leaves behind.
 
Last edited:
I've seen them all. Ronaldo belongs in the pantheon of greats you have named Cruyff doesn't. I think Pele, Messi, Maradona and Ronaldo are the best four players I have seen in my lifetime. Cruyff is top 10 all time, but Ronaldo is the best European player I've been lucky enough to see. Cruyff was great but IMLTHO he doesn't belong in such exalted company.

You really think Ronaldo was a better footballer than Cruyff? As a footballer? Not a goalscorer. If you think so, you should better stick to basketball. Cruyff was a legit footballing genius. For me Messi is the best ever, but for many Cruyff has claim as the greatest ever rightfully.
 
If consistency and longevity are all that matter in these debates then why is Platini not mentioned above Maradona more often?

Because Maradona had more longevity at a world class level. Maradona was talked about as a teenage prodigy, he won the South American PotY in 1979 and 1980 playing for the very unfancied Argentinos Juniors. He won the WC in 86 but was world class for Napoli until 91-92 really. Remember in the 1980s the environment was very different than today and even then Diego loved playing for the unfancied underdog
 
Status
Not open for further replies.