Lots of misconceptions in this thread.
No, because the option is only exercisable in his final year. Otherwise we would’ve just exercised that option right now and be in a stronger bargaining position?
An option year is ALWAYS more valuable to the club than a guaranteed year. It gives the club the right to an extra contract year when it's worth it to them, but the right to decline when it's not. We would never prefer to have someone for 2 guaranteed years than 1 + 1 option. Imagine if he gets some massive injury this year, for example.
We haven't exercised it because there's zero reason to do so before the deadline. That way, if McT has an injury that keeps him out all next year or just massively declines we can just refuse to exercise it.
Our bargaining position will be worse next summer, as right now we effectively control McT for 2 more years. I don't see that as a massive issue though; he's worth something to us being on the roster this year. If we get one more year out of him and then sell him for £15M next summer, that's not so much worse than selling for £20M but losing control right now.
I don't understand why some of you guys don't understand that the main problem is the wage of McTominay (He earns probably the 4-5x of Skipp).....Bayern Munich have the same problem mit Goretzka.
We should have accepted a 20 million offer for him.
Totally wrong. McT's wage is super reasonable; only £60k a week. Skipp earned £40k at Spurs. Goretzka earns £300k a week. This is all available in a quick internet search....
McT's "problem" is he's not a great player. He's solid, which is why he got a £20M offer from Fulham, but he's not a starter on a top Prem team. Solid squad players are worth £15-25M these days (see AWB or Mazraoui for recent examples).