gasmanc
Banned
I was the same!
I have read somewhere it's all but a done deal, probably twitter or facebook but I am still having it.
I was the same!
I have. You thinking because we have Valencia, Young and Nani that we shouldn't sign Mata.
We been crying out for creativity for a long time. And Mata would give our strikers that.
I have read somewhere it's all but a done deal, probably twitter or facebook but I am still having it.
Number 20 ?Where have i said that i dont want mata? Re read my post. I am just against hoarding players just for the sake of it. Our team has a stellar forward line and weak midfield. Where did this strategy got us to?
Some fairly heavyweight publications/broadcasters are reporting this. Can't put my finger on why, but this seems like it's on.
Perhaps it is all a bit too sudden.
The similarities with the RVP move are uncanny. Almost all exact same things were said back then. "We don't need him." "We should spend in other areas." "Arsenal will not sell their best player to us." And all.
Not saying the outcome would be the same, but feck me I am excited as feck.
So let's not improve it by bringing in players better than we already have, great logic ! Please tell me who in our current squad is going to keep Mata on the bench and then explain the reason you would be so attached to the £30-40m that would otherwise line a rich yanks pocket. Strength in depth won that squad the treble, balanced strong, match fit, Nicky Butt was a force that night in Barcelona.
Just disagreeing with you makes any point right by default.
Where have i said that i dont want mata? Re read my post. I am just against hoarding players just for the sake of it. Our team has a stellar forward line and weak midfield. Where did this strategy got us to?
Seems that some people don't want us to sign Mata because they want the money spent on a midfielder. There's reports that Moyes has a hell of a lot of money to spend, why not get Mata and a midfielder?
Seems that some people don't want us to sign Mata because they want the money spent on a midfielder. There's reports that Moyes has a hell of a lot of money to spend, why not get Mata and a midfielder?
Signing players that are better than what we got is not hoarding players for the sake of it. In our current team, we only have two world class player.
I've asked you who we got better than Mata.
And both are upfront. Adding another quality striker to the team is stupid
Come again?
The guardian, The Telegraph, Sky Sports, The MirrorSome fairly heavyweight publications/broadcasters are reporting this. Can't put my finger on why, but this seems like it's on.
Im attacking the concept of buying quality players just because they are available. Mata is a separate issue
Im attacking the concept of buying quality players just because they are available. Mata is a separate issue
Im attacking the concept of buying quality players just because they are available. Mata is a separate issue
Seems that some people don't want us to sign Mata because they want the money spent on a midfielder. There's reports that Moyes has a hell of a lot of money to spend, why not get Mata and a midfielder?
The concept completely depends on the player in question that is available and what he will add to the team.
In my opinion we should get the players we need. I am in favor of mata because we need him and not because he is available
I think you've taken it a bit too literally. We're not really going to go out and buy 21 top goalkeepers just because they're up for sale. But I think you probably knew that and are being deliberately obtuse, not for the first time
I am not being obtuse. I am only criticizing a strategy which has been used for the past years. For example we would have been better off if instead of kagawa and rvp we brought 2 quality cm and kept rooney
You do realize we won the league last year, right?
They have to run with the story even if it's speculative. It's pretty easy to make reasons up if the deal doesn't happen.Some fairly heavyweight publications/broadcasters are reporting this. Can't put my finger on why, but this seems like it's on.
Well aside from us actually not being in for Thiago yea, decidedly more RVP really.this has Thiago saga marks all over it.
Rvp was not the cure but tackled the side effects. Instead of improving the creativity spark we simply brought a lethal striker capable of taking the most out of the little we provided
We could have rid of Young and Valencia, keep Nani we can then play a conventional 4-4-2 with Januzaj, to give us real options should we need.
I have gone full muppet on this, the wife is hiding the rope in case it goes tits up. It's had me awake since 5am trawling the web for even the merest hint it's on.[/quote]
Same. the first thing I did when I got up in the morning was check Redcafe and the news. I am currently on muppet mode, but still holding myself after Thiago and Sneijder debacles.
How would you rate Mata against Özil?
Do you not think Mata will help with creativity spark?
I agree with Gary Neville. Mata doesn't fit our needs. Like Kagawa he drifts inside and doesn't defend well enough for the big matches.
Unless...unless we want some insurance should Rooney fail to sign a new contract in the summer.