wonnie
Full Member
This needs to happen badly. Then Moyes can stop playing so negative w Valencia and Young on the wings and go for some modern variant of a 4-3-3.
It's only a mata of time
It's only a mata of time
I'm saying Neville has spouted a lot of shite this season, his word shouldn't be taken as gospel.
No one said it should be taken as gospel, but it does tend to have far more credibility than the orgy of gobshite one finds on internet forums.
In 2007-2008, we played with a 4-3-3. So honestly, Neville is talking shit when he says Manchester United always plays with wide men. Plus, Mata is too good a player to not sign, irrespective of squad fit. If it means forcing an under-performing Kagawa to the bench, then so be it.
All the papers leading with United making a £30-37m bid for Mata in the coming days.
Independent, Telegraph, etc.
All the reports this morning suggest we are "preparing" a bid...what does that even mean?
If he started all year and in scintillating form for Chelsea, then they wouldn't even consider selling him, and Mata himself wouldn't want a move. There's no rule on how much a player is, especially one that still have 4 years left on his contract. It's the selling club who set the price. If Chelsea feels that he worth 37M, then that's his priceHe said Moyes may have a different philosophy in mind, hence the Mata link. Although (and I hate to bring money into it), I think that is far too much for Mata. 22-25m would seem appropriate given that he can't get into the Chelsea team and has played sparingly this year. If he had started all year and was in scintillating form, then a 30m + fee may be more warranted.
He said Moyes may have a different philosophy in mind, hence the Mata link. Although (and I hate to bring money into it), I think that is far too much for Mata. 22-25m would seem appropriate given that he can't get into the Chelsea team and has played sparingly this year. If he had started all year and was in scintillating form, then a 30m + fee may be more warranted.
If he started all year and in scintillating form for Chelsea, then they wouldn't even consider selling him, and Mata himself wouldn't want a move. There's no rule on how much a player is, especially one that still have 4 years left on his contract. It's the selling club who set the price. If Chelsea feels that he worth 37M, then that's his price
BBC gossip column reckons Chelsea want £40m.
Frankly for a player of Matas class I would just pay it and be done with it. Beggars can't be choosers, we are lacking in quality and there won't be world class players available for peanuts now or in the summer.
We keep making noises about how we have money to spend, time to prove it.
Naah, we are their direct rivals. They wouldnt see if he was a cert starter and bang on form. The only reason this bid makes sense is that he cant get into that team. Even then, we'd need to pay a lot because we are direct rivals. A 20mil bid wouldnt even get a second glance imo, Chelsea dont need the cash.
all these players you mentioned bar ronaldo put in a regular defensive shift. Have you not read how both robben and ribery upped their defensive contributions with Heycnkes? cmon mateHow do Chelsea make it work with Willian Hazard and Oscar? Or Madrid last season with Ronaldo, Ozil and Di Maria with Benzema up top? Or this season with Ronaldo, Benzema, Bale and Isco? Or Bayern with Robben and Ribery? We're the only team who picks wingers for defensive qualities.
Mata is a quality player but I am not sure he'd solve our biggest problems, although having him to play from the right instead of Valencia would be good.
Mata isn't what we need in the slightest.
I think that is far too much for Mata. 22-25m would seem appropriate given that he can't get into the Chelsea team and has played sparingly this year.