ArmchairCritic
You got pets me too mines are dead
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2011
- Messages
- 16,307
Chelsea won't sell him to United. End of.
Signing Mata unless it was an absolute steal wouldn't really make sense for us right now, be like buying a new set of tyres for your car despite the fact the suspension is broken.
He would fit right into our current squad in that he is another player we could buy, play out of position then moan about when he doesn't perform quite as well as expected.
Who exactly are all of these players? Kagawa?
He would fit right into our current squad in that he is another player we could buy, play out of position then moan about when he doesn't perform quite as well as expected.
Kagawa, Smalling, Jones (less so, he's pretty decent everywhere), Giggs, Buttner (his position being anywhere but Man Utd).
Mata is obviously on another planet to those players though. Kagawa has been poor even when played in his correct position, apart from the odd CL game.
Mata wont go to one of our rivals obviously, and I think he will go back to spain, or possibly PSG. Shame as I do like the guy, but he clearly isnt as good all round as we all thought. Oscar has excelled this season and is a better all rounder, Willian has shown what hes capable of and Hazard speaks for himself. Mata would be good to keep untill the Summer ideally though so we can rotate with him as a squad player when the FA cup and CL games return.
I think he'll be off to Atletico on loan.
Takes a particular sort of idiot to not make good use of a talent like Mata. Atletico would be an ideal destination although as unlikely as it would seem I'd prefer he ended up with Barcelona.
We passed on Ozil. What makes you think we will go for Mata? That too from Chelsea?I think we would be mad to not put in a bid atleast. We know he is surplus to requirements at Chelsea. Why not just bloody have a go and make a bid?
Hell, we bid 25mil for Fabregas so you can't really use the excuse it's a waste of time.
A big public bid, even that failed, would show some intent at least.
It's funny that Chelsea will happily sell and loan their players to the likes of Liverpool and Everton who they clearly don't see as rivals, but are shit scared of selling to United in case the player tears up trees, yet they think we should sell our best player to them for peanuts.
I'd sleep happier in my bed if I knew that at some stage both Chelsea and City will be abandoned by their super rich owners and end up like Portsmouth. Not going to happen but it would be such an enjoyable thing to watch happen.
Mata's perfectly capable of playing across the front 3 AM positions. I'm sick of all this nonsense that every attacking player is a '10' these days.
Of course he can play out wide, but it doesn't get the best out of him as was proved at Chelsea. Like Kagawa Mata is better in the centre and though he'll still be an upgrade on the left flank for the fee he would cost it would just be better to get an actual left winger.
Our maybe we just stop playing with wingers. I can't name a quality winger that plays the way we play. Only the Bayern lot and they both play like inside forwards. Get Mata on the wing cutting in. Unlike Kagawa he has balls.
Our maybe we just stop playing with wingers. I can't name a quality winger that plays the way we play. Only the Bayern lot and they both play like inside forwards. Get Mata on the wing cutting in. Unlike Kagawa he has balls.
We need to change the way we play but there isn't a tactic around that makes a central player play his best football on the wing. It's the same with Silva at City, Mata at Chelsea, Kagawa at United, whoever.
There are certainly some modern players on the flanks like Robben, Ribery, Reus, Hazard, who don't play do the classic style that our wingers do, but I'm not talking about them because they can actually play their best football on the flanks. Mata doesn't fall into that category.
Silva plays frequently for City on the right and is very good and critical for them. Same with Carzola for Arsenal. I think if someone like Kagawa was at Arsenal, he would be playing well for them even at the left side of the midfield.
Of course Silva has played wide for City, same with Spain and Valencia.
As I said about Mata they can play the role and would be an upgrade from Valencia/Nani/Young, but it doesn't get the best out of them and we would be better signing a player who actually performs best out there.
If we signed Mata for the left wing role then we would be daft to expect him to perform like he did last season - he wouldn't do it because the position doesn't suit him. His game completely changed when AVB was sacked and he was moved infield at Chelsea, he instantly became twice the player.
If we could get him for a decent fee then it would probably still be worth it, because a Mata at 75% is still better than our current wingers. But ideally we would just get a player who does his best stuff on the left.