The fact that you're questioning whether he'd improve our first 11 suggest you underrate him, certainly relative to the club. So obviously you're going to think we're overpaying for him.
But however much people do or don't rate Mount is separate to how negotiations are being handled. And as is we've currently offered the lowest amount all those reports on our interest suggested he would actually cost.
So for people to argue we're caving into Chelsea's demands, or that we're being taken for mugs, or that we need to tell Chelsea to feck off is bizarre. As is we're still on course to pay what we intended to pay for him, with no failure in negotiations on our part or suggestion that we're willing to go beyond our valuation.
Complain about signing Mount all ye want, but quit with the needless negativity about how we're not handling the actual attempt to buy him correctly.