Lemansky
Full Member
- Joined
- May 14, 2014
- Messages
- 970
I have been very excited about Rashford lately, and now evenly excited about Mason. We have a lot of talent- hope they keep progressing and we add some quality also.
Quality. It won't take him long to really push being a regular starter here.
4-4-2 all 4 starting with Fretominay behind.James has been great but I really want to see the Rashford + Martial + Greenwood front 3 starting more
Inevitable injuries and dips in form, basically same cycle repeated from few good seasons, which can be easily avoided by boosting depth with a striker who can offer something different on top of goals galore.Great stuff! Why should we splash the cash on yet another young striker in Haaland, when we have Rashford, Martail and this guy already?
James has been great but I really want to see the Rashford + Martial + Greenwood front 3 starting more
James has been great but I really want to see the Rashford + Martial + Greenwood front 3 starting more
I didn't know you could only have one promising talent per team. Their styles are different, their position is different. Having both is fine.And people keep crying about Haaland(who is only about a year older) to come in as striker reinforcement. We have to worry about developing the our own kid rather than paying money to bring in another kid so he can develop here.
Unless someone over rate Haaland(like most posters in that thread) he isn't some sort of generational talent that we should seek after at all cost, especially when we have our own ridiculously talented player(more talented than Haaland by the way) waiting on the wing and developing nicely.
No its not. They're both around the same age and it wouldn't work out without hampering the development of one. Remember there is already Martial as first choice striker who himself is young, you then can't have 2 promising talent as backup if you want to develop them.I didn't know you could only have one promising talent per team. Their styles are different, their position is different. Having both is fine.
And people keep crying about Haaland(who is only about a year older) to come in as striker reinforcement. We have to worry about developing the our own kid rather than paying money to bring in another kid so he can develop here.
Unless someone over rate Haaland(like most posters in that thread) he isn't some sort of generational talent that we should seek after at all cost, especially when we have our own ridiculously talented player(more talented than Haaland by the way) waiting on the wing and developing nicely.
So having 5 players for 3 positions is an issue?No its not. They're both around the same age and it wouldn't work out without hampering the development of one. Remember there is already Martial as first choice striker who himself is young, you then can't have 2 promising talent as backup if you want to develop them.
You simply can't have it both ways, it's doesn't work like that. You put in 2 very young strikers competing to break through and they'll be impeded.
His finishing is like clunge soaked in IPA.
Very well summarised.The way he plays means he probably wont fully flourish until he has matured both physically and mentally. Doesn't have that burst of explosive speed that young players usually rely on but has all the tools to become world class one day.
Another great performance, be fantastic if he can reach double digits for the season. On 6 so far I think?
What are you talking about. They're both strikers and that's where they should develop ideally.So having 5 players for 3 positions is an issue?
Course you can. Haaland will play down the middle, Greenwood from wide. They aren't stepping on each others toes. We are woefully short of numbers up top. Not bringing in a prolific, young striker for a modest fee because he might affect the development of a player who will primarily be used in a different position is nonsensical.
What are you talking about. They're both strikers and that's where they should develop ideally.
Greenwood playing from the left is just a part of his development process but ultimately his main position is as a striker.
Haaland nor Greenwood won't be playing down the middle and from the left respectively because Martial and Rashford play in those areas. Greenwood right now as a young striker get game times through the left but he's first choice backup after Martial in that striker role when team rotate.
A scenario where there is Haaland and Greenwood and both come out of it alright having developed into top players isn't possible. All 3 front positions are already covered and Greenwood is the young striker already. Bringing in another young striker of similar age just doesn't make sense nor would help one of them.
Sure hope you are only talking about tonight...Better than Martial for me.