Martial | Di Marzio thinks he will stay

I am trying to convince myself that this is just tactic for better contract but in reality he just can't have future here . Future which he wants. Where he plays every week.
If we presume that alexis is now our first left winger, and that jose play his star players in most of games, what is left for martial?
1) left winger. Alexis is first option by far and will start most of games there. Jose tried him on no10 and right winger but after last few games i don't think so that ge will be moved from there. Rashford is there also( maybe now in front of martial). So he will play in league cup and sometimes last 10 minutes in PL. Those are minutes for some academy 18y old kid not him.
2) Striker. Lukaku plays. Every game, every minute. Again, few minor games maybe left for martial.
3) rw. He is lost there. And i think even jose does not see him there. Maybe he could try to fight for that position but there is mata, lingard, rashford so i doubt that martial would "risk" with staying and trying to fight for that position. And even then , his playing time would be reduced with sharing minutes with mata and lingard. Also, i don't see jose playing regularly with 3 strikers in team( alexis, lukaku, martial).
I will not go in "what IF" situations. What if jose decides to play with 2 strikers, injuries or something like that. I doubt that martial count on that also.

On the other hand, he can go in other (big) club and be starter in his favourite position. No brainer for him. Unfortunately. This is situation where for one position you don't have any decent player( right winger or left back) and for another position you have 3 excellent players. Just our fecking bad luck. Or bad planning....

If he cant get games on merit against mata rashford and sanchez than he's not a lost.

How can you say losing him is a big lost if he's 3rd in the pecking order
 
If this is the case, you can see it from Martial's perspective but at the same time you can see why he is not getting more games.

Sometimes managers might think that the best way to get the most out of the group is not the most obvious way.

At the weekend, in the second half against City, Lingard switching positions with Lukaku during different phases of play was really important. In a vaccum, Lingard is obviously nowhere near as good as Martial. However, with the intelligence he has and the position he takes up around other players, you can see why Mourinho started him at the Emptyhad. His running in the second half really helped bamboozle City, especially when we worked it wide.

Should Lingard be dropped because Martial wants more games? Some would say obviously because he's better. Still, from Jose's perspective, when it comes to getting the best of other players, does Lingard's movement mean more for helping to raise the overall level of the team? Martial's off the ball running is not very good. With the ball at his feet he's like a runaway train. When it comes to runs ahead of the ball though? Its arguable that Martial falls down on that. Especially relative to Lingard.

Sometimes playing the best players does not amount to creating the best team. This whole debate is very Gerrard and Lampard. At the time, despite the fact the two were great at what they did, it was obvious one of them should've been dropped to give the England midfield better balance. Just because Alexis and Martial are significantly better than our other attackers it doesn't mean they should both play. Even if Alexis did play wide right it's arguable that him and Martial playing together would condense the centre of the pitch too much, certainly neither runs the channels as well as Lingard.

If the crux of the issue is that Martial thinks, probably rightly, that he's better than most of our attacker and should therefore get more games then that's an issue. I wouldn't argue that he's not better than most of them. I'd argue that there is a logic in Jose thinking his team would be more balanced with only one of Alexis and Martial starting.
Good post.

The big problem is that Lukaku plays every game. Personally I think Martial has miles more potential than Lukaku, and offers far more threat against a good team, but that's the manager we have. If we end up sacrificing Martial for Lukaku, a limited player who wouldn't start for any other top side, that's madness, but we've made our bed with Mourinho.

Best-case scenario is that we insert a buy-back in Martial's transfer agreement and can buy him back in a couple of years when Mourinho walks. Or we use the remaining six games of the season to give him a run in the side and stop this nonsense.
 
Good post.

The big problem is that Lukaku plays every game. Personally I think Martial has miles more potential than Lukaku, and offers far more threat against a good team, but that's the manager we have. If we end up sacrificing Martial for Lukaku, a limited player who wouldn't start for any other top side, that's madness, but we've made our bed with Mourinho.

Best-case scenario is that we insert a buy-back in Martial's transfer agreement and can buy him back in a couple of years when Mourinho walks. Or we use the remaining six games of the season to give him a run in the side and stop this nonsense.

What an absurd post, Martial has at no point for club or country shown he has the potential to be a better striker than Lukaku who has proven himself across the board.

Some of you lot really do put too much value on fancy footwork. Martial is limited in many ways too.
 
If he cant get games on merit against mata rashford and sanchez than he's not a lost.

How can you say losing him is a big lost if he's 3rd in the pecking order

Exactly.

Let’s focus on Mata for a minute. The one player Jose wanted to sell supposedly before he even arrived. The one that was on his way out when Mikhi signed. Yet he has won myriad starts and earned a contract extension. You’re telling me hard work and attitude doesn’t pay off?
 
If he cant get games on merit against mata rashford and sanchez than he's not a lost.

How can you say losing him is a big lost if he's 3rd in the pecking order
Because i am his fanboy:wenger:. I just think that he is better than any our attacker. Maybe sanchez is better now but in two years he will be better. Again, it is my opinion.
 
What an absurd post, Martial has at no point for club or country shown he has the potential to be a better striker than Lukaku who has proven himself across the board.

Some of you lot really do put too much value on fancy footwork. Martial is limited in many ways too.
Potential-wise, I think he does. If he manages to nail his off-the-ball movement (one of the main things Lukaku has over him), there's every chance he'll become a very good striker. His technique is a level above Lukaku and he's physically at a good level too.
 
Potential-wise, I think he does. If he manages to nail his off-the-ball movement (one of the main things Lukaku has over him), there's every chance he'll become a very good striker. His technique is a level above Lukaku and he's physically at a good level too.

How many games have you seen Martial at CF to come up with this?

I mean, Lukaku is just 2 years old than Martial yet he has 100 Premier League goals & 35 PL assists ffs.

I really really like Martial, but some of the opinions in this thread are pure fantasy and actually end up frustrating me. There's tonnes of potential in Martial, but these "I think" opinions are beyond silly.
 
He is 22 years old. Why do people all of a sudden expect 20-23 year olds to play with the effectiveness of players entering their prime?


It’s not unusual for me to expect him to have cemented his place in the starting 11 by now, all I see is a player that has made next to no improvement since his debut for us. He seems to have a lazy attitude too which I don’t like.

quite frankly if he doesn’t want to stay and fight for his place then I have no issue with moving him on Especially if it can land us a much better player like Dybala or verratti.
 
Potential-wise, I think he does. If he manages to nail his off-the-ball movement (one of the main things Lukaku has over him), there's every chance he'll become a very good striker. His technique is a level above Lukaku and he's physically at a good level too.

If we are true to ourselves, he had a very good League and Cup campaign for a mid table premier club. It’s not world beater stuff. I may get lambasted for this but Lukaku has had better seasons with Everton and W Brom.
 
You have to give something. Wouldn't mind lower fee, but a buy-back option (don't think the club should look at it purely financially in this case either).



Eh? Because the new club could say we won't sell him? Because he can choose some other top club even if we pay gazillion pounds?
Because that's a terrible way to do business?!
A buy back makes terrible sense to the buying party. Doubt you can dictate terms to a player thats not even being played.
 
What an absurd post, Martial has at no point for club or country shown he has the potential to be a better striker than Lukaku who has proven himself across the board.

Some of you lot really do put too much value on fancy footwork. Martial is limited in many ways too.

I would have been nicer but you sure hit the right points. For the striker role, I will take Romelu over Martial everyday of the week. The Belgian is massively underrated in here. I guess his lack of fancy footwork will always plague him.
 
If we are true to ourselves, he had a very good League and Cup campaign for a mid table premier club. It’s not world beater stuff. I may get lambasted for this but Lukaku has had better seasons with Everton and W Brom.
5th (missing out on 4th through GD) is mid table?
 
Which is why I'm talking in terms of potential. Compare their individual qualities rather than stats.

Compare their individual qualities rather than real World evidence? Really?

If "individual qualities" were all it took, Quaresma would have spent the past decade as one of the best players in the World.
 
Potential-wise, I think he does. If he manages to nail his off-the-ball movement (one of the main things Lukaku has over him), there's every chance he'll become a very good striker. His technique is a level above Lukaku and he's physically at a good level too.

Lukaku is quicker, stronger, hungrier and has already developed a world class knack for scoring. Potential means little unless you apply yourself. From every indication, Lukaku is devoted to improving himself as a striker. Credit to him because at the moment, he is clearly one of the best strikers in world football. I need to see more from Martial. So far, he looks inconsistent and lacking in drive for me.
 
Compare their individual qualities rather than real World evidence? Really?

If "individual qualities" were all it took, Quaresma would have spent the past decade as one of the best players in the World.

Some are acting as if it's a video game where all that matters is doing fancy tricks and skills, along with goals and assists. It's all the stuff on the ball despite most of the game being off the ball.

You actually have some in here making it out that working hard on the pitch is actually a negative thing! It makes you a 'donkey' apparently. I grew up watching players more talented that Martial work twice as hard as him (ie Beckham).

The fact of the matter is, if you want to be a top team every player has to put a shift in. You have to press with intensity, make off the ball runs 100 times even if you don't get the ball once, track back to help your teammates, run forward to support your striker.

Martial is a nobody in the history of football; he isn't even the most talented youngster in the France team. You don't get to slack on the field unless you are GOAT level as a footballer. His footballing fundamentals are severely lacking and is why players like Lingard, Sanchez and Lukaku are favoured over him; they understand the game far better than him despite not being able to do the things he can do with the ball.
 
It can easily be argued Lukaku has shown more growth in one season with us than Martial has in what three seasons? I rate Martial highly, but potential means very little if you don't reach it.
 
Compare their individual qualities rather than real World evidence? Really?

If "individual qualities" were all it took, Quaresma would have spent the past decade as one of the best players in the World.
Martial hasn't been given much of a chance at CF for good comparisons with Lukaku at the same age to be made. Comparing his stats as a LW to Lukaku's as a CF is pointless.

Quaresma's mentality is what stopped him from becoming as good as people expected. I wouldn't say he and Martial are similar in that aspect. Either way, what became of Quaresma is irrelevant to Martial's potential. My point isn't that he's a sure thing, it's that if he can make full use of his talent, he can be a top striker.
 
It can easily be argued Lukaku has shown more growth in one season with us than Martial has in what three seasons? I rate Martial highly, but potential means very little if you don't reach it.

It's the fear that he realises his potential elsewhere and really turns into a world-beater. At which point we'd feel like total mugs for letting him go.

FWIW I don't think Jose is the coach to help him realise that potential. Martial needs a lot of coaching to bring his game to the next level, and attacking coaching just isn't something Jose is strong at or focuses on.
 
Good post.

The big problem is that Lukaku plays every game. Personally I think Martial has miles more potential than Lukaku, and offers far more threat against a good team, but that's the manager we have. If we end up sacrificing Martial for Lukaku, a limited player who wouldn't start for any other top side, that's madness, but we've made our bed with Mourinho.

Best-case scenario is that we insert a buy-back in Martial's transfer agreement and can buy him back in a couple of years when Mourinho walks. Or we use the remaining six games of the season to give him a run in the side and stop this nonsense.

:lol:

Lukaku will score 25+ goals every season, and you choose to call him "limited", why? Because Martial is better at doing tricks and flicks?

I love Martial and want him to stay, but give your head a wobble with posts like this.
 
Bit extreme perhaps but what was it 4, 7, 5, 6?
7, 4, 5, 6. Only the Moyes season, at a stretch, would be considered mid-table.
Lukaku is quicker, stronger, hungrier and has already developed a world class knack for scoring. Potential means little unless you apply yourself. From every indication, Lukaku is devoted to improving himself as a striker. Credit to him because at the moment, he is clearly one of the best strikers in world football. I need to see more from Martial. So far, he looks inconsistent and lacking in drive for me.
I don't doubt that he's physically more impressive, but that isn't all being a striker is about. Him being devoted to improving himself as a striker is helped by the fact that he's been able to gain experience playing there since he was a teen. I can bet that if, somewhere along his line of development (e.g. his time at West Brom and first two seasons at Everton), he had to play on the wings for three years in a row and model his game around being a winger, he wouldn't have reached the level he's at right now.
 
Contract negotiations, so enjoy the hype and over reactions on the Caf, as the media know there are fans who just live for this kind of thing. Personally find it all tedious and looking forward to the next game...
That's my thinking too, but reading through the thread it's making me nervous. Caf hype can have that affect on me tho....
 
:lol:

Lukaku will score 25+ goals every season, and you choose to call him "limited", why? Because Martial is better at doing tricks and flicks?

I love Martial and want him to stay, but give your head a wobble with posts like this.

I think Lukaku lacks finesse on the ball, he's a bit clumsy and his control lets him down sometimes. He makes up for this lack through his pace and physicality, but it does mean that he'll have problems with opponents who can match him physically.

Martial lacks intensity and off-the-ball movement, which IMO is easier to coach / enforce? Could be wrong. He has good finishing skills, good pace, and decent physicality, which, combined with his superior technique, gives him a higher ceiling than Lukaku I would think.
 
Compare their individual qualities rather than real World evidence? Really?

If "individual qualities" were all it took, Quaresma would have spent the past decade as one of the best players in the World.
And Mourinho even bought Quaresma for Inter. If Martial were good enough, he'd be playing. Jose knows top talent when he sees it.
 
Potential-wise, I think he does. If he manages to nail his off-the-ball movement (one of the main things Lukaku has over him), there's every chance he'll become a very good striker. His technique is a level above Lukaku and he's physically at a good level too.

When Lukaku was 22, he was flirting with being the top goal scorer in the EPL (alongside Kane).
Martial is not a prolific goal scorer, though he can dribble.
But dribbling does not win you matches...goals do.
I understand that you are fan of Martial, but he is not currently as good as you think.
 
I think Lukaku lacks finesse on the ball, he's a bit clumsy and his control lets him down sometimes. He makes up for this lack through his pace and physicality, but it does mean that he'll have problems with opponents who can match him physically.

Martial lacks intensity and off-the-ball movement, which IMO is easier to coach / enforce? Could be wrong. He has good finishing skills, good pace, and decent physicality, which, combined with his superior technique, gives him a higher ceiling than Lukaku I would think.

Lacking finesse and being limited are too different things. Lukaku is a complete striker, and scored a ton of goals which is his job.
It’s not his job to be tricky with the ball, sure it would be nice to have, but it doesn’t limit his ability.

Besides, potential is just that. Ask any body who watched our academy and Ravel Morrison had more potential than Pogba, but what has he done with it?
 
:lol:

Lukaku will score 25+ goals every season, and you choose to call him "limited", why? Because Martial is better at doing tricks and flicks?

I love Martial and want him to stay, but give your head a wobble with posts like this.

The funniest part is that it is completely the opposite of reality.

Martial is a massively limited player; 90% of his game is dribbling and end product. It's like all he does in training is shooting and dribbling practice.

If you want a player to make a good youtube compilation, Martial is your guy. If you want a player to run the team or elevate the attack to a higher level you'll want someone else.

Looking at a few examples:

Martial 2017/18 PL : 0.93 G/A per 90 mins
Hazard 2014/15 PL : 0.61 G/A per 90 mins
Mahrez 2015/16 PL : 0.83 G/A per 90 mins
Hazard 2016/17 PL : 0.63 G/A per 90 mins

According to some on here, because Martial has better goals + assists stats he's a 'better' wide attacker than Hazard and Mahrez in those seasons. The reality is that Hazard and Mahrez in their title winning seasons added a whole new dimension to their team. Both Hazard and Mahrez were fantastic playmakers, while also being very good at stretching the pitch by going wide, while also having good end product.
 
And Mourinho even bought Quaresma for Inter. If Martial were good enough, he'd be playing. Jose knows top talent when he sees it.

Indeed.
If he feels that Martial can help him win games (and more importantly, trophies), then he'll play him.
In the MCFC game, when Pogba was allegedly flirting with (joining) MCFC, Jose picked him to be in our midfield. He could've benched him, but because he wanted to win the match, he picked Pogba.
 
When Lukaku was 22, he was flirting with being the top goal scorer in the EPL (alongside Kane).
Martial is not a prolific goal scorer, though he can dribble.
But dribbling does not win you matches...goals do.
I understand that you are fan of Martial, but he is not currently as good as you think.
Was he 22 in the 15/16 season? I'll go off that:

In the prem, he had 18+7 goals and assists in 3174 minutes that season. That's a goal or assist every 127 minutes. This season, at 22, Martial has 9+5 goals and assists in 1344 minutes. That's a goal or assist every 96, from the left wing mainly. That's without Martial being the main man, as Lukaku was at Everton. During Martial's debut, at 19, he managed 11+4 goals and assists in 2632 minutes. That's a goal or assist every 175 minutes from the wing.

Martial's been in better teams, but there isn't a massive difference in output.
 
The funniest part is that it is completely the opposite of reality.

Martial is a massively limited player; 90% of his game is dribbling and end product. It's like all he does in training is shooting and dribbling practice.

If you want a player to make a good youtube compilation, Martial is your guy. If you want a player to run the team or elevate the attack to a higher level you'll want someone else.

Looking at a few examples:

Martial 2017/18 PL : 0.93 G/A per 90 mins
Hazard 2014/15 PL : 0.61 G/A per 90 mins
Mahrez 2015/16 PL : 0.83 G/A per 90 mins
Hazard 2016/17 PL : 0.63 G/A per 90 mins

According to some on here, because Martial has better goals + assists stats he's a 'better' wide attacker than Hazard and Mahrez in those seasons. The reality is that Hazard and Mahrez in their title winning seasons added a whole new dimension to their team. Both Hazard and Mahrez were fantastic playmakers, while also being very good at stretching the pitch by going wide, while also having good end product.

Oh yeah he’s massively inconsistent.
People are forgetting that he was dropped for most of last season because of his inconsistent form. It looked like he picked up form before Sanchez came unfortunately, but no player is bigger than the club.

I don’t think he has the mentality for us to build our attack around right now.
When he’s on song he can be unstoppable, but if he’s not in the mood, then nothing he does comes off.
I believe he will grow and have more of an impact as time goes on, but understandably he wants to play more regularly now.
 
So RMC say he will reject contract offer. He’s unhappy re playing time.

IF this is true, how do you guys have so much time for him. Always seems to have a need to be wrapped in cotton wool. Even with all the talent in the world, this childish mental attitude (re his off-field problems, sulking etc) is hindering him IMHO.

Edit
United have offered Anthony Martial a five-year contract but he is refusing to sign it until he is told he will play more often. #mufc [Times]

Martial has rejected a new 5 year contract & wants to leave United due to lack of playing time. [rmc]
 
So RMC say he will reject contract offer. He’s unhappy re playing time.

IF this is true, how do you guys have so much time for him. Always seems to have a need to be wrapped in cotton wool. Even with all the talent in the world, this childish mental attitude (re his off-field problems, sulking etc) is hindering him IMHO.

Edit
United have offered Anthony Martial a five-year contract but he is refusing to sign it until he is told he will play more often. #mufc [Times]

Martial has rejected a new 5 year contract & wants to leave United due to lack of playing time. [rmc]
I think you need to copy and paste that into more threads. Two isn't enough IMO.
 
What an absurd post, Martial has at no point for club or country shown he has the potential to be a better striker than Lukaku who has proven himself across the board.

Some of you lot really do put too much value on fancy footwork. Martial is limited in many ways too.
How is it absurd? Surely martial has shown potential with all the goals he's scored? Plus he's had zero chances up front this season, apart from at Everton - where he scored and we played some of our best football of the season.

Lukaku has also failed on multiple occasions against top sides. How has he proven himself across the board? There are still huge question marks against him.

But who needs facts and reality when you can release your real-world frustrations with sweeping, aggressive posts on an internet forum eh?
 
Lacking finesse and being limited are too different things. Lukaku is a complete striker, and scored a ton of goals which is his job.
It’s not his job to be tricky with the ball, sure it would be nice to have, but it doesn’t limit his ability.

Besides, potential is just that. Ask any body who watched our academy and Ravel Morrison had more potential than Pogba, but what has he done with it?

Sorry I don't know if I'm expressing myself properly, but what I meant is that Lukaku is limited in his technical ability, which especially shows in his inconsistent (though improving) ball control, and which IMO makes it less likely that he'll become a truly complete, elite striker. It's not his job to be tricky with the ball, but having that in his arsenal would mean he has more options to beat different kinds of opponents, for example.

Martial on the other hand has better technical ability, which IMO means that, if both realised their full potential, Martial would be the superior striker. But as your second point says, potential is just potential. I think there's just the fear that he goes on to become a world-beater for someone else.

Also agree with your other post that Martial now is a moments player - unstoppable at times, capable of producing decisive moments, but too often just allowing the majority of the game to pass him by. He needs a coach to take his game to the next level, and I don't know if Jose is the one to do it.