Martial | Di Marzio thinks he will stay

On what evidence do you base Rashford/Martial better for us in the long run, compared to two established Premier League attackers who have proven themselves at the highest level, at other clubs too?
He's basing it on a dream that Rashford and Martial will someday be world beaters.:)
 
Are you serious. He was doing really well before the new year,4 or 5 goals a few assists and then he gets dropped because Sanchez comes who has been pathetic since he came. Jose has a rep for doimg this. Remember salah was 22 when Jose shunted him out of Chelsea, look at him now. Kdb can't have been much different in age.
Ill ask this of you since nobody else answered me..
Any other names? He's been a manager for 15 years, the list of Martials must be as long as your arm if this is typical Jose..
 
If I was manager Sanchez would be playing on the right, since it was RW where we had a pressing need, and if the manager didn't think Sanchez could play on the right he shouldn't have signed him.

What if Mourinho's answer is that Sanchez wouldn't fit that well on the right in our system? You answer is now, "we shouldn't have signed Sanchez". Im sorry, but he is much better than Martial and there are questions on what level Martial will reach anyway. We 100% should have signed Sanchez. Martial is not Neymar or Ronaldo, and will never reach that level. If he did have that level of talent, it's a different story. Sanchez signing was 100% correct.
 
I agree with you there. The player should not be telling him where he should play. Also what was the motive for buying, I would presume to stop City getting him.
Because Sanchez is a better player available on a swap deal?
Should we not sign better players now?
 
Any highly rated youngster will cost a fortune and I doubt united have skilled enough scouts now-a-days to find a hidden gem. When was the last time we did?

We signed Martial for 50 million. You realise we could do something similar in the coming years?
 
What if Mourinho's answer is that Sanchez wouldn't fit that well on the right in our system? You answer is now, "we shouldn't have signed Sanchez". Im sorry, but he is much better than Martial and there are questions on what level Martial will reach anyway. We 100% should have signed Sanchez. Martial is not Neymar or Ronaldo, and will never reach that level. If he did have that level of talent, it's a different story. Sanchez signing was 100% correct.
Why wouldn't he fit on the right? That's exactly where was for our first goal against City. Playing with the freedom Mata and Lingard get, there wouldn't really be an issue.
 
Would definitely get rid of both lingard and Mata before Martial. Rashford isnt a long term wide player, martial is definitely more natural out there. Rashford is more of a forward playing out wide. He should be rotating or playing alongside Lukaku more (or martial doing that if rashford is back up left Winger). Imo, we dont really need #10's with how squad is shaped. Certainly not 2 who do a job on the right at best. So I would sooner bet rid of both lingard and Mata, get a proper right winger like Bailey, in and that be that.

I think the biggest problem with all this is how Mourinho sees his strikers. He never rotates them. Never subs them. Never moves them around or changes to go 2 up top. So lukaku plays almost every single game and the entire game, leaving no room for a back up striker. Rashford or martial or both would get loads of playing time if Mourinho had more flexibility in how he used his attack, but he doesnt, so there's only space for one.

Lingard has been a favourite of Jose and has had and excellent season. Mata might still be sold this summer.
 
I’m devastated if the news is true. Martial is easily my favourite player, that LVG season was incredible. He’s had a decent season this season too. I don’t think he’ll hit the heights of say Ronaldo, but more a Ribery level.

He’ll be world class elsewhere. I can see him going Juventus, I think it’d be a good move for him. I seriously hope we use him to get someone like Dybala from Juve or something.

I think signing Sánchez always caused this issue, and as good as Sánchez is, I think the club has looked too short term for this. Martial was performing well, and whilst Sánchez is world class, how long will he perform at a high level? Martial, whilst may never perform as well as Sánchez, could still produce good numbers and provide magic with his dribbling. I’ve backed Mourinho but if we lose Martial this summer, questions will be asked.
 
What if Mourinho's answer is that Sanchez wouldn't fit that well on the right in our system? You answer is now, "we shouldn't have signed Sanchez". Im sorry, but he is much better than Martial and there are questions on what level Martial will reach anyway. We 100% should have signed Sanchez. Martial is not Neymar or Ronaldo, and will never reach that level. If he did have that level of talent, it's a different story. Sanchez signing was 100% correct.

1. I would 1 question the logic of that and the system, given that our world record signing cannot seem to fit into said system as well I would question whether he has the right system for the squad.

2. If we wanted to sign Sanchez and he didn't think he could play on the right (even though he has played over half his career there) then I would question him also

3. Lets say all that was fine though, did United have a problem with the left side of the attack? NO! We have major issues and still do with the lack of balance on the RW we didn't NEED to sign Sanchez, especially when someone like Bale could be available in the summer.

Also FUTURE planning. The notion that we NEEDED to sign Sanchez and it was 100% right to do so, as if there is no other top class attacker we could sign which maybe would have actually solved a problem we had in the side, problems we STILL clearly have is a nonsense.
 
Why wouldn't he fit on the right? That's exactly where was for our first goal against City. Playing with the freedom Mata and Lingard get, there wouldn't really be an issue.

Right, so just stick Sanchez on the right and play Martial on the left. Seems a very simple fix. So simple that Mourinho is probably aware of it and isn't doing it for a reason. Much like he was reluctant to play Rashford and Martial on either wing.
 
I'd sell Martial to Juve, PSG, Atleti as long as we get one of their players in return.

Obviously Mbappe would be amazing but thats never happening so no point in dreaming.

I would however take Rabiot, Verratti from PSG.

Koke will never leave Atleti and Griezmann looks to be on his way to Barca. So Saul and/or Gimenez would be great.

From Juve, I'd love Dybala and/or Sandro.

If Martial is to leave, I hope it's not for nothing and we can get one of those players in return.
No way we are getting any of Rabiot, Veratti or Dybala for Martial. Veratti is probably worth three times what Martial is.
 
I am glad we signed him, but if City hadn't gone in not sure we would have either.
We'd have waited for the summer and got him on a free then?
City have signed a lot of players that we haven't tried to highjack.
I like Martial, but if the choices are Sanchez on the left with a Martial funded Sandro behind or Martial with a cheaper Danny Rose (I cant think of an example) then its option 1 for me.
Saying that, it seems this is on the player and not Jose so who knows if funds are even a factor.
 
1. I would 1 question the logic of that and the system, given that our world record signing cannot seem to fit into said system as well I would question whether he has the right system for the squad.

2. If we wanted to sign Sanchez and he didn't think he could play on the right (even though he has played over half his career there) then I would question him also

3. Lets say all that was fine though, did United have a problem with the left side of the attack? NO! We have major issues and still do with the lack of balance on the RW we didn't NEED to sign Sanchez, especially when someone like Bale could be available in the summer.

Also FUTURE planning. The notion that we NEEDED to sign Sanchez and it was 100% right to do so, as if there is no other top class attacker we could sign which maybe would have actually solved a problem we had in the side, problems we STILL clearly have is a nonsense.

A world class player became available so we signed him. With considerations to our transfer budget, it was a fantastic deal. We signed a world class forward and still have our budget to sign the CM's and fullbacks we need. We could sell Martial and sign a RW as well, who knows. Sanchez > Martial. Rashford for the future.
 
It's almost a given at this point that this will be another Mourinho speciality like Salah, De Bruyne and Lukaku.
 
A world class player became available so we signed him. With considerations to our transfer budget, it was a fantastic deal. We signed a world class forward and still have our budget to sign the CM's and fullbacks we need. We could sell Martial and sign a RW as well, who knows. Sanchez > Martial. Rashford for the future.

I seriously don't rate this guy as a top talent at LW
 
Still not too bothered as I dont rate martial as highly as others. He should’ve established himself as a starter by now.

If we can use him as a makeweight for someone else a (Dybala/Veratti type) then I’m all for it.
 
A bad mistake this. Hope United know he should be sold abroad. Would be worst selling him to another PL club.
Imagine alienating one of our most talented young players. Fecking crap
 
Martial was in form before he was benched for Sanchez who has been largely average. Shaw was benched for Ashley Young despite having performed decently but this decision is still understandable as young has been consistently good. Fellaini was preferred in the CL despite Mc Tominay playing very well for games prior the Sevilla game. Mikhi was alowed to stink out the place for months before he was let go yet Martial and Rashford get benched for 1 bad game. Mourinho has consistently trusted older players to play themselves into form and has not afforded the same luxury to younger players.
For the short term I would say all these decisions can be justified but unfortunately that is the problem with manager and the club, no long term thinking. Jose would rather have couple of years of Sanchez's service than go through the pain of coaching Martial to his potential for the next 10 years as Jose is not going to be here that long. This policy is going to be applied to all of our youngsters. Jose would have upgraded De Gea straight away if he was managing him in his 1st two years at United due to the mistakes he was making and I am sure Mourinho's fans would have justified that as well.
It is justified. Proven players will get preference because they are just that, proven. You already know what they are capable of. With youngsters you are taking too big of a risk.
 
Right, so just stick Sanchez on the right and play Martial on the left. Seems a very simple fix. So simple that Mourinho is probably aware of it and isn't doing it for a reason. Much like he was reluctant to play Rashford and Martial on either wing.
Took him a while to finally play Pogba in a three as well, to be fair.
 
Are you serious. He was doing really well before the new year,4 or 5 goals a few assists and then he gets dropped because Sanchez comes who has been pathetic since he came. Jose has a rep for doimg this. Remember salah was 22 when Jose shunted him out of Chelsea, look at him now. Kdb can't have been much different in age.

Remember how great Salah was at Chelsea? That’s because he wasn’t very good. Then it took him a season on loan at Fiorentina and another 2 seasons at Roma before he reached his potential. Any Chelsea manager doesn’t have 3 years to allow a player to reach his potential.
 
Yes and then Lukaku, I think it would have been ok if the left was left for them, but then we signed Sanchez. That is 3 blows and enough for any player to look at it and think the manager just doesn't have faith in me


EDIT: In all honest I feel like we should be playing a 2 striker system and rotating the two of them with Lukaku, and should have done the same with Ibra
So signing Lukaku and Zlatan, two of the best strikers in the world was a mistake because an unproven kid should have played instead. Right.
 
Hate to think that if he leaves, he might have a better career. Some players are just not suited to Jose's football style and management.
Shame that Jose has so much say in our transfers. Maybe a dof would help.

Begging fellaini to stay while freezing martial on the bench :wenger:
 
If we absolutely have to get rid of one of our three left-sided wide forwards then Rashford is the obvious choice. He's the least talented of the three by a distance.

It would be lunacy to let Martial go.
I agree. But it's Martial who isn't happy not being a starter and wants to leave, not Rashford. That's the problem.
 
Do we believe those reports or not? As I understand there are both reports he want to go and he wants to stay.
 
We signed Martial for 50 million. You realise we could do something similar in the coming years?
In the coming years? I hope it’s sooner than that mate.

What’s your point anyway? I’m asking when we last signed a hidden gem. £50m is not a hidden gem.
 
In the coming years? I hope it’s sooner than that mate.

What’s your point anyway? I’m asking when we last signed a hidden gem. £50m is not a hidden gem.

Why do we need to sign a hidden gem?
 
So signing Lukaku and Zlatan, two of the best strikers in the world was a mistake because an unproven kid should have played instead. Right.

Is your post on crack? What a nonsense post.

Martial is an unproven kid?

Buying a decent right winger, and full backs would have been sufficient along with matic this season and martial would have excelled as a striker.

Unproven :lol:
 
He's 22 y.o. Beckham, Scholes, Xavi, Iniesta, Zidane &, Del Piero all were still a novice at that age. i think people have watched too much Messi or Ronaldo and think every players at that age shouldve start in the starting IX at a big club. If Martial doesnt want to wait & learn his trade, i can only say good bye and good luck. Can't see United sell him to another PL clubs or for cheap though, so his options will be pretty limited.
 
Is your post on crack? What a nonsense post.

Martial is an unproven kid?

Buying a decent right winger, and full backs would have been sufficient along with matic this season and martial would have excelled as a striker.

Unproven :lol:
So you'd go into the season with just Martial as a striker?
 
No way we are getting any of Rabiot, Veratti or Dybala for Martial. Veratti is probably worth three times what Martial is.

There is talk of PSG willing to let Verratti go. And it would obviously be cash + Martial type deal. Anyway, it's all pointless speculation in my head right now anyway. :lol:
 
It was clear as a day. He is not even first sub anymore. He knows he will be reduced to 10 mins per game and some smaller game.
He will be our de bruyne
 
Last season his agent was sounding off about Seville, and now this. "Play me or I'm gone" appears to be the attitude. F*ck 'im then. With a bit of luck some of his rabid fanclub will go with him.
 
Be fuming if he left, he will given a run of games be fantastic. He showed that earlier this season where he was starting a bunch of games and was one of our best players. At the very minimum and if he were to go, I hope he signs a new deal just so we can get a mega fee because losing him on the cheap in this market is criminal
 
We signed Martial for 50 million. You realise we could do something similar in the coming years?

Only to sell the player again
So you'd go into the season with just Martial as a striker?

Rashford, Martial and Zlatan.

Zlatan had signed an extension and would have been a backup. Lukaku has not been a bad buy and is showing a lot of promise but we had mata and lingard as cover for the left side, a new right winger with good full backs would have suited united better.