JefferiesTube
New Member
- Joined
- May 28, 2014
- Messages
- 1,452
Are we still talking about football?Its related to how he receives the ball. His body shape and first touch. Its known as "receiving with a positive touch". He is very good at it.
Are we still talking about football?Its related to how he receives the ball. His body shape and first touch. Its known as "receiving with a positive touch". He is very good at it.
Because you cannot live in a world where Kompany is overrated defender? All the poor games he has, all the mistakes, they are all irrelevant because he is called Kompany and plays for City?Using the website used for those stats, Evra & Rafael both had > 7 in ratings. Whatever way they calculate their stats, seeing that, allied with the fact Fellaini is above Kompany in the ratings, amongst others. No, just, no.
Kompany is a top notch defender. He makes mistakes, as do many other players, but he does a whole pile of right too. Fellaini on the other hand, makes mistake after mistake, and doesn't do a lot right, and that which he does is just a simple ball here and there. I live in a world where I base players abilities and performances on what I see <edit, wrote read initially>, not on arbitrary numbers I see on some website. And from what I have seen this season, Kompany was far, far better than Fellaini.Because you cannot live in a world where Kompany is overrated defender? All the poor games he has, all the mistakes, they are all irrelevant because he is called Kompany and plays for City?
I agree, see it very often, not just during talk about United and football eitherStats are a bit pointless, really. Not completely, but a bit. In my opinion.
That said, they can sometimes be used to counter positively erroneous impressions of how a given player performed on the day - if you have it in for someone (both Cleverley and Fellaini strike me as players many simply don't care for), you tend to forget about everything they did beyond those moments which confirmed your own prejudice. It's human nature, as they say.
Fellaini wasn't good. But who was? De Gea, to an extent Rooney, Adnan should get a mention too - but the team as a whole were horribly under par. And Fellaini got zero credit - from many of our fans - for whatever he did which wasn't shite.
Any answer to my question? Do you think Kompany had a better season, in all honesty, than Fellaini? To an extent I agree with the post you're agreeing with here (too lazy to re-quote) but maybe there is a reason that people don't care for those 2, simply that they're not up to scratch as first team regulars for United. Ince, Keane, Robson, Scholes ... that is the quality of midfielder we should aspire to.I agree, see it very often, not just during talk about United and football either
Manchester United will listen to offers for midfielder Marouane Fellaini and are prepared to offload the 26-year-old for £15m having bought him for £27.5m last summer under former boss David Moyes. Times (subscription required)
I doubt it's true, plus it would be completely ridiculous to sell him at this stage.
People have been doing their nut in over paying 4m extra for him. Losing anywhere up to 75% (as some would get rid that badly) on that fee by selling him now seems to be an even dumber move. But I can't keep track of what fans want anymore, it's become ridiculous.Why?
People have been doing their nut in over paying 4m extra for him. Losing anywhere up to 75% (as some would get rid that badly) on that fee by selling him now seems to be an even dumber move. But I can't keep track of what fans want anymore, it's become ridiculous.
Well, it's merely speculation at this point. I can't see LVG not trying him somewhere at least.So we should keep him and watch his value fall further? If he isn't part of LvG's plans what is the point in keeping him?
Well, it's merely speculation at this point. I can't see LVG not trying him somewhere at least.
He plays a more attacking and free role for them though, not too much reliance on him defensively. We have much better players in attacking positions for him so he just doesn't fit in, at all, because he isn't a good defensive midfielder. It's always been the case with him.I do wonder that if we go for Strootman in the summer, until he is fit (october-November by all counts) Felaini keeps his place on the pitch warm. Despite his often poor performances for us, he's often selected in central midfield for Belguim ahead of some decent competition (Dembele as example).
12.5 million is probably a fair price, for a club that's desperate we might get 15m if we are lucky
He plays a more attacking and free role for them though, not too much reliance on him defensively. We have much better players in attacking positions for him so he just doesn't fit in, at all, because he isn't a good defensive midfielder. It's always been the case with him.
I've only seen them a handful of times but he's always supporting attacking positions and playing as the advanced one of the three, at least whenever I see them. A belgian poster could obviously give a better opinion, but that's what it seems like to me when I see him. The Belgian manager also did say that we were using him wrong this season in restricting him as a defensive midfielder or whatever.Isn't he the most withdrawn in a midfield three of Winstel and Defour? Or is Defour the anchor most of the time?
I've only seen them a handful of times but he's always supporting attacking positions and playing as the advanced one of the three, at least whenever I see them. A belgian poster could obviously give a better opinion, but that's what it seems like to me when I see him. The Belgian manager also did say that we were using him wrong this season in restricting him as a defensive midfielder or whatever.
He's just not very good I think.
When choosing a Belgium team Dembele should be 1st midfielder on the team sheet.Isn't he the most withdrawn in a midfield three of Winstel and Defour? Or is Defour the anchor most of the time?
When choosing a Belgium team Dembele should be 1st midfielder on the team sheet.
What we paid for him shouldn't influence our decision to sell or keep him- it's a sunk cost.
Whether LVG is not going to use him is speculation at this point. The facts are that plonkers on the caf have gone off their onion over the 4m that we 'overpaid needlessly' for. Standing to lose half of the entire fee if we sold him in this window is ridiculous and anyone advocating that has rocks in their heads. He'd be much better served playing through the life of his contract than to cut and run at this point in time. If we recovered nearly the entire fee for him then fair fecks and we move on.Of course it's speculation but you speculated that if it's true it's totally ridiculous to sell him. I'm speculating that if it's true it's not ridiculous at all and we are best off cashing in now rather than letting his value slide further by rotting out of favour.
Whether LVG is not going to use him is speculation at this point. The facts are that plonkers on the caf have gone off their onion over the 4m that we 'overpaid needlessly' for. Standing to lose half of the entire fee if we sold him in this window is ridiculous and anyone advocating that has rocks in their heads. He'd be much better served playing through the life of his contract than to cut and run at this point in time. If we recovered nearly the entire fee for him then fair fecks and we move on.
In reality away from the lunacy of the Caf, he's not that bad a player and deserves a second chance. Certainly not so bad that he should be scratched from the side at a heavy loss. I don't think any player is really worth that to a club like United. You'd have to go back to Veron to really see the last player that we didn't fully give a chance to, even then we recovered a fair amount of the fee.
15 million is about what Fellaini playing at his very, very best is worth. Fellaini playing at his very, very best is not the calibre of player that United should be aiming for, so even at his best, he shouldn't be making the team. Thus, if we manage to get an offer of 15 million for him, we should absolutely snatch it and run.Whether LVG is not going to use him is speculation at this point. The facts are that plonkers on the caf have gone off their onion over the 4m that we 'overpaid needlessly' for. Standing to lose half of the entire fee if we sold him in this window is ridiculous and anyone advocating that has rocks in their heads. He'd be much better served playing through the life of his contract than to cut and run at this point in time. If we recovered nearly the entire fee for him then fair fecks and we move on.
In reality away from the lunacy of the Caf, he's not that bad a player and deserves a second chance. Certainly not so bad that he should be scratched from the side at a heavy loss. I don't think any player is really worth that to a club like United. You'd have to go back to Veron to really see the last player that we didn't fully give a chance to, even then we recovered a fair amount of the fee.
I really should have read this reply before writing my own, because this is quite simply spot on.I disagree completely. Your logic is flawed.
We "overpaid by £4m" which firstly is incorrect. Because Moyes dithered and fecked around we overpaid by about £10m instead of over paying by £6m.
Now we can either have a player that is never going to make it here sitting on the payroll with his value dwindling away further or we can be proactive and cut our losses and get the inevitable over and done with and recoup some of the fee back. Just like we should have done with Anderson 4 or 5 years ago.
The guy is absolute garbage and doesn't have a future here. £15m back would be great business for us. The damage was done last summer, it's recovery time.
$Xm, I don't really care how much. The point is that some fans have done their nut in over that particular tidbit about his transfer but are happy to essentially throw away what he is worth to move him on and make a heavy loss? How is that flawed logic, seems pretty stupid to just throw away money like that. (Logically speaking of course, like I have said, it's not my money so I don't really care what happens).I disagree completely. Your logic is flawed.
We "overpaid by £4m" which firstly is incorrect. Because Moyes dithered and fecked around we overpaid by about £10m instead of over paying by £6m.
Players aren't a black and white trade resource like that. This club is notorious for showing loyalty to players in certain situations. There is a whole strong of players in the last 10 years to support that, which is why cutting a loss isn't in the United playbook, which is also why I can't perceive it as the logical thing to do for the club. But that is my opinion and we can disagree, of course.Now we can either have a player that is never going to make it here sitting on the payroll with his value dwindling away further or we can be proactive and cut our losses and get the inevitable over and done with and recoup some of the fee back. Just like we should have done with Anderson 4 or 5 years ago.
Says some bloke on a forum. Logically speaking just writing off a 15m dollar loss or staying loyal to a signing through the life of his contract is a dice roll that we won't be making. I know which is the better option. 'Its recovery time', or 'loyalty to the player' to turn it around because 'he's so shit' that the only way to go from here is up? Isn't it?..The guy is absolute garbage and doesn't have a future here. £15m back would be great business for us. The damage was done last summer, it's recovery time.