Picking out what suits my argument? We can discuss this but do not shy away from the point.
You stated he has had 1 good season in 4. You then disregarded last season because the function he performed wasn't of a defensive midfielder yet you used this in your assessment of 4 seasons.
I didn't mention Kevin Nolan at any point. So I'm not sure why you are addressing an imaginary point, I'm aware he has been mentioned in this thread but he has not been mentioned by me. Then you go on to say "sorry if you don't like it" yet at zero point did I even mentioned Nolan!!
You aren't very good at debating, you cannot reply to my post by discrediting a point made by another poster when it has nothing to do with mine!
My point is this, you assessed Fellaini's 4 seasons and said he had only 1 good season, you went on to discredit last season on the virtue he was not playing defensive midfield yet still included it into the 4 season assessment thus inferring last season was a bad season by the very fact he did not play in his preferred position!
"Said", I used the term "infer" therefore look it up in a dictionary if you are not sure of its meaning. Ironically you are not reading my post properly, either that or you assumed the term "infer" means "said".
You are again refusing to acknowledge the point of our discussion. You are talking about things that have nothing to do with the discussion indicating your point was invalid, otherwise you would address it directly.
Oh, you do understand the meaning of infer! However you can't see it though?
(Clearly Shamwow was inferring last season he did well in terms of the function asked of him).
You inferred last season wasn't as shamwow put it "pretty good right" because he didn't do what he did from defensive midfield. It is most ridiculous to state he had only 1 good season in 4 yet not assess him last season in relation to his performed function if you are going to include that season in your assessment.
The non-bolded bit has nothing to do with anything I've said so it's random waffle and not addressing the points of discussion.
The bolded bit shows you need to read a little more accurately, this is something you read before the reply:
So either you have not read my post accurately. Or you have interpreted not being a Fellaini fan as the standard of player I want at the club. Bobby logic would suggest because I am a Vidal fan, I do not want him at the club. Because I am not a fan of tiote, I do want him at the club.
You asked me to show you videos of several times where he has under performed. I merely posted comments from four years ago that surprised me however such was your dislike of posting a video where he was scoring goals you demanded a video (that doesn't exist) where he has scored for United and where he under performed against City. You automatically assumed with your response I was trying to paint Fellaini is a positive light despite showing a video from 4 years ago!!
You are very bad at debating. Comments such as these have no place in discussion, the fool will resort to insults such as yours. Often when he has no argument left.
You once more miss the point, I posted a video of Fellaini and comments associated with it. I think everybody disagrees with the comments making him out to be the next Vieira or the best defensive midfielder in the league or the greatest Belgium of all time, you were however the only one that got very defensive and started demanding to see videos that didn't exist instead of talking about reasons for the viewpoint so long ago.
Did you see the comments?
It is far more plausible to expect a sane man to post comments, making Fellaini out to be some Patrick Vieira, as him portraying his surprise at the comments as opposed to honestly believing Fellaini has that ability! Furthermore, the video was of only goals! Yet you think it was some kind of endorsement of his ability as the best midfielder in the premier league?
Furthermore you stated to 'back up your argument' but there was no argument!!! It was a random post. You could not see why else I would do that because you seem to be on a crusade to spread hatred towards Fellaini otherwise you would have seen the post for what it was, your judgement is clouded by emotion.
I even stated I am not a Fellaini fan. Bobby logic however, not a Fellaini fan therefore posting video to show how good Fellaini is...
Understand this, when I use the term "Bobby logic", it is not mean't as an insult. It is merely showing the logic you have portrayed, for example:
I made it clear I was not a Fellaini fan prior to this post in response to you.
You knew this yet you stated "if that's the standard of player you want at the club", therefore despite knowing I am not a fan of Fellaini, you thought he was the standard of player I wanted at this club where it should have been obvious that is not my opinion.