elmo
Can never have too many Eevees
The sooner we move on from him, the better. He has more PR articles in a week than he has decent performances in an entire season.
Still easily our fastest player. The problems are decision making, not improving weaker areas of his game particularly using his running power to press and chase loose balls and his best position in the past, left wing not being used in our new formation.
For me he should be rotated in as our #9 to give Hojlund breaks and depending on who is scoring. I do see a potential future where he's starting up front for us and scoring lots of goals. But he can work on the pressing, hold up play and off the ball running until he looks like scoring every game and starting because of it.
Let me ask my you (as a Rashford fan), what do you make of his work rate on the pitch with regards to both tracking back and making runs?I'm not going to slander anyone posting on this thread by noting how similar it is in here right now to what's going on at the cesspool that is the reddveils subreddit.
I'm just going to say that I love Rashy and I always will regardless of what comes in the. next few months. Rashy's a proper Red and he loves this club more, and understands it on a deeper level, than every single cretin having a go at his character/intelligence/what ever else. Until the day he signs for another club I will hope that he finds his form once more and starts banging in goals for his boyhood club. Regardless, his is a success story of the highest order.
Saying he should be a rotation player earning over 300k a week gives more reason for him to be sold. He simply isn't worth his salary now.
His hold up play is trash and he can’t press from the front. Why do you want our strike force to be so rubbish? Do we just accept being a Europa league team then?It'll cost a huge amount more to replace him. 33 times as much in fact.
Rashford is someone who could play up front and score lots of goals for us and compete with Hojlund, you're looking at probably £40-50 million at least on a new player who can compete and score goals like Rashford has shown he can. Then the wages on top. Rashford's 4 years on 300k which would be just over £1.2 million as its 4 years and then into then summer. Very small in comparison
His hold up play is trash and he can’t press from the front. Why do you want our strike force to be so rubbish? Do we just accept being a Europa league team then?
Ah can he also be the next great dribbling genius but just isn’t? 8 years and the bloke is still terrible off the ball. How many years before we accept who is and isn’t?He can press from the front, he just isnt. I
He’s a terrible centre forward. Can’t hold the ball up, can’t win duels and can’t judge the flight of the ball. Yet you want him as the alternative to an inexperienced striker to ensure we continue to score 65 goals a league season forever. Nicking a goal now and then simply ain’t worth it for all his flaws. He’s not prolific ffs.I want our strike force to be good, thats why I want someone who has proven they'll score goals to compete with Hojlund.
Ah can he also be the next great dribbling genius but just isn’t? 8 years and the bloke is still terrible off the ball. How many years before we accept who is and isn’t?
He’s a terrible centre forward. Can’t hold the ball up, can’t win duels and can’t judge the flight of the ball. Yet you want him as the alternative to an inexperienced striker to ensure we continue to score 65 goals a league season forever. Nicking a goal now and then simply ain’t worth it for all his flaws. He’s not prolific ffs.
He's a player who scored 30 goals and had 9 assists in a season. Obviously he can do better than he is currently doing and a manager can help him become a better player
I wonder how long we are going to be talking about that season. Also this is a manager that could have helped him but a month into the new regime, HE has downed his tools not the manager.He's a player who scored 30 goals and had 9 assists in a season. Obviously he can do better than he is currently doing and a manager can help him become a better player
Martial also had a 30 goal season didn’t he, or thereabouts? Get him back too. De Gea can replace Onana given he’s our best post SAF player. Stick with mediocrity till it comes good I say.He's a player who scored 30 goals and had 9 assists in a season. Obviously he can do better than he is currently doing and a manager can help him become a better player
Martial also had a 30 goal season didn’t he, or thereabouts? Get him back too. De Gea can replace Onana given he’s our best post SAF player. Stick with mediocrity till it comes good I say.
I wonder how long we are going to be talking about that season. Also this is a manager that could have helped him but a month into the new regime, HE has downed his tools not the manager.
He's a much better player than a lot of people in this thread are saying. The simple fact is that we're changing system and to fit in he would need to learn a new role and doesn't appear willing to do so. He would also need to start pressing, something Ten Hag (and others) failed to get from him. There'll be some good clubs after him, I'm sure of that. The huge contract will force the price down unfortunately.
Almost as delusional as Rashford’s latest comments to the media.It'll cost a huge amount more to replace him. 33 times as much in fact.
Rashford is someone who could play up front and score lots of goals for us and compete with Hojlund, you're looking at probably £40-50 million at least on a new player who can compete and score goals like Rashford has shown he can. Then the wages on top. Rashford's 4 years on 300k which would be just over £1.2 million as its 4 years and then into then summer. Very small in comparison
Rashford had 39 and 22 goal involvements that season in all comes and premier league respectively. Martial got 34 and 23 respectively a few seasons before.Rashford is the only player to score 30 for us since Sir Alex retired.
Only others who got close were Bruno, Lukaku and Ibrahimovic.
Almost as delusional as Rashford’s latest comments to the media.
At his best, yes he’s hard to replace. But he’s barely at his best and that’s the player we’re actually replacing. He’s one of the worst player in the league when he’s not at his best.
Have to admit that I agree with Craig burley and frank lebeouf here. Starting from 3:30 if anyone interested.
Rashford had 39 and 22 goal involvements that season in all comes and premier league respectively. Martial got 34 and 23 respectively a few seasons before.
People eulogise about that season as if it’s one of the greatest individual seasons we’ve witnessed in the PL. He was good but we’ve seen similar in the post SAF United era.
More importantly, you’ve missed the point. That season is in the past - he’s been poor for 3/4 seasons and this is a player who is all about stats. Outside of stats, which are also now sub par, he’s not a very good player and a tactical headache to have - can’t hold the ball up, bad in tight spaces, doesn’t link up well, poor decision making and terrible off the ball. Basically when his output is good you bear with the poor general play as opposed to players who are general good and also produce end product.
Move on.
Yeah, RashfordI answered your question.
I think someone certainly does need to move on.
Rashford seems to me like someone who needs to express himself. I dont mind it. Its best for both parties to move on. He wont play in england anyway.What was the point of this article? He could have easily secured a move away from press limelight.
Rashford does need a move away. Hopefully he kick start his career somewhere else
Don’t bother, the whole post reeks of begging for a like.Let me ask my you (as a Rashford fan), what do you make of his work rate on the pitch with regards to both tracking back and making runs?