Member 109952
Guest
Rashford regularly scores against top teams. My issue with Rashford is not so much his brilliance, but the rubbishness on the market. We will spend 80m and get a player who excites us for a little while, because he is new, but when it’s said and done - his excitement probably won’t produce a better statistical output than Rashford will get this season - and definitely not what he will get in a good season.
I look at players like Luis Diaz for example. Unanimously praised by all, and I imagine people would say he’s worth 80m odd. I’d be surprised if he has more goals than Rashford this season, and for sure, Rashford back in form would blow his figures away completely.
To get rid of Rashford, I’d want a mature player who can come in and guarantee 15+ goals in the league alone. Not a prospect who will score 4 goals for the next few seasons. We need goals. I can’t see many players who I would back to do that. Some are old, and not available, like Salah, Son or there is Mbappé, Vini and Leao. Anything else will fall into the Sancho, Antony bracket of signing who might if we are lucky become top players, but often fail and flatter to deceive. We might get industry and running, but we’d get an output that isn’t good enough.
If Garnacho was 22 and looked like he could score near 20 in the league then I’d be all for getting a 6 goal younger winger to develop. But we need one forward in their absolute prime years who can be expected to deliver. And if we feel Rashford is no longer that player, fine, but then at least go and get someone who is.
A very good post and similar to how I feel. If we can get Greenwood back that gives us some leeway. If we could get Leao that would be an upgrade, if we could get someone like Mitoma I'd be okay with it too. But I'm sick and tired of the likes of Sancho and Antony signed from tier 4 leagues.
Selling Rashford gets us a lot of FFP profit, but Garnacho is nowhere near to being a 40 game starter on the LW. We should only sell if we have a good replacement lined up.