Feck me this clown isn't worth the hassle - I hope the moment we heard "lawsuits" we went to the backup to our backup! We're not looking slick at all whether this is our fault or not. Time to move on and quickly - only 2 weeks left in this window.
Marcos Rojo | Manchester United Player Pending Medical
- Thread starter Hawkeye
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) and Imran (@Annihilate Now!) are here to discuss Amad saving our blushes in a win against Southampton as well as our now annual loss at home to Brighton. They discuss Amorim's post-match comments, revisit how mid-table we may or may not be, and discuss some transfer news.
- Status
Uncannily similar to the Herrera deal we tried to rush through around this time last summer.
At least we're learning from our mistakes, eh?
Why did we bid for him then? A club of our size should do their fecking research. It's a joke quite frankly.
Funny how they moan about them while Sporting have their player there.
What do you think is next for Rojo?
Do you think your president after he made such a strong statement will consider a peaceful solution in the end, or is legal actions/confrontation his only way forward?
There have been plenty of reports about him. And it´s not even Sporting related. He´s a very dodgy fella Joorabchian style.
Same type of greasy mobster style:
Not your finest argument, but that jacket is a shocker.S
Sorry to hear that, very sad.
1) We could be in trouble by January, at the back. If he can't make things happen in the summer, January is likely to be any better.
2) Many of think he is wholly incompetent in the transfer market.
3) Of course he won't, he is too good at convincing sponsors to part with their cash.
To the Benatia thread?
But unfairly judging Blacketts recent preseason form vs Rojo's past club and country campaign they look similar? Problem I have with this transfer is they're both left footed and will be fighting for the left sided CB spot but Blackett is 4 years young so could have a higher potential so why ruin it.
Sporting statement: http://t.co/B5CEWgj03W
Lovely stuff. Hopefully we still buy him and only Sporting pocket all the money.
Lovely stuff. Hopefully we still buy him and only Sporting pocket all the money.
Would rather look at Benatia if Sporting stick to their guns about his buyout clause..
Have the imposters turned up yet?
Haven't we got some sort of arrangement with Sporting that we basically get 'first dibs' on all their best players? How hard can this be Woody?
Yeah, seriously.
I think that agreement has expired. Can anyone confirm?
Yep, long expired.
"We are worried about a fund, which manages millions and various assets, and its inability to count." Legitimately made me LOL.
It's weird. All this hassle and no one seems to know whether this guy is really all that good.
You won't believe it!That Sporting statement is really unprofessional sounding, with the silly jibes about arithmetic and stuff.
Yeah, seriously.
Are you actually serious? I just came here saw the Herrera last summer bit and was joking.
No ideia mate. I don´t think any of the parts are willing to compromise. What i do know is that it´s almost impossible for Rojo to remain. Our President drives a really hard bargain. If there is a solution to this case, i think it will appear in the last transfer days.
The third party who own Rojo attempted to negotiate with Sporting as Manchester United.
I liked it mate. That´s the answer the fund deserves.
Difference is Herera is worth some hassle, I'm not sure this guy is.The third party who own Rojo attempted to negotiate with Sporting as Manchester United.
If the fund did pay 75% for his transfer from Spartak, then they have an investment in the player. Do you think they lied about the 75% penalty that Sporting has to pay if they reject a bid?
None of us know if he's worth it or not, but we need a left-sided defender and we've left it late again.
Why not get rid of their player then and move on?
It wouldn´t be the first time they lied mate but i can´t answer that with certainty.
I'm sure you did. Gives a very bad impression of the club though. Would definitely make me think twice about going into business with them.
I think the President wants to make an example out of him. We have several highly rated players and we can´t tolerate behaviour like this. It would be chaos.
I really doubt they're going to need a large container full of pink fluffy dildos, so I doubt it's going to be an issue.
Don't think this will happen if Sporting keep this up. Not enough days in the window to go through a saga.
If you guys don't like what the fund is doing and how they handle things then you sell the players they own and move on. Keeping him would be hypocrisy after moaning about them.
How do they intend on ripping up the contract with Doyen without paying them a reasonable fee?
I beg to differ. Sporting´s only problem is with this mafia style fund. Their behaviour deserved this answer. We have dealt with most of the top european clubs in what regards transfers and there was never a problem. Sporting and United enjoy a good relationship and have made satisfying business in the past without any issue. It´s your interpretation of the matter. Us Sporting fans are pleased because what matters to us the most is having a President who defends our interests and doesn´t back down under pressure. I don´t care about the style. What matters to me is that the club is not a Doyen pawn anymore.
No idea mate. There are few details yet. There is an obvious extremism at the moment but i think sooner or later there will be compromise.
Who says we are keeping him? He is under disciplinary action that´s it. I don´t know if we are going to keep or move him. You can´t expect the club to be held randsom by some fund. He will move according to our interests and timing.
- Status