Nah, more players that score would do that. What have we learned this season? In the games we drew and should have won, we created a bucketful of chances, so there is nothing wrong with our creativity. With someone in our team to convert and turn a few of those draws into wins, we'd be up there.Verratti Fabinho and Pogba would win the EPL for us.
Didn't they have a transfer ban though since Zidane has become their manager?I think we're seeing a more restrained RM with Zidane as manager. They're not outspending everyone any more, and they're playing players like Casemiro and Kovacic. It's working for them too.
Wasn't being entirely serious bro. I agree he'd cost too much for real to buy him given the midfield they already have but they don't really play by the sensible rulebook when it comes to transfers. No guarantee Zidane is the manager next year anyways. Simply depends upon whether Perez fancies him.Not for 100m+ though. Whoever signs Verratti won't be doing a lot of other business. So priorities have to be about positions which need reinforcing the most. Real have the best midfield in world football, so I can't see them wasting their entire transfer budget on one injury prone midfielder. They seem to be moving away from the Galáctico policy under Zidane anyway.
I think we're seeing a more restrained RM with Zidane as manager. They're not outspending everyone any more, and they're playing players like Casemiro and Kovacic (as well as Isco, who's started lots more than you'd expect). It's working for them too.
Nah, more players that score would do that. What have we learned this season? In the games we drew and should have won, we created a bucketful of chances, so there is nothing wrong with our creativity. With someone in our team to convert and turn a few of those draws into wins, we'd be up there.
We'll have to wait and see what they do this summer, and they'll spend a lot when it's time to replace Ronaldo, but because of those upcoming expenditures, I think they're more likely to try and sign someone like Mbappe for a similar fee.Didn't they have a transfer ban though since Zidane has become their manager?
Actually they went after Pogba last summer, so it was over. But if we didn't offer stupid amounts, Pogba would more than likely have gone there, so what is this about more restraint?
Nah, more players that score would do that. What have we learned this season? In the games we drew and should have won, we created a bucketful of chances, so there is nothing wrong with our creativity. With someone in our team to convert and turn a few of those draws into wins, we'd be up there.
Bayern make the most sense, they are losing Alonso and Lahm and will want to make a statement in the summer. Not that I think it will happen but out of the potential candidates I think they're the most likely.
Shame he couldn't put his foot on the ball and dictate the game in barca then. That isn't a dig on him btw, cause I actually think he's a wonderful player as my previous posts over the years on him have shown. My point was that he failed to do what you said he can do in a big game against a big team.When have United ever been able to go toe to toe with another big side and dominate possession properly, like boss the game.
Bayern simply do not spend money to that level that's needed. . I keep seeing Bayern being linked with Sanchez etc. It makes no sense because they don't have to spend big.Bayern make the most sense, they are losing Alonso and Lahm and will want to make a statement in the summer. Not that I think it will happen but out of the potential candidates I think they're the most likely.
Shame he couldn't put his foot on the ball and dictate the game in barca then. That isn't a dig on him btw, cause I actually think he's a wonderful player as my previous posts over the years on him have shown. My point was that he failed to do what you said he can do in a big game against a big team.
I thought they were skint?
I am tired of everyone saying Barcelona are skint and all that Jazz. I am not a finance buff and I don't know all their expenditure, but this looks promising.They are, with wages and whatnot, and probably won't be able to make this happen unless PSG is accommodating. I meant in football terms though. I think he's perfectly suited to their midfield, whereas Real don't need him.
Bayern simply do not spend money to that level that's needed. . I keep seeing Bayern being linked with Sanchez etc. It makes no sense because they don't have to spend big.
30 odd million?They do, Renato Sanches for example
Shame he couldn't put his foot on the ball and dictate the game in barca then. That isn't a dig on him btw, cause I actually think he's a wonderful player as my previous posts over the years on him have shown. My point was that he failed to do what you said he can do in a big game against a big team.
A lot of add ons though which can make him very costly. Dont know the requirements though.30 odd million?
okThat's definitely a dig on him because basically what you were saying is that he couldn't control the game against Barca in camp nou means he's not that top player who can control the game in a big game.
People always said Carrick couldn't control a game against big team because he failed to do it against Busquest, Xavi Iniesta all together by himself. But he played with poor players around him against them. If Veratti had Pogba and Herrera, it might be a different story. Even Alonso couldn't handle Barcelona's midfield and lost 5-0.
I think we need equally both "more players that can score goals" and "midfield who can control the game". And also a top class centre back.
Yes but it's a cheap transfer either way.A lot of add ons though which can make him very costly. Dont know the requirements though.
Add ons to 60m isnt really cheap. But he'd be worth it then though.Yes but it's a cheap transfer either way.
I doubt Verrari could be bought with add ons.
If I remember correctly media reported something about 35m plus another 25m (5m per 25 matches played) plus potentially additional 20m in case he makes it into FIFA world eleven or the top 3 of ballon d'or.Add ons to 60m isnt really cheap. But he'd be worth it then though.
I'd say 60 million max then, cant see him becoming such a good player.If I remember correctly media reported something about 35m plus another 25m (5m per 25 matches played) plus potentially additional 20m in case he makes it into FIFA world eleven or the top 3 of ballon d'or.
Won't disagree on that one. But returning to the topic, today I read that Bayern Munich's willingness to push their "record transfer sum" has been around 11-12% of their yearly revenue.I'd say 60 million max then, cant see him becoming such a good player.
200 million should secure his services I'd imagine.Think the competition for his signature would be immense, especially Barca, Real, Bayern and Chelsea would throw everything at him i imagine.
Would be my transfer target number 1 if there would be a chance of a move.
That is not correct though (or I am missing something there). From Deloitte Money league, we are the richest club in football with revenues (for the previous season) of 689m euros, Barca being second having 'only' 620.2m euros, and Madrid being third with 620.1m euros. Madrid lead the table for 11 years but this time went to third place.I am tired of everyone saying Barcelona are skint and all that Jazz. I am not a finance buff and I don't know all their expenditure, but this looks promising.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kurtba...s-record-revenue-of-750-million/#3002a6a5b1e6
Spanish soccer giant FC Barcelona reported record revenue for the 2015-16 season of €679 million or $750 million. It is the highest annual total in the history of sports and up 12% over the previous year. The club projected revenue before the season of €633 million, but blew past the forecast as the team won the La Liga title and Copa del Ray. The tally puts the world’s third most valuable sports franchise at $3.55 billion on pace to meet its target revenue of €1 billion by 2021
It is about to soar thanks to a new kit deal with Nike NKE -6.10% inked this year. The new deal is expected to bring in as much as $170 million a year
Sponsors love Barcelona in part because of its role as the top sports team on social media. The club had 148 million followers across Facebook, Instagram and Twitter as of last month thanks to the star power of players like Lionel Messi, Neymar and Luis Suarez. Messi and Neymar rank as the most popular athletes in the world on social media behind only Cristiano Ronaldo
But indeed, they are probably skint and won't be able to sign another player for 2.5 seasons, or something.........
I believe you. it is just people keep saying they are brassic, like they won't be in the running for signing players as they can't afford to dip into the market because of their wage bill or some shit.That is not correct though (or I am missing something there). From Deloitte Money league, we are the richest club in football with revenues (for the previous season) of 689m euros, Barca being second having 'only' 620.2m euros, and Madrid being third with 620.1m euros. Madrid lead the table for 11 years but this time went to third place.
https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pag.../articles/deloitte-football-money-league.html
Obviously they are not skint, but we are in a better financial position because we have a higher revenue (the difference will be lower this year because of lack of UCL), and more importantly our wage is quite lower than theirs.
We got Pogba and everyone was after him as well, I don't see why Woodie and Jose can't pull off a signing like this.
They weren't, only team properly interested was Madrid
How are you so sure?
It was well documented that Barca, Madrid, Chelsea and Man City were all very interested in Pogba. Pogba has since made it clear he wanted to come 'home' to United, so I'm sure any interested parties got the message.
Because all of those teams distanced themselves? No bid was documented by any proper sources for any of them. Barca and Citeh were interested really early on but turned away due to the prices being touted iirc. Besides, even if other teams were competing for Pogba, it's still different to Veratti as Veratti doesn't give a shit about us, has no emotional attachment.
All them teams were interested, but they couldn't afford him/couldn't compete with United. It's that simple really. Being uninterested and not being able to compete is two very different things.
I remember in some presentation Pogba thanked the 'other clubs' for showing interest in him, so that indicates there was more than just Madrid.Do you have any proof of that? It's all speculation and apart from us, Madrid seemed to be the only club making noise.
I remember in some presentation Pogba thanked the 'other clubs' for showing interest in him, so that indicates there was more than just Madrid.
30 odd million?