Borys
Statistics Wizard
This should've been a loan. Strange, was he actually highly rated? Doesn't even look good defensively.
This should've been a loan. Strange, was he actually highly rated? Doesn't even look good defensively.
Not a great look for our new setup. Reminds me of the mount deal where the selling club clearly needed to sell but we still ended up paying over the oddsRespect to PSG for holding out all that time and getting the fee back but I guess they know the club they're dealing with.
Agree - I feel like it’s very hard to actually judge any of the new signings at the moment when the team are being managed in such a farcical way. That said, he’s massively limited on the ball, which I hate in midfieldersIt's very early days and he's playing under a clueless manager in a disaster of a system, but the signs right now aren't good.
Short passing : Amrabat was better
Composure: Amrabat was better
Shot: that left foot hip high volley he tried the last game shows both were awful
Physicality: Amrabat was better
Positioning: He’s marginally better
How do we continuously manage to overpay for average players who don’t improve us at all is the single biggest reason why we’re in this mess. Another dud who we’ll struggle to move on.
Absolutely, I hated how in the summer posters here were justifying buying such limited player 'because he wins lots of balls'. We are United ffs, we should be dominating 80-90% of games, we need midfielders who are actually good at receiving and passing it.Having said that, this club really frustrates me with the profile of midfielder it signs. For a team that is so poor at keeping the ball I don’t think we can afford to add players who aren’t good at that. The mindset is wrong.
ExactlyI knew it would only be a couple of games before everyone was shitting on him, and here we are
He's not looked good so far, but sweet fecking jesus give the guy some time to bed in and get used to a new club and a new league.
If his definition of breaking the play is to shove people or commit rash tackles then we have problem in our hands regardless of how new he is in the team.Exactly
Let's give him some time.
If his definition of breaking the play is to shove people or commit rash tackles then we have problem in our hands regardless of how new he is in the team.
I’ve said before, until the club has a mindset that promotes and accepts possession play, we will get nowhere. The fans too - who at the mention of it only think of Guardiola, Barcelona etc and panic with the United dna talk. It’s not about tiki taka but driving us out of this backwards mire we are in. Every new signing has to be comfortable on the ball - otherwise we aren’t going to make the progress we need to.Absolutely, I hated how in the summer posters here were justifying buying such limited player 'because he wins lots of balls'. We are United ffs, we should be dominating 80-90% of games, we need midfielders who are actually good at receiving and passing it.
Ugarte is worse than McTominnay on the ball, and we all wanted McTom out because of his deficiency.
If he proved to be a very good destroyer he should still only be a squad player. Ideal scenario is to have four good CMs - three ball playing ones (Mainoo plus two) and Ugarte.What worries me are two things. First - he was ineos transfers, ETH did not want him. Second - he looks exactly like he was meant to be. Limited destroyer without ball carrying ability.
He can actually carry the ball. He isn’t a top ball player but he isnt as bad as is being made out either in my opinion.What worries me are two things. First - he was ineos transfers, ETH did not want him. Second - he looks exactly like he was meant to be. Limited destroyer without ball carrying ability.
I think the profile is correct, he's just not looking at a good player at all.Early days, but this wasn't the profile of midfielder we should have brought in.
He's not good enough on the ball for the level we should aim for.
All his critics in the transfer thread are right so far. Frightening how fans can see what our scouts can't over and over.
If you buy a defensive midfielder and he needs a deep lying playmaker alongside him to make up for the limitations in his game you have just added another tactical problem.
This was always the worry with buying someone who is not well rounded as a footballer. Someone who had obvious defencies, and would need another player to hide them. I was amazed at the number of people who thought a pure destroyer was what our midfield was missing. How many top teams have a player like that?Interesting how many said he was poor on the ball before we signed him. Lo and behold he turns up and looks horrible on the ball. Another player who can’t pass 6 yards to a red shirt. It’s early days but Jesus, why are casual football watchers on an internet forum seemingly better scouts than those at United?