Escobar
Shameless Musketeer
Marcus PRashford
It’s weird you say that as I was going to mention Keane as I do like context, but even then he wasn’t given that grace by some. Anyway he like, Vidic and Evra, went on to be more consistent but even then when he played next to Giggs he took time to adapt.
Ultimately I think you might be right on Rashford and his legend status although as an optimist I think this is his last chance to make that happen. If he knuckles down and adapts he could still have have 3 to 4 good years here. If not and he leaves then maybe it’ll be for the best for both parties. Time will tell.
Can we all stop pretending that Rashford is the only one that does this?Marcus PRashford
It is all big words and PR - but zero work or results. No wonder people joke about itCan we all stop pretending that Rashford is the only one that does this?
It's also worth saying that his original crime in the eyes of many was launching a campaign to help feed children.
Let's have a bit of perspective ffs.
The circus has only increased because people have become obsessed with hating the guy.Can't wait for this circus to end
well the media are just obsessed with him periodThe circus has only increased because people have become obsessed with hating the guy.
The likes of Mark Goldbridge and the other YouTube cranks have only made it worse.
Zero results? That's just not true is it. He's been a great player at times, if a little (or very) inconsistent.It is all big words and PR - but zero work or results. No wonder people joke about it
The media have been all over him since he led the campaign during lockdown.well the media are just obsessed with him period
all the talk was him being dropped, who quite frankly I didn't care about, he shouldn't even be a first 11 player for us simple as
It's a case of the chicken or the egg, are those team great because their star players perform or their star players perform because of the team? The thing is he's earning like a worldclass player and he's not remotely performing as one.Which of the "EPL greatest earners" do you want to compare him with?
Because whichever player you name, then chances are they are playing in a high level, functioning team. Rashford has only ever had that for short periods at United.
Has there ever been a period in the last 9 years when United have been playing great and Rashford has not been a part of it? They go hand in hand.
Now, that is not to say that Rashford is up there with Salah, Haarland etc. But there is something to be said about the team and the forward hitting form at the same time. The big difference is that Liverpool and City have been consistently good for a long time, allowing those players to flourish.
You think if Liverpool had been changing managers every other season and been signing shit players then Mo Salah would be the star he is today? Likely not. Salah is a product of his environment and has been aided massively by having a top level manager in Klopp who built a great team for Salah to perform in.
Look at Haarland for example. City are playing like crap and all of a sudden Haarland cant score and looks very average.
Why would you not afford the same grace to Rashford?
And this is not me saying Rashford is a world beater, but when Ten Hag had United playing well in 22/23 (for around 4 months), what did we see? Rashford banging in a lot of goals.
The online football fan moulded on the Arsenal Fan TV success really is one of the worst things to appear as a by-product of football.The circus has only increased because people have become obsessed with hating the guy.
The likes of Mark Goldbridge and the other YouTube cranks have only made it worse.
I’d agree that Rashford has lost the top end pace that made him so explosive when he was younger and that it almost became his signature attribute but i do feel there is more to his game than just pace. I think he is an instinctive player and when things go wrong he looks to things that have served him in the past. When they don’t work he loses confidence further. We have seen him perform against top teams before and I’m sure he has a pretty good record against the top 6.What I worry about with Rashford isn't so much his tendency to mentally check out of games as much as his overreliance on pace. He's not exactly a flat track bully as I believe that term as used in the British lexicon (I'm an American) means someone who beats up on inferior opponents but crumbles before superior opposition, but he does tend to perform well only against inferior opposition, which I believe was explained earlier in this thread, and overcomes opposition with his pace and not much else.
When the pace isn't there, there isn't much there. He's of no use in tight spaces and her zero aerial ability. He did used to have a free kick but he's no longer a viable option on free kicks. His best attribute is hitting on the counter where his pace can be used to advantage. But most opponents will sit back on us.
If we can find a club willing to bring him in, we should sell him. It will be a sad day, but a day that either has to come or he runs down in his contract more or less in the manner of Gareth Bale.
Yeah. I feel like this could be a good thing.There's really nothing wrong with that retort from Rashford.
Things are a bit clearer, he's happy for a new challenge but will continue to fight for his place. He's definitely gone by the summer.
Players that have assaulted their partners have received less stick than Rashford has at times. Our support is an absolute shambles.
Loan with obligation.Greenwood had no or little support on the forum and most agreed with the decision for him to go. If Greenwood is the yardstick, we’re never supposed to criticise any player ever. Rashford is our highest paid player and has performed poorly over an uncomfortably long period. If it was any other signing, the decision to sell him wouldn’t warrant any debate. This one should be as well.
The only problem is who will buy him and at what price. Everyone knows we’re skint and desperate to sell.
It's a case of the chicken or the egg, are those team great because their star players perform or their star players perform because of the team? The thing is he's earning like a worldclass player and he's not remotely performing as one.
If you want to make the case about Rashford being worldclass but not delivering due to the team, then any player in our squad is granted the same wages. Even average players in average teams, thats not the way it works. Players are paid that much to perform, if Haaland continues to underperform he'll be questioned, there's no way he'll be granted years of mediocrity blaming City's poor performances.
What would that be?You may be right there, GB. Shame to see.
Think we have completely mismanaged his career
and now are openly discussing discarding him as a statement.
He's not exonerated, either, but it's Robbie Fowler style indulgence of a precocious talent and a warning sign for posterity.
Harsh, myopic attitude which seems to conceal your real intent.
Anyway, it's all a bit ten Hag, again. Fair enough we ditch a misfiring member but who is the replacement?
That's the difficult bit.
Gyokeres? Kolo Muani? Good, solid players who'd cost a packet with Rashford levels of return.
Bother.
What a load of bollocks. Without Rashford we actually have 11 players on the pitch and performances have improved.there are about 50 emotional posts in a row here that could have been written by a bot saying 'get rashford out of my club ahhhhhh'. there is no discussion just posters that have got on this latest bandwagon venting
a few years ago it was maguire, de gea etc etc
the media are all over it and have convinced united fans with their efforts that the on field performances will improve if we get rid of rashford, instead of they will simply improve when the coaching improves, which hopefully will happen. that is what i call a scapegoat.
Rashford has lived on a reputation built from a handful of good performances. He has scored an average of only 8 league goals per season over the last nine years, which hardly justifies his 350k/week salary. His goals to games ratio is worse than that of Martial, who is frequently criticized for his lack of effort. Rashford standout 30 goal season is an anomaly, a glitch in the matrix. I am not sure why you brought up Salah in this conversation. Salah is a world class player who has scored 48 goals in a single season, led Liverpool to Premier League and Champions League trophies and scored and scored 35+ goals for three consecutive seasons. Even Jamie Vardy at 37 years old runs more and remains a better finisher than Rashford. Rashford has been built up to a level that doesn’t seem fair to him. He has never been a world class player and he never will be.
I take it you disagreeOh feck off.
Come off it, Rashford deserves all the stick he is getting.Players that have assaulted their partners have received less stick than Rashford has at times. Our support is an absolute shambles.
That's not the praise you think it is. It's only because the quality of the other players is nowhere near what it used to be.Zero results? That's just not true is it. He's been a great player at times, if a little (or very) inconsistent.
He's been among our top 10 players since Fergie retired.
I'm all for balance or analysis etc but the criticism he gets has been insane.
The media have been all over him since he led the campaign during lockdown.
I know for a fact that some journalists were ringing his family, old school friends and teachers trying to get dirt on him after that. That was, again, in response to him having a campaign helping kids in poverty. Just think about that for a second.
In response to both posts, it's not that surprising that he maybe tried to be proactive with his PR.
he did seem very pro English core from what we read (although I still struggle to believe anyone actually thinks Southgate was a good shout).Probably been said already but I wonder if there was pushback from Ashworth over selling Rashford and that’s part of the reason why he ended up in the bin too.
That's not the praise you think it is. It's only because the quality of the other players is nowhere near what it used to be.
Pre back injury for sure.Totally agree.
I think Rashford is a bit of a throwback player. I could imagine him being brilliant in a 442 as a forward who could burn any center back. But football has changed and that change has not suited him.
Just curious, what do people mean when they say Rashford seems like a good guy? Is it just the charity stuff?The online football fan moulded on the Arsenal Fan TV success really is one of the worst things to appear as a by-product of football.
No one should hate Rashford, he seems a good bloke, but it's more than to criticise him for footballing reasons.
The muppet in me is sad that Ineos actually have a recruitment plan, if Woodward were here I'd be hopeful of some ill fated swap like Rashford for Neymar.
I can see a very odd eventuality that we sell Garnacho, not because he isn't a great talent but because he is and he's like to bring in a huge offer which would give us insane wiggle room with PSR. Not saying I think it's likely or that I even agree with it but I don't think the chance is 0.People have lost the plot
Just curious, what do people mean when they say Rashford seems like a good guy? Is it just the charity stuff?
He hasn't had any major off-field scandals, which is a good start. But having (at least somewhat) poor effort and attitude doesn't scream "great guy" to me. He comes off somewhat poorly in my opinion given his position, although it's nothing too serious.
How about we keep him because he's a great player, not this fecking face of United bollocks.... I feel so old sometimesI can see a very odd eventuality that we sell Garnacho, not because he isn't a great talent but because he is and he's like to bring in a huge offer which would give us insane wiggle room with PSR. Not saying I think it's likely or that I even agree with it but I don't think the chance is 0.
I can't see any way we sell Mainoo, we're gonna need someone to be the face of United with Rashford's impending transfer.