- Joined
- Jun 6, 2024
- Messages
- 148
Funny how there’s never a response to posts that strictly point out his unacceptable lack of work ethic and professionalism. Maybe because there’s no logical excuse.
Yes because players have NEVER been sold that had more name value than actual ability right? We’ve never seen big fees for players that ended up average? That would make no sense!If he fetches a big fee it will be because of his potential as a player, which you have dismissed. I think if the club were to sell him on the basis they will definitely not struggle to replace him AND will save money signing someone better AND which they can only do by selling Garnacho (I mean wtf?), it'd have to be based on a bit more than the baseless opinion of a random internet person.
And no they don't. Already very good teams might sell players because they have a surplus of good players. We are definitely not in that position. We should not be selling any talented young players unless they are causing more trouble than they are worth. It is not a viable tactic to build a winning team unless you are planning to build it in The Championship.
This also has absolutely nothing to do with Marcus Rashford and all stems from some absolutely mental idea that we should sell Garnacho and Mainoo to make us better which has come from feck knows where. Maybe don't go aiming the word insane at other people when you're peddling or piggy backing on ridiculous irrelevant nonsense that wouldn't even make sense if you were playing FIFA.
Tis true. His most shameful trait.Funny how there’s never a response to posts that strictly point out his unacceptable lack of work ethic and professionalism. Maybe because there’s no logical excuse.
Yeah, plus anybody seriously scouting him must see this aswell. It’s what makes me think Saudi is the only real option, he can sit and laugh at us all while earning a mil per weekFunny how there’s never a response to posts that strictly point out his unacceptable lack of work ethic and professionalism. Maybe because there’s no logical excuse.
Or he could sit tight and earn his 350K a week here doing nothingYeah, plus anybody seriously scouting him must see this aswell. It’s what makes me think Saudi is the only real option, he can sit and laugh at us all while earning a mil per week
The Sancho situation was worse to be honest and we got rid of himVery MUFC to try to offload him in a way which says "warning: do not sign this player". Honestly, who is going to want him?
check simon's eyeroll here (timestamped)Tis true. His most shameful trait.
I see he’s got skauslover Henry Winter onboard to promote his Mother Teresa II campaign. Desperate.wonder if he was dripping with $100s of $1000s worth of jewellery around the schools?
World Cup coming up and he's going to want to be back in the England squad so he'll have to be playing somewhere in the PL or Europe. Can't see Tuchel picking players from the Saudi league.Or he could sit tight and earn his 350K a week here doing nothing
World Cup coming up and he's going to want to be back in the England squad so he'll have to be playing somewhere in the PL or Europe. Can't see Tuchel picking players from the Saudi league.
check simon's eyeroll here (timestamped)
I share your disgust about racism. But we cannot say that no black player can be criticised for his performance because it would entail racism. That in itself would be racist, in that we are treating the marvellous black players here at the club over several decades as somehow needing a different standard to be judged by than those from other ethnicities. They don't. Many - not all, I (now) fear to say - have been absolute bloody dynamite. So let's not patronise them.Saying that it 100% it has nothing to do with race is also wrong especially considering that he has been the victim of racism. The commentary and "disgust" around him being "dressed like a rapper" is 100% shrouded in racism. Cole Palmer was hanging out with a rapper, gave the middle finger in a Pic and everyone said how cool it was.
It's been proven that Rashford has been racially abused multiple times..Those same people who were sending out racist tweets are some of the same people who according to you are "only criticizing his performance". Except that racism can't be turned on and off like a light switch..it's always there, either on a conscious or subconscious level. It's been proven through research that most people have implicit biases. Yes, it has been proven that racists watch football. Are you under the impression that those racists disappear from convos about his performance?
It's generally people who have never experienced racism a day in their lives who think they have the right to tell everyone else what does or does not qualify as racism. Odd that.
See I have a different opinion on this as I think hate is unnecessary in football as there’s so much of it elsewhere in life but I understand the strong emotions that football can evoke. I’m not really going to debate whether he is being a prima Donna of the pitch or just enjoying life. In relation to on it, something is clearly wrong and I don’t think it’s lazy and not caring but maybe it is.The hate is over the top, although it's not hard to see why the hate is there. Marcus grew up in extremely humble circumstances and now carries himself like a prima donna off the pitch and like someone who doesn't care on the pitch.
But if he produced the end product, Marcus Rashford can carry on like a pre-Madonna for all I care. But the end product has evaporated and it's not just a run of poor form. When Forlan was missing chances on goal at least he ran his socks off. When Rooney would go cold, you knew he would get hot again. Both gave it everything they had, even on days when they had nothing. Rashford just gives up too easily and it's weird to watch. But above all he never bothered to learn a new skill, a new trick or anything to advance his game beyond what it was when he was 20 years old.
Would he prefer he don sackcloth and ashes?Tis true. His most shameful trait.
I see he’s got skauslover Henry Winter onboard to promote his Mother Teresa II campaign. Desperate.wonder if he was dripping with $100s of $1000s worth of jewellery around the schools?
It's you who doesn't get it.
It's obvious to everyone that if a team is struggling then you'd expect individual performances to also look worse but the point that's being made over and over again is the extent of how much his performances have fallen off and for how long.
You're example of Haaland being off form is a span when he's sill scored 3 premier league goals and 4 champions league goals, also no one is looking at the current city slump and thinking it's because of Haaland.
I can’t see any other club agreeing to his 350/week wages and I can’t see Marcus agreeing to a lesser salary. The way this works out is that Marcus will eventually break and behave like a professional footballer again at OT. Squad man perhaps, but a squad man under Amorim.
To be exact, income on the income statement, not cash on the balance sheet. It's a one-time windfall that helps you offset expenses in the current accounting period.
The flip side of the argument is that you still need to find a way to fund the wages + amortization of incoming players in future years.
Christ, Rashford FC in full force here. Maguire did/has done exactly what your hero should do, get his head down, keep quiet, and work hard to get back in the team.Maguire knew he wouldn't get an equivalent wage elsewhere. That's why he stayed. He was thinking of his future in terms of financial compensation. Rashford's thinking of his future in terms of getting back to his previous level and winning his spot back in the England squad. If he was only interested in keeping his wage, he could insist on staying and the club could do nothing about it.
Frankly I don't have any admiration for Maguire staying since he's still taking a massive wage off the club for very little effort (due to not being good enough to be 1st choice). I don't have any ill-will to him either since he's just doing what's in his best interests, but there's nothing admirable in it either in the way you seem to be suggesting. Rashford will have options that Maguire simply wouldn't have.
My question is, why would he want his charity work publicised? Why can't he do his things quietly like most others do?Most of those who wanted him out in the summer are probably gone. Therefore if Rashy wanted to change the club's mind then he had all the time in the world to do so. Its evident from his commitment on the pitch and in training that it's not the case.
And to have a seasoned football editor like Winter drive over to write about his charity work is quite amazing. The guy is more powerful PR wise then we even imagine
Using the racism card is just trying to deflect from the issue. It's just cheap.People like you also conveniently pretend like Rashford hasn't been the victim of racist abuse. People like you like to pretend that there isn't currently a campaign to kick racism out of football because there have been so many racist incidents.
The same people who think it's cool that Palmer is literally hanging out with rappers giving the middle finger are the same people clutching their pearls that Rashford is "dressed like a rapper".
Some of the same people racially abusing him are the same people criticizing his performances and pretending that racism doesn't exist..hiding their biases behind his performances..that's great if that doesn't describe you specifically..but let's stop pretending that there aren't people shrouding their racism in criticism about performances. No racists don't dissappear they simply hide their true intentions.
If it's not then what is?If that's the case then yes fair enough. But I don't think it is.
They just try and twist it to all being about racismFunny how there’s never a response to posts that strictly point out his unacceptable lack of work ethic and professionalism. Maybe because there’s no logical excuse.
You aren't arguing in good faith. So now you have switched to implying that I said something which I never did. When did I say that no black player can be criticized? I NEVER said that a black player can't be criticized but don't insult my intelligence by saying that it's 100% not about race. You clearly don't share my disgust for racism because you can't actually admit the problem and you are actually trying to excuse it.I share your disgust about racism. But we cannot say that no black player can be criticised for his performance because it would entail racism. That in itself would be racist, in that we are treating the marvellous black players here at the club over several decades as somehow needing a different standard to be judged by than those from other ethnicities. They don't. Many - not all, I (now) fear to say - have been absolute bloody dynamite. So let's not patronise them.
If Marcus moves on, that is NOT because we are a racist club.It's do with with his form.
I
The only people who think racism is a card to be played are people who have never experienced racism. Only people who speak from a place of privilege are the only ones who describe racism as a card in a game. The only thing that's cheap is describing racism as a game.Using the racism card is just trying to deflect from the issue. It's just cheap.
Dunno… ask himWould he prefer he don sackcloth and ashes?
Palmer is friends with rappers, taking pictures with rappers, giving the middle finger with rappers and there is zero outrage. Most people said it was cool. Most of the discourse around Palmer was that he is a "great guy just having fun". Imagine the outrage if Rashford took a picture like Palmer did. Rashford "dresses like a rapper" while behaving perfectly and everyone criticizes him. That's racism.
Then someone will tell us how they always thought he was a little ordinary, Amad as well. They won,t sat it now though.Some parallels between Arsenal getting rid of Aubameyang but it provokes a sadness in me.
Rashford was a local lad who came through the academy and now to see him as something we need to get rid of in what should be his prime is not how the story should end.
I really hope we're not talking the same way about Mainoo in 8-10 years.
Fair enough, I agree with that - as much as I'd hate to lose some of our young academy talent, I don't think any player sales should be off limits, especially if a crazy offer comes in.No one wants to sell young talent, but Unied are in a mess. We have 3 first team players that will potentially walk away on a free this season - Eriksen, Lindloff and maybe Maguire if he feels that he is better off making more money at a smaller club who would save the transfer fee on him.
We have very few players we can sell and make money on to rebuild the squad at a rate the speed that may be required. Is Amorim going to want to wait for 3 or 4 years to rebuild the side like Klopp was able to? Will he be given that time?
Im not saying i want this, but if you did sell a young academy player for 80m, we could bring in 3 or 4 players and amortize over multiple years. Yes, they still need to be funded, but the club do still make enough revenue year on year, so the idea is that the players would be funded by the club over future years.
Chelsea have done their spending, they have the core of their team that looks set for some time. The next few years, i dont expect them to be going hard in the windows as they will be maxed out having to pay for the players they amortized.
Jesus, chill it marcus.You don't get it, do you?
No one is saying Rashford is a patch on Haaland.
The point is, without a functioning team Haaland is not the super striker he was in previous years at City or Dortmund. City are playing like shit and Haarlands goals have dried up. So why not accept that United have been playing like shit for well over a year and accept that Rashford is also off form?
Is it not complicated, is it?
And why bring up Cunha. The guy was crap for Athletico, which is exactly why he ended up at Wolves. He is looking great now and from what Gary O'Neill said, he is extremely motivated at the moment - perhaps to get back to a decent club.
What is the job of the club press officer? Why are we putting everything on the manager?
I share your disgust about racism. But we cannot say that no black player can be criticised for his performance because it would entail racism. That in itself would be racist, in that we are treating the marvellous black players here at the club over several decades as somehow needing a different standard to be judged by than those from other ethnicities. They don't. Many - not all, I (now) fear to say - have been absolute bloody dynamite. So let's not patronise them.
If Marcus moves on, that is NOT because we are a racist club.It's do with with his form.
I