Blind
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2017
- Messages
- 1,322
He's kind of the forgotten man, if they can somehow get him and Kompany to play most of the season they'll be a much stronger team.
GK - Ederson, Bravo, Gunn
RB - Walker, Fernandinho
LB - Mendy, Bertrand
CB - Kompany, Stones, Otamendi, Adarabioyo, Kolarov (if he stays), this whole position unfortunately will hinge on VK's fitness.
DM - Gundogan, Fernandinho, Yaya
MC - Gundogan, D.Silva, B.Silva, KDB, Yaya, Delph (if Stoke move falls through)
AM - D.Silva, B.Silva, KDB, Jesus
WM - Sanchez (I hope), B.Silva, KDB, Sterling, Sane, Jesus, D Silva
FC - Aguero, Jesus, Sanchez
For what its worth I don't see us getting Sanchez without paying stupid money for a guy with 1 year left on his contract and part of me wishes we'd go for a top CB instead though not spunk £60m on someone like Van Dijk.
Tosin looks like he's going out on loan, think Delph will definitely leave and I agree with you on Sanchez and I think if we do sign him Aguero will move on.
Although Maffeo is probably going to Girona I'd take him on the US tour and if he does ok I'd not loan him out and have him as backup to Walker and ensure he plays a good % of the games against the bottom half teams. Though for the money I'd possibly let Walker stay at Spurs and go for Cedric at Southampton or even Coleman at Everton, they're better than what we had last season and could still get a decent sell on if Maffeo turns out to be the player people are hoping him to be.
No face saving here I'm afraid for you. Alves was not keen joining baldy, simple as.Missing out on Alves is disappointing but he went to PSG for double what we were offering so no complaints.
You're already doubling them.As per Sky Sports it appears that Mendy and Walker are close to being done. Unless of course PSG come in and offer to double their wages..
Why?I really don't get the Kyle Walker thing.
Why?
They need a RB desperately.
Walker and Mendy for 50m each... Well at least they're addressing their problem positions but ffs the costs for any player these days are insane. They still have shit center backs though and basically nothing when it comes to holding midfielders. But their attack will be very hard to stop, even if they don't sign Sanchez.
Edit: They'll have spent almost 200m on Ederson, Bernardo Silva, Mendy and Walker if those 2 deals go through
How can they spend so much money yet the defensive spine of the side - CBs and CMs - still be so shit?
The CM situation is particularly puzzling. Relying on Gundogan for much of anything seems very foolish. Fernandinho is a player dependent on superior athleticism at an age when most lose a few steps. Yaya is a joke defensively. Delph and Fernando belong nowhere near a club of this size. Pep wants to always have the ball and push teams back but there will be matches in which you'll need two players in central midfield with some steel and their options are pretty bad.
I don't think it's quite as shit as people think, still not great. They have Gundogan, a player who was probably the most impressive midfielder in Europe the season Dortmund made the CL final, playing in a deeper role than he's been used so far at City and Yaya's a better option than Carrick is for us. As for the centre backs they go up a level when they're paired with Kompany, without him Stones will still make awful decisions on the ball and Otamendi will sprint into every challenge.
Or roughly the same as as Lukaku and Pogba? Shocker, players in 2017 cost a lot of money.
Yet despite what you say, and with Bravo in goal for most of the season, City conceded fewer goals than Arsenal last season.
But he's been out for 170 days or so during his time at City. Ligaments, and generally he's just a sicknote. Hard to rely on.
Walker and Mendy for 50m each... Well at least they're addressing their problem positions but ffs the costs for any player these days are insane. They still have shit center backs though and basically nothing when it comes to holding midfielders. But their attack will be very hard to stop, even if they don't sign Sanchez.
Edit: They'll have spent almost 200m on Ederson, Bernardo Silva, Mendy and Walker if those 2 deals go through
Of course, but if they manage to get lucky with injuries this season their options are decent.
Yet despite what you say, and with Bravo in goal for most of the season, City conceded fewer goals than Arsenal last season.
That isn't really a proper answer to what he was saying though. Your central midfield options right now are quite average considering Gundogan's injury proneness.
I don't think it's quite as shit as people think, still not great. They have Gundogan, a player who was probably the most impressive midfielder in Europe the season Dortmund made the CL final, playing in a deeper role than he's been used so far at City and Yaya's a better option than Carrick is for us. As for the centre backs they go up a level when they're paired with Kompany, without him Stones will still make awful decisions on the ball and Otamendi will sprint into every challenge.
Is "We're still not as shit as Arsenal!" really the argument you want to make if you have serious ambitions?
True, it was the hypocrisy of an Arsenal fan, who have spent heavily on their own spine, criticising City when hos own team have a worse defensive record (with Bravo in goal), that riled me.
Yes, the three options of Gundogan, Fernandinho and Toure are all flawed in one way or another. However, Pep is unlikely to play two defensive midfielders so I wouldn't be too concerned over the options available.
Yeah adding players from last window makes sense
There is nothing hypocritical about it as I never claimed Arsenal didn't have big problems. As an Arsenal fan I know perfectly well that we're kind of shit and that we'll never win anything big with Wenger around. That doesn't really bear on the question of why City, who have the top manager in the world (according to many at least) and a gazillion pounds of blood money to spend, have these substantial weaknesses.
Because he's nothing special. I know money is no object for City but it still seems ridiculous to spend 50m on Walker when they could easily pick up someone as good or better for much cheaper.
Sorry. I don't understand what point you are making. To me, these ridiculous posts trying to score points about what clubs pay for players are just that, ridiculous (especially coming from Utd or City fans). Unfortunately, this is modern football.