Because neither team really played to win it. You guys only really took it serious when you got to the last 8 and your league season started to slip away. Still I'm pretty sure I said while being in it is a failure, you will look back on it not only as a low point but as the start of Jose fixing things no? The last line of your post makes no sense... do you understand the word embarrassment? An embarrassment is something you feel shame over. Having a club thats above the europa league is not an embarrassment, unfortunately in England there are 6 clubs who should be in CL but for 2 of them that shame is coming every season.
Do you really think Spurs took the EL seriously? Did you guys before the last 8.
Bravo's deal has not been swept under the carpet, I think you'll not find a single person who said anything other than he was a flop, but you can say what you want the fee was sweet feck all in the modern market. If you think Bernado Silva is a replacement for Nolito than eh.. you know sweet feck all about football. Nolito is a left winger, Silva plays on the right or as a no.10. I think you'll find Silva is in the squad in a completely different role and position but given some of your logic I hope you can understand instead of making stuff up.
Plenty of players have justified their fee in the first year (Lukaku for example is off to a good start, KDB, Martial, Bailly, Jesus) and plenty haven't. I think you'll find that whole paragraph you typed on Pogba is pretty much what I said if you actually paid any attention while reading. My almost exact words (Last season he didn't justify his price but he's showing signs he will and if he stays with you for many years he will. So your idiocy is you arguing with me by agreeing with me? Really, hows that work?
Are you actually really comparing Pogba's first season at United to Ronaldo's at Madrid? Really? Ronaldo scored 33 goals in 35 games. He hit the ground running, he totally justified his fee (now your beating yourself with your own stick). If you think Ronaldo needed years to justify his fee, well you should give up on watching football. Just because he was overshadowed by Messi doesn't mean he didn't justify his fee.
Who said the club paid for his first year or he played bad? Now you are making stuff up completely. I simply said Pogba didn't justify or look a £90m player last season, but I also said he would and the deal would look cheap. So you obviously didn't read what I said and spent 3 paragraphs ranting shite while trying to argue with me to defend your player by agreeing with exactly what I said.
The Lukaku argument lol. Your moving goalposts, so you're making one excuse for £90m Pogba and another for potentially £85m Lukaku. The reality is they are both good footballers like every other other footballer who went for crazy prices not a United problem or even a mistake as I said so I don't know what you're trying to defend. No one criticised United for it, I simply said whether these players turn out to be value for money or not will be decided in the future by how they perform which was only backing up what I said about Pogba.
Again not a criticism but your inability to read apparently turned that into something you were trying to justify, what doesn't that logic apply to Bernado Silva, lets see he cost half a Lukaku and came in on the same wages as Jesus Navas who he actually replaced.. but your logic on that one only applies to United when justifying high fees right?
Biting your own ass, what does that even mean. Given that comment and your lack of understanding of plain english and the fact your spent 3/4 of your post arguing with something I didn't say or soemthing your agreeing with plus the United bias I'd say this suggests your about 12.
LVG got done by West Ham, Jose had to build from there? Are you really saying United were on a par with West Ham? I'm pretty sure ye finished the season 5th and only lost out to City on goal difference. Jose had to build off a 5th place team with 66 points, Pep off a 4th place team with 66 points. I swear that was probably the dumbest post I've ever responded to on here. Heres a quick summary..
1 - You don't understand the word embarrassment
2 - Spurs tried to win the EL
3 - You argued with me by agreeing with me for 2 paragraphs.
4 - You argued with me about something you imagined I said or misread.
5 - You wrote "biting your own ass"
6 - You said Man United team who finished with 66 points were on a par with West Ham.
7 - Man United and West Ham ffs....
8 - I'm still in shock over West Ham
9 - Yet you somehow believe a City team who scored only the same number of points should do better? Logic...
PL should have 6 teams in CL. Having a laugh? 3 of them never lifted the trophy for once and 2 of those seems like never try to go all the way. That's is embarassment right there. Tottenham rested players for the game with Chelsea. Sure their chance to progress was narrow, but it's telling their ambition. That's embarassment right there. Robbed and other Bayern players remark when Bayern having Arsenal as their opponent. Arsenal is a joke of a CL club for them. That's embarrassment right there. Are you sure you know what embarrassment is? Genuine question.
@roonster09 already have answer for you for this part about Tottenham fielding their strong team, yet got kicked out. It was not easy after all. Always the same downplaying whenever our club achieved something. Just how RAWK had a their annual worst PL season whenever United lifted the trophy under SAF...
Before calling out other about not knowing football, then just go by mere position, not role, you exposed yourself knowing nothing. Bernardo Silva & Nolito are both players who attack/exploit the pocket of space. They may not start same role, but has the same role with other player to stay more wide. Trying to downplay Bravo fee when he initially moved using this summer rate is sweeping under the carpet, mate. Clubs must have been ripped off for years with previous world transfer fee since they could have got more like 200+m nowadays. There were better players than Neymar in the past surely?
You must not be serious if you took Ronaldo example I made as like for like comparison?! Please read along the lines, mate. Ronaldo scored that good amount of goal but what Real Madrid achieved that season more than the previous one without Ronaldo? That season Ronaldo was labelled as flat track bully and big player in small games for a reason. Even Messi divided opinion that season since people argued Sneijder, Xavi, Iniesta contributed more for their club & their national teams, let alone Ronaldo was convincingly beaten and schooled in You seem like all caring about mere numbers/stats and hardly touched on the context of the situation. Bravo was first and now this. My point with Ronaldo case was he didn't justify his fee. The team position didn't improve. Still miles off Barcelona in La Liga. Same old humiliatingly got knocked off early in CL. He couldn't score more because the team ain't progressing that much in Cup competitions. Ronaldo won Best Player award before, but ended up miles off in Best player award (not even made top 3) after the first season. Let me remind you again Ronaldo transfer fee in context was significantly more expensive than previous one. The expectation at the time was much more than the revisionism now. People were writing off Ronaldo transfer as stupid as he ventured too close to Messi and would never see the sun light (of winning Best Player award) again.
How on earth Jesus & Bailly justified their fee but not Pogba? Here relation between expectation with the fee. Since you love isolated off context numbers so much, let check KDB first season at City: 10 goals & 9 assists in PL & CL playing in an attacking position. Pogba yielded 8 goals and 4 assists in PL & EL in position where he does more defensive work. Without context, look like KDB was superior player right like you want to think right? Pogba had 9 MOTM compared to KDB's 5 (Stats from Whoscored). Hmm, seems like just because Pogba was world record, then there seems to be different parameter to judge him.
Martial had a great first season, but meh second one. So what was your point again? First season in the contract should be judged harshly because of the fee? Was not my point was about the fee should be justified over the course of the contract length?
Bernado Silva half the price, and you told me I can't read
. Everyone know English media didn't report the addon for Bernado Silva while adding every fine line into certain deal. Perhaps, I can't read with one eye closed. I give you that.
Moving goal post between Pogba and Lukaku fee?
One was the most expensive player the year before. One was not even half the fee the current most expensive player...
City was in CL semi, playing against a top top team, and was in CL qualification positions all season (never once got out top 4). Just because one team was always in control and could afford slow down and doesn't mean there was competitiveness. Same season, Arsenal finished above Tottenham despite Tottenham was supposed to the team to chase Leicester, and Arsenal fan had meltdown after meltdown. Again you always tried to avoid context.
You tried to be ignorant to miss the point on purpose, didn't you? You know clearly I am talking about LVG failure that we were stuck around West Ham (in a good season) level all season. In the end, LVG missed out CL football for EL which West Ham also got qualification for. Try to avoid context as you can. GD can separate a Champion from challenger, of course it could separate CL qualification from EL qualification. It's clearly showing how much LVG failed that season. Playing in CL is differently better than playing in EL, that's not even a debate. Don't move the goal post mate. Heed what you preach.
The same old "age" & "language" insult.
Someone need to grow up.