Because he's nothing special. I know money is no object for City but it still seems ridiculous to spend 50m on Walker when they could easily pick up someone as good or better for much cheaper.
Just curious but who is the same quality thats available for the same money? Walker was pretty much the best rb in the prem last season by a fair distance, Valenica probably next. Of potential RB's who may be available Bellerin is worse and would cost at least £40m +, Alves of course whom we were clearly in for but chose PSG but I can't think of many others..
regressed under him. Went out in cl eariler, not as entertaining even worse defence.
Rubbish, The CL we beat one good team under Pellers on the way to the semi's. Last season we went out to Monaco a round earlier. Under Pep we finished a place higher, earned 12 more points, scored 9 more goals and conceded 2 less than the previous season. We never looked like beating any of the big teams in the CL in either year (unless you count PSG) so the only place Pelligrini's last season really bettered Pep's was the League Cup...
How much will Pep have spent at city already after these signings. £350m odd?
If he doesn't win the treble this season, he's a shit manager
People in glass houses and all that... When speaking about 1st team players....
Lukaku - 75m (I believe rising to 90 if he's a success), Lindelof - 31m, Pogba - 89m, Mkhi - 35m, Bailly - 32.5m = £262m
Ederson - 35m, Silva - £43m, Stones - 50m, Sane - 42m, Jesus - 27m, Gundogan - 23m, Bravo - 15m, Nolito - 15m = £270m
Both with the rest of a summer to go. Walker and Mendy will probably cost us 90m, Perisic and a hold midfielder will likely cost you at least 80m as well.
Jose better beat Pep to the treble or he's a shit manager.
There is nothing hypocritical about it as I never claimed Arsenal didn't have big problems. As an Arsenal fan I know perfectly well that we're kind of shit and that we'll never win anything big with Wenger around. That doesn't really bear on the question of why City, who have the top manager in the world (according to many at least) and a gazillion pounds of blood money to spend, have these substantial weaknesses.
I agree to and extent the fault has to lie with Txixi, Pep and Pellers for not getting the fullbacks done in the last 2 seasons. Our CB's I think are fine, not world class but competent and if Kompany stays fit we'll be pretty good. We had a better defensive record than Chelsea after christmas last season. Stones is a concern but I won't write him off yet. Otamendi is rash but is fine with a composed defender beside him. The key is keeping VK fit and his run of games at the end of last season was his best in awhile so I'm confident enough to take him at his word when he says his worst days are behind him.
Don't understand the interest for Walker. Is he good enough technically? Guardiola doesn't need an actual RB, he needs a wide midfielder, like dani alves, a player with great IQ and technical skill with the pace and legs to cover the flank.
I think Pep has learned he can't make inverted fullbacks work in the Premier League. The ball goes from back to front too fast for them to recover positions. Once we gave up on the idea bar against the weakest of teams our defence was much better even with Jesus Navas playing RB albeit Kompanys fitness played a part.
Semedo off for 30m euros rising to 35, and City are waiting on Walker for £50m. Such is the EPL.
Semedo is quite good but is mainly potential and not nearly as experienced or established as Walker. Only Barca will force him away for less than the 50m Euro asking price too. No way a premier league team gets him at that money.
Theres also Walkers homegrown status to consider as we are quite light on HG players and those that are seem to be heading for Girona. Would I rather we were in for £30m Semedo than £50m Walker? Of course but as of right now. Walker is simply more valuable to City for a number of reasons.