I am fine with him playing as RB. But it's clear that his best performances at RB came before Pep took over.
I thought he was his usual brilliant self whenever he played rightback last season, just like it was at the World Cup, when he finally played right back again. Overall the treble winning season was his standout year, but if we start discussing if Lahm was a better rightback under van Gaal or Heynckes, then it gets silly in my opinion. Fine margins and often not influenced by his individual ability but the team around him, the tactics and whatever.I am fine with him playing as RB. But it's clear that his best performances at RB came before Pep took over.
Again a dicey pick by Gio. Definitely not close to his peak under Trap.
He had a couple of great performances as RB. His level of performance didnt drop; he just didnt play week-in-week-out on this position. Its up to you how you rate things, but if thats really one of your concerns, things become incredible complicated. No way that you are able to make a similar detailed assessment for the majority of players.
Not sure if serious? Trap is clearly the most influential manager in his career and turned him into a Ballon d'Or winner, gave him that attacking box to box role, which clearly was his peak form, the role in which he drove Germany to a World Cup win.Again a dicey pick by Gio. Definitely not in the peak under Trap.
Again a dicey pick by Gio. Definitely not close to his peak under Trap.
Edgar has his Traps mixed up I reckon. Inter Trap would be the relevant one for Lothar, obviously.
I'm just absolutely torn between two choices here.
Given that you've got Skizzo breathing down yer neck, I would've thought your first pick was pretty much set in stone.
I'm just absolutely torn between two choices here.
Let me know what you're thinking. .. I'll see if I can help you out
There's two clear GOAT's there though isn't there? I've not checked the dates, but I think there is.
I know who I'd go for but I'm not too surprised he's tossing it around. Assuming I've got the dates right.
Yep. Insane choice, really. But passing up on...yeah. I wouldn't have had the balls to do that myself.
Having said that, though - there could be, possibly, maybe, perhaps...some sort of "peak" argument to be made here. Which would complicate matters further and make the call even harder to make.
Glad I don't have to make it!
The bold part should be key, I reckon. There is no reason to suspect Lahm wouldn't have been brilliant IF he had been played exclusively as a RB - and there you pretty much have it.
The peak/best position/whatever part is only relevant for some players who clearly featured in certain teams/under certain managers in a) markedly poor spells or b) clearly after their prime.
Like Balu's VDS example above - or, say, Larry White for Fergie.
Yeah. We can't assume they can only play one role, in one tactic - because that was what they played during "our manager". We're going by abilities and Lahm's ability to play RB wasn't any different under Guardiola. Whether he played there or not isn't relevant as the fact that he played there for his entire career already is indisputable proofs of that he could play there.
If somebody had picked Giggs here, then they'd be able to use all his unused subs and it'd be hard to dispute their level being any different from the week before or after his time as a first coach.
Aye - that's how I would interpret it. With some players it is obvious that they simply weren't at their best, playing for team X under manager Y - and in those cases the "peak" card can be played legitimately.
Moyes would be a grotesquely interesting case in point here. I'd say you could play that card for all his players bar De Gea - they all had a decidedly bad season under him and if someone were crazy enough to pick Moyes, his United players would have to be judged accordingly.
With Giggs, however, the evidence simply isn't there either way - and so they would get the benefit of the doubt in my book.
By the stage that he made his debut for the national team it was apparent that Bozsik’s decision making was one of the central strengths to his game. Not only was he able to spot the right pass at the right moment, his technique was impeccable. The youngster possessed a range of passing that allowed him to find distant targets, but he was also happy to play the simple ball if it meant retaining possession. Furthermore, he was almost impossible to dispossess as he shielded the ball so well from opponents.
Yeah, I've found it recently, but thanks anyway. Some great stories in there.
I'm taking the original Ronaldo. Lippi managed him for Inter I think.. didn't want to take the risk.
Certainly did. Not the best of times for either of them - Ronaldo was injured for long spells during Lippi's time in charge. But on the upside this was within what most consider Ronaldo's peak years - he won the Ballon (again) the season after Lippi left, so there shouldn't be a problem there unless people decide to nitpick to the point of being unfair.
I do remember Magyars from the research I did for my first ever draft here, took over from someone who did not show up I think. Again coming back to the peak arguement, isn't Boszik of 47/48 similar to CR7 of Sporting? Peak can be argued during army team under Sebes circa 1954-56 ot at stretch 1952 when the club won the league? I just could not find anything the club or player did in 47/48.
Don't confuse when the team peaked with when the player peaked. Honved became such an incredible side when they turned into the army side and got all the top players from all the other top clubs. It's not like I have access to the full nationalteam here, just the few players who already were at the club before it became that big. Bozsik already became a regular starter in the nationalteam in '47 and was one of the key players to turn their style of football into success. Bozsik was already 22/23 years old in '48, Ronaldo was 18 when he signed for United, that's a huge difference.I do remember Magyars from the research I did for my first ever draft here, took over from someone who did not show up I think. Again coming back to the peak arguement, isn't Boszik of 47/48 similar to CR7 of Sporting? Peak can be argued during army team under Sebes circa 1954-56 ot at stretch 1952 when the club won the league? I just could not find anything the club or player did in 47/48.