Edgar Allan Pillow
Ero-Sennin
I've got 4 managers to fight off for my team..mmmmm...
a lot of people failed to capitalize on picking manager first. Paolo, MJJ, Balu, Cutch I think all did capitalize on that and did great
What's this mean? Not capitalizing by not picking a unique manager?
Those managers who are being shared have deep pools to have 2 strong teams. If they were alone, they would just be super strong even in the first round, imo.
Didn't mean it as something negative, just that I've seen some people be unsatisfied with their pick and wasn't sure they knew that in the reinforcement in the next round they'd be last.
you lost me again. Isn't that in order? If 12th pick ends with crappy, then next round we start from top, right?
Crappy had pick 16 in this round, Harms had pick 1. So for the reinforcement Crappy will have pick 1 and Harms will be last.
You can't do that. The advantage to give someone twice in a row the top player pick is way too big. You have to reverse the order for the first reinforcement round, especially because many agreed that picking the manager last was actually an advantage. The manager picks shouldn't count.Crappy had pick 16 in this round, Harms had pick 1. So for the reinforcement Crappy will have pick 1 and Harms will be last.
I have the 2nd Capello pick? Damn you!
2nd and 3rd.
Yup. I was in the same dilema. Is a less than stellar Ronaldo still lethal?
I am fine personally to reverse the order or randomize it but the people from the bottom half has to decide it and accept it considering it was quite clear who had the first pick in this draft, and who had the 16th pick.
At no time was anywhere mentioned that the player draft won't start in reverse order in the reinforcement rounds. It's silly in my opinion. Not that I care, it won't matter for my team, but it just feels very wrong to me.I am fine personally to reverse the order or randomize it but the people from the bottom half has to decide it and accept it considering it was quite clear who had the first pick in this draft, and who had the 16th pick.
Is it though? Basically meant that I could not pick someone like Udo Lattek (was always gonna be picked twice), Ferguson ( can't play him with a divided pool), Pep (Same) and some others.You can't do that. The advantage to give someone twice in a row the top player pick is way too big. You have to reverse the order for the first reinforcement round, especially because many agreed that picking the manager last was actually an advantage. The manager picks shouldn't count.
I think it is fair. I had the same in previous drafts. crappy has first pick this round. Next round would start at the other end.
It was never a rule, Annah's comment came completely out of nowhere and is completely against the order we had in all the previous drafts. Unless I missed that it was written somewhere, it makes no sense to me.No changing rules now.
Is it though? Basically meant that I could not pick someone like Udo Lattek (was always gonna be picked twice), Ferguson ( can't play him with a divided pool), Pep (Same) and some others.
It was never a rule, Annah's comment came completely out of nowhere and is completely against the order we had in all the previous drafts. Unless I missed that it was written somewhere, it makes no sense to me.
Even those were picked twice, could not be picked againYup, all the managers who couldn't be shared was free for grabs for the early pickers. Feels worse in my eyes to give Crappy the last pick, then he makes it through and gets the last pick again. The managerial picks was clearly part of the game and starting in that round, then starting in the reinforcements is a bit off.
Actually this is exactly the order of always? Start first round, last second round, start third round etc.
I think randomizing which way we start is the best though in the reinforcements.
I wouldn't want to play Lattek with a divided pool. Picking the manager early had its risks, because you had no control over your player pool anymore and everyone behind you had the chance to steal the key player of your team, because they could pick first. Being first and last both had its advantages and disadvantages in my opinion and it simply shouldn't count in regards to the order of the player draft in the reinforcement rounds.Is it though? Basically meant that I could not pick someone like Udo Lattek (was always gonna be picked twice), Ferguson ( can't play him with a divided pool), Pep (Same) and some others.
Only if you include the manager picks, which makes it a lot more unbalanced as usual in my opinion and wasn't clear to me at all. You didn't mention it before today, right? I'm fine with randomising it, that's probably the best solution. Your decision anyway.Actually this is exactly the order of always? Start first round, last second round, start third round etc.
I think randomizing which way we start is the best though in the reinforcements.
so much drama.
I wouldn't want to play Lattek with a divided pool. Picking the manager early had its risks, because you had no control over your player pool anymore and everyone behind you had the chance to steal the key player of your team, because they could pick first. Being first and last both had its advantages and disadvantages in my opinion and it simply shouldn't count in regards of the order of the player draft in the reinforcement rounds.
Only if you include the manager picks, which makes it a lot more unbalanced as usual in my opinion and wasn't clear to me at all. You didn't mention it before today, right? I'm fine with randomising it, that's probably the best solution. Your decision anyway.
Peak Rivaldo is available under Van Gaal.This is damn interesting. Nobody can pick Rivaldo or Ronaldo in their peak. 2003 version, 2006 version and 2004 version are available of Ronaldo only. Rivaldo is only available from Milan. I have no clue how people will pick, it will be a blast.
Peak Rivaldo is available under Van Gaal.