The Red Viper
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2013
- Messages
- 2,175
- Supports
- Liverpool
SERGIO BUSQUETS
Since it's Inter Passarella, always worth revisiting this story.
@Annahnomoss I'm not too sure about Dida either mate, why him?
I know .Puskas and Eusebio up top. Ooft.
Even the first round will be a clash of heavyweights. There are no 'preferred' opponents in this draft.
think mine is one of the weaker ones tbh.
Pierre Littbarski (April 16, 1960) was a frail German dribbler who was known for his O-beine. 'Litti' played the majority of his career at 1.FC Köln and Germany won the World Cup in 1990.
The little 'Spielmacher' made his debut in the first team of the people of Cologne during the season 1978/79. The team had just become champion of West Germany. In "Die Geißböcke" Littbarski played rapidly in the base.He was a two-legged, had an excellent game understanding and not to get off the ball.
It was then fine for years 1.FC Köln, the team finished consistently in the top half. 'Litti' would be in his early years at FC Köln include playing under coach Rinus Michels. That relationship was not very good, incidentally. The General Littbarski would ever call the craziest coach he had ever had because Michels would have given due dribble. Received a fine of two thousand marksIn 1985, moreover, the midfielder made the "Tor des Jahres' after an inimitable dribble against Werder Bremen.
The year after FC Köln had lost against Real Madrid, the final of the UEFA Cup Pierre Littbarski left for France. He signed in 1986 a contract with the then very ambitious Racing Club de Paris, the club where Sonny Silooy still would come out. Later However, a success that was not staying, because in 1987 turned the midfielder already back to Cologne. His second period at 1 FC Köln would last until 1993. In total, he would be more than 400 games to play in the red and white combination. Littbarski finished his career in Japan, after staying with JEF United and Brummell Sendai.
Pierre Littbarski was part of an outstanding generation of German footballers with players like Lothar Matthäus, Jürgen Klinsmann, Guido Buchwald and Klaus Augenthaler. With his country he became world champion in 1990. Argentina was defeated 1-0 in the final with a penalty kick by Andy Brehme. In 1982 and 1986 he was with West Germany second at the World Championships. 'Litti' was in this plowing one of the creative minds of Die Mannschaft.
Lets say a player was at the club when the manager was appointed but he never played a game. Is he eligible?
I know we are considering the form of the player under that manager. But, I was just wondering if he will be eligible or not.
In the spirit of the draft I'd say it would need to take into account the player's performances under a manager. It's always about building a case either way as you say, although I think there should be an emphasis on how that player performed under that manager, whether's that 1 performance or 100. In @The Red Viper 's case he's obviously got the opportunity of a big name there but one who never played under his manager.Depends completely on why he didn't play. If he was injured then he will count as being injured here too as his highest peak under the manager was being injured. If it is a case of the player just never getting to feature during a short period of time, then it is up to you to argue that the player still had the peak levels he had under whoever managers had him before and after.
If somebody had Mourinho it would be fair to assume Mata would still be a pretty great footballer even if he rarely played. As for Mourinho he played as a RAM - but if he was played centrally, in a style that suited him then he'd be brilliant still. So it is difficult, up to the manager who researches the players in depth to make a decision on it. If you think the player was actually still at a really high level, even if he didn't play much - or feature in the first eleven - then it is up to you to provide the sources and reasoning for your thoughts.
Personally I'd not have any issues with Mata for Mourinho, as long as he wasn't played out wide etc.
In the spirit of the draft I'd say it would need to take into account the player's performances under a manager. It's always about building a case either way as you say, although I think there should be an emphasis on how that player performed under that manager, whether's that 1 performance or 100. In @The Red Viper 's case he's obviously got the opportunity of a big name there but one who never played under his manager.
I agree in general but I think it will be quite obvious when a player was just second choice to an even greater player etc and when the player just wasn't that great of a player under the manager. If somebody coached a national team for a really short period, there's a chance some players never played even if they were clearly in their peak at that time.
With the nationals - do you consider every active player of certain nationality available or just the ones that were called up into 23-man squad?
With the nationals - do you consider every active player of certain nationality available or just the ones that were called up into 23-man squad?
Just the ones from the 23 man squad I would imagine. Otherwise it seems the peak under manager wouldnt apply to them.