Robertd0803
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2014
- Messages
- 7,191
Some of you apply the same logic to todays team as they would have done almost 20 years ago. No doubt, would we be competing for shit then I'd say yeah that makes sense because we really have to make sure to have a strong bench. But we aren't competing at all. We have to focus on creating a good first eleven plus 3-4 useful impact subs. Everything above is 2nd or even 3rd priority. If I can choose, I get rid of both, Casemiro and Maguire. Give the minutes our 4th- or 5th choice CB would get to a younger player we might be building up for the future for ourselves or to sell at a profit. Extending Maguire isn't the worst idea in the world but, to me, it is lazy and kind what we always do and what keeps the deadwood counter of the squad in the orange zone forever.
edit: and fyi - we are playing differently these days than in last seasons Palace game. And iirc he filled in at least 3 or 4 times at CB and was alright, certainly not worse than Lindelof.
Except hes not quite deadwood, certainly not in the sense Lindelof is for example (or Rashford but thats a whole other discussion). When called upon hes been solid for the most part and until Amorim has a definite decision of his first choice back 5 you have days like Sunday wheres hes in the starting line up. Having him for 12 more months is a sensible option without needing to play Casemiro at the back ever again.
Last edited: