gza the genius
Full Member
I'd love it if this were true, especially if it meant Jones or Rojo were leaving.
No, not for the price paid for him. He's not the best. It's all relative. I find Maguire better as a player. He offers the same level of aerial threat, just as much strength and better passing. The game's moving away from defending again.
they are when replacing him may cost just as much, as I said Evan has effectively replaced both Huth and Morgan, we already need another CB, if we sold Harry to we'd probably have to spend most of the fee on that player as Harry is key to what Puel wants to do
Kante had a release clause for around £25m for Cl clubs, CL clubs were interested but thankfully Chelsea weren't in the CL so had to bid higher, once they did we could refuse to sell at a lower price, we didin't have much choice for Kante, Riyad only had 2 years on his contract so we weren't in a position to hold out for more in a 1 club market yet still got top money for him
I don't disagree with that but unlike the sulky little semi-retired Algerian I very much doubt Maguire would go on strike over it
But pace and can lack concentration but very good player
yeah we sold Kante as we had no choice and Made Mahrez wait until we got the offer we wanted, I didn't say we wouldn't sell I said we wouldn't be bullied
Let say I am not against this. But what role of the CB partnership he would play? He is a stopper as far as I see. Smalling, Bailly, Jones, Rojo are stopper. Most of our partnership between these players failed because when these guys were tried as sweeper, they ain't always great at reading the play, but rather chasing ball carrier. Football is not played on paper and player can change/improve but the point is if we're to spend big, shouldn't we try to get one natural fit the profile than buying and hoping?
VVD is quick. Having watched loads of him when he was at his best at Southampton I’d not say concentration was an issue. When he wanted to leave, yes, because he didn’t care!!
Vvd is slow to get going and his concentration is an issue.
He has been playing that role forever... Being good on ball doesn't mean anything, it's how one's attribute, preferred style of (defensive) play that matters and Maguire has been a stopper.He's not a stopper, too good on the ball on the ball to be played in that role. That's not to say he's not tough and good in the air, but he's the one carrying the ball out of defence, taking it off the keeper. He'd actually compliment all of the above.
But they made City jump through hoops to sign Mharez.It’s leicester, he’s available for the right price and they’ve just signed Jonny Evans. I suspect they know Maguire will be leaving sooner rather than later
He's as much, if not more, of a liability as Jones is, he'd be an asset for us for his aerial ability and his forward bursts but we need defensively reliable defenders and for the price we'd have to pay for him he's not worth it.erm no thanks we don't want to overwork our Physio
who says he'd be cheaper? he's 1 year into a very long contract and we obviously will fight hard to keep him
no he isn't
But they made City jump through hoops to sign Mharez.
He also has three years left on his contract, there's no way Leicester asks for less than VVD.
That's how English football works these days. Southampton etc are all mini Levy's
But they made City jump through hoops to sign Mharez.
He also has three years left on his contract, there's no way Leicester asks for less than VVD.
That's how English football works these days. Southampton etc are all mini Levy's
Stones was a world record and Laporte doesn't come from a rich, English club.They may have, but Mahrez was sold for quite a bit less than VVD - the world's most expensive CB. And Mahrez is a miles better player than Maguire.
If Maguire would like to leave and a club wants to buy him it'd be madness to see much more than City paid for their defenders. You're looking at a Stones-Laporte fee rather than equalling the record for a CB.
If you look back I've been a big advocate of buying Maguire for along time. Same with VVD.What's your take on Maguire now?
He has been playing that role forever... Being good on ball doesn't mean anything, it's how one's attribute, preferred style of (defensive) play that matters and Maguire has been a stopper.
I question whether you watch him enough then.The days of having old fashioned stoppers are all long gone. Same way full backs now are many teams sole attacking width, game has evolved. Central defenders need to be comfortable with the ball. Maguire is not and never has been a stopper. To call him that is to do a disservice to his game. He may look like an old fashioned stopper, but if you actually watch him play, it's clearly evident he isn't.
Only paper chit chat.Any links to him at all?
Any links to him at all?
Any links to him at all?
I think the media has zero idea of what United are interested in. If we're even in anyone at all.