LVG's Legacy/Foundations

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can agree with some of the players but the other thing? No. Mou is more then capable to learn the players to pass the way he want. Giving LvG credit for learning players to pass I think is wrong. If Mou does good thats because of Mou and not the proccess of LvG. He did good to bring up Rashford but there were many circumstances that made it possible. Same goes for TFM.
 
He didn't get the best out of those players though did he? Which is the first and foremost job any manager ought to do, not just in football.
Well that is a topic for another thread. Not this one. This thread is to access any positives he left behind. Not to piss and moan about how some of us hate him so much and how he didn't live up to expectations nor the hype.
 
Well that is a topic for another thread. Not this one. This thread is to access any positives he left behind. Not to piss and moan about how some of us hate him so much and how he didn't live up to expectations nor the hype.

Oh aye most definitely. In the end he won the FA cup with us so it wasn't that bad now was it? Was it?
 
Talk of missing the point. You clearly do not grasp the difference between identifying what positive things LVG left behind and blanket praise. Its also utterly puerile thinking to claim he deserves no credit for anything. All due to total amnesia about Moyes' reign, plus amnesia about the huge amount of selling LVG did when people moan about what he supposedly spent. If the dude was useless and left rubbish behind like some of you claim, they'd be no reason why Mourinho has only added 4 world class players to the squad to make it easily one of the best in the entire league.
:lol: This is quite spectacular. 'Only' 4 world class players, as if it's easy for for a club to go sign 4 world class players every summer, and that 4 world class players isn't a big deal, it's only like .. a minor improvement to the squad.
 
What part of the word squad do you not get? I also repeat, if all he did in the transfer market was blow money Mourinho wouldn't have only added 4 players to his current first team squad.
We were signing Shaw regardless.

Blind and Martial we excellent signings, - I don't think anyone will dispute that.

However, it seems the most shunned players by Mourinho are not Fergie players, not even Moyes players - but LvG players. Aside from Herrera, who's sort of on the fringes of the team, who else is there? Morgan, Bastian, Depay, Rojo, none of them look like they're in his plans. Di Maria turned out to be a bit of a disaster, too. Let's not even mention Falcao.

3 successful signings out of 9/10 is pretty fecking dire.
 
:lol: This is quite spectacular. 'Only' 4 world class players, as if it's easy for for a club to go sign 4 world class players every summer, and that 4 world class players isn't a big deal, it's only like .. a minor improvement to the squad.
talk of another pointless post. A team like United has zero business having trouble signing world class players. The fact also remains if LVG left utter shit behind the vast majority of the squad would be sold or transfer listed and Mourinho would never have stopped at signing 4 players.
 
What part of the word squad do you not get? I also repeat, if all he did in the transfer market was blow money Mourinho wouldn't have only added 4 players to his current first team squad.
4 first team players is a huge addition to a football team, its over a third of the starting line up and all 4 are guaranteed starters in the spine of the team so it suggests LVG did not leave the team in good shape at all.

Probably the only reason we don't see more signings is because it will unbalance the squad.
 
talk of another pointless post. A team like United has zero business having trouble signing world class players. The fact also remains if LVG left utter shit behind the vast majority of the squad would be sold or transfer listed and Mourinho would never have stopped at signing 4 players.
What world-class players have we signed since Fergie left? I'd argue the only one until the summer was Di Maria, and look how that turned out, never even wanted to be here.

As I said in my previous post, the majority of Mou's preferred XI and subs are a mix of Fergie & Moyes players, with only 3/4 out of 9/10 being LvG signings. That's a piss poor return.

That fact is the majority of players Mourinho sees no place for in the side are LvG players.
 
:lol: This is quite spectacular. 'Only' 4 world class players, as if it's easy for for a club to go sign 4 world class players every summer, and that 4 world class players isn't a big deal, it's only like .. a minor improvement to the squad.
Is there a point to this off topic post? Because I don't see any. No one is arguing LVG should have stayed. No one is saying he'd have attracted the players Mourinho has been able to. Its also rather baffling that you imagine it hard for a team of United's quality with the a top manager to attract world class players. Yet even the hated LVG was able to attract Di Maria and Falcao to add to the already incoming Shaw and Herrerra
 
Is there a point to this off topic post? Because I don't see any. No one is arguing LVG should have stayed. No one is saying he'd have attracted the players Mourinho has been able to. Its also rather baffling that you imagine it hard for a team of United's quality with the a top manager to attract world class players. Yet even the hated LVG was able to attract Di Maria and Falcao to add to the already incoming Shaw and Herrerra
Why are you quoting the same post again?

I think you're the one bringing the pointless argument into it, here. It's not easy for any club to get 4 world class players in one window. At no point did I single out our club. When's the last time a club did that? I'd argue not since Real did in Summer 09. My point was that saying 'we only had to sign 4 world class players' to improve the squad is absolutely absurd because signing 4 world-class players makes a mammoth improvement to ANY squad. They're world-class for feck sake!
 
Why are you quoting the same post again?

I think you're the one bringing the pointless argument into it, here. It's not easy for any club to get 4 world class players in one window. At no point did I single out our club. When's the last time a club did that? I'd argue not since Real did in Summer 09. My point was that saying 'we only had to sign 4 world class players' to improve the squad is absolutely absurd because signing 4 world-class players makes a mammoth improvement to ANY squad. They're world-class for feck sake!
So basically you didn't have a point. Thanks for the confirmation
What world-class players have we signed since Fergie left? I'd argue the only one until the summer was Di Maria, and look how that turned out, never even wanted to be here.

As I said in my previous post, the majority of Mou's preferred XI and subs are a mix of Fergie & Moyes players, with only 3/4 out of 9/10 being LvG signings. That's a piss poor return.

That fact is the majority of players Mourinho sees no place for in the side are LvG players.
If they had no place in the side they wouldn't be part of his 25 man squad for the season.
 
4 first team players is a huge addition to a football team, its over a third of the starting line up and all 4 are guaranteed starters in the spine of the team so it suggests LVG did not leave the team in good shape at all.

Probably the only reason we don't see more signings is because it will unbalance the squad.

Aye, I was about to say that. 4/11 players, and of the remaining "7", all of DDG, Valencia, Smalling (one can argue Blind - I think majority agrees his been a star for us at CB), Rooney, Fellaini "pre-dates" LvG.

So after all the money spent and 4 transfer windows later, LvG's signings (if we're being kind, Shaw and Herrera are classified as his signings) guaranteed in the first XI seems to be Shaw and Martial. Even Martial, as LvG said, was signed for his successor - Giggs. But let's not argue pedantics.

Falcao, AdM and valdes - gone. Bastian soon to follow. And how much longer Darmian, Romero, Depay, Rojo and even Schneiderlin/Herrera, (who are both on the fringes and not first choice after substantial investment into them) are still with our club, is unclear.

That, in all honesty, is an appalling transfer record and makes the "he left a stronger squad" debate...well, debatable, IMO.

Obviously most of us were excited at signing those players, based on their previous record/performances/potential etc....but it seems hardly any of them have really worked out for us under LvG.
 
So basically you didn't have a point. Thanks for the confirmation
Actually I think the issue is you don't have a tangible response.
If they had no place in the side they wouldn't be part of his 25 man squad for the season.
Right because what's the point in filling up the 25 man squad if you don't have a need for the players? Not like you have injuries, cup competitions etc.

Fact is that a lot of LvG's signings are currently on the fringes or not being used at all which clearly shows that Mourinho doesn't see much use for them other than for injuries or minor cup competitions.

You seem like one of those posters who doesn't actually read what anyone else says and just makes shit up as you go along cause you're so set in your ways.
 
What part of the word squad do you not get? I also repeat, if all he did in the transfer market was blow money Mourinho wouldn't have only added 4 players to his current first team squad.
The majority is still players signed after him or pre dating him. Perhaps Mourinho didn't want to or is unable to add further to the squad because he can't shift players like Schweinsteiger or Rojo. Most reports seem to suggest that's the case.
 
4 first team players is a huge addition to a football team, its over a third of the starting line up and all 4 are guaranteed starters in the spine of the team so it suggests LVG did not leave the team in good shape at all.

Probably the only reason we don't see more signings is because it will unbalance the squad.
That makes zero sense. If the squad was unbalanced as you claim many players would have been shipped out. As it stands now of bona fide first teamers LVG left behind only Schweinstieger and McNair have been identified as surplus to requirements. That does not point to the new man in charge thinking his squad is unbalanced.
 
The majority is still players signed after him or pre dating him. Perhaps Mourinho didn't want to or is unable to add further to the squad because he can't shift players like Schweinsteiger or Rojo. Most reports seem to suggest that's the case.
Yeah right.
I bet those reports are similar to the ones that assured as Blind, Mata, Valencia and Fellaini were sure to be sold by Mourinho
 
Actually I think the issue is you don't have a tangible response.
I insist. You never had a point.


Right because what's the point in filling up the 25 man squad if you don't have a need for the players? Not like you have injuries, cup competitions etc.
You ask yourself that. You are the one after all trying to argue that Mourinho has only 11 players he wants and the others are unwanted and their for mere convenience.


Fact is that a lot of LvG's signings are currently on the fringes or not being used at all which clearly shows that Mourinho doesn't see much use for them other than for injuries or minor cup competitions.

I will simply post a link to what Mourinho thinks of his squad. Which is in direct opposition to most of your claims:
http://www.manutd.com/en/News-And-F...nho-discusses-his-23-man-squad-with-mutv.aspx
 
What I'm starting to find truly hilarious is the idea that Mourinho, at a club that gives him full managerial power, would leave himself a squad of 25 that is either unbalanced or full of players he doesn't want, just there to make up numbers. An argument being made simply to just desperately cling on to the notion LVG left Nada but disaster behind.....
 
That makes zero sense. If the squad was unbalanced as you claim many players would have been shipped out. As it stands now of bona fide first teamers LVG left behind only Schweinstieger and McNair have been identified as surplus to requirements. That does not point to the new man in charge thinking his squad is unbalanced.
4 guaranteed starters being brought in, in one window , pretty much suggests LVG's 1st choice team was not good enough.

As @Ish 's breakdown illustrates so well, LVG did not buy the likes of AdM, Darmian, Schneiderlin, Rojo or Depay to sit on the bench. They were bought as first 11 and even LVG did not think them worthy to nail down a spot during his tenure, which speaks volumes!

I'm not saying he was a complete disaster; LVG did steady the ship after the Moyes debacle and bringing us our first post SAF silverware was also a major bonus but I think it should be somewhat accepted that his transfer dealings were, on the whole, poor.
 
What I'm starting to find truly hilarious is the idea that Mourinho, at a club that gives him full managerial power, would leave himself a squad of 25 that is either unbalanced or full of players he doesn't want, just there to make up numbers. An argument being made simply to just desperately cling on to the notion LVG left Nada but disaster behind.....
Well it has been reported we are struggling to move on the likes of Schweinsteiger, Rojo, Depay Jones due to wages
 
Yeah right.
I bet those reports are similar to the ones that assured as Blind, Mata, Valencia and Fellaini were sure to be sold by Mourinho
Schweinsteiger, Darmian, Depay, Rojo, Scneiderlin and Romero have played 6 minutes between them so far. The reports have a little more credence given that evidence.
 
Well it has been reported we are struggling to move on the likes of Schweinsteiger, Rojo, Depay Jones due to wages
It was also reported that Valencia, Blind, Fellaini and Mata would be sold. That Mata was headed straight for the exit door after being subbed in the Community Shield game. That Fosu Mensah has been placed on the transfer list, just because he missed present season minutues due to injury. Yet we all know how its turning out. Players aren't leaving in mass mainly because a) Mourinho still has use for them and b) ala Schweinstieger they want to stick around and some how convince Mourinho to change his mind about them. It has feck all to do with wages. Right now the press wants us to believe that whoever doesn't make match day squad is unwanted or on the transfer list. Which is ridiculous in the extreme. I mean, its hardly a week and a half since Mourinho spoke fondly of Depay and his plans for him..Yet 'reports' want to convince us he is now suddenly tired of him and only wages are sparing his hide. If Mourinho doesn't want a player he will let the world know.
 
Last edited:
Schweinsteiger, Darmian, Depay, Rojo, Scneiderlin and Romero have played 6 minutes between them so far. The reports have a little more credence given that evidence.
They will only have credence when after the international break none of them get a game. Mourinho has said in September he fully intends to give most of the rest of his squad game time. Nothing thus far suggest he is just playing politics.
 
They will only have credence when after the international break none of them get a game. Mourinho has said in September he fully intends to give most of the rest of his squad game time. Nothing thus far suggest he is just playing politics.
They'll play in cup games. It's not exactly a sign of players the managers believes are good enough to win him the league. What do you expect from people here? To wax lyrical that Van Gaal identified two players in two years, with an unlimited transfer budget, that are good enough for our strongest team? You'll be waiting a while on that one.
 
I expect people to stop pedaling obvious bullshit. No manager worth his salt keeps a squad full of players he inherited from a previous regime, that he doesn't want or are an unbalanced collection. Trying to argue that a squad of 25 is only their for cup games is the type of bullshit I'm talking about. Squads win titles. Not just first 11s. So to try to ever argue only the first choice starters are wanted is plain ridiculous. I also don't want anyone to wax lyric about LVG. Rather I simply want folks to quit lying about him and what he left behind just because they hate him and thought him a rubbish manager.
 
LvG does this at every club. He nurtures greatness for the future while he sacrifices himself with poor results. The man always looks ahead. He has the vision of Jesus Christ himself.

Numerous managers have benefited from LvG's genius masterplan and hundreds of players would be playing in China right now if it weren't for LvG giving them chances.

We would have had 3 shots on goal today if it weren't for LvG. Mourinho really should be paying half of his salary to LvG plus a nice bonus after each win. LvG taught all our players how to pass properly and keep possession. Look at Mourinho's previous teams. The guy doesn't know how to teach his players to pass.

On that note, we also have a certain David Moyes to thank. Who signed the Broccoli haired man bossing the midfield right now? Moyes knew that he would eventually become good and put up with the fans' criticism while he wasn't playing well. Everything has a process and the fact that he's in good form right now has everything to do with David Moyes and not Jose Mourinho. Herrera and Shaw were also pursued by Moyes before they were officially signed. That is fecking brilliant.

It's all about the philosophy. It's all about the process. If we had kept LvG for another few years, we would've been an unstoppable force by 20200. The fact that the team is playing much better since the previous manager's departure again means that the credit goes to the previous manager. It's 1+1=2. It's not rocket science.

/s

Ok, the guy spent a massive amount of money and led us an extremely underwhelming CL campaign while managing to land us out of top 4 in what was probably the least competitive Premier League in long time.
I think he would have guaranteed a top 4 finish nearly every other year by 2020 at any rate. Not to be sniffed at.
 
Is there a point to this off topic post? Because I don't see any. No one is arguing LVG should have stayed. No one is saying he'd have attracted the players Mourinho has been able to. Its also rather baffling that you imagine it hard for a team of United's quality with the a top manager to attract world class players. Yet even the hated LVG was able to attract Di Maria and Falcao to add to the already incoming Shaw and Herrerra

How'd that work out for him?

Basically he brought players in and they played like shit for him, and barely seemed to care. All hail the foundation he built, never mind it was crumbling under him.
 
I insist. You never had a point.


You ask yourself that. You are the one after all trying to argue that Mourinho has only 11 players he wants and the others are unwanted and their for mere convenience.




I will simply post a link to what Mourinho thinks of his squad. Which is in direct opposition to most of your claims:
http://www.manutd.com/en/News-And-F...nho-discusses-his-23-man-squad-with-mutv.aspx
What's wrong with you? Why are you constantly trying to invent stuff that was never said? Why are you constantly departing on silly tangents that serve no relevance to the original discussion we were having?

I never once said Mourinho only has 11 players he wants. I said that LvG's signings are the ones on the fringes/not being used.

I never once said Mourinho wasn't happy with his squad. In fact - that's so unbelievably irrelevant to this discussion that it's almost mind bending in its daftness.
 
If LVG happened to recruit some players who are useful to his successor, then yes - that's a positive, what else could it be?

But it has little to do with leaving behind a "foundation" in any meaningful sense. You have to identify what this "foundation" actually is - and then demonstrate how Mourinho has benefited from it, directly or indirectly. If you can't do that, it isn't a "foundation" - it's simply one manager getting sacked and another taking over (something which happens a lot in football, without anyone insisting that "foundations" are being built all the the time, the latter seems to be mainly an LVG thing).
 
Typical Caf. There's absolutely no middle ground when it comes to any form of discussion. LVG didn't leave any "legacy" as such, neither did he leave the club in disarray as the reactions in this thread would suggest. I don't get why people are so against giving the man any credit. When it comes to criticism all blame is laid firmly at his door but for any positive thing he achieved, there's a caveat somewhere that means he was essentially lucky. I've already read that we only won the FA cup because we didn't have to face any 'top team'. It's not just the pro LVG brigade resulting to revisionism:

I mean really? Did you see our home record under LvG or are you confusing him with Moyes? I wouldn't blame you as people seem to have mixed the 2 together and have come out with Moyes as the better manager of the 2.
This needs to be post again. Especially the bold part.

IMO, he did alright, except for the playing style. Result wise could be better, but I can forgive him that because we are much better against the top teams in the league than Moyes. I don't think I'll ever forget being beaten by City and Liverpool and looking completely clueless. That was worst than anything LvG ever shown us.

Also, it's funny how some people can't credited Rashford on him. "Lucky because all the other players are injured" ? Are you fecking kidding me? Have you seen our injury records throughout that season? Players will get injured and he made a conscious decision to go with youngsters when that happened. And like most posters already noted, he could've played Depay upfront. But instead, he trusted Rashford, a converted winger with no outstanding goal record in the youth team to lead the line for United in an important away game. That's something we can credit him for.

I am not saying that he shouldn't be sacked. He should and wish we done it sooner. But there are so many factors why we couldn't do it sooner. Mourinho availability, FA Cup run. Heck I can credit him for winning the FA Cup. At least he went out with a trophy
 
I expect people to stop pedaling obvious bullshit. No manager worth his salt keeps a squad full of players he inherited from a previous regime, that he doesn't want or are an unbalanced collection. Trying to argue that a squad of 25 is only their for cup games is the type of bullshit I'm talking about. Squads win titles. Not just first 11s. So to try to ever argue only the first choice starters are wanted is plain ridiculous. I also don't want anyone to wax lyric about LVG. Rather I simply want folks to quit lying about him and what he left behind just because they hate him and thought him a rubbish manager.
What he bought wasn't good enough. That's why most can't get a game or have been sold on already.
 
What's wrong with you? Why are you constantly trying to invent stuff that was never said? Why are you constantly departing on silly tangents that serve no relevance to the original discussion we were having?
Seriously? you want to start denying your own statements?

I never once said Mourinho only has 11 players he wants.
Sure. because saying this:

[That fact is the majority of players Mourinho sees no place for in the side are LvG players.]
or this:
[Fact is that a lot of LvG's signings are currently on the fringes or not being used at all which clearly shows that Mourinho doesn't see much use for them other than for injuries or minor cup competitions.]
or this:
[Right because what's the point in filling up the 25 man squad if you don't have a need for the players? Not like you have injuries, cup competitions etc.

in response to this;

[If they had no place in the side they wouldn't be part of his 25 man squad for the season.]

'some how' mean you are not implying Mourinho sees no practical use for the LVG bought fringe players in the squad....


I said that LvG's signings are the ones on the fringes/not being used.
read above

I never once said Mourinho wasn't happy with his squad. In fact - that's so unbelievably irrelevant to this discussion that it's almost mind bending in its daftness.
Honestly, the only thing i'm seeing daft here is you attempting to deny your own positions that you posted earlier. :lol:
Frankly I don't have time for this shit. Suit yourself
 
Last edited:
What he bought wasn't good enough. That's why most can't get a game or have been sold on already.
The only player he bought that has been sold to date is Di Maria. I also still insist it they all weren't good enough they'd all have been relegated to the under 23's like Bastian Schweinstieger by Mourinho. Besides, the jury is still out as to whether it was they who were not good enough or it was he who simply didn't know how to use them effectively.
 
Last edited:
Seriously? you want to start denying your own statements?

Sure. because saying this:

[That fact is the majority of players Mourinho sees no place for in the side are LvG players.]
or this:
[Fact is that a lot of LvG's signings are currently on the fringes or not being used at all which clearly shows that Mourinho doesn't see much use for them other than for injuries or minor cup competitions.]
or this:
[Right because what's the point in filling up the 25 man squad if you don't have a need for the players? Not like you have injuries, cup competitions etc.

in response to this;

[If they had no place in the side they wouldn't be part of his 25 man squad for the season.]

'some how' mean you are not implying Mourinho sees no practical use for the LVG bought fringe players in the squad....


read above

Honestly, the only thing i'm seeing daft here is you attempting to deny your own positions that you posted earlier. :lol:
Frankly I don't have time for this shit. Suit yourself
I .. what? None of that goes against what I said :lol:

I gave you a reason for Mourinho keeping them:

clearly shows that Mourinho doesn't see much use for them other than for injuries or minor cup competitions.


Fringe players, squad players, etc. - not first team players.

Fact is that most of the players who aren't getting games right now or even on the bench, who are in our 25 man squad ... are players LvG purchased.
 
4 first team players is a huge addition to a football team, its over a third of the starting line up and all 4 are guaranteed starters in the spine of the team so it suggests LVG did not leave the team in good shape at all.

Probably the only reason we don't see more signings is because it will unbalance the squad.
Of our current best team, 3 players that Van Gaal signed will make the starting line up. This includes Shaw who Moyes recommended. I reckon the ones that will get used for big games occasionally will be Herrera, Scheinderlin, Rashford, Rojo. Other than that, the rest of LVG signings will be reserved for Europa League and Carling Cup
 
Status
Not open for further replies.