LVG's Legacy/Foundations

Status
Not open for further replies.
His Legacy is the young core that we have in the squad. In the next 5-7 years we don't have to spend much money to compete in Europe.
The problem is he didn't delivered when we need to win, he can smashed City, Liverpool, Arsenal, and Spurs but struggled against Chelsea, Liecester, Westham, and the rest even the fecking Sunderland.
He was stuck with Rooney and couldn't benched his captain because he is too arrogant in press conferences.
He was a slow learner of English Football, he need a year to realize it's more physical game than technical unlike in Spain, Holland, or Germany

People always blame him for the failure, but forget Ryan Giggs didn't help him at all. I think LvG and Giggs combination is the main problem since the beginning.
 
I think LVG's legacy will come down to 2 things

Firstly LVG brought back some United swagger in how we dealt with big teams and his record against them was quite well (His first game at Anfield was arguably our best away big game for a While)
Secondly it is bringing Rashford into the team which was by some sheer dumb luck and bad injuries but sometimes the football gods smile down and something special happens.
 
In that case, is there any coach on earth who has left a big club without at least one of his buys or promoted players being useful to the next coach? Even Moyes got us Mata and would have probably got more good players if he stayed as long as LVG. Anyone who takes over clubs like Utd, Barca and Bayern will always inherit a great set of players which he has to improve on, but it seems any coach who takes over an LVG club has to bring his own first 11 or else all his successes get attributed to him. Successes that never seem to come when the said LVG is around. It's a strange theory that's exclusive to only LVG. Real Madrid won the CL months after Mou left with pretty much his first 11, won another one about a year later, yet you don't hear anyone talking about Mourinho 'foundations'. But LVG fans keep falling over themselves to give LVG 'credit' for stuff that happened 2 managers and 2 years after LVG.
If foundations simply mean leaving leaving good players for the next manager, name one coach who left a big club without doing this.

Well again you missed the important points being - LVG has done it consecutively for 4 of the biggest clubs in the world that have the best youth products in their respective league. He is never hired when teams are at their best & always hired when the team needs a different direction (perfect time to bring youth).

Since we are talking on the same line Atleast - name me a manager who has given debuts or changed positions to some of the best players of their generation & we shall compare with LVG's list? From Ajax to United - I will guarantee my friend you won't find a manager who has influenced as many youngsters as he has.
 
Well again you missed the important points being - LVG has done it consecutively for 4 of the biggest clubs in the world that have the best youth products in their respective league. He is never hired when teams are at their best & always hired when the team needs a different direction (perfect time to bring youth).

Since we are talking on the same line Atleast - name me a manager who has given debuts or changed positions to some of the best players of their generation & we shall compare with LVG's list? From Ajax to United - I will guarantee my friend you won't find a manager who has influenced as many youngsters as he has.

Gave debuts to and changed positions of players...to players he already found at the club...so that's really all he has to do to 'lay the foundations'? Really? No wonder someone described the LVG fan club as some sort of cult. Play all the youngsters in every club your hired,get fired for being shit=foundations, well I guess he'll be a huge success wherever he's hired, there's no failure with him now that you've put it that way
 
LVG didn't want to buy backup players but that's exactly what he did, It's not as Darmian, Shweini, Depay and Schneider suddenly stopped performing for Jose, They didn't do well for LVG either. He wasn't any good at judging what players he needed. Luck or not all 4 of Mou's signings have been great but that's down to his motivational skills I think. Under LVG no one even seemed to care except maybe Herrera and LVG benched him. We will never know what would have happened if he got one more season but I doubt it would have been good.
Yep, really hard to understand why Schneiderlin, Depay or Schweinie didn't perform. I would argue that LVG didn't buy them as backup, but as his first team. It didn't workout though as you say. In addition Jose doesn't really have a place for them. Herrera was positionally poor under LVG and that is why he didn't play so much. I loved Herrera when he first came, but he did chase the ball a lot a leave gaps on his side of the pitch.
 
We were talking about VG earlier and that was a follow on from an earlier part of this thread thats why he was mentioned. Your right VG was all about possession for possessions sake with no real end product. He was behind more backward and sideways passes than any other manager in the premiership if you remember the stats.
Yep. Interestingly at Xmas the usual season review DVDs were shown. If you have watched last seasons, and I understand they are just showing the good bits, there was a lot of nice football. No argument about the slow pace of most games, just think it is player mindset more than manager instruction.
 
Likewise LVG has done this type of things with countless young players at 4 different clubs - where most or not all of said youth becaming pivotal.

His Legacy is the young core that we have in the squad.

Are we talking about his Legacy/foundations at UTD or in general? If we just look at it from his UTD record only (Its all I really care about) then the stats raise some interesting questions.
I'm all for giving youth a chance, if they are good enough. I believe as a UTD manager you should pretty much know that they are good enough before you put them in. Afterall, we are UTD and you have to be a pretty special youth product to earn a first team jersey ahead of our established internationals.

LVG gave Debuts to 14 youth players. Rashford, Lindgard have justified that ( Although I don't rate Lingard personally) and to a lesser extent TFM still has a chance to do it. What about the other 11 that LVG thought were UTD first team quality?

Marcus Rashford

Jessie Lingard

Timothy Fosu Mensah

Tyler Blackett (Championship with Reading)

Saidy Janko (Scotland/ Celtic)

Reece James (Now with Wigan)

Andreas Pereira (On loan at Granada)

Paddy McNair (Squad Player at Sunderland)

Tom Thorpe (On loan at Bolton…from Rotherham)

Cameron Borthwick Jackson (On loan at Wolves. 6 apps this year)

Donald Love (Sunderland Squad player 8 apps)

Joe Riely (On loan at Sheffield Utd. Yet to make an appearance for them)

Reegan Poole

James Weir (Now at Hull, but despite their tiny squad has yet to make a league appearance.)

I think its safe to say that " Most if not all have not proved pivotal"
Does this support the claims of those that state he just plays all the youth and hopes to get lucky with one or two? For every Rashford there's a Thorpe and a James and a Love..etc etc. For me its a questionable philosophy.
 
I can't believe that some still defend him. He was taking us backwards, in terms of quality of play and statistically in all aspects. Yes he brought through some young players, but he would have sucked the life out of them given another season

I'm convinced lvg stays young because he's some kind of demon that sucks the life and soul out of everyone he comes across
 
I can't believe that some still defend him. He was taking us backwards, in terms of quality of play and statistically in all aspects. Yes he brought through some young players, but he would have sucked the life out of them given another season

I'm convinced lvg stays young because he's some kind of demon that sucks the life and soul out of everyone he comes across

Half expected you to have locked this thread by now given your dislike to Louis van Gaal :smirk:. In all seriousness, last week, this thread was bumped for the first time in three months, isn't that something mods/admin want to avoid with regards to bumping old threads?
 
Are we talking about his Legacy/foundations at UTD or in general? If we just look at it from his UTD record only (Its all I really care about) then the stats raise some interesting questions.
I'm all for giving youth a chance, if they are good enough. I believe as a UTD manager you should pretty much know that they are good enough before you put them in. Afterall, we are UTD and you have to be a pretty special youth product to earn a first team jersey ahead of our established internationals.

LVG gave Debuts to 14 youth players. Rashford, Lindgard have justified that ( Although I don't rate Lingard personally) and to a lesser extent TFM still has a chance to do it. What about the other 11 that LVG thought were UTD first team quality?

Marcus Rashford

Jessie Lingard

Timothy Fosu Mensah

Tyler Blackett (Championship with Reading)

Saidy Janko (Scotland/ Celtic)

Reece James (Now with Wigan)

Andreas Pereira (On loan at Granada)

Paddy McNair (Squad Player at Sunderland)

Tom Thorpe (On loan at Bolton…from Rotherham)

Cameron Borthwick Jackson (On loan at Wolves. 6 apps this year)

Donald Love (Sunderland Squad player 8 apps)

Joe Riely (On loan at Sheffield Utd. Yet to make an appearance for them)

Reegan Poole

James Weir (Now at Hull, but despite their tiny squad has yet to make a league appearance.)

I think its safe to say that " Most if not all have not proved pivotal"
Does this support the claims of those that state he just plays all the youth and hopes to get lucky with one or two? For every Rashford there's a Thorpe and a James and a Love..etc etc. For me its a questionable philosophy.

Isn't that the point though. No young player is guaranteed to make it, they all need to be developed and given opportunities. Messi is the best player in the world but even his career looked threatened until Barcelona took a risk on an impish kid that other clubs weren't willing to do. It's trial and error, but you need to have the courage to give young players the opportunity. Rashford has paid off so far, but if LvG didn't throw him in him he could easily have wasted away in the youth team until he was released to a lower league club.

TFM could be a world class player for United and lead us to CL gory later in his career. But unless Mourinho doesn't give him an opportunity he could find himself at Nice, or Seville, or Wolfsburg etc, getting a handful of appearances, falling out of favour with manager X then being sold to a smaller club. You can never really be sure which way a young player's career is going to go, but you can go someway to finding out by actually playing them. For all his faults, LvG does deserve credit for the way he trusts young players.
 
Half expected you to have locked this thread by now given your dislike to Louis van Gaal :smirk:. In all seriousness, last week, this thread was bumped for the first time in three months, isn't that something mods/admin want to avoid with regards to bumping old threads?

It's best to keep the LVG stuff in one thread...this thread.
If you close this thread, several new threads will pop up.
BTW: If LVG is credited with the success of the next manager. Why didn't Moyes got credit for us winning the FA Cup?
 
Isn't that the point though. No young player is guaranteed to make it, they all need to be developed and given opportunities. Messi is the best player in the world but even his career looked threatened until Barcelona took a risk on an impish kid that other clubs weren't willing to do. It's trial and error, but you need to have the courage to give young players the opportunity. Rashford has paid off so far, but if LvG didn't throw him in him he could easily have wasted away in the youth team until he was released to a lower league club.

TFM could be a world class player for United and lead us to CL gory later in his career. But unless Mourinho doesn't give him an opportunity he could find himself at Nice, or Seville, or Wolfsburg etc, getting a handful of appearances, falling out of favour with manager X then being sold to a smaller club. You can never really be sure which way a young player's career is going to go, but you can go someway to finding out by actually playing them. For all his faults, LvG does deserve credit for the way he trusts young players.

I do accept that despite all the time and money that we spend on our youth set up, that the likely hood of unearthing a Messi or a Ronaldo on a regular basis is highly unlikely. Its a law of averages type of thing. When you are a top club, that can attract some of the best players in the world in their positions, it means that your youth prospect has to be really special to break into the side. Thats where my problem arises. The players that I listed in my previous post, the ones LVG gave a debut to, were mostly not that special. I find it hard to believe that it wasn't apparent that a player that ends up being loaned out by Rotherham was deemed worthy of a place in the UTD first team a few months earlier.
I don't believe LVG deserves credit for "trusting" Tom Thorpe.
Play someone if they are good enough. Not because they are young.
 
Are we talking about his Legacy/foundations at UTD or in general? If we just look at it from his UTD record only (Its all I really care about) then the stats raise some interesting questions.
I'm all for giving youth a chance, if they are good enough. I believe as a UTD manager you should pretty much know that they are good enough before you put them in. Afterall, we are UTD and you have to be a pretty special youth product to earn a first team jersey ahead of our established internationals.

LVG gave Debuts to 14 youth players. Rashford, Lindgard have justified that ( Although I don't rate Lingard personally) and to a lesser extent TFM still has a chance to do it. What about the other 11 that LVG thought were UTD first team quality?

Marcus Rashford

Jessie Lingard

Timothy Fosu Mensah

Tyler Blackett (Championship with Reading)

Saidy Janko (Scotland/ Celtic)

Reece James (Now with Wigan)

Andreas Pereira (On loan at Granada)

Paddy McNair (Squad Player at Sunderland)

Tom Thorpe (On loan at Bolton…from Rotherham)

Cameron Borthwick Jackson (On loan at Wolves. 6 apps this year)

Donald Love (Sunderland Squad player 8 apps)

Joe Riely (On loan at Sheffield Utd. Yet to make an appearance for them)

Reegan Poole

James Weir (Now at Hull, but despite their tiny squad has yet to make a league appearance.)

I think its safe to say that " Most if not all have not proved pivotal"
Does this support the claims of those that state he just plays all the youth and hopes to get lucky with one or two? For every Rashford there's a Thorpe and a James and a Love..etc etc. For me its a questionable philosophy.
Agree with you. Any manager could promote a dozen prospects and if ones successful claim it as intuition about the successful one
 
Agree with you. Any manager could promote a dozen prospects and if ones successful claim it as intuition about the successful one

And that's what his fans call 'foundations'. He's done it across 4 continents you see. With Barca and Ajax he was lucky there were 5-6 good players in the crop of youngsters there which according to his fans means he's responsible for any success those 5 are a part of forever. Based on this logic he can't fail at any club you see, he could go to Madrid, bench CR7 and Bale, play all the academy players, finish 9th on the table and get fired. All he needs is for one of the 20 academy players to turn out to be decent(which will always happen cos well...it's a fecking academy) then he laid the foundations for the next manager. If up to 5 are decent, then he's responsible for whatever the club wins over the next decade. It's infallible logic that can't be argued against, and I've given up.
 
In that simple legacy he put an FA cup in the cabinet.
At the same time, he didn't manage to send us in UCL one season and failed to pass the groups in the other season. Spent 250m pounds to buy 15 players or so with half of them already left the club or are close to.

Not the best return ever, and not something that can be called 'legacy'.

He failed at United, simple as that. Not totally failed like his predecessor, but failed nevertheless.
 
At the same time, he didn't manage to send us in UCL one season and failed to pass the groups in the other season. Spent 250m pounds to buy 15 players or so with half of them already left the club or are close to.

Not the best return ever, and not something that can be called 'legacy'.

He failed at United, simple as that. Not totally failed like his predecessor, but failed nevertheless.
I don't think anyone is disputing that, the comment I was replying to is a legacy is based on the trophy cabinet. So he put something in it.
 
He was fecking shit. Can people not just accept that? It was a nightmare time to support or be involved with the club. He did us a lot more harm than good
 
http://www.football365.com/news/an-ode-to-valencia-man-uniteds-mr-reliable

First used as a right-back at a time of injury crisis in September 2011, it was Louis van Gaal who can take the most credit for the transformation in position. Valencia played only 12 games in defence in five seasons under Ferguson, David Moyes and Ryan Giggs, but never played as a winger under Moyes’ permanent replacement.


Player Schweinsteigered!
811px-Check_mark_23x20_02.svg.png
 
That's bollocks

Another successful load of bollocks.

That's one totally unbiased article. He's writing a piece on one of our most improved players, one that happened to be transformed by LVG. This got nothing to do with ME.

There was a thread created called: who will Van Gaal Schweinsteiger. People took their bets on who would be the new superstar in a new role. These things only appear after a while.

Guys, read the first post. In this thread we come back to recognize the things we couldn't see at the time. No one will be hanged for failing to understand his plans. Hell, I was even one of his biggest antagonists on this forum for a while but I will always be man enough to acknowledge a mastermind.
 
Excuse me for rushing ahead with the outcome. A year has almost gone by now and I just want to continue keeping track of the development.

I've used a simple plus and minus system to help identify development. + means the player is contributing to the team and is better today than when we bought him. - is we expected more and the player is not ready to contribute at this level. -/+ is undecided.

Signings
Memphis Depay -
Regan Pool -/+
Matteo Darmian -
Ander Herrera +
Marcus Rojo +
Daley Blind +
Anthony Martial +
Luke Shaw -/+ (?)
Morgan Schneiderlin -
Sergio Romero +
Timothy Fosu-Mensah -/+

Signing outcome
Number of players: 11
Plus: 5
Minus: 3
Undecided: 3



Promotions:
Cameron Borthwick-Jackson -/+
Tyler Blackett -/+
Marcus Rashford +
Jesse Lingard +
Anderas Pereira -/+
Joe Riley -/+
James Wier -/+

Promotion outcome
Number of players: 7
Plus: 2
Minus: 0
Undecided: 5

Total outcome:
Number of players:18
Plus: 7
Minus: 3
Undecided:8


Yield on investment: 39%
Unsuccessful yield: 16,6%
Undecided: 44,4%

Today 39% of the players LVG signed are in use and should be considered helpful players. We should also follow the development of sold players to see how they follow through. It's impossible to be 100% in the transfer market.
 
You are undecided about whether Tyler Blackett is contributing enough to Manchester United?
 
Ah, talk of foundations again. Development good or bad should now be attributed to Mourinho.
 
Excuse me for rushing ahead with the outcome. A year has almost gone by now and I just want to continue keeping track of the development.

I've used a simple plus and minus system to help identify development. + means the player is contributing to the team and is better today than when we bought him. - is we expected more and the player is not ready to contribute at this level. -/+ is undecided.

Signings
Memphis Depay -
Regan Pool -/+
Matteo Darmian -
Ander Herrera +
Marcus Rojo +
Daley Blind +
Anthony Martial +
Luke Shaw -/+ (?)
Morgan Schneiderlin -
Sergio Romero +
Timothy Fosu-Mensah -/+

Signing outcome
Number of players: 11
Plus: 5
Minus: 3
Undecided: 3



Promotions:
Cameron Borthwick-Jackson -/+
Tyler Blackett -/+
Marcus Rashford +
Jesse Lingard +
Anderas Pereira -/+
Joe Riley -/+
James Wier -/+

Promotion outcome
Number of players: 7
Plus: 2
Minus: 0
Undecided: 5

Total outcome:
Number of players:18
Plus: 7
Minus: 3
Undecided:8


Yield on investment: 39%
Unsuccessful yield: 16,6%
Undecided: 44,4%

Today 39% of the players LVG signed are in use and should be considered helpful players. We should also follow the development of sold players to see how they follow through. It's impossible to be 100% in the transfer market.

Feck me, what a weird post. So really Moyes has had more of an impact on our development than van Gaal.

What are we going to do with these LVG romanticists??
 
After PSG trashed Barcelona 4-0 in the first leg I saw @Successful post something like 'PSG enjoyng LVG's legacy' or something in the CL match thread,I was too bewildered by the post to muster a reply. Scary thing is he's not wumming or anything, he actually believes the shit he posts
 
Dont know why people going around in circle about LvG. We played some shit football under him,we played better and actually won games vs top teams in PL (games like City at home/away, away vs Liverpool was something i didnt even see under SAF etc.). He had that "if you are good enough,you are old enough" thing,which i liked.

When it comes to trophies,he won us FA cup and if i had to choose between 2x Top 4 plus zero trophies and top 4 plus out of top 4 with FA Cup,will always choose 2nd but thats just me.
 
He had that "if you are good enough,you are old enough" thing,which i liked.

Yeah. Problem was that he also had the " Even if you are not good enough, you're young, so on you go" thing, which kind of sucked.

Marcus Rashford

Jessie Lingard

Timothy Fosu Mensah

Tyler Blackett (Championship with Reading)

Saidy Janko (Scotland/ Celtic)

Reece James (Now with Wigan)

Andreas Pereira (On loan at Granada)

Paddy McNair (Squad Player at Sunderland)

Tom Thorpe (On loan at Bolton…from Rotherham)

Cameron Borthwick Jackson (On loan at Wolves. 6 apps this year)

Donald Love (Sunderland Squad player 8 apps)

Joe Riely (On loan at Sheffield Utd. Yet to make an appearance for them)

Reegan Poole

James Weir (Now at Hull, Has he made an appearance? despite their tiny squad )
 
Yeah. Problem was that he also had the " Even if you are not good enough, you're young, so on you go" thing, which kind of sucked.

Marcus Rashford

Jessie Lingard

Timothy Fosu Mensah

Tyler Blackett (Championship with Reading)

Saidy Janko (Scotland/ Celtic)

Reece James (Now with Wigan)

Andreas Pereira (On loan at Granada)

Paddy McNair (Squad Player at Sunderland)

Tom Thorpe (On loan at Bolton…from Rotherham)

Cameron Borthwick Jackson (On loan at Wolves. 6 apps this year)

Donald Love (Sunderland Squad player 8 apps)

Joe Riely (On loan at Sheffield Utd. Yet to make an appearance for them)

Reegan Poole

James Weir (Now at Hull, Has he made an appearance? despite their tiny squad )

Yea but line quoted was reason for him to give them chance,some might take it some not and who knows maybe some among those you mentioned as failures (i guess) could turn into decent players in the future. Also what i meant under quoted part is that he didnt lack of trust in young players,either way i would rather take that then current "oh you are 18,no way you are better then 26 year old Darmian (i am basing that pure on age,ignoring skills,current form etc.) " approach.
 
@Vato said:
A manager's legacy are the things you put in a trophy cabinet.

This is utter trash. First of all that is a very success driven way of looking at football. Not every club in football are born to win trophies, are you then saying that none of these clubs have a legacy? Are you saying that someone like Pearson wasn't important to Ranieri at Leicester?

Have you seen our possession this season? 58.8 %, the highest in the league. Yet, we obviously play much better football without van gaal. Are you genuinely telling me that with this, coupled with the youngsters he bought through, mixed with the players he changed positions & the few signings that are now looking good - that he has had no foundation?

Don't be so deluded.

Jose is even starting to play with 3 defenders again because he knows LVG isn't a damn idiot but he is too strict with his own ideas & takes away freedom from the team.


You will notice that Bayern & Barcelona hardly ever change their formation. Why should they, when they have been successful? You do know that after being with the greatest manager for 20 consecutive years that this club needed a platform? That this club had to move away from the SAF shadow and tactics and build a new identity while carrying an ethos.

What did LVG say then? His football is about a philosophy, an idea - & after SAF, we greatly needed a new idea.

Now I go back to Barcelona & Bayern & why they are so special. Because they rarely change their philosophy & if they change their tactics it's normally an alteration of the base formation - even under different manager's. Now sooner or later in a duration of 5-10 years - playing within one system of understanding and ideas is going to be better than having 4 different managers coming in and playing 4 different types of football. Eventually this football will peak. It happened to Barcelona - then it happened to Bayern.

It will happen to United next & I can bet my life on it & while all of you will be celebrating over the success we have got through the wonders of Jose or any other manager in the future - all that fans like me will do & spare an applause for LVG for putting a structure in place for a club that kind of needed it.

Again - he isn't a Godly manager with 100%,perfect ideas and all success should be attributed to him - he is an influential manager however who has influenced probably the best list of footballers any manager has ever & also has one of the best CV's on the planet for exactly the same reason.

He is a Manger who is bought in to clubs in desperation. He is the Sam allardyce of the big clubs.

I mean fair enough you can't see it mate; as usual some fans will show just as much negligence as we show appreciation. Some people are just inclined to move in to a flat or house & forget the fact that someone else lived there. Likewise - just as much as Jose to this day still has a minute influence on the way Chelsea play under Conte - the same is being seen here at United after LVG.

Players and an organization don't have hard drive memories where things are erased and restarted.

Just if you ever do wonder why - you are seeing on occasion Jose using formations that LVG used, you are seeing players who were promoted or bought under LVG, you are seeing possession football without the lack of freedom? Then maybe you will see what LVG brings; if you don't then fair enough - it is just not for you.

I really just want a thread we can discuss LVG's tenure for his fans - without getting called stupid or people laughing at us all the time.
 
@Vato said:
A manager's legacy are the things you put in a trophy cabinet.


This is utter trash. First of all that is a very success driven way of looking at football. Not every club in football are born to win trophies, are you then saying that none of these clubs have a legacy? Are you saying that someone like Pearson wasn't important to Ranieri at Leicester?
You make a valid point but I obviously meant at big clubs who are supposed to compete for all the titles.
 
@TheSweeper

It's far too early now.

Give it probably 10-15 years when Rooney's son Kai plays at OT citing LVG as an inspiration.
 
No when lingard or Rashford scores a goal in the CL final in 5 years time. :)

Lingard and Rashford are both United academy products; Rashford would have been noticed either way, he was that good at an young level; Lingard went to 3-4 teams on loan and is still a squad player at best. Depay is gone, Schneiderlin is gone, BFS is injury-plagued; Falcao, Di Maria Flopped. Herrera, Blind, Rojo, Darmian were never used in their correct positions consistently. Only plus - Martial, even he would have been on the list of a lot of major clubs so not exactly a find.

What are you harping on about?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.