Acquire Me
Full Member
If we dont care about statistics, I still think that we have never played well under LvG.
If we were lucky against Liverpool, does that mean Southampton were lucky against United?
Either way the results are going backwards from last season and the quality of football has been nothing short of diabolical.or 5th best after 23 games, hard to choose a number of games to give a true picture isn't it.
If we were lucky against Liverpool, does that mean Southampton were lucky against United?
Are there any rumours that he could be sacked?
If we were lucky against Liverpool, does that mean Southampton were lucky against United?
or 5th best after 23 games, hard to choose a number of games to give a true picture isn't it.
The point is the only stat that is important is the one at the end of the season. So to constantly say we haven't won in 3, worst in last 5, 6, 10 or 12 games in the league is pretty pointless.Either way the results are going backwards from last season and the quality of football has been nothing short of diabolical.
If we were lucky against Liverpool, does that mean Southampton were lucky against United?
Ive never seen a team so bereft of attacking threat.Me too. I was concerned about who we'd get to replace him. At this stage I think any change will only help.
So we are the only one that has luck? Current form reflects only the current performance and usually reflects the state of the team, that is why it is not a good indicator of the season. It might be lost on some, but we do have an injury crisis and until yesterday, though not playing well, we were on a par with City performance for 2016. If we look at Spurs, maybe they are getting results, but they have come from behind in their last 3 games, so maybe a bit of luck or confidence is getting them over the line. Not saying we are dynamite, as yesterday proved we can be dismal, but there are not many teams performing well this year.yes but we are sliding down the league and further and further away from our goal. we have lost 9 points on Leceister in those 19 games and 8 to Spurs, our two biggest rivals to 4th place. our title hopes have gone from -2 to -10 in those 10 games.
right now, we are playing like the 18th best team in the league and we have been playing like that since November. its a miracle we aint lower but we are only another 2 or 3 weeks away from slipping out of the top 8, if yesterday is anything to go by.
the current form table is a better reflection of our season as the results have caught up with the early season performances, which were shocking but only pure luck got us through.
Just read the comments after every tweet United have posted today.How many millions of United fans all over the world are waiting for the announcement that LvG is no longer the manager of United?
I understand your point but there's no escaping its a downward trend we are seeing, with no sign of LVG steadying the ship. Very soon top 4 will be gone, which is a massive blow for our club.The point is the only stat that is important is the one at the end of the season. So to constantly say we haven't won in 3, worst in last 5, 6, 10 or 12 games in the league is pretty pointless.
How many millions of United fans all over the world are waiting for the announcement that LvG is no longer the manager of United?
Southampton had probably one chance in the first half (for Mane) and apart from the goal, did they really have any other chances in the second half. They played better than us, no argument, but I always find it interesting that when we were dominating and getting one goal from our few chances, it was we are lucky, but when someone does it against us, e.g. Norwich, Southampton it is never luck, it is always the best team won.no because we were second best in both games. look at MOTM - d heyou and the new kid with the long name.
If you go back to the season that City won the league, we trailed by 8 points, within a short space of time, we were then 8 ahead, and then within 6 games City were back equal. All teams have shit periods. Top 4 is still open to the top 8 or 9 teams, and pretty sure that there will be changes throughout February.I understand your point but there's no escaping its a downward trend we are seeing, with no sign of LVG steadying the ship. Very soon top 4 will be gone, which is a massive blow for our club.
We were anything but 'dominating' against Liverpool, it was a literal smash and grab, that did nothing but paper over some serious cracks. This run of pathetic performances goes back a long way and hasn't shown any signs of improving.Southampton had probably one chance in the first half (for Mane) and apart from the goal, did they really have any other chances in the second half. They played better than us, no argument, but I always find it interesting that when we were dominating and getting one goal from our few chances, it was we are lucky, but when someone does it against us, e.g. Norwich, Southampton it is never luck, it is always the best team won.
Just took a quick snap for you.
We were anything but 'dominating' against Liverpool, it was a literal smash and grab, that did nothing but paper over some serious cracks. This run of pathetic performances goes back a long way and hasn't shown any signs of improving.
How many millions of United fans all over the world are waiting for the announcement that LvG is no longer the manager of United?
I never used to like that stuff, but I am beginning to agree with folk who want Woodwards name on the banner as well. If he does nothing about this then he needs calling out as well.
What makes you think Mourinho is out of the question and rightly so?
lolTheir fans forums are seriously talking about resting their back four for our game. Thats how toothless Van Gaal's United are. They were actually very pleased to get Man United.
Putting Januzaj at left backThat tweet doesn't match the article. What was the decision?
So we are the only one that has luck? Current form reflects only the current performance and usually reflects the state of the team, that is why it is not a good indicator of the season. It might be lost on some, but we do have an injury crisis and until yesterday, though not playing well, we were on a par with City performance for 2016. If we look at Spurs, maybe they are getting results, but they have come from behind in their last 3 games, so maybe a bit of luck or confidence is getting them over the line. Not saying we are dynamite, as yesterday proved we can be dismal, but there are not many teams performing well this year.
That tweet doesn't match the article. What was the decision?
This is interesting Ulli Hoeness words roughly when they sacked Van Gaal back in 2011.
"Football should be enjoyable, but there has been nothing enjoyable about football at FC Bayern for a while now," said Honess.
"And to say that he had the players behind him was a myth...
"Problems were created which were totally unnecessary and which have ripped the club to pieces.
"Louis Van Gaal should consider what he has done."
Ah okay, gotcha.Januzaj on left-back I reckon. Instead of right-wing where he scored two for the reserves
Louis van Gaal Manchester United future: Ed Woodward must act decisively on Van Gaal
COMMENT: If he goes, then United must act now, because transfer deals are set up months before the window even opens
- Mark Ogden Chief Football Correspondent
- 18 minutes ago
- 0 comments
5
Fans head to the exits on Saturday as Louis van Gaal (bottom centre) watches United’s latest defeat PA
Ed Woodward, Manchester United’s executive vice-chairman, faces a decision over Louis van Gaal which will not only affect the club’s prospects of success this season but also Old Trafford’s hopes of once again becoming the heart of the action during the remaining years of this decade.
Does Woodward have a strategy for life with, and after, Van Gaal, or is he a man without a plan?
The answer to that remains a mystery but there has been little evidence in recent months of any clear direction being pursued by the man at the top.
After two and a half years of drift and expensive failure since Woodward succeeded David Gill as United’s most senior official, the inability of both Van Gaal and David Moyes to breathe new life into the team of champions left behind by Sir Alex Ferguson is as much down to him as his two managers.
Now he must decide whether to appoint a third, be it Jose Mourinho, Ryan Giggs or A N Other, with Van Gaal having lost the faith of the club’s supporters following Saturday’s dismal 1-0 defeat at home to Southampton.
Woodward stuck by Van Gaal when he could have dismissed the Dutchman during an awful December, which brought no victories and Champions League elimination. Perhaps there was an element of wanting to display the same resolve and backing for Van Gaal which Ferguson received from Martin Edwards during his own winter of discontent during the 1989-90 campaign.
But Ferguson was making progress, the youth system was beginning to bear fruit and he emerged from the storm.
Manchester United 0 Southampton 1 player ratings
Van Gaal, in contrast, walked into one last month and shows no sign of being able to escape it.
His football is grim. A run of no first-half goals for United at Old Trafford dating back to September says everything about the risk-averse, stultifying philosophy being imposed on the club’s players.
Woodward has insisted that Van Gaal will remain at the helm until his contract expires in June 2017, but that in itself is a naïve position to take ahead of a pivotal summer for the club.
If United have a plan and are taking a strategic view of the summer transfer market, they will realise that it should be one dominated by themselves and Manchester City.
Real Madrid are out of the game, having been issued with a 12-month transfer ban by Fifa, while Barcelona’s financial problems mean they are more likely to sell than buy. Bayern Munich cannot compete with United or City in terms of transfer fees, while Arsenal will not go head-to-head with either on fees or wages. Chelsea are unlikely to be able to offer Champions League football, so only Paris Saint-Germain can legitimately compete with Manchester’s big two.
But while City are almost certainly going to be able to sell themselves to prospective new signings by dangling the carrot of a three-year magical mystery tour with Pep Guardiola, what is United’s pitch? If Van Gaal stays, that pitch will be to work for a manager who will be gone in 12 months, to be replaced by... well, that is anyone’s guess.
If he goes, then United must act now, because transfer deals are set up months before the window even opens.
Five more months of drift over the manager and United will see transfer targets move elsewhere, so whatever Woodward does now with Van Gaal will have implications for the summer and beyond.
City could secure the best manager and best players while United and Woodward decide what to do and that would set the club back even further.
If Mourinho is ready and willing to move to Old Trafford, Woodward can at least devise his own three-year plan with the Portuguese.
With Van Gaal, uncertainty clouds everything and United have already spent too long fumbling around in the fog.
Putting Januzaj at left back
That tweet doesn't match the article. What was the decision?