LVG Out Thread | BBC: Sacked!

Do you want LVG sacked?


  • Total voters
    1,419
Status
Not open for further replies.
Just out of interest what does everyone think we should do if Jose was not in the equation at all?

Not too sure, actually. I'd initially supported giving LVG until the end of the season and evaluating him then, but it's becoming harder and harder to continue with that idea. At the moment, I'd almost be tempted to go for a Pochettino type option; someone who's perhaps not overly proven as a top level manager (admittedly like Moyes), but who offers something potentially dynamic and exciting for the club and has shown some managerial credentials.
 
Unai Emery shouldn't be mentioned with the likes of Laudrup, OGS and such. i'd take Emery tomorrow.
 
Still sack him. The only thing that should enter the equation on his future is the performance and results of his team. We have scored 25 league goals since we beat City in April - that's the same amount as Sunderland, Villa, and Newcastle and less than Palace, West Brom, Stoke, West Ham and may others.

This is not a recent down turn. Its been a long time coming.
That would mean giggs most likely as caretaker (OK by me) but not a popular choice
 
Just out of interest what does everyone think we should do if Jose was not in the equation at all?
Giggs till the end of the season, and then get Pochetino (or someone similar), providing that Pep is really going to City and Simeone ain't available.
 
Not too sure, actually. I'd initially supported giving LVG until the end of the season and evaluating him then, but it's becoming harder and harder to continue with that idea. At the moment, I'd almost be tempted to go for a Pochettino type option; someone who's perhaps not overly proven as a top level manager (admittedly like Moyes), but who offers something potentially dynamic and exciting for the club and has shown some managerial credentials.
Pep is and always was my number one choice and I won't believe it until I see it (him taking over city). If that's an option it's either giggs of lvg for the remainder. For sheer curiosity on how he would cope it be keen to see giggs get that shot.

Must say though I am also coming around to the idea of Pochettino. Getting him off Levy is another question though
 
That makes no sense, why did LvG suddenly decide to do that when he is so steadfast in believing his 'philosophy of possession football'? I'm not expecting you to know the answer btw, but I can't understand why nobody in the media is asking this question.

It really hacks me off that he can just suddenly decide to switch to an attacking setup and suddenly everything is ok, why the heck didn't he do it earlier.
You have your own interpretation of possession football and therefore any deviation from your interpretation you are seeing as a change is philosophy. Possession does not mean non attacking. The issue has been the tempo, speed of passing and movement of players.

Fergie use to mention loads of times when United were poor in his era that the players were playing too slow, they needed to up the tempo. He certainly didn't tell them to play slow.

I am quite sure a lot of yesterday was players wanting to prove a point. There was more movement and the passing was quicker. Martial gained a lot of confidence from beating his man and this continued. Confidence goes a long way to shaping your performance. There was no master plan changes from LVG yesterday, no shackles removed. The only real change was bringing back suspended and injured players and restoring the CB pairing of Blind and Smalling.
 
You asked me what the bigger issues at the club were apart from the crap football and I pointed them out, I don't get your response at all. We've played crap football stylistically for 3 years but we can't even win a game now, and the whole Giggs mess is a completely different thing to the quality of the football.

You said that the crap football was the tip of the iceberg and then went on to talk about the rest of the iceberg being...the crap football! So I think we are in agreement on that front, we're all sick of the crap football.

We'll just have to agree to disagree on the Giggs 'mess'.
 
Im sick of hearing people say he needs time.

Time for what exactly?

250 million and he has achieved in 18 months far less than Moyes achieved in 12 months.

Give LVG more time for what exactly? How could Giggs be any worse?

We need change, we need instant change, letting LVG stay for another few months is the very worst of all our options.
 
You said that the crap football was the tip of the iceberg and then went on to talk about the rest of the iceberg being...the crap football! So I think we are in agreement on that front, we're all sick of the crap football.

We'll just have to agree to disagree on the Giggs 'mess'.

Well I don't consider crap football and losing football as the same thing, I guess we just differ a bit in that aspect.

Fair enough.
 
:lol:

Yes, I don't want him anywhere near the club

:lol:
Totally agree.

There is a reason United and the English FA didn't take Clough in his day as well. Probably the same reason they don't want Jose.

Not sure why so many fans have a fixation on Jose, Klopp and Pep when there are a lot of very good established managers out there and also some decent upcoming managers.
 
Sack LVG now and just have Giggs run things until the end of the season, then break the bank for Pep. Giggs may well feck it up, but it cannot be any worse than the shit we've been served up for the last 18 months (a few games excepted).
We aren't getting top 4 with LVG in charge, so we may as well roll the dice with Giggs. Every game with LVG in charge is wasted time. I actually cannot stand to look at his face any more.......
Not necessarily. I wouldn't have Giggs anywhere near the job. They should be getting Mourinho. If not, why not be taking a stab at Pochettino?
Pochettino is my second choice to Pep But he will be impossible to get mid season.
 
His record of success is based upon short term contracts with a high impact. He has generally served 2-3 year contracts with big silver in the first season before moving on. Planning long term with LVG really involves taking the first year as his high water mark. His second season and third seasons have been very unproductive. In other words it's got as good as he gets.

They also breed complacency, arrogance, and failure - remember Liverpool and Leeds - the lessons of similar 'plans'. The present quality of our football is a symptom of the same problems. As to Giggs, he has never managed another side to success and his experience is very thin. Top clubs bring in new managers for new ideas, fresh thinking and pushing the envelope - how does that happen with Giggs? To be 'planning' his tenure as manager or our club is shortsighted given the alternatives. it also points to a board that won't face up to hard decisions.

As to plans in English football, a fantasy! They exist only with hindsight and after success.

That's not actually true. At AZ for example he was almost out the door before going on to win the Eredivise.

I don't see any comparision with the LVG/Giggs plan and Liverpool/Leeds. Liverpool has managed succession very successfully for over twenty five years until King Kenny couldn't handle the pressure and Leeds imploded under the weight of their own debt. I don't know of any club who attempted to do what we are trying with LVG/Giggs, I don't know if it will work but at least is innovative!
 
Just out of interest what does everyone think we should do if Jose was not in the equation at all?
I would be definitely more cautious. That is not to say keep LvG at all costs. But if there are not a lot of alternatives... (Giggs as an interim for almost half of the season when there is still so much to play for is not an alternative)... And LvG clearly didn't lose the trust of players based on yesterday. So basically I would do what Woodward is doing...play a little waiting game.
 
Neither do I. You can lose and play well of course. But as I say we all agree United are playing crap football for too long now.

To divert this slightly, one thing I'll give LvG is that as sick of him and Giggs as I am, I don't think any manager would get this team scoring enough goals to challenge for anything, we simply don't have enough firepower, something pretty unusual for us.
 
I would be definitely more cautious. That is not to say keep LvG at all costs. But if there are not a lot of alternatives... (Giggs as an interim for almost half of the season when there is still so much to play for is not an alternative)... And LvG clearly didn't loose the trust of players based on yesterday. So basically I would do what Woodward is doing...play a little waiting game.

I agree.
 
To divert this slightly, one thing I'll give LvG is that as sick of him and Giggs as I am, I don't think any manager would get this team scoring enough goals to challenge for anything, we simply don't have enough firepower, something pretty unusual for us.

I completely agree. And of course one could argue that LVG is to blame for that in shipping our Chica, RVP, Nani, Wilson and Adanan. I'm just hoping 'the plan' will involve getting some firepower back into the team!
 
To divert this slightly, one thing I'll give LvG is that as sick of him and Giggs as I am, I don't think any manager would get this team scoring enough goals to challenge for anything, we simply don't have enough firepower, something pretty unusual for us.

Buy Lukaku. At all costs.
 
I completely agree. And of course one could argue that LVG is to blame for that in shipping our Chica, RVP, Nani, Wilson and Adanan. I'm just hoping 'the plan' will involve getting some firepower back into the team!

He did make a somewhat rabid cull when there was so little coming in up front, I think he put his eggs in the Rooney basket and it's backfired badly with 2 goals in 15 league games. RvP is as done as Rooney IMO and I doubt he'd have stayed without guarantees over starting, and I'm not sure Wilson and Januzaj are ready to add much, but his issues with what Hernandez doesn't offer instead of focusing on the usefulness of what he does offer was stubborn and Nani would be a good option to offer us a different look on the right.
 
You have your own interpretation of possession football and therefore any deviation from your interpretation you are seeing as a change is philosophy. Possession does not mean non attacking. The issue has been the tempo, speed of passing and movement of players.

Fergie use to mention loads of times when United were poor in his era that the players were playing too slow, they needed to up the tempo. He certainly didn't tell them to play slow.

I am quite sure a lot of yesterday was players wanting to prove a point. There was more movement and the passing was quicker. Martial gained a lot of confidence from beating his man and this continued. Confidence goes a long way to shaping your performance. There was no master plan changes from LVG yesterday, no shackles removed. The only real change was bringing back suspended and injured players and restoring the CB pairing of Blind and Smalling.

I'm sorry but yesterday was more than just a bit more confidence from the players, it was an entirely different approach, players were running forward, players were taking more chances with their passing, players were allowed to shoot from all over the place, etc, we haven't seen similar since the City game last season.

Why? As one poster said probably because his job was on the line, and if that's true it makes his famed philosophy and what has passed in previous games this season a joke.
 
If we're talking about continuity, then we should have just stuck with Moyes. We don't want to be like the other clubs sacking their managers when they fail. Moyes would have done an equally impressive job of driving this team into mediocrity after spending 250 million, with much more to be spent in future. Think about that, teams who should be battling relegation out perform United week in, week out.
 
It depends, really. Eight games without a win after a streak of 20 wins, why not? Eight wins as we are now is a cause for concern. If I were a manager, I wouldn't be pleased at all. And I don't think LVG is pleased at all.

But then again, why 8? why not 10? why not 5? I understand your point actually that it seems like we are snowballing downhill and before 8 becomes 15, we should get LVG out to stop the bleeding. My only doubt is that even if LVG were sacked at this moment, who's there to stop the bleeding? And unless the board has set a pretty specific target like that, I don't think the board would sack him.

I don't really like this argument that we don't know who is going to stop the rut, so we would stick with him.

What if no one is available in the summer and we are out of top 4?. Do we still stick with him, because we dont have anyone available to improve on us?.

Do you genuinely believe that there is no one available at the moment who can come in and get us winning against the likes of Norwich and Bournemouth. Its ridiculous to think only Pep/Ancelotti can do it.
 
I'm sorry but yesterday was more than just a bit more confidence from the players, it was an entirely different approach, players were running forward, players were taking more chances with their passing, players were allowed to shoot from all over the place, etc, we haven't seen similar since the City game last season.

Why? As one poster said probably because his job was on the line, and if that's true it makes his famed philosophy and what has passed in previous games this season a joke.

Probably because the players have been slagged off for not trying all week so they went out to prove a point. The players of course have their own reputations and sense of shame and I doubt they'll be enjoying this long run.

I personally don't think they came out fighting for the manager (for the 30 odd minutes) and I don't think he's correct in saying the players are with him all the way.
 
I'm sorry but yesterday was more than just a bit more confidence from the players, it was an entirely different approach, players were running forward, players were taking more chances with their passing, players were allowed to shoot from all over the place, etc, we haven't seen similar since the City game last season.

Why? As one poster said probably because his job was on the line, and if that's true it makes his famed philosophy and what has passed in previous games this season a joke.
All those things happened, we just disagree on why. We probably will never know, but I am not convinced it was 100% due to LVG.

For example we saw zero difference when Depay came on, he didn't start doing anything different than before. Rooney continued from the Stoke game where we was far more mobile and active. The addition of Schmidfield probably gave the team a lift. Smalling and Blind were re-United and continued complementing each other. So I think it was more about the players. But we won't know for sure.
 
I don't really like this argument that we don't know who is going to stop the rut, so we would stick with him.

What if no one is available in the summer and we are out of top 4?. Do we still stick with him, because we dont have anyone available to improve on us?.

Do you genuinely believe that there is no one available at the moment who can come in and get us winning against the likes of Norwich and Bournemouth. Its ridiculous to think only Pep/Ancelotti can do it.

Correct. As I said earlier, the performance and results should be the only criteria in defining whether he stays or not.
 
Probably because the players have been slagged off for not trying all week so they went out to prove a point. The players of course have their own reputations and sense of shame and I doubt they'll be enjoying this long run.

I personally don't think they came out fighting for the manager (for the 30 odd minutes) and I don't think he's correct in saying the players are with him all the way.

I thought when Rooney was asked the question he hesitated momentarily and seemed to be picking his words quite carefully. If anything they were playing for their professional pride rather than LVG himself
 
I think many have already mentioned it and I'll just reiterate the same. I feel the board are being decisive, but it's just that they are not (atleast, some members of the board) are not keen on getting mourinho. They ignored him the first time (Believe all the quotes of his 'promise' to Abrahmovic all you want, I honestly think he was sure he would get the job), why would they do a U-turn and give in now ? They might have contacted Pep's entourage behind the scenes but probably not got assurances, so they have little choice but to back can Gaal.

Also, as a side note, I think the board are unrealistically thinking that Giggs will be their next Alex Ferguson. They see him as the rightful heir to the club for the next 20-25 years. And they are trying to preserve that image and want to give him an ideal squad to start his tenure with. I maybe completely off, but that maybe another reason, why they are not prepared to sack van gaal and give giggs the interim job for the rest of the season. Also, if Giggs does want the job, I am sure he will want it on a permanent basis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jojojo
Getting him off Levy is another question though

Not least right now, if that's what we're discussing here. Come summer, sure - Levy will no doubt fleece us, but that's to be expected. Poaching him this instant, however, may be impossible. Same goes for several other candidates. Realistically, the alternatives to LVG right now are Giggs (permanent), Giggs (caretaker) or Mourinho.
 
It's blatantly obvious that he's not going anywhere until at least Saturday.

Our performance was much better yesterday, if we didn't sack him after Norwich or Stoke, there's no chance he's getting sacked after an improved display.
 
If he gets a window to spend in, he's not going until CL is impossible. I'm convinced he's staying now.
 
What a bizarre month or so.
Ticking over alright, lack of attack, but results ok, then a mini injury crisis, an absolute meltdown, and inevitable he'd be sacked.

Now... he's got this one draw, with a better performance, and it's all seemingly as you were, with not even a slight chance of the sack now, barring losing to Swansea or Sheff Utd.

Funny old season
 
Status
Not open for further replies.