Randall Flagg
Worst of the best
Thankfully the most successful manager in the world right now will never manage us?
Yes, I don't want him anywhere near the club
Thankfully the most successful manager in the world right now will never manage us?
Just out of interest what does everyone think we should do if Jose was not in the equation at all?
That would mean giggs most likely as caretaker (OK by me) but not a popular choiceStill sack him. The only thing that should enter the equation on his future is the performance and results of his team. We have scored 25 league goals since we beat City in April - that's the same amount as Sunderland, Villa, and Newcastle and less than Palace, West Brom, Stoke, West Ham and may others.
This is not a recent down turn. Its been a long time coming.
Giggs till the end of the season, and then get Pochetino (or someone similar), providing that Pep is really going to City and Simeone ain't available.Just out of interest what does everyone think we should do if Jose was not in the equation at all?
Yes, I don't want him anywhere near the club
That would mean giggs most likely as caretaker (OK by me) but not a popular choice
Pep is and always was my number one choice and I won't believe it until I see it (him taking over city). If that's an option it's either giggs of lvg for the remainder. For sheer curiosity on how he would cope it be keen to see giggs get that shot.Not too sure, actually. I'd initially supported giving LVG until the end of the season and evaluating him then, but it's becoming harder and harder to continue with that idea. At the moment, I'd almost be tempted to go for a Pochettino type option; someone who's perhaps not overly proven as a top level manager (admittedly like Moyes), but who offers something potentially dynamic and exciting for the club and has shown some managerial credentials.
You have your own interpretation of possession football and therefore any deviation from your interpretation you are seeing as a change is philosophy. Possession does not mean non attacking. The issue has been the tempo, speed of passing and movement of players.That makes no sense, why did LvG suddenly decide to do that when he is so steadfast in believing his 'philosophy of possession football'? I'm not expecting you to know the answer btw, but I can't understand why nobody in the media is asking this question.
It really hacks me off that he can just suddenly decide to switch to an attacking setup and suddenly everything is ok, why the heck didn't he do it earlier.
It's actually the other way around, success breeds continuity and stability. It's after finding the successful recipe that you can cook with serenity.
You asked me what the bigger issues at the club were apart from the crap football and I pointed them out, I don't get your response at all. We've played crap football stylistically for 3 years but we can't even win a game now, and the whole Giggs mess is a completely different thing to the quality of the football.
You said that the crap football was the tip of the iceberg and then went on to talk about the rest of the iceberg being...the crap football! So I think we are in agreement on that front, we're all sick of the crap football.
We'll just have to agree to disagree on the Giggs 'mess'.
Totally agree.
Yes, I don't want him anywhere near the club
Sack LVG now and just have Giggs run things until the end of the season, then break the bank for Pep. Giggs may well feck it up, but it cannot be any worse than the shit we've been served up for the last 18 months (a few games excepted).
We aren't getting top 4 with LVG in charge, so we may as well roll the dice with Giggs. Every game with LVG in charge is wasted time. I actually cannot stand to look at his face any more.......
Pochettino is my second choice to Pep But he will be impossible to get mid season.Not necessarily. I wouldn't have Giggs anywhere near the job. They should be getting Mourinho. If not, why not be taking a stab at Pochettino?
His record of success is based upon short term contracts with a high impact. He has generally served 2-3 year contracts with big silver in the first season before moving on. Planning long term with LVG really involves taking the first year as his high water mark. His second season and third seasons have been very unproductive. In other words it's got as good as he gets.
They also breed complacency, arrogance, and failure - remember Liverpool and Leeds - the lessons of similar 'plans'. The present quality of our football is a symptom of the same problems. As to Giggs, he has never managed another side to success and his experience is very thin. Top clubs bring in new managers for new ideas, fresh thinking and pushing the envelope - how does that happen with Giggs? To be 'planning' his tenure as manager or our club is shortsighted given the alternatives. it also points to a board that won't face up to hard decisions.
As to plans in English football, a fantasy! They exist only with hindsight and after success.
Well I don't consider crap football and losing football as the same thing, I guess we just differ a bit in that aspect.
Fair enough.
I would be definitely more cautious. That is not to say keep LvG at all costs. But if there are not a lot of alternatives... (Giggs as an interim for almost half of the season when there is still so much to play for is not an alternative)... And LvG clearly didn't lose the trust of players based on yesterday. So basically I would do what Woodward is doing...play a little waiting game.Just out of interest what does everyone think we should do if Jose was not in the equation at all?
Neither do I. You can lose and play well of course. But as I say we all agree United are playing crap football for too long now.
I would be definitely more cautious. That is not to say keep LvG at all costs. But if there are not a lot of alternatives... (Giggs as an interim for almost half of the season when there is still so much to play for is not an alternative)... And LvG clearly didn't loose the trust of players based on yesterday. So basically I would do what Woodward is doing...play a little waiting game.
To divert this slightly, one thing I'll give LvG is that as sick of him and Giggs as I am, I don't think any manager would get this team scoring enough goals to challenge for anything, we simply don't have enough firepower, something pretty unusual for us.
To divert this slightly, one thing I'll give LvG is that as sick of him and Giggs as I am, I don't think any manager would get this team scoring enough goals to challenge for anything, we simply don't have enough firepower, something pretty unusual for us.
Not necessarily. I wouldn't have Giggs anywhere near the job. They should be getting Mourinho. If not, why not be taking a stab at Pochettino?
I completely agree. And of course one could argue that LVG is to blame for that in shipping our Chica, RVP, Nani, Wilson and Adanan. I'm just hoping 'the plan' will involve getting some firepower back into the team!
You have your own interpretation of possession football and therefore any deviation from your interpretation you are seeing as a change is philosophy. Possession does not mean non attacking. The issue has been the tempo, speed of passing and movement of players.
Fergie use to mention loads of times when United were poor in his era that the players were playing too slow, they needed to up the tempo. He certainly didn't tell them to play slow.
I am quite sure a lot of yesterday was players wanting to prove a point. There was more movement and the passing was quicker. Martial gained a lot of confidence from beating his man and this continued. Confidence goes a long way to shaping your performance. There was no master plan changes from LVG yesterday, no shackles removed. The only real change was bringing back suspended and injured players and restoring the CB pairing of Blind and Smalling.
Could only see the club getting someone off the Redcafe radar.Problem is who can we get? English clubs under no pressure to sell but we should be all out for Lukaku - absolute beast of a centre forward.
Im not sure you know what that means.We would get rolled over by a absolute shite Chelsea team, so all of a sudden it's progress and he keeps his job.
It depends, really. Eight games without a win after a streak of 20 wins, why not? Eight wins as we are now is a cause for concern. If I were a manager, I wouldn't be pleased at all. And I don't think LVG is pleased at all.
But then again, why 8? why not 10? why not 5? I understand your point actually that it seems like we are snowballing downhill and before 8 becomes 15, we should get LVG out to stop the bleeding. My only doubt is that even if LVG were sacked at this moment, who's there to stop the bleeding? And unless the board has set a pretty specific target like that, I don't think the board would sack him.
Definitely. Have a look at the link Glaston posted in the Pochettino thread: http://twentyminutereads.com/2015/12/27/the-sheriff/
Would be very happy to see him as our next manager.
I'm sorry but yesterday was more than just a bit more confidence from the players, it was an entirely different approach, players were running forward, players were taking more chances with their passing, players were allowed to shoot from all over the place, etc, we haven't seen similar since the City game last season.
Why? As one poster said probably because his job was on the line, and if that's true it makes his famed philosophy and what has passed in previous games this season a joke.
All those things happened, we just disagree on why. We probably will never know, but I am not convinced it was 100% due to LVG.I'm sorry but yesterday was more than just a bit more confidence from the players, it was an entirely different approach, players were running forward, players were taking more chances with their passing, players were allowed to shoot from all over the place, etc, we haven't seen similar since the City game last season.
Why? As one poster said probably because his job was on the line, and if that's true it makes his famed philosophy and what has passed in previous games this season a joke.
I don't really like this argument that we don't know who is going to stop the rut, so we would stick with him.
What if no one is available in the summer and we are out of top 4?. Do we still stick with him, because we dont have anyone available to improve on us?.
Do you genuinely believe that there is no one available at the moment who can come in and get us winning against the likes of Norwich and Bournemouth. Its ridiculous to think only Pep/Ancelotti can do it.
Meant to say we would not get rolled over, just because Chelsea are crap - but the board will see it as progress and keep him on.Im not sure you know what that means.
Probably because the players have been slagged off for not trying all week so they went out to prove a point. The players of course have their own reputations and sense of shame and I doubt they'll be enjoying this long run.
I personally don't think they came out fighting for the manager (for the 30 odd minutes) and I don't think he's correct in saying the players are with him all the way.
Getting him off Levy is another question though