LawCharltonBest
Enjoys watching porn..with foxes
LvG still being manager actually rapes part of my soul.
The club lacks ambition
The club lacks ambition
This hurt the most. We, the fans, think of Manchester as ATM sleeping giat who will come back as one of the best clubs in Europe. Sadly our board think it is good enough that we are club fighting for top 4 and milking as much money from it as possible.LvG still being manager actually rapes part of my soul.
The club lacks ambition
But that's his modus operandi, how on earth can he change his style and philosophy now?
So what do we think?
Another wasted day in this thread or will something happen?
Some good posts from LoneyFire and Amol. But also quite sad to read how the club has and continues to fall behind City.
To stop the decline something far more than the manager needs to change by the sounds. Otherwise just add us to the list of former dominant forces. Leeds, Liverpool, Utd.
Top post.The fact that you put all our woes down to our managers precisely makes my point for me. The club has to bear the brunt of Wayne Rooney's obese and unjustified wages, the club has to pay Nani for a year while he plays for another club, the club has to deal with the decision to allow an existing manager in his 70s to pick his own inept successor, the club has to deal with a situation where we've got too small a squad. Hence, the club should have a structure that can deliberate and if necessary, veto daft decisions made by managers. Leaving it all to the manager and saying "HE's the king/idiot" is all well and good when you have a genius like SAF in charge who is the boss in every sense. Less so when you're likely to constantly be hiring new managers every 2-4 years. Hence, the need for the club to have it's own decision-making structure in addition to the one provided by the managerial staff.
And no, it's not that I'm not counting SAF and SBC, I'm calling our only two men being two extremely old chaps, very odd. Get the bright minds of our recent ex-players on board. Ajax have, for example, hired Van Der Sar, as their marketing director, presumably because he knows Ajax through and through, is I imagine in their opinion intelligent, and has played for the best marketed football club on the planet.
As for the accountants and commercial men, I know their worth. I'm in the former field myself. But there should be a healthy mix between footballing and non-footballing people.
Our new "Room Freshener" sponsor?Nothing will happen today for sure... Unless we announce a new sponsor.
Bingo.Let's just put this Pep stuff to bed.
The club has fallen behind City at every youth level age group from U10s onwards. City have invested in their structure heavily in the last 4 years - Utd have not and have not had an Academy Director in place since April. City have brought in Sporting Directors who have experience at the highest level....those Sporting Directors are known to have a very close relationship with Guardiola. Utd have no Sporting Director and a complete lack of direction on a footballing level.
The idea that Woodward & Co. will all of a sudden have shown a proactive approach is ridiculous (unless it involves the words Thailand and Official Noodle Partner). The signs are there for everyone to see - City are miles in front and the appointment of Guardiola is just another step in a direction they have been working towards for years.
PS. If Woodward had been involved in trying to get Guardiola, the giddy little cnut wouldn't have been able to keep his mouth shut.
Are people who are saying LvG should be thrown out immediately, thinking about the replacement?
I mean is the sentiment that anyone but LvG would be fine? Or any specific names in mind?
Pep is not available now. So if we are still in the game for him, then wouldn't it make sense not to fire LvG immediately rather than give it to Giggs who has no managerial experience?
Or is Mou the only one all want?
Our new "Room Freshener" sponsor?
Are people who are saying LvG should be thrown out immediately, thinking about the replacement?
I mean is the sentiment that anyone but LvG would be fine? Or any specific names in mind?
Pep is not available now. So if we are still in the game for him, then wouldn't it make sense not to fire LvG immediately rather than give it to Giggs who has no managerial experience?
Or is Mou the only one all want?
I would be perfectly with Mourinho. It is not about that LVG is bad coach, it is more about that he lost the players and I think he also lost confidence in his methods. This makes it impossible for him to turn around, similar than with Mourinho at Chelsea. Noone would argue that Hiddink is better coach then Mourinho but sometimes all is needed is a fresh face which give some boost to players with new ideas.Are people who are saying LvG should be thrown out immediately, thinking about the replacement?
I mean is the sentiment that anyone but LvG would be fine? Or any specific names in mind?
Pep is not available now. So if we are still in the game for him, then wouldn't it make sense not to fire LvG immediately rather than give it to Giggs who has no managerial experience?
Or is Mou the only one all want?
Not going to happen. Why dont you go for a walk instead of constantly checking to see if a man will loose his job?So what do we think?
Another wasted day in this thread or will something happen?
He's not going anywhere now, it's time to accept that. The club obviously thinks yesterday was a corner turned, for some inexplicable reason. The problem is, if we go through another similar shit patch, the club will look to yesterday's game as an example of how he can turn it around. Even though it was 0-0 against a 16th placed team.
Whoever guessed this the other day was right. We're sticking with Van Gaal because we have a plan. The plan involves giving Giggs the job at the end of Van Gaals tenure. No matter how shit it gets now, they have this plan and that is what will happen.
He's not going anywhere now, it's time to accept that. The club obviously thinks yesterday was a corner turned, for some inexplicable reason. The problem is, if we go through another similar shit patch, the club will look to yesterday's game as an example of how he can turn it around. Even though it was 0-0 against a 16th placed team.
Whoever guessed this the other day was right. We're sticking with Van Gaal because we have a plan. The plan involves giving Giggs the job at the end of Van Gaals tenure. No matter how shit it gets now, they have this plan and that is what will happen.
So you want the club to sack him now and then what?LvG still being manager actually rapes part of my soul.
The club lacks ambition
Cheers mate. Unfortunately, the decline is very real and the manager is just one part of it.....not the sole reason. That said, I do believe he should be dismissed.
Van Gaal after Stoke: I may resign.
Van Gaal after Chelsea: The media may want me to resign, but I won't.
The guy is thick as two short planks. He keeps accusing the media of misquoting him or not understanding what it is he says. It is actually him that is confusing everyone and backtracking all the fecking time.
People are just calling for him to be sacked NOW but aren't giving any alternatives. I know some have suggested Mourinho but you would forgive the club for being wary about a manager that had his team down in 17th.
What annoys me is his arrogance in that everything gets drawn back to him. 'I MAY RESIGN' won't be the club doing the sacking. 'I CHANGED THINGS' in regards to yesterdays match, which discredits the players.
You lot should hang your head in shame. Acting like a bunch of spoilt 10 year olds who was just refused his 20th scoop of ice cream or something.
continuity and stability breeds success.
He's here for the rest of the season or until it's physically impossible for us to get 4th.
Fair enough, the behaviour and matter of expressing this is however ridiculous.Come off it, people are rightly worried that the clubs doing nothing to address the worst run of form we've been on since the 30s.
He is. We need to accept that and get behind the team. Maybe, just maybe, things will improve.
He is. We need to accept that and get behind the team. Maybe, just maybe, things will improve.
That's extremely debatable, and entirely depends on the talents of the people employed; there's no long-term success if employees don't prove themselves good enough in the short-term.
Anyway, the board might be overlooking an important aspect of this process: we're going to lose fans, potential or longstanding, if the football doesn't satisfy. We even see it here on the Caf - increasingly, posters are finding other things to do rather than watch United matches - and this has little to do with our declining form.