Raees
Pythagoras in Boots
- Joined
- May 16, 2009
- Messages
- 29,553
In fairness he wouldn't have written the headline. Van Gaal obviously hasn't said what is in the headline but the quotes in the story and what we've seen him say lately aren't much more promising......nope. Read that twice now and I still don't see where he says he doesn't know how to solve the crisis.
James Ducker: I'm a shite journalist.
Louis van Gaal’s Manchester United future hangs on result against Chelsea
http://www.theguardian.com/football...al-manchester-united-chelsea?CMP=share_btn_tw
More guessing from journos, though all reports are pointing towards his resignation if we lose to Chelsea.
"There has been progression,” he said. “A month ago we were first in the Premier League, maybe you remember that?
.....nope. Read that twice now and I still don't see where he says he doesn't know how to solve the crisis.
James Ducker: I'm a shite journalist.
Yes! We won the November cup!
Get a grip Louis, there has been no progression, at this rate we won't even make the Europa league spots.
I think that he said something like that after the game.
And according to the telegraph we want him to stay on but he'll still lose his job if we lose to Chelsea. Oh, and the game is apparently at the bridge. The journos have no idea.According to that article above...the club want him to stay, and not resign.
Then they should quote it! This is exactly why I think sports journalists are generally useless. @RORY65 has made a fair point as the sub editor probably came up with the headline, but it's still poor.
Guys, I came upon a nice video.
T.Henry compares Guardiola's Barca with LVG's MUFC.
For the bottom 2/3rds of the pitch, bascially, it is an identical system.
However, in the final 1/3 of the pitch - there is a big difference.
It also explains why the "system" prevents us from scoring goals.
And the video also shows how to break down a team who are defending in numbers (something we see a lot against us).
This is too sensible for a late night.I really don't think it's as simple as "the club is run by clowns" as many are saying. It's far from as simple as "You, sacked. You, you're the manager now". Especially in late December. We currently have a proven manager, and it is probably in the club's best interests to persevere until the summer, and hope that LvG can have a 2nd half of the season similar to what he had last season. It's a gamble, but so is sacking him. For all we know, Mourinho could have no interest in United, so it would end up being Giggs, which just about nobody wants.
More fecking shite from Woodward
What a joker.
What I don't understand is why he didn't just go back to basics and forget his philosophy, if its not working then change things its so strange to me that a manager can't try something new. If anything I think he'd be far more respected for holding his hands up and saying let's do something else I was wrong.
What I don't understand is why he didn't just go back to basics and forget his philosophy, if its not working then change things its so strange to me that a manager can't try something new. If anything I think he'd be far more respected for holding his hands up and saying let's do something else I was wrong.
Seriously, without a clear successor what do you expect, he isn't going to let his manager leave.
I'm convinced the reason the board want to keep him is so they can go ahead with their plans for Giggs when he finishes.
It's clear they don't want Mourinho now as we'd have moved quicker to get him and Giggs as interim in these circumstances would probably put to bed any chance of him having support for the job full time as it's unlikely he'd steer this team to the top 4.
Plans are in place.
Something about this stinks. I don't think Fergie ever wanted Mourinho as United manager for whatever reason and was happy to lumber us with Moyes. The pre-match press conference had his hands all over it and he was even mentioned by LVG when he said he'd offered his support. All this despite his promise to keep away from team affairs?