Sam
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2007
- Messages
- 31,585
We're such an unbelievably stupidly run club.
pretty sure he's staying now. And this isnt even a reverse jinx.
It will be deflating to listen to philosophy and process for another week.And its getting rather tiring losing everyweek.
I think him leaving would have given the players that boost that usually happens when an ineffective manager leaves.Now we are stuck with tense players, with a manager than needs a win but cant afford to lose. Does he go for it and risk exposing himself to a thrashing, or shut up shop and stick to the unpopular philosophy? I wouldnt want to be him
How is it obvious?It is obvious the club is talking to various candidates.
He should have stuck with his possession football and grind out wins, going for it and losing to Wolfsburg, Bournmonth and Norwich is the reason everyone is calling for sack. If he had won all those 1-0, what he will have in his hands is a section of unhappy fans, his job will still be safe.
How've you come to this conclusion?We're such an unbelievably stupidly run club.
The club briefing that he has two games to save his job, the club refusing to comment on if and when he will get the sack, the club refusing to comment of if they are talking to Mourinho and Guardiola. IMO, it's clear the club is talking to peopleHow is it obvious?
The club briefing that he has two games to save his job, the club refusing to comment on if and when he will get the sack, the club refusing to comment of if they are talking to Mourinho and Guardiola. IMO, it's clear the club is talking to people
Surprised he isn't on the WUM list. Guy just guesses things and isn't listed as a journo anywhere either.
If he had won all those 1-0, what he will have in his hands is a section of unhappy fans, his job will still be safe.
Being a listed Journo means nothing, Palmer is listed and he truly knows feck all.
As a journalist you're only as good as what you execute. This guy said pedro was going chelsea before anyone, was called stupid/random and then it happened.
The club haven't briefed anyone or said anything. The only thing that seems clear to me is that nobody knows what's going on and everything is speculation.The club briefing that he has two games to save his job, the club refusing to comment on if and when he will get the sack, the club refusing to comment of if they are talking to Mourinho and Guardiola. IMO, it's clear the club is talking to people
vividly remember his tweet dropped first, then the m.e.n journalists were briefed that United were still expecting pedro then all those bs stories about pedro being warned off mufc by Valdes appeard in AS/Marca once it was known that the move was pretty much done.It's Marca or AS that said it first, he just repeated it.
Has it occurred to you people the club might not even want Giggs as caretaker before confirming who gets the job permanently. I don't get the hysteria because we haven't sacked him yet. It is obvious the club is talking to various candidates.
I don't think the club briefed the press and since when clubs comment about behind the scenes discussions before their conclusion? It's all speculation.
vividly remember his tweet dropped first, then the m.e.n journalists were briefed that United were still expecting pedro then all those bs stories about pedro being warned off mufc by Valdes appeard in AS/Marca once it was known that the move was pretty much done.
You can say that, but then again the ultimatum business is pretty specific. It reads more like something coming out of the club than a random rumour. What clubs normally do is to either sack the guy - or not. Giving him two matches - during the hectic Christmas schedule - to prove himself isn't common practice as far as I know.
To me, at least, it sounds like a Woody briefing - the purpose of which one may question, but that's a different debate.
Put it like this: It would be odd, given the immense load of speculation, that the club hasn't offered a single comment. But if the ultimatum is, in fact, a briefing - well, then they have offered a comment (in the style favoured by Woody lately), as expected.
He should have stuck with his possession football and grind out wins, going for it and losing to Wolfsburg, Bournmonth and Norwich is the reason everyone is calling for sack. If he had won all those 1-0, what he will have in his hands is a section of unhappy fans, his job will still be safe.
He should have stuck with his possession football and grind out wins, going for it and losing to Wolfsburg, Bournmonth and Norwich is the reason everyone is calling for sack. If he had won all those 1-0, what he will have in his hands is a section of unhappy fans, his job will still be safe.
Unless Woody is an idiot, he isn't going to brief that, he isn't even going to say that to Van gaal. Because there is no benefits for him, if Van gaal loses a game the board will be responsible for the dropped points, if Van gaal win both games the board will be in the same situation at the next bad strech of games. Also te club isn't going to publicly say that they don't really trust the manager, that's bad for everyone involved.
As mentioned several times in this thread, it's clearly a foolish thing to do - if it actually has been done. I just find it very specific for a completely unfounded rumour that has gained this degree of momentum.
Some journo, or random mug on Twitter, dreams up this two-match scenario - and presto. Sure, it's possible. It just doesn't strike me as the likeliest thing to be dreamed up - for the exact reason you suggest yourself: It's an odd, not to say stupid move - and it's not a common one either.
It's not really specific, I heard that hundreds of times in France.
Yeah. You are 100% correct.
The only problem is that we did lose/draw all those games.
"According to the Daily Star"http://www.touchlinetalk.com/ex-chelsea-boss-take-16m-pay-cut-united-job/120384/?
Well. I have not read this before. If Jose comes it may spell the end of Giggs too.
Or it could be a man with one last desperate attempt to salvage something/get players behind him.According to the BBC at a club dinner LVG asked for Unity.Does not sound like a man that will be sacked any time soon.
He sounds like Rick James.According to the BBC at a club dinner LVG asked for Unity.Does not sound like a man that will be sacked any time soon.
I have the feeling that Van Gaal is only still in his job because Mourinho doesn't want to face Chelsea in his first home game at Old Trafford and is ready for us after that match.
"Impressive Christmas period" means 2 wins and attractive attacking football = That will never happen and then the board can sack him
Actually you could be spot on!I wonder if we are waiting to pull the trigger while we explore the possibility of still getting Pep, or whether no one wants to tell Giggs he can take the Stoke game but a proper manager will be appointed.
No need for the slash, we lost them all.
According to the BBC, at a club dinner LVG asked for Unity.
This could be his last ever game in management....what a weak way to go out.He will do/play exactly as he has done in all his games.
Pass the ball from side to side in front of their penalty box and not do much with it.
Ultra defensive. Few shots on goal. Few goals (maybe 1).
I have the feeling that Van Gaal is only still in his job because Mourinho doesn't want to face Chelsea in his first home game at Old Trafford and is ready for us after that match.
"Impressive Christmas period" means 2 wins and attractive attacking football = That will never happen and then the board can sack him