Gambit
Desperately wants to be a Muppet
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2004
- Messages
- 31,055
This deal was done ages ago.
It's idiotic that we aren't going for Coentrao. Shaw may turn out to be a top class LB (I do love his potential)...Coentrao is already there, has at least 5 good years left in him, has played at the highest levels and excelled for both club and country.
So what we have is a far superior player...who will cost half as much. But Shaw is English, so roll on the 30m bid Woody.
It's idiotic that we aren't going for Coentrao. Shaw may turn out to be a top class LB (I do love his potential)...Coentrao is already there, has at least 5 good years left in him, has played at the highest levels and excelled for both club and country.
So what we have is a far superior player...who will cost half as much. But Shaw is English, so roll on the 30m bid Woody.
Shut up. The transfer forum is not the place to be rational.
That's not being rational. That's asking why we don't sign a player for cheaper when
A) we don't know if he'd come
Here
B) we don't know if he's available
C) we haven't got a clue how much they'd want for him.
So yeah if making up scenarios and then saying we are stupid for not going through with said scenario equates to rationality that was very rational.
Nah, to 40 million they'd have said yes immediately. The conception that you always meet halfway is far fetched, when the bid is too good to turn down it'll be accepted.The difference between a player having a release clause or not, perhaps?
Southampton were never going to say yes to a first bid, even if it had been 40m.
Why hold back the other 3%? And isn't 97% a strange number. I mean I understand 99% to convey you are almost sure but 97%?
I agree with this in principle, but this is not the summer to have principles. We have to decide what is more important, strengthening our squad or avoiding getting ripped off. When you strengthen in increments and are in the CL you are in a position of strength. When you absolutely positively have to buy players and are not in the CL, you are naked, kneeling over a table and asking to get taken.Nah, to 40 million they'd have said yes immediately. The conception that you always meet halfway is far fetched, when the bid is too good to turn down it'll be accepted.
Thing is, 27 million was already too much. If they really decided to turn that down then we should let it go, they will never get the same price from any other team.
It's idiotic that we aren't going for Coentrao. Shaw may turn out to be a top class LB (I do love his potential)...Coentrao is already there, has at least 5 good years left in him, has played at the highest levels and excelled for both club and country.
So what we have is a far superior player...who will cost half as much. But Shaw is English, so roll on the 30m bid Woody.
I agree with this in principle, but this is not the summer to have principles. We have to decide what is more important, strengthening our squad or avoiding getting ripped off. When you strengthen in increments and are in the CL you are in a position of strength. When you absolutely positively have to buy players and are not in the CL, you are naked, kneeling over a table and asking to get taken.
Chelsea won't bother preparing a bid, they'll jump in and sign him for 25 million in no time if they want him. We know it, don't we?Michael Owen reckons that Shaw is "nailed-on" to go to Chelsea. I don't know how much insider knowledge he has, but he did know about the Rooney contract quite some time before it was announced. Though that could probably put down to him being mates with United players. I don't know how he'd know what's going on at Chelsea or Southampton.
cnut.Is he now the Spurs correspondent then?
Exactly. Walking away from this deal isnt going to change that. It means we have to chase our second choice, and his club is going to be in an even stronger position to do exactly the same thing. We might as well get used to it because this is going to be happening with every player we try to sign this summer. From Southampton's point of view it would basically be negligence to accept our first offer, it just wasnt going to happen.We have put ourselves in a position where we DESPERATELY need a left back, centre half, midfielder (even two) and possibly a winger as well. No one to blame but ourselves but clubs will try to capitalise on that which is why we are bound to pay over the odds.
Chelsea won't bother preparing a bid, they'll jump in and sign him for 25 million in no time if they want him. We know it, don't we?
Chelsea won't bother preparing a bid, they'll jump in and sign him for 25 million in no time if they want him. We know it, don't we?
Chelsea won't bother preparing a bid, they'll jump in and sign him for 25 million in no time if they want him. We know it, don't we?
Delighted!? Where are these fullbacks and please don't say Coentrao.Not necessarily a bad thing in this case. Too much money for a left back who still has it all to prove.
Delighted if Chelsea swoop in for him, we can get good left backs for a better price.
Michael Owen reckons that Shaw is "nailed-on" to go to Chelsea. I don't know how much insider knowledge he has, but he did know about the Rooney contract quite some time before it was announced. Though that could probably put down to him being mates with United players. I don't know how he'd know what's going on at Chelsea or Southampton.
Delighted!? Where are these fullbacks and please don't say Coentrao.
Have you ever watched him play?Alberto Moreno?
Gareth Barry and Scott Parker, obviously.@Kevin while youre at it do you know any cut price, top class midfielders we can snap up as well? Because while Im excited about the prospect of a new left back and all, I still see this as little more than an amuse bouche for the main course: a couple of midfielders who will walk into our first XI.
He looks like a great prospect but at 30 mil will be the 2nd or 3rd most expensive defender in the world. Joking aside, and yep I know the argument about could be here for X years but unfortunately football is not a science and this is now rare for so many reasons in modern football.
Not knocking it, it's a state of intent by the club. He fits the profile but still thinks it's expensive and for 30m represents a massive gamble.
Have you ever watched him play?
You joke @Siorac - if we had bought Scott Parker 4 or 5 years ago I think it wouldnt have been a bad move at all. I think he'd have helped us out. Which just goes to show, you didnt need to be amazing to improve our midfield in recent years.
Not much we can do though. We've been sensible in the market and it cost us a lot of top players. We got more then our fair share of bargains down the years. Sometimes you have to pay over the odds IF you know he's the right player. We can't always get what everyone thinks is a great deal. No one really cares once the seasons underway and if the players fit and doing the business
Kevin was wumming a lot last summer with Barry and Parker.You joke @Siorac - if we had bought Scott Parker 4 or 5 years ago I think it wouldnt have been a bad move at all. I think he'd have helped us out. Which just goes to show, you didnt need to be amazing to improve our midfield in recent years.
Does SolidState have a twitter account.
I'd love to follow it this summer
There is absolutely no way Coentrao is a far superior player. This is one of those cases where the fact he's already excellent at a young age counts against him - he's somehow underestimated just because he's young.
I was being serious, I obviously rate him a bit higher than you and Pogue but either way he is not the quality of player we should be looking for now (or then). Hopefully we'll spend big on top quality though Im not confident we'll get what we need no matter how much we spend.Kevin was wumming a lot last summer with Barry and Parker.
But if you're actually serious: no, Scott Parker wouldn't have improved us five or ten years ago. He got fashionable for not being totally hopeless in the team that finished 20th. Barry could have done a job for us but he was never an option and it would have had to be either him or Carrick and Carrick is better. Well, was. Not sure he'll recover from this season.
Where abouts did you see this mate?
Owen has been spot on in the past...
Good points but I doubt Coentrao would be significantly cheaper. And that's assuming Madrid would sell at all (don't think they would).Far superior might be an exaggeration. But there are certain risks present in signing any young player. Injury development, ability to perform at the highest level, composure in the kind of intense pressure situations United players face (champions League, finals, title chase etc) are all question marks. Personally I think Shaw will go on to be a star and deal with these challenges. But he may not, while we know Coentrao is already proven. Given that we have a need to strengthen in other positions, I think minimizing the risk and saving quite a bit in transfer fees makes Coentrao the better choice.
I'm not saying I'll be unhappy if we get Shaw instead, as he's definitely a talent. I just think we can get better performance, for our needs at this time, for a lower price.