Luke Shaw | Deal done! Almost...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah I agree with that actually, Giggsy would have been the better bet. Its just impossible to know the circumstances surrounding these things though, such a small thing to worry about. Fwiw, I feel our midfield options at the time prevented him from coming here. Ironical but there you go.

True these thing happen in football all the time I guess. I think we did say we were loaning him back to Cardiff as per Manutd.com's premature ejaculation of the story. Wenger told him if he is good enough he will play. That obviously helped seal the deal.

Anyway I kind of forget this is a Luke Shaw thread.....
 
See the thing is, had we signed Bale from S'oton, we'd have played him at LB, and not moved him up to a winger. Bale was a shit LB, I tell you that now. We probably would have sold him to a low team and his potential would never have been realised

Right, because Fergie has never converted players or molded them to a different position
 
See the thing is, had we signed Bale from S'oton, we'd have played him at LB, and not moved him up to a winger. Bale was a shit LB, I tell you that now. We probably would have sold him to a low team and his potential would never have been realised

We'd have played him at left back despite having a 27 year old Evra?
 
See the thing is, had we signed Bale from S'oton, we'd have played him at LB, and not moved him up to a winger. Bale was a shit LB, I tell you that now. We probably would have sold him to a low team and his potential would never have been realised

The conviction with you've said most of that whilst it being based on pretty much nothing is quite incredible.
 
Right, because Fergie has never converted players or molded them to a different position
Yeah obviously Fergie has converted players before, but there's no guarantee he would have turned Bale into a winger.


The conviction with you've said most of that whilst it being based on pretty much nothing is quite incredible.
Which part? Bale being a LB or him failing here? Because he was failing as a LB on S'oton.
 
Yeah obviously Fergie has converted players before, but there's no guarantee he would have turned Bale into a winger.

Yeah, no guarantees. How did you go from there to being certain we'd have played him at LB and then sold him on to some other club and then him not even realizing his potential?
 
Yeah, no guarantees. How did you go from there to being certain we'd have played him at LB and then sold him on to some other club and then him not even realizing his potential?
Had we not turned him into a winger, he'd most certainly have been a backup to Paddy, who was in his prime. Bale would have been like Buttner, and whatever potential potential Buttner had has certainly not been fulfilled here and it looks he'll get even less games with Shaw possibly arriving.

You're right, what I said may or may not have happened . My bad for making it sound like facts. But I was just basing it off similar situations.
 
Had we not turned him into a winger, he'd most certainly have been a backup to Paddy, who was in his prime. Bale would have been like Buttner, and whatever potential potential Buttner had has certainly not been fulfilled here and it looks he'll get even less games with Shaw possibly arriving.

You're right, what I said may or may not have happened . My bad for making it sound like facts. But I was just basing it off similar situations.

Buttner never had much potential. Really think just because he's incredibly shit defensively, his offensive game gets overrated.

And Sir Alex loved to try out players in different positions(one of the reasons he took a lot of flak here), I see no reason why Bale wouldnt have been tried further up if he came here.
 
Had we not turned him into a winger, he'd most certainly have been a backup to Paddy, who was in his prime. Bale would have been like Buttner, and whatever potential potential Buttner had has certainly not been fulfilled here and it looks he'll get even less games with Shaw possibly arriving.

You're right, what I said may or may not have happened . My bad for making it sound like facts. But I was just basing it off similar situations.
My interpretation of that would be that Bale is much better than Buttner.

Are you suggesting that we are missing a trick by not playing Buttner as a winger? Do you think we could do that and then sell him to Madrid for £80m?
 
Buttner never had much potential. Really think just because he's incredibly shit defensively, his offensive game gets overrated.

And Sir Alex loved to try out players in different positions(one of the reasons he took a lot of flak here), I see no reason why Bale wouldnt have been tried further up if he came here.
My interpretation of that would be that Bale is much better than Buttner.

Are you suggesting that we are missing a trick by not playing Buttner as a winger? Do you think we could do that and then sell him to Madrid for £80m?
As I said, Buttner was just an example of an average LB that we bought as a reserve that has done shit all. Of course I think Bale's better than Buttner.

However, we should try Buttner at winger, he can't do worse than anyone we have right now and his defensive game's clearly going nowhere.

Edit: One more thing, Spurs were also on the verge of selling Bale after several games as a LB until he was converted.
 
As I said, Buttner was just an example of an average LB that we bought as a reserve that has done shit all. Of course I think Bale's better than Buttner.

However, we should try Buttner at winger, he can't do worse than anyone we have right now and his defensive game's clearly going nowhere.

Edit: One more thing, Spurs were also on the verge of selling Bale after several games as a LB until he was converted.

What? We have Kagawa, Januzaj and Nani all of whom can play on the left. Buttner shouldnt be anywhere near the squad. As I said, his offensive game gets overrated because he's utterly shit defensively.
 
As I said, Buttner was just an example of an average LB that we bought as a reserve that has done shit all. Of course I think Bale's better than Buttner.

However, we should try Buttner at winger, he can't do worse than anyone we have right now and his defensive game's clearly going nowhere.

Edit: One more thing, Spurs were also on the verge of selling Bale after several games as a LB until he was converted.
The implication here seems to be that Redknapp has a better eye for where someone's natural position is than Fergie does. This is simply not a notion I am willing to entertain.
 
What? We have Kagawa, Januzaj and Nani all of whom can play on the left. Buttner shouldnt be anywhere near the squad. As I said, his offensive game gets overrated because he's utterly shit defensively.
The implication here seems to be that Redknapp has a better eye for where someone's natural position is than Fergie does. This is simply not a notion I am willing to entertain.
Bloody 'ell, I feel like a bull with two dogs trying to take chunks out of me!

I certainly agree that Redknapp cannot be compared to Fergie. I'm saying, Bale wouldn't have got the chance here that he got at Spurs. Post 2008-10, I can't think of a player Fergie moulding a player into a completely different player permanently. We were busy challenging for Europe and the league and we already had the best team in the world. We couldn't really afford to give games to an untested LB and try I convert him into a winger. Spurs on the other hand could because as per usual they were challenging for shit all.

Also, if we're saying we have Kagawa, Nani and Januzaj who can play on the win instead of Buttner, think of the reaction Bale would have got if Fergit played him on the wings instead of Ronny, an inform Nani or a Tevez. Playing a LB on the wings simply wasn't feasible for us back then.
 
Bloody 'ell, I feel like a bull with two dogs trying to take chunks out of me! I certainly agree that Redknapp cannot be compared to Fergie. I'm saying, Bale wouldn't have got the chance here that he got at Spurs. Post 2008-10, I can't think of a player Fergie moulding a player into a completely different player permanently. We were busy challenging for Europe and the league and we already had the best team in the world. We couldn't really afford to give games to an untested LB and try I convert him into a winger. Spurs on the other hand could because as per usual they were challenging for shit all.

:lol:

Okay lets top this even though I disagree. In any case, its not the thread for it.
 
@NJM78 we showed Hazard around but Chelsea gave more money to his agent. Guess who won that battle?

If I remember the posts on here at the time we were convinced we'd got the better player in Kagawa. It hasn't worked out for him but I think I'd rather the club draw a line against agents and other clubs demands.
 
Yeah obviously Fergie has converted players before, but there's no guarantee he would have turned Bale into a winger.



Which part? Bale being a LB or him failing here? Because he was failing as a LB on S'oton.

There was talk of Fergie wanting a then 17 yr old so he could convert him to a LW. People were saying he could be the next Giggs.
 
If I remember the posts on here at the time we were convinced we'd got the better player in Kagawa. It hasn't worked out for him but I think I'd rather the club draw a line against agents and other clubs demands.
Aye. I think Kagawa would have shown more qualities if we had continued with Fergie's plans to rejig the system but that never happened. Well Hazard's agent demands werent even that high. We only paid Rio's agent £1m less. Miguel Delaney has gone on record to say the issue is the Glazers dont understand the nature of paying agent fees in general.
 
NEV: "If you want to join United, you have to really hate the scousers."
RAMSEY: "I do!"
NEV: "Oh yeah? How much?"
RAMSEY: "A lot!"
NEV: "Right, you're in."

Unless you get a job with England. In that case you suck Gerrard's .....
 
There was talk of Fergie wanting a then 17 yr old so he could convert him to a LW. People were saying he could be the next Giggs.

Yes that was certainly how I remember it being at the time... united saw him as a potential winger rather than left back

will never know though so back to shaw... he may go on to be a great player but he has some way to go yet and a cant help but feel that moreno at half the price and half the wages will certainly be better than half as good.

cant see anything official happening till post world cup now eitherway so fingers crossed he does not get injured
 
will never know though so back to shaw... he may go on to be a great player but he has some way to go yet and a cant help but feel that moreno at half the price and half the wages will certainly be better than half as good.

Entirely possible, but the difference is that Liverpool need quantity but we need quality.
 
Yes that was certainly how I remember it being at the time... united saw him as a potential winger rather than left back

will never know though so back to shaw... he may go on to be a great player but he has some way to go yet and a cant help but feel that moreno at half the price and half the wages will certainly be better than half as good.

cant see anything official happening till post world cup now eitherway so fingers crossed he does not get injured

The thing with Shaw is he's an exceptional young English talent. He'll be worth more to the club in merchandise and he'll give us more years of service on the pitch and probably after as an ambassador. I'd rather Shaw than anyother LB at this point.
 
I'm still flip-flopping on this one. Maybe I've not seen the right matches, but I just haven't seen the wow factor that says he's a safe bet to be a top player. I keep looking at the pricetag and getting this, "I remember when Micah Richards looked like he was going to be special," vibe.

Please reassure me. Someone?
 
I'm still flip-flopping on this one. Maybe I've not seen the right matches, but I just haven't seen the wow factor that says he's a safe bet to be a top player. I keep looking at the pricetag and getting this, "I remember when Micah Richards looked like he was going to be special," vibe.

Please reassure me. Someone?

I feel the same way.

Paying for potential is fine by me but I am struggling to see the world class potential in him.
 
I'm still flip-flopping on this one. Maybe I've not seen the right matches, but I just haven't seen the wow factor that says he's a safe bet to be a top player. I keep looking at the pricetag and getting this, "I remember when Micah Richards looked like he was going to be special," vibe.

Please reassure me. Someone?

Opinion from a Saints fan

SaintNick said:
OK, thoughts on Luke Shaw as a player, his future, your chances of signing him.

Just for perspective I've been a season ticket holder for over 20 years at the Dell/ St Marys. Although have rivalries I'm bit old for petty slagging off other clubs (apart from when their used to be another club along the coast but don't think they are still in professional football ;) ). I can't say you are my favourite team, mainly due to usual thing of backing underdogs etc, but I recognise the relevative standing of clubs, finances, support, champions league etc.

Shaw
He is very good, however, I think much of the media reporting on him is lazy. I don't know whether it is just because of his age, or because he follows recent graduates of Walcott, Bale and OxC, but he is often described as very good going forward and weak defensively. He isn't weak defensively.
He stands out due to his maturity in attitude, ability and strength - at 18 he is more complete than the previous three I mentioned. He is freakily calm, confident and physically strong for an 18 year old. Defensively he has been excellent this season, in my opinion (and guess professional footballers ) the best. I have not seen him struggle at all this season, can't really remember him being beaten, for example januzaj didn't get close to beating him, Shaw was calm and faster.
IMHO, he is already ahead of Baines or Cole defensively - with the only fault being, very occasionally positioning. Due to his speed he often sits in the opponents half, even when attackers are behind him. This maybe the manager's instruction (but we've got rid of him ;) ).
His attacking ability, at the moment, is over rated. He gets the ball forward quickly, running with it, stretching opposition, but his final product isn't great (Clyne is better going forward but trying to keep him quiet!).
Good signing? Undoubtedly. You are trying to buy potential. Remember he is 18, how many players play more than handful of games in the premier league at 18? This is his second season as well, Cole was 20, Baines 21, Evra 25, before they played at this level - and not only has he played but played well over a season, consistently to make the PFA player of the season - he is a long way better than any of those were at his age.

A lot of posts on your Shaw thread talk about other players failing to make their potential when hailed at this age. I think that is an unfair comparison - he is already proved his consistency, and if I can brag for a moment, is from our acedemy, you don't get better preparation. We are also big on character, Bale, OxC, Walcott, Ward Prowse, Chambers, Shaw, all level headed.
Would he be good signing? No doubt at all. If he peaks early he will be international level / top prem player for a decade, if he improves as most players do will be better than Cole who is best I've seen for while whatever I think of him!

Will he leave this window? Likely but by no means certain. He has been here since he was 8. He recently commented about how no-one can imagine playing, and being on top of ManCity at home (as said by their manager and captain) and as 18 year old there were four players who have played together for saints in same team from under 8s. We have something like 4 in under 19, including captain (another 18 year old fullback!) And two other younger players moved up - Shaw and Ward Prowse captaining u21s.
He will leave, but I am not convinced following some very positive Southampton comments by his parents, that he is in rush. He will be on huge money for his age (he can't drive) he has already made team of season and world cup so several of usual reasons for leaving are not there.appreciate its sore point but you can't offer him champions league, what if he left, and you didn't qualify again? (Personally think you will but not guaranteed).
He may think that another year or two then move to top four - he still would be youngest defender at that level.
I appreciate its a done deal in papers, but wasn't it all agreed before end of season according to them? We also had this last summer, papers waiting to announce him at Chelsea... Then he signed 5 year contract.

The other thing to remember is Southampton do not want to sell (applies for Lallana) and do not need the money.

There is a lot of wrong information printed, although they are starting to realise their errors.

Our owner has made it clear, she is not selling and doesn't think team has peaked. Her father died before our first promotion from league one - we were I think 8th league 1 when she took over, two promotions, prem 14th then 8th...she has spent the money, she only started going to games last season and clearly loves it.
The official club statement has said all young players on long contracts, do not need to sell any and money available this window.
That said, depending on money offered and players attitude to it any player can be sold, but I think fact we have turned down (from official website) multiple bids for players shows rumours of fire sale were wrong - if desperate we would have cashed in on Lallana and Shaw a month ago and be over £50m richer.

The strongest rumours, from local BBC sports news, is Lallana sulking for move, Shaw being very professional. Bids of £25 & £28 turned down. Manager likely to be Koeman (hmm famous defender, Shaw??) Or Magath, but tip for you Yakin has dropped out in odds as was signing for Moscow but believe he has pulled out, very well thought of, his agent said interested, just won Swiss league twice - where our owner lives. Anyway, reporter states that new manager will get £30-50m PLUS anything raised - Koeman could get Indi martin and classie for a lot less to replace those two.

Gut feeling, 80% likely you will get him & I wish him well.
 
I'm still flip-flopping on this one. Maybe I've not seen the right matches, but I just haven't seen the wow factor that says he's a safe bet to be a top player. I keep looking at the pricetag and getting this, "I remember when Micah Richards looked like he was going to be special," vibe.

Please reassure me. Someone?

Same, would have preferred Coentrao by a country mile. But if we have to go a level below or two, then Shaw is fine to me. We have done well with expensive young British players in the past. Als the fee is ridiculous, but that's English players for you, all overpriced. I am more pissed of about the wages, if we offer him 100 k now he will be one of our highest paid players already which doesn't sit well with me.
 
The fee is ridiculous not just because he's English, but this is what happens when you have to deal with mid table clubs like Southampton who aren't going to part with him without a fight.
 
The fee is ridiculous not just because he's English, but this is what happens when you have to deal with mid table clubs like Southampton who aren't going to part with him without a fight.

Why should they let him go easily?
 
Don't care much for this player but imagine if Chelsea power-swooped in for Shaw as well after the World Cup.
 
Don't care much for this player but imagine if Chelsea power-swooped in for Shaw as well after the World Cup.

Which is very much a possibility, but I don't see them spending 27m on Shaw, they'll rather get talent from Europe for that amount.
 
Koeman looks like the new Soton manager .. Lets hope this clears up their reluctance to part ways with Shaw. Its always been reported they wouldnt sell till AFTER a new manager was in - which is odd, cuz they sold Lambert. Perhaps they just like Liverpool more than us!
 
Koeman looks like the new Soton manager .. Lets hope this clears up their reluctance to part ways with Shaw. Its always been reported they wouldnt sell till AFTER a new manager was in - which is odd, cuz they sold Lambert. Perhaps they just like Liverpool more than us!

Shaw leaving is a much bigger deal than Lambert leaving.
 
Unless we assume that a deal has already been done here - the performance of the likes of Blind, unless Shaw can also perform at a high level this WC, may be quite handy to give us an easy alternative if Southampton are trying to play hard ball.

I reckon the deal is already done though - can't believe Southampton would reject close to £30m for an 18 year old who wants to leave.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.