Well it may not be a theory at that point but it doesn't mean it's something people do not do. In different religions people spin religious texts to suit their own agendas. Although it's "based" on the religious text, using what many would construe as an invalid or not very sound interpretation of the text in one sense makes it baseless. I feel there are lots of examples where someone makes up an idea and then uses something which resonates with people as a form of manipulation or persuasion.
What we are seeing in this scenario is not so dissimilar from the Wayne Rooney one. Posters are acting on presumptions about Young's wage. Each party (selling club, agent, journalist, buying club) most likely won't cite the correct figure as they each are serving their own interests. Therefore, it doesn't matter if the reported figures don't match the actual ones. Won't change the fact that some people feel the 125k figure for Young is plausible since it's been used consistently by different sources. Is it plausible? It seems so when you have papers reporting Rooney's wage from anywhere in the neighborhood of 180-250k a week.
All this to say is the news fuels these transfer stories because they know people will buy into them. I'm going to post an article I came across last night which I think is very fitting for what we're seeing nowadays. It offers good perspective into how the transfer rumour mill even began. Although I'm going to post it in the Rooney thread as there's a certain application of the article I found more apt for that thread.
Your posts make me sad. Just because some clever philosophical works are long winded and complex, the converse is not always true, ie making something long winded and complex doesn't mean it's clever. The life is being sucked out of football discussion by this overly complicated approach. I blame Graham Hunter. Transfer rumours are agenda driven bollox. Some points are lost in superfluous explanation.