Yeah this seems eerily similar to when Fergie froze the likes of Ruud and Berba out.
I think he (and Anderson) get far too much of this on here.
"He's not being supported"
"He wasn't playing with the right players"
"He played in the wrong position/system"
"Loads of other players played badly too"
"He's being rotated far too often"
"It's all because of the contract"
etc. etc.
He won't last very long at the club if he isn't capable of taking responsibility for his own performances. If his contract is an issue then so be it, but if he was as good as people on here would have you believe he'd have gotten the massive wage hike he's looking for. If he plays like he can between now and the end of the season I have no doubts he'd get the contract he wants.
I have a suspicion that Nani or his agent might have been angling for a move, either because he genuinely wants to move, or as a contract negotiation ploy. In which case I would fully support SAF's decision to alienate him a bit. It takes him out of the eye of potential buyers and weakens his negotiating position. It's then up to Nani to pull it together and show that he wants and deserves to stay at United.
He can be very good at freezing out very good players and then selling them for pittance.
I think he (and Anderson) get far too much of this on here.
"He's not being supported"
"He wasn't playing with the right players"
"He played in the wrong position/system"
"Loads of other players played badly too"
"He's being rotated far too often"
"It's all because of the contract"
etc. etc.
He won't last very long at the club if he isn't capable of taking responsibility for his own performances. If his contract is an issue then so be it, but if he was as good as people on here would have you believe he'd have gotten the massive wage hike he's looking for. If he plays like he can between now and the end of the season I have no doubts he'd get the contract he wants.
Agree with Brophs.
Especially this whole business about how he needs a run of games to get his confidence up. Sorry but if your confidence is that brittle, that is a problem that is going to hold you back at a club like United. You need to be good enough to seize your chances when they arise. If he wants to play every week regardless, he should be at a smaller club. We do that with Rooney and I dont really agree with it there either: if someone is not playing well enough they should be dropped in favour of someone who is in good form, in my opinion. Not that I think my own personal man management skills are anything to write home about.
He won't last very long at the club if he isn't capable of taking responsibility for his own performances. If his contract is an issue then so be it, but if he was as good as people on here would have you believe he'd have gotten the massive wage hike he's looking for. If he plays like he can between now and the end of the season I have no doubts he'd get the contract he wants.
Agree with Brophs.
Especially this whole business about how he needs a run of games to get his confidence up. Sorry but if your confidence is that brittle, that is a problem that is going to hold you back at a club like United. You need to be good enough to seize your chances when they arise. If he wants to play every week regardless, he should be at a smaller club. We do that with Rooney and I dont really agree with it there either: if someone is not playing well enough they should be dropped in favour of someone who is in good form, in my opinion. Not that I think my own personal man management skills are anything to write home about.
Sort the feck out of defence and Nani's contract, get him and Valencia playing at their very best AND at the same time (like they did in the 1st half against Bayern) and we are as good as anyone in Europe.
I'm not convinced that we will get that price for him, unless one of the moneybags clubs are interested. Not saying that he isn't a £20m at his best, but clubs will look at the situation and feel that they can get him for less, and they'd probably be correct.I just hope we get rid of him in January if he does go. I'd hate it if he's just wasting a subsitute spot if he won't even play from Febuary till May.
We should get at least £20million for him.
Rooney was good enough to earn wages equal to those Ronaldo and Messi ean? Rooney earns almost a double then most of our players do, Berbatov wages were bigger then Nani's, and if I am not wrong, Young also earns lot more then him. Is that fair? Are those players that good?
Comparing him to those, he isn't asking for massive wages at all... And even if you ignore those comparisions, 130k per week are regular wages for a player that was one of our best players in last three years, and is considered by one of the best wingers in the world.
What about Valencia? What did he do to earn starting spot in our almost every game? He is nothing better then Nani at the moment, and yet he is our safe starter, while Nani plays one game, and gets dropped for next three. Young is awfull at the moment too, and still he was starter for our last three PL games.
I agree with your opinion though, but if we are already giving so many opportunities for other players to prove, I don't see why we wouldn't do that with Nani too.
No we're not.
When on song he's the best winger at the club. That's the infuriating bit.
I'm kind of resigned to him leaving now to be honest, I can't see this situation solving itself and there's too much smoke for there not to be fire. We just have to find another gem who'll hopefully fulfil his potential unlike Nani, who's one very good season showed what he could've been.
Rooney was good enough to earn wages equal to those Ronaldo and Messi ean? Rooney earns almost a double then most of our players do, Berbatov wages were bigger then Nani's, and if I am not wrong, Young also earns lot more then him. Is that fair? Are those players that good?
Comparing him to those, he isn't asking for massive wages at all... And even if you ignore those comparisions, 130k per week are regular wages for a player that was one of our best players in last three years, and is considered by one of the best wingers in the world.
No doubt, but you need to be consistent about that, which Fergie hasn't been. Certain unnamed players still seem to be undroppable despite poor form this season.
There is the other dimension to it, which is that when you have a lopsided squad, you cant drop certain players because there is nobody else that can do their job. That was an issue with Rooney in the past, hopefully with Van Persie and Kagawa around though we can manage without him a bit better. Now maybe it is Carrick who is in that position.
I like Valencia more than Nani, anyone who pays attention to my posts will know that, no point in regurgitating all of that stuff again here. But I agree with you in the sense that what I said before should be universally applicable - to Rooney, which is the example I have already given, but to Valencia too, or anyone else. (I had this conversation a while back and someone made the point the exception maybe has to be defense, because you want to keep a stable unit, and maybe there is something in that.) But in general the rule has to be: if you are playing shit, you get dropped. I dont see how you can keep a squad motivated if they dont believe they will be rewarded with games when they play well.
I have no idea what any of those players earn, as I'm sure you don't. But I'd be amazed if Rooney's on the same sort of money as Messi or Ronaldo. If only because he's not nearly as good a player. That isaid, he's clearly valued much more highly than Nani by the people at the club who make these decisions. Personally I don't disagree.
As for the rest, Nani's wage is from an old(er) contract. Someone like Young was signed more recently, at a time when wages are on the rise. It makes sense that he'd be on more, given that he signed much more recently.
Saying Nani deserves more doesn't necessarily mean you give him whatever he wants. I'm all for him getting more money, but within reason. If the wages he's looking for are extortionate - and I find it hard to believe we wouldn't give him the same sort of money as Young is on, given that he's obviously a better player - then what can we do?
Of course we also need to factor how players are around the club. Without any evidence at all (bar the apparent recent fight with Petrucci) Nani seems like he could be the kind of personality who would be a negative influence if he wasn't happy.I have no idea what any of those players earn, as I'm sure you don't. But I'd be amazed if Rooney's on the same sort of money as Messi or Ronaldo. If only because he's not nearly as good a player. That said, he's clearly valued much more highly than Nani by the people at the club who make these decisions. Personally I don't disagree.
As for the rest, Nani's wage is from an old(er) contract. Someone like Young was signed more recently, at a time when wages are on the rise. It makes sense that he'd be on more, given that he signed much more recently.
Saying Nani deserves more doesn't necessarily mean you give him whatever he wants. I'm all for him getting more money, but within reason. If the wages he's looking for are extortionate - and I find it hard to believe we wouldn't give him the same sort of money as Young is on, given that he's obviously a better player - then what can we do?
Of course we also need to factor how players are around the club. Without any evidence at all (bar the apparent recent fight with Petrucci) Nani seems like he could be the kind of personality who would be a negative influence if he wasn't happy.
Okay, I don't know how much Rooney earns eventough there are tons of articles where he is showed as one of the top earners in the world football, while you are saying we shouldn't give Nani those wages because he asks too much? How do you know how much does he wants then?
As for Rooney being better player, let's say he is, and let's say all those media speculations about his wages are correct, do you agree he is that better then Nani? Nani's new contract would give them, how much, 130k? And Rooney earns around 200k, is he really that much better then him?
Of course we also need to factor how players are around the club. Without any evidence at all (bar the apparent recent fight with Petrucci) Nani seems like he could be the kind of personality who would be a negative influence if he wasn't happy.
You think so? He seems a lovely lad in all the interviews I've ever seen.
No evidence to back it up. Im my experience of playing, personalities are usually magnified on a football pitch. Drama queens on the pitch are usually the same off it too.Yeah, I was just about to say. I think the only negative view you could take of him is based on his persona on the field.
Yes, we are. Barring only slight superiority of Barcelona perhaps.
No evidence to back it up. Im my experience of playing, personalities are usually magnified on a football pitch. Drama queens on the pitch are usually the same off it too.
No evidence to back it up. Im my experience of playing, personalities are usually magnified on a football pitch. Drama queens on the pitch are usually the same off it too.
I'm not saying he's asking too much. Nor do I have any idea what he's asking for, beyond media speculation. I'm saying that, if, as is being reported, the breakdown is due to wages then that means Nani wants more than what we can offer. Whatever that figure is.
And there's no real way of comparing how much better I think Rooney is than Nani, only to say that if Rooney is on £200k p/w, as you suggest, then yeah, I think around £130k p/w is reasonable-ish for Nani. Even aside from footballing reasons Rooney's a more well known and marketable commodity.
He is nowhere near better for 70k per week then Nani mate. Individually, he isn't even better player then Nani.
It's statements like that that give us Nani fans a bad name.
It's statements like that that give us Nani fans a bad name.
I'm going to disagree with that statement pal.