Fergus' son
Gets very easily confused
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2011
- Messages
- 11,161
Hopefully we are in the hunt for a quality replacement if he is to be sold, Hazard and Moura level of ability.
He'll go for £10M ish to PSG.
We've basically won the title without him. People are over-rating his impact for us. He's a good player no doubt, and one that I thoroughly enjoy watching when he has his mojo (which isn't often sadly).
We've basically won the title without him. People are over-rating his impact for us. He's a good player no doubt, and one that I thoroughly enjoy watching when he has his mojo (which isn't often sadly).
Regarding the bolded....
We won the title without Ronaldo the season after he left, cause we have a very fecking good football team. I reckon we'd have probably even won the title this season without Rooney.
Amazing considering how shite all our wingers have been, we've basically won the league without wingers.
The way this is worded is bugging me. Do you regard 10/11 as the season after Ronaldo left us?
We've basically won the title without him. People are over-rating his impact for us. He's a good player no doubt, and one that I thoroughly enjoy watching when he has his mojo (which isn't often sadly).
I don't get this argument that we have coped with loosing better players.
It's a team/squad game & loosing players like Beckham, Stam, RvN, Ronaldo, Keane & potentially Nani & even Rooney has, & will, weaken our squad, whether we cope with it or not.
The season after, rather than the season he left us. Shit wording I know.
I had many better examples to give too, Beckham for one.
If you go to the match threads where Nani has played...you will see so many comments about how frustrating he is interspersed with the odd..."nice play nani". It appears that when he isn't playing people question why but when he is people get frustrated with him. He's a bit of a dilemma that way...
Personally I think probably too much expectation was put upon him after Ronaldo left...
We've basically won the title without him. People are over-rating his impact for us. He's a good player no doubt, and one that I thoroughly enjoy watching when he has his mojo (which isn't often sadly).
To be fair this season I don't think that is particularly saying much as I'd say we would have won the title if you took away any single player from our squad. It would be difficult to suggest that even the likes of RVP or Carrick are 12 points better than the next best player in their position.
I'd say the best single performance out of any of our winger's this season has been Nani, which given his shortfall in appearances in telling.
After watching Aguero jump tackle, studs up into Luiz and be allowed to finish the game while Nani gets a straight red for a perfectly legitimate attempt to control the ball, I'm really pissed off about how this game is officiated.
I will never suggest conspiracy because it's just not that. The problem is that referees are not held to account for inconsistent and incompetent performances.
I can excuse the occasional miss (Drogba offside or multiple Terry handballs) because sometimes the human eye and the brain don't connect, but both the Aguero and Nani situations were outrageously poorly judged.
Kompany clearly hauled down Torres.
Why is this sport so badly officiated so frequently?
I know this is the Nani thread, but Nani really did fukked by that Turkish ref. Yes, you have to move on, but my God it can't be easy to move on from that. I feel for the lad. Unless someone comes in with silly money or we pick up Ronaldo or Bale I say give Nani another season, which necessarily involves a new contract. If he holds out for silly money then off he goes to Galatsaray or some other godforsaken wasteland.
After watching Aguero jump tackle, studs up into Luiz and be allowed to finish the game while Nani gets a straight red for a perfectly legitimate attempt to control the ball, I'm really pissed off about how this game is officiated.
I will never suggest conspiracy because it's just not that. The problem is that referees are not held to account for inconsistent and incompetent performances.
I can excuse the occasional miss (Drogba offside or multiple Terry handballs) because sometimes the human eye and the brain don't connect, but both the Aguero and Nani situations were outrageously poorly judged.
Kompany clearly hauled down Torres.
Why is this sport so badly officiated so frequently?
I know this is the Nani thread, but Nani really did fukked by that Turkish ref. Yes, you have to move on, but my God it can't be easy to move on from that. I feel for the lad. Unless someone comes in with silly money or we pick up Ronaldo or Bale I say give Nani another season, which necessarily involves a new contract. If he holds out for silly money then off he goes to Galatsaray or some other godforsaken wasteland.
Refereeing in the modern game is a complete shambles.
It's 'whatever you're having yourself' - the ref makes up his own rules; and ignores those he doesn't feel like enforcing.
Many of the traditional rules of association football have died through neglect. What constitutes 'obstruction' in modern football? When did constant use of hands and arms - clutching, grabbing, arms across an opponents body, jersey pulling.... - become an accepted part of the game? Most refs can't even ensure that a 'wall' is ten yards away from a free kick. It boggles the mind.
Maybe if refs went through a proper education and training process, rather than the amateurish approach which currently prevails, we might hope for some uniformity and consistency. Although many amateur sports have far higher standards of officiating.
For example, has Welbeck had a good season in your view?
Explain this.
For example, has Welbeck had a good season in your view? He hasn't scored or assisted many, but his general play has been high quality. It is a team game, and the most important statistic is who wins, not who scores, or who assists.
Not for me. He's had some nice moments but for a lad as talented as he is, he really should be making more of a difference by creating and scoring. I think he's an absolutely brilliant footballer but he's currently let down massively by his composure in and around the box.
Jesus, for you to say Nani "fanboys" ignore his poor performances is quite ironic isn't it? I remember a fair few occasions where there were around 50 posts saying Valencia was rubbish only for you to then say otherwise or defend him.
I think you're talking bollocks, by the way, nobody has claimed he wasn't rubbish against Chelsea, read back, his biggest fans, myself and IAR and whatever, said straight after the match that he was rubbish and it was one of his worst performances in years. We've also not denied that he's had a poor season.
I always find it funny how you constantly come into this thread and decide to turn things into a Nani v Valencia debate, which you're doing above, it's like you can't just accept that some people prefer Nani as a footballer and think he's the better player and you have to run into his thread to try and dismiss that, and start going on about Valencia and how great he was and how mistreated he is, whatever.
How about you just ... give it a rest?
What an absolute plonker you are. Do you not realise how stupid this post looks coming from you?
After the Chelsea game, and well, every poor Nani performance, I've fecking called it poor, I call a spade a spade whether I like a player or not. You on the other hand claim Valencia had a good game when 99% of other people think he's played shit... and then you make a fecking post like this. Seriously, what the flying feck!??!
There's also this:What an absolute plonker you are. Do you not realise how stupid this post looks coming from you?
After the Chelsea game, and well, every poor Nani performance, I've fecking called it poor, I call a spade a spade whether I like a player or not. You on the other hand claim Valencia had a good game when 99% of other people think he's played shit... and then you make a fecking post like this. Seriously, what the flying feck!??!
I'm his harshest critic but I genuinely don't want him to go. He's arguably earned the right to be commonly tagged world-class and is comfortably our best left winger.
You (as you said yourself) really are shite at 'this internet thing'. Only once did I go against the mainstream, which was stating Valencia had a poor game. I also acknowledged that and said I didn't give a shit if your opinion differed or not. In my opinion he had a decent game and I said so. I also once claimed Nani was 'ok' whereas he was being eaten alive on here but I'd wager it doesn't really fit your non-argument.
You really can't behave, do you?
So, a draw can be a win?
Then I hope we buy Aderbayor for his efforts, feck Falcao.
BBC Sport Gossip - Apparently we are selling Rooney and Nani to PSG for 40 million...
Really? Can they not even come up with a more feasable transfer fee? I don't see how Rooney would go to PSG for less without Nani, considering their money...
I'd want at least 60-65 million for the both of them.
For all the talk of Nani's so called inconsistencies, you only have to go back about a year and he was one of our most productive and reliable performers. As someone said on the previous page when Nani is given a run of games he finds his form.
When you have players like Valencia who are apparently unstoppable regardless of form, and the likes of Rooney and RVP who are apparently I droppable just... Because.. There do seem to be some double standards going around with SAF.
For me there has to be some non-football reasons involved to make any sense of this. Nani is our best and highest potential winger. If he has been out of form this season it is because of injuries and then not being given a chance to get his form back, you can't expect him to do well if he never plays.
The other thing is even if we were going to sell him we are hardly putting him in the shop window currently. If he were playing and performing the. His price tag would increase enormously whereas currently it looks like he will be sold for a trivial amount, which is one thing SAF often does quite frustratingly.
If previous summers are anything to go by he will sell Nani for about £10m then we won't buy another winger, it will reach the end of August, we will look desperate and overspend on a player like downing
Instead of auctioning them off how about we just keep them both, get them to sign new deals so feel secure about their futures at the club, and then hope that without injuries and a good run in the team they both really perform for us next season, which they are more than capable of doing.
People argue that Rooney' performances have been underwhelming but he still has great goal/assist stats given how infrequently he's played, and Nani's goals and assists beats our other two wingers despite hardly featuring this season. Get them them both tied down and on a good run of games and I'm sure it'll be much better next season.
They're both confidence players to a certain extent, and as a team we look and play much better when both are on form. Might not happen but I'd much rather keep them here.
I'd = I would. I would take £60m if offered, it's not necessarily what I want, but I wouldn't say no. How long should we keep players who don't perform or at least don't perform regularly? I'm looking at Anderson here mostly and Nani to a certain extent, but not Rooney. You've got to cut losses eventually so it might as well be at a time when you can get decent money for the player(s).