She wasn't on the island, it was clearly shown in the finale that she left the island on plane.
True. She may have gone back for the rest of them?
She wasn't on the island, it was clearly shown in the finale that she left the island on plane.
1st season was amazing went horribly downhill after that.
I would not even have it in my top 10 TV shows
The thing with Lost is they invented so many brilliant characters, yet the actual story was pretty weak in comparison. I was really miffed that the writers managed to arse it all up when the characters were so good. It was frustration matched with sheer disgust.
Ending worked on a personal moment for the lead character. The last few moments were well done IMO. But plot wise, it was definitely under cooked. Also just talking about the island bit, the side ways universe thing I have decided to disregard completely on the account of being utter tripeTo be fair the ending was underwhelming. Still loved the show though.
People are talking about the sideways universe I guess. But I understand what you mean, they died a long time after that.Wait...people STILL think they were all dead? rofl. Finale wasn't the best, but I'm sure either that episode or the previous one made it clear they weren't.
Wikipedia said:After an emotional embrace, Christian reassures him that the events leading up to now actually happened and the time he spent with the people on the island was "the most important period" of his life. He explains to Jack that time has no meaning in this place and that they "made" the place to "find each other", independent of the time at which they died, so they could "move on" together.
tbh, they did......ABC just wanted to milk more out of it than the planned 4 seasons, so they had to create like 20 episodes and extra stuff that was unplanned, most of that coming in the godawful season 2 and early parts of 3. small things are small things, which are kind of acceptable, but most of the big flaws come from season 2.
4 & 5 > 1. Come on now. Though they are the 3 good seasons, with the other 3 mostly being the bad ones.
I always saw that about Battlestar Galactica.
I think endings might just be hard to write. Lost and BSG have been two of my absolute favourite tv series ever (BSG more so than Lost, particularly a few of those Lost seasons), but how they ended... I am not exaggerating when I am saying that BSG went from "best TV series I have ever seen" to watching it for the first time since it ended this week.
Then again, half of my favourite tv shows are cancelled before they even get to an ending. Some get it right, though. Like The Wire, or The Shield.
Straight over my head? I just confessed that I didn't remember exactly how it ended. It's been a long time since I saw it, and I've never seen the ending after the first time. Now I read up on it again, and it's all coming back.
It was still terrible writing. And it was still essentially "explaining" something that was introduced half way through the show.
In short, feck off.
Yet you happily pretended you did watch it AND didn't forget about it to make this statement.
"Oh, and rememeber "no, they're not all dead" from the writers? Yeah. Turns out they're all dead. Who saw that coming? Stellar writing."
Dunno why you getting u mad over it. At least now you wont make the same error again
Damien are you referring to Ashes to Ashes?
Yeah. I left out the name of the show in case there were people who hadn't saw the ending. I thought that was brilliant and though the ending that happened was inevitable I thought they did it well. Lost's ending wasn't exactly the same but it left a bitter taste in my mouth afterwards.
Yeah I completely agree. Did you hear about the American version of Life on Mars, they
I thought that would have been a real mind feck.woke up on a rocket ship to mars
Ashes to Ashes ended well. Same kind of expectation, but they delivered it well. That said, Lost had 6 seasons of 20ish episodes and just meandered to feck along the way to the point that you really felt you'd been had by the end. Life on Mars & Ashes to Ashes operated on a villan of the week with an arching storyline basis. With Lost you were in it for the arching story. Which was shit.
Holy shit. Gene Hunt. Wonder if they threw that in there deliberately so it could end like that if it wanted too.
"The script's first 14 pages just appeared like a run-of-the-mill cop show," Glenister recalls. "Then you got to page 15 and it was like, BAM! Sam Tyler wakes up and suddenly you're in the 70s. I couldn't put it down. Originally, he was called Gene Burroughs – he wasn't even Gene Hunt." The name "Burroughs" rolls around Glenister's mouth like he's savouring a fine meat pie. "As it turned out, they'd spent about five years trying to get it made, but nobody wanted it – nobody."
1. Heroes and the writers strike (Tim Kring said that there being so many episodes was part of their downfall but I think there being no real sense of direction and storylines being repeated a lot was a bigger problem which may have been a result of there being so many episodes)
When Lost was going on and you were watching it every week, or waiting for the new season, etc, it was kinda fun to watch. Season 1 was good, season 2 was shite because it had no direction at all for them wanting to get of the island or what they wanted to do at all. S2 really was a pile. It started getting better and they had some solid eps. But then you get to the finale. I remember the Lost finale was broadcast at the same time for around the world or something (it was 6am to 8am UK time) and I remember waking up early to see it (as I didnt want to be spoiled)
You're watching the ep and there are some cool things, but then they reveal the sideways timeline, and you end up thinking.... thats it? Really? It was almost like you wasted 6 years of your life following this show.
I think the problem was they were kinda making up episodes as they were going on. I remember season 2 or 3 had soooo much jack, Kate and sawyer and fans were getting sick of it, so they decided to cut back on them and focus on other characters. It was all bizarre at the time because you're thinking "wait, they are changing it based on fans reaction rather than having a story set in place?"
Also didnt JJ abrams leave after season 1 to do MI3 and other movies like Cloverfield and the story kinda broke apart after that.
All the best US drams in last decade or so have been 10-12 episodes a season ones.Sometimes I feel disappointed with how short our series are with there being six or so episodes then the long wait until the next series comes around but when I think of the likes of Heroes, Prison Break and Lost a few years ago which all promised a lot but in the first two cases fizzled out and the last one had a terrible ending it can have it's advantages.
Those three had different problems:
1. Heroes and the writers strike (Tim Kring said that there being so many episodes was part of their downfall but I think there being no real sense of direction and storylines being repeated a lot was a bigger problem which may have been a result of there being so many episodes)
2. Prison Break and the concept. Once they broke out of the first prison there was not much else they could do (following the escape was a natural progression but after that they should have ended it. Instead they tried to break out of another prison and it got tired).
3. Lost and the numerous questions which kept on piling up.
What all three had in common was their success at the time. They were popular so more episodes were made that the producers of each show hadn't actually thought about beforehand. They had something in mind but as more and more episodes and series were commissioned they just dragged it out further and there were more filler episodes. Instead they should have ended a lot earlier with a lot less episodes. People may have been disappointed at it ending early but at least it would be more likely that they'd be happy with the ending.
This comment is a good one: http://collider.com/tim-kring-heroes/68585/#comment-97725