coolredwine
lameredboots
I think the Coutinho transfer would derail them.
Oh that's poor. Recycling my post because you've got nothing better. Never mind, we know even when you're down you'll keep posting just to ensure you get the last word in - well go ahead. I know with you this trading of insults will go on for pages because you simply must have the last word otherwise how can you mark this up on that chalkboard in your head? Sad. Knock yourself out. You simply aren't worth it.Except that didn’t happen at all. I saw that post when I clicked on this thread today having not visited it for a while. It tickled me so I replied. You don’t like being called out so threw a hissy fit and started talking about 20/18.
A grown man who spends his life on a rival forum regurgitating club PR is a much more sad and pitiable case. But you have no shame.
Oh that's poor. Recycling my post because you've got nothing better. Never mind, we know even when you're down you'll keep posting just to ensure you get the last word in - well go ahead. I know with you this trading of insults will go on for pages because you simply must have the last word otherwise how can you mark this up on that chalkboard in your head? Sad. Knock yourself out. You simply aren't worth it.
imagine Utd selling De Gea. Imagine City selling De Bruyne. Imagine Chelsea selling Hazard. That's the impact this is going to have guys. For what it's worth those 3 clubs wouldnt sell their best players
He isn't the best player at Liverpool at the moment (and not in my Top 3 in terms of being 'invaluable to the team'). We'll miss him of course but not as much as you seem to think (without him (W9-D3-L1) with him (W8-D9-L1) this season). The only issue could be a knock to the team's confidence and a lowering of the squad depth - unless we get a suitable replacement (Mahrez, Lemar who whoever else is of that quality).imagine Utd selling De Gea. Imagine City selling De Bruyne. Imagine Chelsea selling Hazard. That's the impact this is going to have guys. For what it's worth those 3 clubs wouldnt sell their best players
He's actually ahead.Statistically Mahrez is not far behind in Coutinho in terms of PL goals/assists despite playing for a defensive counterattacking side, while Coutinho played for a high powered offense. I think Liverpool will be fine, if they get him.
He's actually ahead.
Mahrez isn’t on Coutinho’s plain. Coutinho’s game is not about statistics. He’s comfortably Liverpool’s best and most creative player.
Anything else is just spin.
Lemar is Cup tied for CL. I know it's not like L'pool should aim to win CL, but Lemar is more risky given his form this season, while Mahrez is PL proven and can join the CL squad in place of Coutinho.Mahrez is mostly RW, same as Salah, Mane and sometimes Ox. We need either CAM or LW. Which makes Lemar an ideal candidate.
Firmino is easily Liverpool´s most important player. The whole system falls apart without the brain at the top to start pressing intelligently and still have the energy and skill to create spaces and score goals. But Coutinho definitely provides that elite technical ability they need to replace. They need somebody that can thread a needle. That´s not Salah, Mane, Solanke or Firmino´s strength. Lallana comes the closest, but he´s only one guy and still well off form it seems. Mahrez and Lemar fit the description.
Mahrez isn’t on Coutinho’s plain. Coutinho’s game is not about statistics. He’s comfortably Liverpool’s best and most creative player.
Anything else is just spin.
Imagine Manchester United selling Ronaldo.. and Beckham before that. Plus letting Tevez go to City. That would be hilarious, wouldn't it?imagine Utd selling De Gea. Imagine City selling De Bruyne. Imagine Chelsea selling Hazard. That's the impact this is going to have guys. For what it's worth those 3 clubs wouldnt sell their best players
Those three clubs are significantly wealthier than Pool and offer the sort of wages that keep players happy.imagine Utd selling De Gea. Imagine City selling De Bruyne. Imagine Chelsea selling Hazard. That's the impact this is going to have guys. For what it's worth those 3 clubs wouldnt sell their best players
I agree with most of that but it wasn't that long ago on here he (coutinho) was called a one trick pony by many non LFC fans. I do think if it was Mahrez (Lemar seems more likely atm) Klopp could improve him, and whilst he may never reach Coutinho's level he could still be a good addition. Leicester will want a fortune from us now they know we're getting £145m.
Those three clubs are significantly wealthier than Pool and offer the sort of wages that keep players happy.
Imagine Manchester United selling Ronaldo.. and Beckham before that. Plus letting Tevez go to City. That would be hilarious, wouldn't it?
For what it's worth.. We don't want to sell, but when Barca and Real Madrid come calling, nearly all players want to go there, and if the club and the player wants it badly enough, they will eventually go. That goes for Liverpool, as well as Manchester United, don't you agree?
Yeah you should have signed a replacement before selling him, unless a deal is already done.
The Coutinho deal was probably done in the summer. So got to assume LFC worked on something for this window.
Its mostly wages. Those clubs don't sign the best players from lessor prestigious clubs who are as wealthy as them for a reason.Its more than just wages taking players to those clubs.
I think the scouse narrative since it’s been clear Coutinho is leaving is that Firmino is more important. I don’t think anyone truly buys it and given an ‘either or’ scenario to sell, Firmino would be out the door 99 times out of 100.
Mahrez would be a smart signing but not the same player at all. Coutinho’s strength is creativity from deep and unlocking tight defences. Mahrez is a superb counter-attack player. It would require a change in approach.
Lemar was great last season feeding bullets for Mbappe, but hasn’t hit same heights this year. If they were going to to raid Ligue 1 they should go for Nabil Fekir.
Imagine Manchester United selling Ronaldo.. and Beckham before that. Plus letting Tevez go to City. That would be hilarious, wouldn't it?
For what it's worth.. We don't want to sell, but when Barca and Real Madrid come calling, nearly all players want to go there, and if the club and the player wants it badly enough, they will eventually go. That goes for Liverpool, as well as Manchester United, don't you agree?
Its mostly wages. Those clubs don't sign the best players from lessor prestigious clubs who are as wealthy as them for a reason.
Hence the best players from those clubs don't ever go anywhere. Its happened once with Ronaldo out of those clubs and you can't tell me those clubs haven't had any quality in recent times. PSG also aren't going around hemorrhaging talent. Neither does Bayern for that matter. What all those clubs have in common is the ability to pay top wages whenever they want.Players could be paid as much by City, Chelsea, Utd etc - its as much to do with the fact that they will play with the best players in the world and the latin connection as wages.
Mahrez isn’t on Coutinho’s plain. Coutinho’s game is not about statistics. He’s comfortably Liverpool’s best and most creative player.
Anything else is just spin.
So you're saying
Next year is their year?
No one is winning the Premiership this season other than City. Clubs need to gear up for next season and how to beat them and it even starts now
Hence the best players from those clubs don't ever go anywhere. Its happened once with Ronaldo out of those clubs and you can't tell me those clubs haven't had any quality in recent times. PSG also aren't going around hemorrhaging talent. Neither does Bayern for that matter. What all those clubs have in common is the ability to pay top wages whenever they want.
Aguero and Silva are Latin but there's been practically no chance of signing them by any of the big Spanish clubs. Madrid tried to sign Ribery, failed. Barca tried to sign T.Silva, failed. Barca tried to sign Verratti, failed.
Considering the prices for the players with the required quality in todays market I think it will be a tough ask for anyone. City did their shopping at just the right time.
Chelsea won't spend big anymore, United have their limitations, Liverpool certainly has limitations.
Chelsea keep offering Hazard "record-breaking" wages....which are less than what real madrid pay to Kroos and Sergio RamosPlayers could be paid as much by City, Chelsea, Utd etc - its as much to do with the fact that they will play with the best players in the world and the latin connection as wages.
They play for Liverpool and none are going to miss out on a chance to maximise their earnings in order to stay there. Hence the Torres deal was possible, and he wasn't just Latin, he was Spanish.Your theory would make sense if players like Alonso, Masch, Suarez and now Coutinho had gone to other big clubs aside from Barca or Real but they didn't. The only players leaving us in recent times who support your theory would be Sterling and Torres - but lets face it Torres was a crock at the time and Sterling was/is nowhere near the level of the others and also isn't Spanish or South American.
Of course there are outliers such as Silva, Aguero etc, there always will be. But I think it's hard to deny the pull that Barca and Real have for most top players of Spanish or South American origin and couple that with the chance to play with Messi, Ronaldo etc and its hard to resist. Let me ask you this - if City had offered the same or even more, than Barca do you think Coutinho would have chosen them?