- Joined
- Oct 24, 2018
- Messages
- 579
You call it a slip, I call it getting bullied at the back post. Even fecking lindelof (the softest CB I've seen play for United) would've headed and cleared that ball.Where he slipped. So not height related… great
You call it a slip, I call it getting bullied at the back post. Even fecking lindelof (the softest CB I've seen play for United) would've headed and cleared that ball.Where he slipped. So not height related… great
Of course managers teams are going to try to target a 5ft 9 CB aerially. The question is whether doing so actually works for them. And in this case none of the goals we conceded came from their attempt to target Martinez. De Gea having a meltdown doesn't suddenly make targeting Martinez a successful tactic.
And teams already had lots of success against us for years from set pieces and balls in the air. So they would likely have done it whether we signed Martinez or not. That was already our problem defensively for several seasons conceding goals from set pieces and having problems with crosses.
He's played against both of their strikers in the CL and played fine. He is not my biggest worry if we are to play them.Do people really feel confident with him in the team at CB going against physical strikers? Genuine question.
Even City and Liverpool signed couple of physical strikers because, you know, its the Prem. He is aggressive in his defending but I don't think he is particularly quick either added to his height. It's a genuine concern for me.
The thing is that at Ajax, Martinez was playing at CB, but was playing for a dominant side who had the lion’s share of possession. It is a completely different ask. It would be a completely different ask playing for City, where he’d spend a far smaller proportion of the time defending aerial balls.It's a fact that aerial ability doesn't relate 1-to-1 with height. It's a fact that he's just come from a league where his opponents were physically taller. It's a fact that none of the goals we conceded were as a direct result of his height. And it's a fact that that style of play relates directly to the amount of aerial pressure CBs come under (i.e. if we get better in that regard, the pressure on all our CBs decreases, and we bought Martinez because he will help us get better in that regard, not because he'd be resistant to the pressures we come under until we do).
The height narrative is insane. Every single fault he's shown so far we would also have seen from 6ft 3 Pau Torres, who was the recruitment team's suggestion, or 6ft 2 Victor Lindelof, whose place Martinez has taken, or multiple other tall CBs we could have signed who will naturally take time to adapt to the premier league. If Martinez was that height and had performed in exactly the same way as he has, people wouldn't currently be focusing on his aerial ability at all. They'd just be saying he needs to get used to the intensity of the league, which is a far more accurate judgement on the issues he's had so far.
Haven't you seen the game today? We were completely out battled all over the pitch yet you want to put to AMs together with a 5'9 CB from the Dutch league and expect them to "more solid"?! Seriously people, how is that supposed to work?The goal he slipped unfortunately, but yes in that situation stuck under the goal posts he might get troubled.
In this situation though we should be adapting and playing him as a CDM maybe? we've got Varane on the bench who's a giant.
Today would have been nice to have Eriksen/Martinez/Fernandes in midfield and we'd be much more solid. Perhaps i'd go that way in the future too.
Neville kept going on about it being a problem but he won more duels than he lost. They just can't see past him being small.
Let's see how he does next week if he plays. I am not sold on him and certainly think he is not worth the 55-60m we've spent on him.He's played against both of their strikers in the CL and played fine. He is not my biggest worry if we are to play them.
As I said, basic physics.
He's played against both of their strikers in the CL and played fine. He is not my biggest worry if we are to play them.
Do people really feel confident with him in the team at CB going against physical strikers? Genuine question.
Even City and Liverpool signed couple of physical strikers because, you know, its the Prem. He is aggressive in his defending but I don't think he is particularly quick either added to his height. It's a genuine concern for me.
My worries go way further than just the defenders tooExactly this. He's the one thats actually proven against them. The rest of our defenders arent
Of course managers teams are going to try to target a 5ft 9 CB aerially. The question is whether doing so actually works for them. And in this case none of the goals we conceded came from their attempt to target Martinez. De Gea having a meltdown doesn't suddenly make targeting Martinez a successful tactic.
Which headers did he lose today?
This is the concern I have. No I don’t feel confident.Do people really feel confident with him in the team at CB going against physical strikers? Genuine question.
Even City and Liverpool signed couple of physical strikers because, you know, its the Prem. He is aggressive in his defending but I don't think he is particularly quick either added to his height. It's a genuine concern for me.
He's come from a league where his team dominated the ball. Mascherano was the same at Barca, he was protected by the fact his team controlled possession.
This transfer is potentially the biggest feck up we have ever made, unless we can convert him into a DM, I just think he's going to be made into mincemeat every week.
Not scoring goals directly from that tactic doesn't make it an unsuccessful tactic either though.
Frank references the Brighton game as an inspiration for his decision, none of the goals there came directly from that tactic either but he still chose to employ it.
Fair enough that people don't agree with other posters concerns but to think that it's narrative driven etc is bizarre.
The thing is that at Ajax, Martinez was playing at CB, but was playing for a dominant side who had the lion’s share of possession. It is a completely different ask. It would be a completely different ask playing for City, where he’d spend a far smaller proportion of the time defending aerial balls.
Well they had clearly more profitable tactics today. 1 shoot from range, De Gea let the first slip in with a terrible mistake. 2 when United play the ball out of the back be right down Eriksen's neck and try to pinch it as he was playing the deepest DM role. That led to the 2nd goal.
3rd was actually a cross to the back post that was not tracked by Eriksen and the header lost by Dalot, and then that first header back into the middle where Lisandro failed to clear out the ball. So that was a case of targetting the far post/ RB area on a set piece
So yeah if we want to talk about the 4th most dangerous tactic against us today then maybe it wasnt completely unsuccessful, but all their success came from other avenues and other players making mistakes before Lisandro did
I genuinely don't remember him winning many headers... And whoscored has him as winning 0 aerials... So what were these aerial balls he was dealing with?
Yeah this. He’s obviously been brought in for his ball playing skills as much as anything for a side that’s supposed to dominate possession. Probably part of the appeal is rhar he can pick occasional passes straight to forwards, bypassing midfield, We really need to start scoring first as this will make it easier. With hindsight seems like a bizarre and stupid decision but I think it’s clear what he was trying to achieve.The thing is that at Ajax, Martinez was playing at CB, but was playing for a dominant side who had the lion’s share of possession. It is a completely different ask. It would be a completely different ask playing for City, where he’d spend a far smaller proportion of the time defending aerial balls.
More solid with 2 6'4 centre backs and an aggressive CDM that can tackle and pass and head well? yeah sure I think that would be better than what we started with.Haven't you seen the game today? We were completely out battled all over the pitch yet you want to put to AMs together with a 5'9 CB from the Dutch league and expect them to "more solid"?! Seriously people, how is that supposed to work?
I genuinely don't remember him winning many headers... And whoscored has him as winning 0 aerials... So what were these aerial balls he was dealing with?
Not saying they weren't there as I'm generally a bit weary of stats, but yeah.
This is why I have massive concerns about ETH, because he chose to publicly back De Gea and not look to sign a keeper. He chose to not address the midfield as an absolute priority, and has seemingly been happy to wait for just one player. It doesn’t feel holistic. The signing of Martinez for that fee looks misplaced.Yep, agree with this entirely.
But then it becomes a chicken and the egg scenario. Do we wait until we play like City/Ajax first and then sign players who suit City/Ajax football? Or do you sign the players who suit the City/Ajax style first because you need them in order to get the team playing like City/Ajax?
I think it has to be the latter. You sign players for the team you're trying to become, not the team you currently are. And if in the short term that means teething problems, players' weaknesses being exposed and players like Martinez shipping early criticsm then that's the way it has to be.
Did he join us?He is going to be an easy target to blame when we concede goals. I'd say keep him at CB, but surely we can't have Varane on the bench anymore.
Maybe move him to midfield to pair with De Jong, and Eriksen at AM. Would make us stronger. We have the worst physical and least tenacious team in the league.
I genuinely don't remember him winning many headers... And whoscored has him as winning 0 aerials... So what were these aerial balls he was dealing with?
Not saying they weren't there as I'm generally a bit weary of stats, but yeah.
The ironic thing is that our defence struggled far more with playing out from the back and dealing with the opposition press today than they did with aerial threat. And those former aspects of the game are exactly what we signed Martinez to try and help improve.
Of course managers teams are going to try to target a 5ft 9 CB aerially. The question is whether doing so actually works for them. And in this case none of the goals we conceded came from their attempt to target Martinez. De Gea having a meltdown doesn't suddenly make targeting Martinez a successful tactic.
Defending aerial threat from set pieces has been improved since last season. I think it is partly down to Ronaldo clearing a lot of incoming balls. But you are right with having more trouble passing from the back now.The ironic thing is that our defence struggled far more with playing out from the back and dealing with the opposition press today than they did with aerial threat. And those former aspects of the game are exactly what we signed Martinez to try and help improve.
Ok but Frank isn't falling for some media led Narrative.
If Premier League managers are targeting that area it has to be for a good reason.
How do we get more solid in midfield by having one different CB on the pitch than today? And ETH has said, that Martinez isn't a midfielder in his eyes. Just look at McTominay, this is what you get if you play somebody in midfield who isn't comfortable of play happing left and right, in front and in the back of him. Aggressive, passing, heading - if all that would be a given, the player would do fairly well at CB anyways. Mate, Brentford pushed us off the field today, without a single AM. Yet you (and many others) seem adamant that a day where we don't field every available attacker is a lost day. Bruno and Eriksen don't have the strength and the intensity to work in a midfield at the same time. Maybe they will at some point, when teams are really scared of us and play very deep blocks. But that sure isn't the case these days.More solid with 2 6'4 centre backs and an aggressive CDM that can tackle and pass and head well? yeah sure I think that would be better than what we started with.