RedThaiDevils#7
Full Member
The fact he is aiming at the goal, not a corner, not trying to outsmart the keeper and completely relying on the way his techinque manipulates the flight of the ball as a means to score/cause problems for the keeper is why i put it down to luck.
Look at videos of genuinely great free kick takers and see the way they find the top corner, and the narrow margins. They curl the ball in, they aim. Zico explains exactly how he took free kicks, as did Mihajlovic. It was accuracy and power, they would aim for a certain part of the goal. Ronaldo has about as much of an idea of what the ball will do once it leaves his foot as the goalkeeper does.
The fact that when he gets it wrong the ball either flys a mile over/wide or hits the wall is evidence of this. When players who aim miss their intended target it tends to be a by a much lesser margin. They will have pulled it too close to the keeper or gotten slightly too much elivation, yet the strike remained close because they are relying on accurracy rather than the balls physics. If Ronaldo doesnt strike it correctly it's a loose cannon. When he does strike it properly it is still a loose cannon, just one that is likely to hit the target.
With due respect if he didn't know how to kick a free kick at all and he used that tecnique, no way he'd score that amount of freekicks. So plz respect his tecnique a little. Try debating as a neutral, not a Ronaldo hater. He has done well and has already scored 2 freekicks whether they were fluke or not.