kouroux
45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
7 out of the last 11 league titles is SAF's style domination.
7 out of the last 11 league titles is SAF's style domination.
Ronaldo fanboi alert
I suspect he has taken some PEDs as well. How would you feel if in 8 years you found out the two greatest players in the game were cheating? It's happened before.
I suspect he has taken some PEDs as well. How would you feel if in 8 years you found out the two greatest players in the game were cheating? It's happened before.
I honestly don't associate Messi with entertainment. I associate him with sheer ability to do the most things that majority of footballers aren't capable of. Dinho on the other hand, like @kouroux said, is a footballer who even a casual watcher of the game will appreciate. He brought so much joy to the watchers, the kind that Messi simply isn't capable of. Messi is superior to Dinho in most attributes, but there are certain ones Messi can't even imagine doing that Dinho would. Of course that's not a slight on Messi, it's just one of the few things Dinho is comfortably superior on to every footballer there ever was.Dinho was fun but the 2009 Messi is the most entertaining player I've watched.
Really? There's plenty of footage on the previous page which I can watch all day long.He brought so much joy to the watchers, the kind that Messi simply isn't capable of.
So were Lance Armstrong's.
Does thread banned mean he can't see the thread or he cannot contribute in the thread?
I honestly don't associate Messi with entertainment. I associate him with sheer ability to do the most things that majority of footballers aren't capable of. Dinho on the other hand, like @kouroux said, is a footballer who even a casual watcher of the game will appreciate. He brought so much joy to the watchers, the kind that Messi simply isn't capable of. Messi is superior to Dinho in most attributes, but there are certain ones Messi can't even imagine doing that Dinho would. Of course that's not a slight on Messi, it's just one of the few things Dinho is comfortably superior on to every footballer there ever was.
Pretty much this. Although to be fair, you have a good chance of winning picking 'Dinho too.If I have to pick'em in my team (like in the famous Adidas old ad)...If I wanna have fun I'd pick Dinho. If I wanna win I'd pick Messi
League winning goal from a better view:
Dinho's imagination was much bigger than Messi's hence people say he was more entertaining. Messi looks like he's on repeat in every game, before beating players or creating as a fan, a lot of the time you know what's about to happen, with dinho it was different. Doubt even he himself knew what he was about to do.The point that casual viewers who don't give a toss about football could enjoy Dinho too doesn't hold much weight, for me.
Yes, Ronaldinho did some outlandish things, stuff that looked like it was from a comic book drawn by a 10 year old or something... but the subtle things Messi pulls off at super human speeds, and the how he just seems to be several moves ahead of others, both in terms of his individual movement and his teamwork, means that he's just as mesmerising to watch. That, and he has plenty of in your face oh-my-God-I-can't-believe-he-just-did-that moves that you don't have to be a football connoisseur to get.
Doing stepovers or flicks and pointless lookaways isn't really imaginative. It's entertaining but a lot of it is fluff. Ronaldinho's most imaginative moments were his brilliant runs and passes and mind boggling finishes, and it's the same with Messi, but he holds the fluff.Dinho's imagination was much bigger than Messi's hence people say he was more entertaining. Messi looks like he's on repeat in every game, before beating players or creating as a fan, a lot of the time you know what's about to happen, with dinho it was different. Doubt even he himself knew what he was about to do.
The point that casual viewers who don't give a toss about football could enjoy Dinho too doesn't hold much weight, for me.
Yes, Ronaldinho did some outlandish things, stuff that looked like it was from a comic book drawn by a 10 year old or something... but the subtle things Messi pulls off at super human speeds, and the how he just seems to be several moves ahead of others, both in terms of his individual movement and his teamwork, means that he's just as mesmerising to watch. That, and he has plenty of in your face oh-my-God-I-can't-believe-he-just-did-that moves that you don't have to be a football connoisseur to get.
Doing stepovers or flicks and pointless lookaways isn't really imaginative. It's entertaining but a lot of it is fluff. Ronaldinho's most imaginative moments were his brilliant runs and passes and mind boggling finishes, and it's the same with Messi, but he holds the fluff.
You said it yourself, those things are so subtle at times (like a simple drop of the shoulder) that people who don't really know about football or who haven't played it would not fully grasp it like we would.
When you know your shit about football (and you're not extremely biased), you'll realize that Messi is a great and a truly unique player in the history of the game. Ronaldinho's skills were less "subtle" and more eye catching in general, therefore even the dumbest viewer could see it clearly when he does something great.
It is imaginative when you know to use which trick at which moment. This is what separates the idiots like say Taarabt and the greats like Ronaldinho. Besides a lot of his brilliant runs included stepovers and tricks, you can't separate them.
Not to add - the fact that Taarabt is about a 1/50th of the player in terms of ability.
Nothing Dinho did was fluff, most of it was effective. Those pointless lookaways lead to match deciding goals in massive games(ie vs milan) those step overs got rid of the best defenders (ask cole).Doing stepovers or flicks and pointless lookaways isn't really imaginative. It's entertaining but a lot of it is fluff. Ronaldinho's most imaginative moments were his brilliant runs and passes and mind boggling finishes, and it's the same with Messi, but he holds the fluff.
Lots of it was fluff, some of it was effective.Nothing Dinho did was fluff, most of it was effective. Those pointless lookaways lead to match deciding goals in massive games(ie vs milan) those step overs got rid of the best defenders (ask cole).
Loved the goal Ronaldinho scored against Chelsea in 2005. Jaw dropping stuff.
Nothing Dinho did was fluff, most of it was effective. Those pointless lookaways lead to match deciding goals in massive games(ie vs milan) those step overs got rid of the best defenders (ask cole).
Nothing Dinho did was fluff, most of it was effective. Those pointless lookaways lead to match deciding goals in massive games(ie vs milan) those step overs got rid of the best defenders (ask cole).
The no-look is the most pointless thing in football. It was a goal because of the quality of pass not because he didn't look.
Can't remember but I think it was Sanchez who pulled a terrible no look off this year. Very rarely does it have any sort of influence on the defenders actions. Not a useless tool to have just hard to make it count for anything else than being entertaining.
Messi is far more economic because he doesn't have to do as much to get passed players due to his agility and superior acceleration.This is blatantly untrue. He was capable of lightning moments of genius, but his main flaw was how often he slowed down play by deliberating on the ball, stepping about with it to see if he could do something game changing.
Messi is far more economic.
Not its not, its very deceptive and anything to deceive defenders is useful. Hence some forwards give keepers 'the eyes' before shooting(benteke did recently I think). Just delays defenders reaction for that split second that can prove to be vital.The no-look is the most pointless thing in football. It was a goal because of the quality of pass not because he didn't look.
Does anyone here think Messi doesn't have the talent to do all those skills, no looks or whatever, or he doesn't possess the intelligence to know when to use them? He just has far better, deadlier weapons in his locker. Why in the world would he bother with things like stepovers, when he can simply accelerate and waltz past most defenders in a single touch and the defender can do feckall about it? Makes no sense.
Loved the goal Ronaldinho scored against Chelsea in 2005. Jaw dropping stuff.
Ronaldinho epitomizes the spirit of Samba, it is safe to say that all that he did, he did to enjoy the game, end of. Not for the cameras, not to win the match. It just happened that he was that good that him enjoying himself equalled to his team winning the game. I can't imagine him being involved in a tactical discussion and going "alright then, that defender is slow on the turn I'll probably use that skill against him.". Not a chance, he couldn't care less who the defender was, or the opposition was. I know some would be thinking I'm talking about Garrincha and not a modern day great who excelled in a tactically challenging competition such as the CL, but that's how I view his game.Ronaldinho didn't do tricks for show, he did them for effect.
I don't think he did anything for camera but like all "trickster" players a good part of his trickery wouldn't result in anything productive. He was the best at it, so that's not a slight on him. It's just that trickery is that sort of thing where you have to do 5 things and one will actually make a tangible difference. Maybe a couple of those other 5 he,p unsettle the defender mentally, but yeah it's never a super high success rate for anyone IMO.Messi is far more economic because he doesn't have to do as much to get passed players due to his agility and superior acceleration.
His slowing down of the game was never an issue as it almost always ended in something special, especially when he was 1 on 1. Ronaldinho didn't do tricks for show, he did them for effect. Don't think I ever saw him(in his pomp) do a trick for the cameras rather than beat a man/men. Fluff should be associated with the likes of denilson and cristiano(in his younger days) not dinho.