FlawlessThaw
most 'know it all' poster
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2005
- Messages
- 29,724
If we sign Baines, I'd imagine we would look for a replacement in 3/4 years. I suppose £4.5m a season isn't that bad for a first choice player.
No they don't need the money, least not how much anyone aside the City or Chelsea would offer in the league.
Why?
Players can play at a high level until they're 33/34.
Why? Do they have a wealthy sugar dady?
Who are the top right/left backs who are 33/34 at the moment?
Purely in the respect of his age
Do you remember the don't buy players over 26 rule we seemed to have - think Berbatov was the exception during the 'value' years
If we sign Baines, I'd imagine we would look for a replacement in 3/4 years. I suppose £4.5m a season isn't that bad for a first choice player.
Evra.
He's 32. Also, he's a fecking machine.
Why? Do they have a wealthy sugar dady?
I agree that in 3 years we would look for a replacement. Considering that Evra can play this year, that will mean that Baines would be a good signing for only 2 years. With all the wages and price tag (and that he's value in 3 years would likely be nil) he isn't worth it IMO.
Why?
Players can play at a high level until they're 33/34.
So what about Evra then?
It's not a waste of money if Evra plans to leave at the end of the year.
It would mean we have a good quality replacement ready to step in when he goes. There really aren't that many good left-backs out there & Baines is one of the best.
I don't see a downside to him signing for us.
Shaw is a good prospect, but how many of those have we seen who have not lived up to their original billing? You pick on a couple of underperforming established signings as justification for not signing anyone else over 25. Have you considered the list of young prospects we have had who haven't produced either? We can then use them as a justification for not signing any more youngsters!
Baines is in his prime and producing the goods week in week out, and has been for at least 2 seasons. You cannot reasonably compare the logic of spending money on Shaw, to spending it on Baines. Baines is established and the finished article, and the argument - whether you agree or not - is that he would improve us right now. Would Shaw? No is the answer, and while he may be great in a few years, that still remains to be seen. Spending money on him now may be a good investment for the future, but he could just as easily be another Wayne Bridge. Proven quality should never be written off in favour of potential.
Everyone whines at our lack of quality service to the strikers, and yet here we have Baines who is as reliable and consistent a first time crosser of the ball as there is in the PL. Yet many don't seem to want to increase our productivity on the left, in favour of keeping Evra who is now 32 and can't cross a ball first time- or even after a touch- if his life depended on it. 4 or 5 great opportunities against Chelsea to put in an early ball while the space was there, and every time he took a touch and then delivered a poor ball. He gets space like that all the time, and we have to do more with it. In big games that kind of space has to be capitalized on far more, better quality from those opportunities could easily have proved the difference in winning and drawing.
I don't really care whether we sign Baines or not, but I don't doubt he would improve our quality in the final third, and I personally don't give a feck how much the Glazers have to pay to get any player, that's just not a consideration for me, and I don't know why so many posters get so pissed off when they think we are overpaying. If they produce the goods, they are well worth the money. If they are shite, they are a waste of money whatever we spend on them. Look at Bebe, biggest waste of money you can imagine. Contributed feck all since his time here, yet apparently it seems worth taking similar punts on potential, rather than buying someone who is already proven they have the quality. Bizarre logic in my view.
Says who?
Anyway, since no one else seems to be in for Baines, why not wait until next year then & get him for peanuts. By then Evra will be getting on a bit, I suppose, & Baines would be a decent stop gap for 3 years.
Edit: Just seen your post above, even more reason to wait until next year.
Too much sense in this post for my liking. The bolded part in particular is spot on.
Too much sense in this post for my liking. The bolded part in particular is spot on.
Funnily enough, a certain tiny French fullback has a few goals off corners last season...Indeed. It's not like Evra has created 2 goals with his crossing already this season...
I'm not going to claim that Evra's crossing is brilliant or anything (because it isn't - though he did put at least one decent cross in against Chelsea too) but, what he does do is win us a shit load of corners with his wing play/crosses - and we generally do alright from corners these days.
Baines on the wing?People are "whining" about the delivery from our wingers, not our full-backs. It was largely acknowledged last year that Rafael and Evra were doing fine with crosses, the issue was that our wingers were shit.
Evra and Baines alone is overkill. It won't last long if it happens. But then, Moyes may be looking for competition this year, assuming Evra will be gone in a year anyway.
No.Baines on the wing?
We needed a CM and a LB during the start of the last season. Nothing has changed now, except for the fact that Evra has stepped up slightly(still below par IMO).Good Lord, this is all very disconcerting. Does our summer transfer activity amount to chasing a left full back that we don't need...?
We had Evra and Baines in 2006-07.
One had 29 starts and the other 32. I am not sure why we are so worried if we want to have both?
Heinze left the next season, I think it will be ok if Paddy wants to leave next year.
Evra has been better in the last year or so than what he was for almost two years before that. But that does not mean that he has been exemplary recently. He has been better than bad but that does not mean that he has bee good enough.
Defensively, his aerial games has been good no doubt, but his positioning and adeptness at one-on-one situations has been quite poor.
Are you sure about that?
Didn't Evra put a beauty of a cross for RVPs goal in the Charity Shield? Didn't he do it a week later against Swansea?
We needed a CM and a LB during the start of the last season. Nothing has changed now, except for the fact that Evra has stepped up slightly(still below par IMO).
If you believe that we are going for a LB then you also have to agree to the fact that we are going for a CM, right? So, what's your point?
Evra's crossing compared to Baines is like Valencia compared to Beckham. So name as many good crosses from Evra as you like.. There not as dangerous as Baines.
Evra on the wing?
That's clearly not the point he was trying to make. It was a valid point to bring up to a daft original statement.
Stop.
I really don't think it's a bad idea. Ideally you'd want a 100% Nani there, but if we've got injuries...
The point is irrelevant. The fact is one player has redicilously consistent crossing accuracy the other doesn't. Its like telling me a striker with poor finishing scored a goal last week.
Baines will be a great buy, evra is past his best (still better than many), but Baines is better and younger at this moment in time. If we don't get him this year, chelsea will next year.
I think I'm just a little underwhelmed, because if we were to sign a left-back, I'd hope we could sign someone who could be as good as Evra was between 2008-2010... but instead, we'll just be signing someone who is (maybe) slightly better then Evra is now - mainly due to his incredibly impressive delivery.
Fabio on the wing.gewse stahp